Now that we've crossed the $9,000 barrier, why not take a look at the McAfee model again:
https://i.postimg.cc/g2Js0vMZ/mcaffeeeeeeeee.png
Assuming another %600-ish parabolic increase, it would put us around $65,000, which would mean McAfee may not have to heat his own dick as the model would be back on track. Consider that we went above %245 of the mean prediction line at the $20k peak, so there's a big margin of error. If moon and stars align (or ETF and halving) who knows. We'll have to find out in the next episode of McAfee Balls Z.
Edit: Actually funny how we just broke the nonlinear regression curve and given past precedents, the potential for a bullrun is around $60k
https://i.postimg.cc/mhf7bH60/median.png
Maybe McAfee can keep his manhood after all. Hang on tight.
https://i.postimg.cc/g2Js0vMZ/mcaffeeeeeeeee.png
Assuming another %600-ish parabolic increase, it would put us around $65,000, which would mean McAfee may not have to heat his own dick as the model would be back on track. Consider that we went above %245 of the mean prediction line at the $20k peak, so there's a big margin of error. If moon and stars align (or ETF and halving) who knows. We'll have to find out in the next episode of McAfee Balls Z.
Edit: Actually funny how we just broke the nonlinear regression curve and given past precedents, the potential for a bullrun is around $60k
https://i.postimg.cc/mhf7bH60/median.png
Maybe McAfee can keep his manhood after all. Hang on tight.
In addition to this, I want to add that Shelby is lately considering McAfee's model as a potential good candidate for 2020's price prediction, and it would look like this:
https://i.imgur.com/dx9G5k8.png
I can't imagine how this thread would look like if McAfee ends up being anywhere near right. Bitcointalk would probably collapse due too much traffic.
Awesome. Where can I find the source for the first pic?