Hey, Bitcoin finally made it to the
front page of the Sunday New York Times!!
Wait, did I say Bitcoin? Sorry, I meant
DAO. DOW was on the
front page of the Sunday New York Times.
Disregard.
Also, ive never seen so much fear in the BTC traders
This feeling is direct result of your obsession, pumpy. You subconsciously project your eth-related fear onto btc traders.
He's not wrong tho. A palpable sense of defeat and desperation in BTC threads, can't you smell it?
Or maybe fear is like bad breath? You can't smell your own?
Yup, all publicity = good publicity. $450 immanent. Buy buy buy!
Swedish Court Rules Against KnCMiner Mining Hardware Customers"The court further ordered the plaintiffs to pay KnC’s legal costs, amounting to 772,000 krona, or approximately $93,000."
Serves them right! harassing
possibly the only honest bitcoin business. Parasites!

What if before rootstock is released someone else releases something with smarter smart contracts than rootstock's smarter smart contracts than ethereum's smart contracts?
Rootstock smart contracts aren't even smart, just some Turing-incomplete software stack kludges that don't even try to shift paradigms. How's that disruptive?
Bitcoin must integrate intelligence right into the blockchain, protocol-level smartness is what's needed to contractualize the future of money!
then this isn't money but debt!
Money IS debt. If not contract/debt, what is it

^
Wow, didn't mean to trigger you bro, I'm sorry. I'll answer your questions tho. ELY5

If debt is money then the more debt you have in a community the more wealthy is that community as a whole.
That's silly. If I owe you 100 bit-coins and you owe me 100 bit-coins, our community of 2 has plenty of debt, but nothing could be said about its wealth.
most indebted nations think they are the richest ones.
They don't think they're the richest nations because they have the most debt. They think they're the richest nations because they have stuff, power and clout. That's what makes them rich.
Look at it from a different perspective: it's almost impossible for a poor person to accrue substantial debt, only a fool would lend money to someone who can't pay. That's why bums don't live in mansions and drive Ferraris -- no one offers them that kind (or any kind) of credit.
Does this clear things up at all?
^
Not all debt is good debt, is that what you're trying to tell me? How is this any different than all the bit-coin
deadbeats captains of industry scurrying off with investors' bit-coins?
You still haven't answered my question tho:
Money IS debt. If not contract/debt, what is it
