All posts made by chriswilmer in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 1873414 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):

Long term chart is easy:

http://www.bitcoinx.com/charts/

(look at the bottom)

Where do you get those SHORT-TERM charts?!!?!



2. Post 1957141 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Up!




3. Post 2064949 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

http://blogs.wsj.com/venturecapital/2013/05/07/coinbase-nabs-5m-in-biggest-funding-for-bitcoin-startup/



4. Post 2065134 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 07, 2013, 10:24:20 PM
I am hoping to buy 20,000 BTC at 95... 

I wish it goes down!

It won't! Hello... is anyone reading this? Biggest bitcoin startup investment ever just publicly announced?!

http://blogs.wsj.com/venturecapital/2013/05/07/coinbase-nabs-5m-in-biggest-funding-for-bitcoin-startup/



5. Post 2065169 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 07, 2013, 10:27:27 PM
The price doesn't follow the news.

And it's money going in a startup, not in bitcoins.

Imagine how much easier it will be for everyone to use Coinbase when their company has 10x the staff!



6. Post 2068142 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: oroboras on May 08, 2013, 04:43:18 AM
Looks like this final bounce will end at about $110 as the triangle comes to a close.

I think I'll hold out for the $110 and get some sleep... it's nearly 6am after all.

I don't think it's going back down. *shrugs*



7. Post 2288708 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

On the bright side, has anyone noticed that there is basically no lag on Mt.Gox through all of this?  Grin



8. Post 2347062 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on June 02, 2013, 08:39:12 AM
Tempted to put my no touchy fiat in at 120...

Anyone have an explanation for this sell?

Easy:

1) A whale wanted in with no slippage (huge bid wall)

2) Eventually another whale who wanted to take a large, no-slippage profit seized the opportunity

3) The market overreacted to the whale mating as expected (whales prefer to mate with no slippage)

This actually makes a lot of sense! Thanks.



9. Post 2417712 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: byronbb on June 09, 2013, 07:07:25 AM
Someone who dumped 60K bitcoins at 101, is not going to buy back in.  Moreover, if they have more btc, they're likely to wait for the rebound to lure more fools into the milking barn...
Noone dropped 60k at 101. Maybe you are talking about the eaten 10k wall?
My guess for the reentry in in the 50 range. We might see a bull trap there.

Ya agreed. While this hurts my equity it is amazing to watch bitcoin now vs that of a year ago. I just watched 50k btc selloff worth 5 million dollars. Been around this board when we watched it go to 30 then grind to $2 then crawl to $20 then RAMP to the moon. A $100 bitcoin is truly amazing in its own right. Everything about this night is bullish long term.

I agree. It's amazing that we have $100 bitcoins at all. It's still so early in the bitcoin game too.



10. Post 2417744 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on June 09, 2013, 07:15:44 AM
Yes, sure. Wouldn't that be SIMPLY WONDERFUL?

Cheap coins!!!

When it finally reaches the bottom, surely everyone will FLOOD IN to buy them.

"SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY", all the noobs will shout as they are desperate to buy into BTC. Banks will be awash with wires to Mt Gox.

VCs will be falling over themselves to get a piece of the action.

I mean, why wouldn't they?

Agreed, Bitcoin will probably be dead forever then.

http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/mtgoxUSD#rg60zczsg2011-04-01zeg2011-11-01ztgSza1gSMAzm1g20zm2g200

As I said before: This has happened before. It will happen again.

I think this resembles the Aug. 2012 crash and that 95 will probably be the bottom (see below). I am very bullish on bitcoin though.

http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/mtgoxUSD#rg60zig6-hourzczsg2012-06-01zeg2012-12-01ztgWzm1g10zm2g25



11. Post 2424578 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: 420 on June 09, 2013, 09:59:59 PM
so it has 5x as much as bitstamp. but there's progress

Is Bitstamp a UK or Ukraine exchange?



12. Post 2426947 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: keewee on June 10, 2013, 04:10:52 AM
This is awesome action!   Shocked  Love how he ran it up to 110 and then put a 5k bid  wall @ 110 to hold the price.   Grin

Pretty sure the 5k wall is what was left of a huge market buy to $110. That's what wasn't filled from asks

It was Jaroslaw, who meant to put in a bid order at $10  Grin



13. Post 2427173 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

I think we're going to go WAY HIGHER than the NASDAQ did since that crash. Even the bears (I think) will agree. There is no way that bitcoins will exist five years from now without being $5,000+ per coin or $0. This $100-$200 stuff will look like a barely noticeable speed bump.



14. Post 2427204 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: dwdoc on June 10, 2013, 04:49:54 AM
I think we're going to go WAY HIGHER than the NASDAQ did since that crash. Even the bears (I think) will agree. There is no way that bitcoins will exist five years from now without being $5,000+ per coin or $0. This $100-$200 stuff will look like a barely noticeable speed bump.


5 years on the NASDAQ chart equals 1.15 month on the BTC chart.  Smiley

Hmm... good point. OK, point taken... UP!



15. Post 2444384 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on June 11, 2013, 09:53:18 PM

I'll go for *potentially* game changing.

I dream of a hardware miner/wallet that you'd use as your home ATM...plug and play, secure.

That's a pretty cool idea.  However, that assumes that what is being kept secure, is still valuable.  With this manipulation and no safeguards in place any big money player can destroy Bitcoin.  I didn't realize that before, but now it is blatantly clear.  Let's use any government that has $1 billion to spare.

They could build massive mining rigs and with the rest, purchase BTC slowly.  It wouldn't take long before they would control enough BTC to just continually smash the markets with wave after wave of coordinated "dump attacks".  All confidence would be would be lost.  Current investors would flee into other currencies and investments.  Potential investors would stay away from a corrupt and manipulated currency.  It's actually a better Achilles heel than any regulation could dream of having.  

So in the end, Bitcoin's greatest weakness, is it's very own principles of non-regulation.  The irony is quite amusing.

Worst. Attack. Idea. Ever.

The attacker would be dumping free money until he/she runs out and then the system would continue to run as usual.



16. Post 2537644 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

More than a $10 USD difference between Bitstamp and Mt.Gox... I mean, I get the press release and all... but that doesn't seem like a sufficient reason. Especially for people who have a lot of USD on Mt.Gox, you'd think they would be fine with waiting a few weeks for the issue to resolve... (which I think it will)



17. Post 2537868 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Today is anti-arbitrage today...



18. Post 2606566 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 28, 2013, 08:01:29 PM
Below 88.14, this market is going to be priced below a billion dollars again.

This isn't a billion dollar market and it never has been. People are painfully beginning to realize.

But what is the realistic number?

I don't even know how to fairly assess this. I mean, even if 90% of the market is speculation money, that's still market.. and every single market out there has it.

And I wonder; if we were to magically remove all speculation money, where would we be? pre 2011 boom price?

How much btc is actually circulating in the economy as opposed to trading, speculation and hoarding?

If we remove speculation, there is little to no market left.

Blitz­ is just depressed thats all, a good buying opportunity; thats what every bitcoin crash has ever been / will ever be, the big the crash the better the buying opportunity.  Cool

+1



19. Post 2606718 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on June 28, 2013, 08:16:05 PM
all the bear talk. tststs.

what has this thread come to?

yup.
It's because of your $180 prediction that instilled hope of course. Cheesy

The $180 prediction will come true... whether in 3 months, 6 months, or 12 months.



20. Post 2606753 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: niothor on June 28, 2013, 08:19:45 PM
all the bear talk. tststs.

what has this thread come to?

yup.
It's because of your $180 prediction that instilled hope of course. Cheesy

The $180 prediction will come true... whether in 3 months, 6 months, or 12 months.

For ~ 75 million people that prediction is irelevant

Which 75 million people? I don't think it's irrelevant to anyone. Bitcoin is an amazing invention... the bears are losing site of that, and people who haven't heard of bitcoins will be affected by their existence whether they realize it or not.



21. Post 2606776 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: niothor on June 28, 2013, 08:24:04 PM
all the bear talk. tststs.

what has this thread come to?

yup.
It's because of your $180 prediction that instilled hope of course. Cheesy

The $180 prediction will come true... whether in 3 months, 6 months, or 12 months.

For ~ 75 million people that prediction is irelevant

Which 75 million people? I don't think it's irrelevant to anyone. Bitcoin is an amazing invention... the bears are losing site of that, and people who haven't heard of bitcoins will be affected by their existence whether they realize it or not.

the usual 75mils that go to heaven each 12 months Smiley

Bitcoins work, even in heaven. Prove me wrong.



22. Post 2648241 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Jaroslaw on July 03, 2013, 09:50:04 PM
i have a dream of 250$ next week Cheesy

Whoa. Did you buy in?



23. Post 2658997 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Is everyone just trying to catch the bottom?



24. Post 2677422 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: Slix on July 07, 2013, 11:18:34 PM
Surprised this rally hasn't been killed quicker, all the bears sleeping?

Or are they waiting for bids to build? There's 3.5kBTC above 70. That looks like tasty bear food.

Seen more buy pressure today but it's not convincing of a rally.

lol Bears ran out of BTC and the banks are re-opening soon.

After all of the negative sentiment, I can't imagine anything other than 95% of all of the bears having run out of BTC to sell.



25. Post 2780741 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: rpietila on July 22, 2013, 04:32:52 PM
The question is though - what has changed since January? Granted, exposure has certainly increased - does that mean BTC is worth 6 times more, 7 months later?

Bitcoin is a revolutionary technology that is either worth hundreds of $billions or not much. During whole of its history it has been worth "not much" and dissecting the current price movements that (literally) I can create at will, does not lead us anywhere. It is simply too small. 99.9% of money managers have not taken any position yet. It goes to much higher or zero, and it is difficult for it to go to zero, (as well as it is difficult to shut down the internet).

The recent runup in price was an event I did not see many predicting. If it now goes to zero due to (for example) a concerted crackdown on all the exchanges, it does not alter my perception of the long term value. Nobody is forced to sell at zero. I work in gold/silver, and the crash in prices this year has lead to people not selling their scrap silver any more. In 2008 silver was valued officially at $9 per oz, but in 2.5 years it went up to $50.

This is a percentage game. You got a certain percent of coins, good.

+1



26. Post 2818563 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: vokain on July 28, 2013, 08:40:09 AM
what ever happened to coinlab?

Yeah. I want to know too.

And where is Coinsetter? I want more exchanges!



27. Post 3049585 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

I love walsoraj... in my eyes, he was solely responsible for reversing the downward trend after the bubble burst... he was the champion who turned Jaroslaw upside down!

He's just grumpy lately because of Mt. Gox... we all are...



28. Post 3098097 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on September 06, 2013, 08:56:45 PM
This has been a weak "crash" so far. If volume doesn't accelerate, I might have to go back in time and change my predictions.

Bitcoin, you disappoint me.  Angry

"go back in time and change my predictions"

That's awesome. I'm going to use that line more!



29. Post 3098234 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on September 06, 2013, 11:40:46 PM
This has been a weak "crash" so far. If volume doesn't accelerate, I might have to go back in time and change my predictions.

Bitcoin, you disappoint me.  Angry

"go back in time and change my predictions"

That's awesome. I'm going to use that line more!

The phrase is my intellectual property. It will cost you 0.1 btc per use. Otherwise, I sue.

How much for a perpetual license?



30. Post 3098257 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Wait wait wait... guys... Bitstamp is at $118 and Mt.Gox is at $122... could it be... that Mt.Gox solved the withdrawal problem? Is this the elimination of the spread we've all been waiting for? Maybe this crash on Mt.Gox is... super duper bullish?!

I need to figure out from adamstgBit how to post with all of those flashing red alert rocket buttons...



31. Post 3098276 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: justusranvier on September 06, 2013, 11:58:40 PM
Wait wait wait... guys... Bitstamp is at $118 and Mt.Gox is at $122... could it be... that Mt.Gox solved the withdrawal problem? Is this the elimination of the spread we've all been waiting for?
My guess is that somebody got an arbitrage path working via JPY withdrawals.

You're probably right. Still, I would see that as a positive sign if that was the case. Even the people who have fiat stuck on Mt.Gox would like that because now the buying-bitcoins-on-gox-to-get-out strategy is cheaper for them.



32. Post 3105376 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on September 08, 2013, 03:45:03 AM
http://www.ted.com/talks/didier_sornette_how_we_can_predict_the_next_financial_crisis.html

^Watch if you haven't already.

Really interesting. The super-exponential part really hit home, as I remember people figuring out that bitcoin was in super-exponential growth in the first week of April. Still, it doesn't really indicate how one should trade. Bubbles don't have to pop, it's just that the super-exponential behavior has an expiration date and "something" happens afterwards that is different.



33. Post 3118998 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: coolbeans94 on September 10, 2013, 02:30:49 AM
I think you guys are looking too narrow, any day now we could see a blowup. The market is not very mature yet... $1.5B market cap is not much in all actuality. There really are many people out there with hundreds of millions of dollars that can severely shock the market. All it takes is someone like my friend's grandma (who has about $200 million dollars) to decide to put 10 percent into Bitcoin...and BAM! the price is driven over $1,000  instantly, shocks the whole community and market, and you will have wilder volatility than you could ever imagine.  Shocked  We haven't seen nothing yet!   If you think April was volatile, just wait... Roll Eyes  I'm sure it will happen again.

Yeah, the "time bomb" model of bitcoin is the one I subscribe too.



34. Post 3129642 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: grovestr on September 11, 2013, 01:52:00 PM
1. Mtgox insolvent in BTC having ~13kk USD in bids bought 7,5k BTC for withdrawals.
2. Mtgox insolvent in USD and some whale run away with 7,5k BTC.
3. Someone just want Jaroslaw to be sad.

Maybe Jaroslaw is a bull, now that Walsoraj is a bear...



35. Post 3133054 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: Kupsi on September 11, 2013, 11:26:28 PM
Hitting a 6 month high might pull some coins out of a few pockets anyway.

I agree. But I don't think this bubble will pop before $500.

+1



36. Post 3295194 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: uvwvj on October 07, 2013, 08:15:10 PM
On the topic. If it's known that they manage to strike a deal with DPR on the >600k, the market would instantly go into Armaggedon as soon as it hears the news.

Honestly I believe this is the case and why I am sitting on cash at an exchange waiting on.

That could be years from now. Bitcoin might have a huge crash from $3000 down to $1200... but your strategy of holding cash waiting for it won't work out for you.



37. Post 3295244 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on October 07, 2013, 08:21:55 PM
http://blockchain.info/tx/c99eab8a071d91ce60de038c0d6bff8a51d9f566ef977edc91f6bcf091b7c06f

^253 coins sent to the FBI's wallet. Interesting...

Yeah, that IS interesting!



38. Post 3334002 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: justusranvier on October 14, 2013, 04:00:06 AM
So what happens when all the coins finally leave Gox?
They're going to China.

Seriously. This is a good day for any bitcoiners that suddenly want to line their pockets with yuan.



39. Post 3346178 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on October 16, 2013, 01:55:50 AM
lmao btc is off the handle. meanwhile people are dumping altcoins

I am so simultaneously happy and sad about this Smiley Sad

(mostly in bitcoins, but my poor altcoin portfolio... so wounded)



40. Post 3365965 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

960... the Chinese rocket is taking off without us!



41. Post 3366031 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

960 yuan should be about ~157.5 USD according to Google, FYI



42. Post 3366488 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on October 19, 2013, 04:20:08 AM
yes anyone else having this problem?  i am a verified user (mailed them my passport etc..) and never had this problem until today.  Not able to get my btc out for over 8 hours now and still waiting, very frustrating as i need it to do a transaction.

i got a bullshit cookie cutter response from mtgox, btc withdraw still not processed.   wtf, i am going to get all my btc out of mtgox, this is crap.

Quote
Hello,

Thank you for contacting us. Please be aware that:

When withdrawing or depositing bitcoins into your Mt.Gox account there may occasionally be a delay (1~24 hours) depending on network congestion, your internet connection speed and the time required to get 6 confirmations on the network. If you're sending to your computer's wallet, it's good practice to keep your bitcoin client running so it can download the block chain. For those that may not know the block chain is the complete history of all transactions made on the bitcoin network, and as such it can take some time to update and download the most current block and see the bitcoins in your wallet.

If you aren't seeing the funds after either withdrawing/sending to Mt. Gox from your bitcoin program, please wait 24 hours before contacting us. If your transfer has still not occurred within 48 hours, please lodge a support request so we may begin the process of tracking your bitcoins and reinitiating the transfer.

We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. If you have any further enquiries, please do not hesitate to contact Mt.Gox Support by responding to this email (should the enquiry relate to this ticket).

Best regards,

Mt.Gox Team
https://www.mtgox.com

This is such bullshit i still dont have my bitcoins and no response from mtgox after 2+ days now.

I can understand bank wire taking time due to external factors with international wire transfers and regulations.

But there is NO EXCUSE why bitcoin transfers is taking anything more than 30 mins.

fuck mtgox.

^uh oh. And LoL at gox's excuse.

*sigh* Someday I want to know what really happened at Mt.Gox...



43. Post 3383937 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Anyone else expecting more activity from Mt.Gox right now? It's stuck...



44. Post 3439604 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

Quote from: hmmmstrange on October 30, 2013, 03:42:05 AM
http://www.cbc.ca/player/Embedded-Only/News/BC/ID/2414917638/  lmao!


Next Bitcoin ATM Downtown Montreal. cant wait to try it!

What's up with all the negative comments on cbc? Seems a lot of people in canada are scared of bitcoin.

I think it's because the Bitcoin concept appeals more easily to those who are at least a bit distrustful of their government. Say what you want about Americans, but I think they have a healthy distrust of their government, whereas Canadians are much more supportive (and relatively less supportive of free enterprise). I am a Canadian, and I'm sorry.



45. Post 3444170 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

Hmm... I know there is a lag effect with all of the newcomers... but I would have expected a slightly larger reaction to all of the press yesterday.



46. Post 3447343 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

Quote from: MAbtc on October 31, 2013, 05:23:58 AM
Pretty calm right now. Where's the volatility?!  Cheesy



It's the calm...

(•_•)
( •_•)>⌐■-■
(⌐■_■)

...before the storm!  Cheesy



47. Post 3454639 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

I have a theory. There is a big player slowly accumulating bitcoins across all of the exchanges. Basically there is a very big, invisible bid wall.



48. Post 3495519 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 06, 2013, 04:37:18 AM
ATH!!!

ATH!!!



49. Post 3513328 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 07, 2013, 09:31:24 PM
Bitcoin value doubled in 3 months

19 times in a row

This is like Moore's law but for Bitcoin.

Maybe we should call it Rpietila's Law Cheesy



50. Post 3513383 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

[Interview with financial engineers in 2024, one bitcoin is $3 billion USD]

"Yes, many people have been predicting the end of Rpietila's Law, but year after year financial engineers and entrepreneurs have found innovative new uses for Bitcoin. When Bitcoin crossed the $10 million dollar mark, many said 'this is the end, the Bitcoin market cap cannot exceed the sum of all wealth on Earth,' but this proved to be just as short-sighted as those who thought a bitcoin could never be worth $100. By enabling new micro-transactions, and now even nano-transactions (and possibly even pico-transactions further down the road), we have dramatically increased the total wealth of all people on Earth just so that Bitcoin could accommodate it."




51. Post 3513547 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: Chalkbot on November 07, 2013, 09:51:28 PM
[Interview with financial engineers in 2024, one bitcoin is $3 billion USD]

"Yes, many people have been predicting the end of Rpietila's Law, but year after year financial engineers and entrepreneurs have found innovative new uses for Bitcoin. When Bitcoin crossed the $10 million dollar mark, many said 'this is the end, the Bitcoin market cap cannot exceed the sum of all wealth on Earth,' but this proved to be just as short-sighted as those who thought a bitcoin could never be worth $100. By enabling new micro-transactions, and now even nano-transactions (and possibly even pico-transactions further down the road), we have dramatically increased the total wealth of all people on Earth just so that Bitcoin could accommodate it."



OMG chris, you're killing me. Please tell me you have a book I can buy (with bitcoin).

Funny you should ask...



52. Post 3516694 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: haightst on November 08, 2013, 04:49:53 AM




BTC SKYBOXXX!!!  Grin WEEEEEE

No fair... how come I don't see these images? Is there a browser setting I should be aware of?



53. Post 3522484 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on November 08, 2013, 06:08:12 PM
For a non-pro trader, it's really incredibly hard to discern the best course of action at the moment. Sell or hold, sell or hold. It's so crazy high it doesn't make sense. But it was so crazy high it didn't make sense 24 hours ago too, and now look where we are. The incredulity of it all makes $500 or $100 on monday seem entirely possible.


I'm pretty sure the people who are the richest in the Bitcoin world are the ones who just held.



54. Post 3525310 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on November 08, 2013, 11:07:55 PM
China 2100! No limits  Grin

China is unstoppable!



55. Post 3540625 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

I think the bears are having their picnic a little too early this year.



56. Post 3541060 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: Kj1 on November 10, 2013, 05:28:58 PM

Which stage best matches the current/recent market sentiment?

doubt

+1



57. Post 3554762 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: mb300sd on November 12, 2013, 02:26:06 AM
Recovery key doesn't help. The master key is encrypted with your recovery key and bootup usb. Thats the key used to decrypt the data, and its not stored anywhere except the drive itself.

I think I was one of the last ones to successfully withdraw from gox, thankfully pulled out all I needed to buy my house before the withdraw problems started.

Although it was at an average of $120/btc, missed the 266 bubble and this runup... Would have been way better off with a mortgage.
You can talk about sellers remorse in a couple of years.

Still got plenty more.

Besides, remorse is the 5000btc wallet lost to a corrupted bitlocker partition, or close to that lost to pirate.

Jesus Christ, I can't imagine.

Truly no way to recover that partition?

Sent it off to 4 data recovery companies. Almost all datas intact, but the bitlocker metadata (including master key) are corrupt... 256 bit AES key

I wouldn't give up if I were you.

Obviously you can't brute force a 256 bit AES key. But you MIGHT be able to brute-force an algorithm to fix whatever corruption happened to the metadata... I'm not an expert but at the very least it seems plausible.

For 5000 bitcoins, I'd hire an expert and get a few Amazon GPU clusters going. If you're not into the idea of trying out of pocket, maybe you'd be willing to crowdfund to give it a shot? I'd be interested.

Metadata dosen't matter too much, the key is part of whats corrupt. Would me far more cost effective to attempt to brute force the silk road coins

I'm just speculating that most of the information is still there, that maybe only a few bits are wrong, or that something is bit-shifted, or whatever (again, not an expert). It seems much, much less computationally intensive to try to repair the key than crack a wallet blind.

The first few entire sectors of the drive are unreadable.

Heh, one more order of magnitude in price and it will be worth getting your drive under a magnetic force microscope. Maybe you should just donate it to an MIT (or Northwestern University) materials science lab and  tell them they can keep half of the profits.

(I did my PhD at Northwestern - they are a top materials science research university, let me know if you need a connection)



58. Post 3555632 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: solex on November 12, 2013, 05:23:05 AM
china and gox are desperate to make a sustained climb, but stamp is asleep at the wheel.


The Bitcoin world needs more arbitrageurs...



59. Post 3603845 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on November 16, 2013, 06:29:07 AM
The funny thing about Bitcoin is that anyone in the ranks of the elite who understands it well enough to see it as a threat will automatically also want to own it. Now their interests are aligned with everyone's. They might be misguided, like Mellon, but they're Bitcoiners all the same.

Bitcoin is like the blob. Punch it and it just assimilates you.

Now THAT should go on a t-shirt! Smiley



60. Post 3647588 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

So... what is going on on Mt.Gox? I know I'm the 50th person to ask... but I still don't get it.



61. Post 3647644 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Who would have thought that the first, second, and THIRD great Bitcoin crash would all be caused by Gox?  Grin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2ku1A5Ox8U



62. Post 3656751 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Boom!




63. Post 3668521 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 21, 2013, 10:38:57 PM
So what's the thinking right now? Have we changed regimes and departed permanently from the long-term trend, or is this latest uptrend just dragging out the inevitable bubble pop?

Those of you in the "bubble" camp, what's your price target?

Heh, well, this didn't turn out to be the damped oscillation we thought it would be Smiley



64. Post 3668572 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: chriswilmer on November 21, 2013, 10:42:26 PM
So what's the thinking right now? Have we changed regimes and departed permanently from the long-term trend, or is this latest uptrend just dragging out the inevitable bubble pop?

Those of you in the "bubble" camp, what's your price target?

Heh, well, this didn't turn out to be the damped oscillation we thought it would be Smiley

In all seriousness though, I didn't think this "crash" would survive very long because of all the new money that was bound to come in over the next week or two. Maybe the current price rise is partly based on the anticipation of that.

I never really bought the exponential trendline argument for Bitcoin's price anyway... I think if an investor has deep pockets, patience, and is confident that bitcoins will go to $100,000+ USD in 5+ years then he/she would buy at any price reasonably far below that value (e.g., $25,000 would still give a high rate of return if $100,000 was reached 5 years after the fact) and then just wait for the infrastructure to catch up.



65. Post 3668604 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Rampion on November 21, 2013, 10:50:29 PM
$750 (Stamp) getting closer. It could be a nice battle, bears seem to have more ammo in the frontlines Smiley

I think if we break the ATH on bitstamp ($755), that would be pretty crazy. You might get a lot of people saying "it's different this time" and really believing it.



66. Post 3668782 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

5000 CNY broken (again) !!!

POST PICTURES OF TRAINS!!! POST PICTURES OF TRAINS!!!



67. Post 3668804 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):




68. Post 3677558 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Richy_T on November 22, 2013, 06:57:34 PM
Logarithmic growth can't be the long term fit.  Sqrt(x) seems like it would never have the rate-of-increase-is-increasing quality, which we are currently seeing.

Isn't the sigmoid curve an exponential at the start that falls behind with growth? Nowhere is an increase in the rate of increase to be seen in a sigmoid curve. The so called "vertical" phase is exponential-turned-linear on its way to saturation, but I might be wrong.

In an exponential, the increase in the rate of increase is proportional to the rate of increase. So yes, you do see that acceleration
The rate of increase is defined relative to the value, which makes it constant in an exponential curve. It's like 100$ increase now feels like 10$ increase in May.

To sum things up, there is nothing over-exponential in a sigmoid curve, so in a logarithmic chart you would never expect anything faster than a straight line.

However, some physical effects can be over-exponential, like the factorial numbers that appeared in rpietila's model of diffusion. Do you know any others? Maybe nuclear reactions or something like that?

Nope. For an exponential, df(x)/dx =f(x)

So for an exponential curve in time, the rate of change is proportional the the exponential. And the rate of change of the rate of change is also proportional to the exponential (i.e. increasing with time) and so on.

Oh, I see you're talking percentage change. In which case you're correct but that's not correctly called the rate of change.


An exponential function is an exactly straight line on a logarithmic plot - and if the rate slows, it will go from linear to horizontal.

However, an "S-shaped" adoption curve could be a sigmoid function raised to some arbitrary power. If f(x) is a sigmoid function, then f(x)^2 will look like a sigmoid with a steeper vertical, and f(x)^100 will look like a step function (going from 0 adoption to 100% adoption in one day). So, if the power is somewhere between 1 and 2, it will look super-exponential for some period on the log plot.



69. Post 3677826 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Richy_T on November 22, 2013, 07:07:39 PM

An exponential function is an exactly straight line on a logarithmic plot - and if the rate slows, it will go from linear to horizontal.

However, an "S-shaped" adoption curve could be a sigmoid function raised to some arbitrary power. If f(x) is a sigmoid function, then f(x)^2 will look like a sigmoid with a steeper vertical, and f(x)^100 will look like a step function (going from 0 adoption to 100% adoption in one day). So, if the power is somewhere between 1 and 2, it will look super-exponential for some period on the log plot.

(e^x)^2 = e^x * e^x = e^(x+x) which is still a straight exponential (This also applies to raising to any abitrary power)

Sorry if I wasn't clear. f(x) in my example is not e^x

f(x) = 1/(1+e^(-x))

If you raise this function to higher and higher powers, it will look more and more like a step function and have a super-exponential growth phase on a log-chart (in the limit, it will look like a step function on the log chart as well as the linear chart)



70. Post 3678011 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Pruden on November 22, 2013, 07:37:45 PM

Sorry if I wasn't clear. f(x) in my example is not e^x

f(x) = 1/(1+e^(-x))

If you raise this function to higher and higher powers, it will look more and more like a step function and have a super-exponential growth phase on a log-chart (in the limit, it will look like a step function on the log chart as well as the linear chart)
I am testing this in fooplot.com but it still looks exponential. A superexponential growth would look like a line curving upwards in the log-chart, and there is nothing like that, only straight lines, steeper with greater exponents, granted.

Just plotted it, I stand corrected!

For high enough powers, it will look like a step-function on a linear plot but a "corner" shape (i.e., exactly vertical and then exactly horizontal) on a log plot, my bad!

So yes, it will never look super-exponential. Sorry!



71. Post 3678059 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: chriswilmer on November 22, 2013, 07:48:09 PM

Sorry if I wasn't clear. f(x) in my example is not e^x

f(x) = 1/(1+e^(-x))

If you raise this function to higher and higher powers, it will look more and more like a step function and have a super-exponential growth phase on a log-chart (in the limit, it will look like a step function on the log chart as well as the linear chart)
I am testing this in fooplot.com but it still looks exponential. A superexponential growth would look like a line curving upwards in the log-chart, and there is nothing like that, only straight lines, steeper with greater exponents, granted.

Just plotted it, I stand corrected!

For high enough powers, it will look like a step-function on a linear plot but a "corner" shape (i.e., exactly vertical and then exactly horizontal) on a log plot, my bad!

So yes, it will never look super-exponential. Sorry!

If I could say one thing in my defense though, if you modify f(x) slightly by adding a constant epislon (a teency weency "intrinsic value", say epsilon = 0.001), then it looks like a step function on both the linear and log plots for very high powers.

f(x) = 1/(1+e^(-x))^n + epislon

where n -> infinity



72. Post 3678279 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: BitchicksHusband on November 22, 2013, 08:13:58 PM


I don't think it works that way.

The volatility will get LESS the more people that are involved, not more.

$32->$2 (94% drop)
$266->$60 (77% drop)
$900-> $453 (50% drop)

Don't be surprised if the next bubble only has a drop of (25%-33%).

Someday, when there are 1 billion people in bitcoin, $1 billion leaving the market will affect everyone by $1.  See how that works?

In fairness to TERA, it looks like an approximately 30% (ok maybe 40%) drop on his diagram.



73. Post 3692922 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 24, 2013, 04:02:21 AM
Every aborted crash is extra confidence in the $800 level.

I agree, but this is also confusing for me. It feels like we are "burning in" the $800 price... and yet it is so high above the exponential growth trend line.

*shrugs* I am just a buy & hold kind of guy, but my friends keep asking me if they should buy bitcoins, and I'm not sure what to tell them at these prices (... I always say yes, but I hesitate!)



74. Post 3701244 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: windjc on November 24, 2013, 10:03:00 PM
I think we might see the great crash tomorrow, if new money doesn't come in and prop up the price some more. I think most people are itching to cash out, but are waiting to see what happens tomorrow. It's over, ladies and gentlemen. Prepare.  Cheesy

Right. Because no new money will come in tomorrow. I mean, lets see, we didn't have 2 senate meetings last week, 5 consecutive days of coverage on CNBC, a spike in Google trends, an endorsement by Branson.

I can't think of any possible scenario where money will flow into the exchanges tomorrow. I guess your right.

+1

There will definitely be lots of new money. That doesn't mean it CAN'T crash... but yeah, I'm not betting on it.



75. Post 3704320 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

It seems that bubbles are really just "fragile" states where the price will easily crash if there is sufficiently negative news. You still need some kind of negative news though... all of the last crashes had pretty significant events tied to them (Mt.Gox getting hacked in 2011 and, err, Mt.Gox getting DDOSed in April of 2013). I don't think it will crash solely just because people lose interest.



76. Post 3761086 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Ozymandias on November 29, 2013, 03:11:45 AM
China is now just under its ath, lets see how strong is the resistance

ATH in China broken!!!



77. Post 3811304 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on December 03, 2013, 08:14:56 PM
Recently, Bitcoin market cap (i.e. total value of all Bitcoins issued) reached the $2 billion mark, surpassing small countries like Liberia and Guinea.
This should have been obvious.
isn't it $20 billion?

The authority for this is
http://www.coinometrics.com/bitcoin/bmix

Go to the bottom of the page and select Full Data Table
Bitcoin is currently 71 in the world (out of 191 countries) between azerbijan and lithuania

burma at 12 million?


okay, who wants to go in with me and buy burma?

Hmm, you know what, that's actually an interesting proposition. It's probably hard to buy a country using national fiat currencies, no matter how rich you are, but with bitcoins... you just might be able to do it (i.e., pay out the government + military to leave the country / hand over control). Maybe we will see a brave new world of corporations taking over nations now that they have a financial vehicle with which to do it.



78. Post 3824457 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on December 04, 2013, 07:04:20 PM
Chinese salaries tomorrow, this weekend will be nice Smiley

Wha? Do all Chinese people have the same payday?

yes, and they only get paid once a year.

That's a joke right... right?



79. Post 3826076 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: CMMPro on December 04, 2013, 09:06:03 PM

Capital Gains.

god damn it, i should of never sold anything  Angry

i need to learn how to hide my Capital Gains, should i dump it in BTC?  Cheesy

Dude, we have a $750k capital gains personal exemption here in Canada....use it.  
I'll start a thread somewhere
this is what hes talking about.
not sure how to apply this to bitcoin.

 https://repsourcepublic.manulife.com/wps/wcm/connect/954ef280433c1d79b02df6319e0f5575/ins_tepg_capitalgainex.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=954ef280433c1d79b02df6319e0f5575

Sorry...this is so off topic...

You own an investment, you bought it for X, sold it for 100X, you incurred an amount of capital gains and can claim part of your lifetime capital gains exemption.

http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/tx/ndvdls/tpcs/ncm-tx/rtrn/cmpltng/ddctns/lns248-260/254/menu-eng.html




That's cool. No such thing in the USA eh?



80. Post 3832099 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: windjc on December 05, 2013, 07:08:59 AM
Is no one else here seeing the possibility of a correction or down turn here??


I said 3 days ago I was bearish. Based on basically 1 thing - the correction looked like real market tiredness and the ensuing recovery looked weak.

Then yesterday when we caught fire, starting to go up on higher volume. I said I was a bull again.

But here we are again, on Thursday, and the top is stalling out below ATHs.  Look at the weekly and 3 day chart and they look suspicious. Just look at those charts. It 85% angles.  And where are those red candles?

If we dont break ATHs in the next 24 hours I think the rally may have topped out.

I know, I know, that's crazy talk.  But that's also one huge massive bear wedge on the 1 and 2 hour charts.

Has Bitcoin ever "crashed" from a "tired" market? Maybe there's a good example in some other market?



81. Post 3842814 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Guys, I panicked and sold 5% of my bitcoins at least 1000... am I a bad person? Should I buy back?



82. Post 3853565 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Guys, I bought back in! To the moooooooooon!



83. Post 3958414 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: TERA on December 13, 2013, 11:16:11 PM


 Undecided

Where does everyone find these amazing pictures of bears getting destroyed? They're great! Seems like there is one for every occasion.



84. Post 4002882 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.40h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on December 17, 2013, 02:24:28 AM


Awesome! Smiley



85. Post 4321667 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

Quote from: nanobrain on January 05, 2014, 07:31:12 AM
Well you asked for it (about ten pages back)

The "Choo Choo Motherfucker" t-shirt is now available.

http://www.zazzle.com/choo_choo_tees-235618740034578955

Unfortunately, zazzle doesn't accept BTC which is a bit sad but still.
This is the first in a series of BTC meme themed items I've commissioned via my layabout husband .  Cool

Please let me know via PM if there are any personal requests (I'm thinking of a Lambo one for Goat!!).

Nan  Cheesy

Love the idea but the train MUST be on fire!!!



86. Post 4339633 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

Quote from: Loaded on January 06, 2014, 07:12:31 AM
expect.

...the unexpected?



87. Post 4339885 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

With second market it was like a 2% discount for off exchange buys.



88. Post 4347668 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.52h):

Quote from: windjc on January 06, 2014, 05:05:00 PM
1 BTC bet. huge sell offs happen and price goes below 750 on gox with the next 48 hours??
Ill take that bet.
Shake
New thread required. Smiley

Am happy to send into escrow right now.

Use https://www.bitrated.com/  !!!



89. Post 4534470 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: windjc on January 15, 2014, 10:25:22 PM
Why always "talking book" when someone expresses an opinion...

Generally, on this specific subforum, it's a valid assumption.
I mean more so that it's sort of a moot point. Obviously if I post a buy/sell target, that's my position. But there is this nagging assertion around here that this is done to manipulate price. That seems absurd to me, but I guess some people put a lot more weight on this forum than others.

It is definitely done by several in an attempt to manipulate price. It has become a lot more common since the last run up and the influx of new posters.

Meanwhile, French Congress met today with panel similar to US hearings and things were pretty much all positive on the Bitcoin front.

Good news is coming out every day, so I guess this market is actually over bought afterall. The market seems like it is just going to wait to see what happens in China or eventually there will be such good news that it won't have a choice but to go up.

In truth we really don't know if this market is extended or not, because we are creating a new context with which to view bitcoin every week.

Personally, I think the longer we hang out between 750-900, the more bullish this is. Eventually, and it might take some while, bitcoin will no longer seem expensive in this range.

Rocket on the moon is just refueling. It's a long way to mars.



90. Post 4676891 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 23, 2014, 01:14:02 AM
The prospect of more than three down days in a row hasn't been keeping me awake at night so far.

Now it's been mentioned I guess I had better start panicking as soon as possible. I'm not really in the mood though.

You might have it backwards. These "bears" are actually waiting for a (re)entry-point.  Money is piling up on the sidelines.

yeah but at some point these 'bulls' will loose their patience since no new money will come in and they will be even more sensitive to quick dips, turning them eventually into big drops. Wink
In four years, I have never seen a big drop after sideways motion. Drops come after peaks. It's entirely possible that sub $800 coins will never come back. I hope they do, so I can buy more, but I'm in a club with many, many members.


+1

I just went (almost) all in based on the same observation. Now the market can go ahead and prove us wrong! please don't...



91. Post 5134120 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: smoothie on February 14, 2014, 04:15:17 AM
Too early to call a double bottom?

lol too early perhaps. I guess I was right on my $600 call....muahahahahaha  Grin Grin Grin

Smoothie, oh prescient one, what is next for Bitcoin... please tell us!!!



92. Post 5134191 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: TERA on February 14, 2014, 04:35:34 AM
There has been someone buying 1000btc at a time on bitstamp and bitfinex at every hour during this entire downtrend.

Really? How many hours in a row?



93. Post 5146434 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: windjc on February 14, 2014, 07:04:53 PM
People laughed at me when i started shortin @ 840$ . I can live with that.

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Yeah but it snapped back on your ass. You finally sold your shorts for a meager profit before buying back. While you were out you went silent like a slug.  Now you are short again, except this time you are going to sell for a loss or stop out soon as Gox reopens withdrawals and we bounce again. You'll probably give up a fiat bit of the profits you made on the first trade.

Well i stated a few hours ago that i closed my shorts @ 580$ , which have been opened @ 840$, i also stated that i will short again between 650-690$, when the price was@630 which turned out to be not the badest idea so far. Do you have any kind of personal agenda with me? I´m pretty pleased with my profits, thanks again for askin?
Just keep on actin like a dick.

Of course I have a personal issue with you. You are annoying scum. I don't care that you don't believe in bitcoin and are here just to try and make a buck. I don't care that you are short. But I think you are dispicable as you constantly lie to try and manipulate the readers of his forum. You are the exact same scum that makes the btc-e troll box a fucking hell hole and you brought that same dark and twisted and extremely self serving and immature attitude and energy to this forum. And I hate you for it.

You are a dark person and not at all well. You are certainly not the type of person I would welcome into my home or advise my loved ones to associate with. You pretty much represent the lowest common denominator of individual in the bitcoin space.

+1



94. Post 5212301 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: His Most Eminent Highness Grand Caesar Imperator Goat on February 18, 2014, 04:02:28 AM
Ccmf!

+1

Or said another way...

Cccmf!



95. Post 5244539 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 19, 2014, 08:57:35 PM
not sure i get why the market is acting the way it is.
it should place walls on the low, waiting for gox  to allow withdrawals and catch the coins being arb.
instead the walls are moving to the front line b4 the party has even started...

but why!?

cheap gox coin are sure to be liquidated on stamps soon...

Front running a rally?



96. Post 5265789 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on February 20, 2014, 06:54:44 PM
Quote
First, let me compliment your screen name. Probably my favorite line from Dune.
Your questions are all good and I hope my previous answers mostly addressed them. Just a few additional notes: 1. We hope regulatory clarity will attract exchanges to the United States. I suspect that they are staying offshore right now because they don't know what the rules of the road here are or will be. 2. We do hope that regulation will create a level of certainty that could incentivize banks to promote not stifle these innovations. I also suspect there are banks who are quite interested in the technology but are being risk averse for now in the absence of regulatory clarity. 3. I think Secretary Lew was expressing that money laundering, in whatever form, needs to be dealt with seriously.

 Shocked
BULLISH AS FUCK!!!!!!!!

 Grin



Also:

Quote
I think Bitcoin or the underlying technology has a lot of potential on numerous levels. As Professor Athey said at our hearings, even the experts don't know today how the technology will evolve and what it will ultimately look like. But I do think it holds a lot of promise (if money laundering can be adequately addressed), both on its own and in terms of causing existing payments system technologies to up their game. I've personally evolved a lot on the issue the more I have learned. I wouldn't compare it to a Rocky-IV-final-scene about-face and it has taken time for all of us at DFS to get our minds around it, but certainly our views have changed.

http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/1ygcil/as_requested_im_ben_lawsky_superintendent_of_the/cfkbfgo?context=3

Walsoraj... you 100% perfectly called the end of the last bear market. If you are posting bullish things now, then I know this is turning around...



97. Post 5287056 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: Rampion on February 21, 2014, 06:51:08 PM
I think Jorge's point that logical systems are brittle is well-taken.  They are also robust, within their domain.  Some are provably correct.  Others have extensive stress testing which gives us high confidence in them.  Many are not provably correct.  Many have little stress testing.  Often even very well designed systems have usability flaws which increase the likelihood of operator error resulting in risk or outright harm.

All of which is completely off-topic, but then this is the de facto off-topic thread, and I resemble that remark.

In any case, the primary point I take from that discussion is that one should try to cover for other's errors, in order to be an effective cooperator.  




Well, I kinda feel bad now for being so harsh with Jorge - he really seems a nice guy, and for sure its much better to have him in here than the other thousands trolls that are flooding this forum since October.

What is kinda annoying of him IMO is that he clearly has a lack of understanding of fundamental things linked to Bitcoin, and instead of silently reading and learning what was discussed in the past and try to complement that, he just spits the same old arguments that have been discussed (and debunked) thousands of times before.

Practical example: the "ponzi scheme" thing. We already had an intellectual/economist on the forum who explained us many times and with Jorge's very same words how Bitcoin was a ponzi on the verge of collapse: his moment of glory was during the crash of 2011, and he went to great lengths to explain how Bitcoin was a zero-sum game in which early adopters were assraping late adopters. He cheered with joy during the crash from $32 to $2, but we all know how that played out: the "bag-holders" as he called them (did you think you invented that word, Jorge?) are now holding a bag worth hundreds of times more it was worth during this infamous character's rants. The name of this guy is John Nagle, and you can find his profile here and here a nice web with which he embarassed himself.

And BTW, Mr. Stelfi: please point to us an example of a ponzi scheme which has seen 3 different "boom and bust" cycles in which price deflated as much as it did with Bitcoin, to then recover in such a way as Bitcoin did. Just FYI:

2011: $32 to $2 (-94%)
mid-2013: $266 to $50 (-81%)
late 2013: $1242 to $400ish (-68%)

Maybe because BTC is not a "zero-sum game", or a "ponzi" or a "bubble", despite that's what its critics have said of it from its very inception. Maybe there's much more to it than its mere utility as money, maybe (and only maybe) the distributed blockchain is the promise of a revolution that brings an increased freedom for the people.

I'm afraid that to see that you probably have to look deeper into it.

+1000000000000000



98. Post 5345356 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: seleme on February 24, 2014, 08:44:51 PM
we all talk bullshit here, fight with each other and so on, and that guy on bitcoinbuilder made 1200 BTC in last 24 hours.

:jealousasfuck:

I haven't been looking to closely at the bitcoinbuilder thing... are people placing a lot of trust in the guy who built it?



99. Post 5354745 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

Quote from: Miz4r on February 25, 2014, 06:31:51 AM
I sold the 450s at 470 as soon as I saw those walls pop up and have now rebought some in the lower 400s. This is where bottom was suposed to be, though I am concerned about how fast it has gotten here.

We'll definitely retest 382 on stamp, and if that fails all bets are off. We could dip below 300 shortly even.

Below $300... *sigh* I really hope that's not what this comes to.



100. Post 5354853 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

C'mon let $400 be the line that doesn't fall... c'mon let $400 be the line that doesn't fall... c'mon let $400 be the line that doesn't fall...



101. Post 5355010 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 25, 2014, 06:51:35 AM
lets stabilize 420?

A good, calm number...



102. Post 5375946 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: TERA on February 26, 2014, 01:30:12 AM
not to mention someone who sold 1k coins into buy wall at 550, he's gonna get butthurt pretty quick if he thought he would be able to buy back in cheaper
550 will be seen again, guaranteed.

Quoting for the record books.



103. Post 5376683 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on February 26, 2014, 02:36:22 AM
There isn't enough fiat on Stamp to sustain this rally. The order book only shows about 13 mill right now. Sure there is some off book too. But not likely near what Gox had before the malleability issue. I remember ~40 mill on book. I bet 2-3x of that off book.

You said that at $515 too.

And I'm still correct.

I liked it better when you talked about mega USD laser canons getting us into the Oort cloud.



104. Post 5473105 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on March 03, 2014, 12:00:11 AM
Wow. Someone slammed on that market buy button pretty hard.

I like to imagine a panicked, anxious trader... finally capitulating and deciding to sell all of his remaining bitcoins... so that he can pay off some accumulating debts. However, in his state of clouded judgement and jitters, he hits "market buy" instead of "market sell" and all of his remaining fiat get turned into bitcoins. Since there was no wall to buy into, the price jumps by $10... and some speculators posts on forums about a huge buy order. "Buy order?" "Buying?" "Buy" "BUY" "BUY!!!!" "CCMF WE"RE GOING TO THE MOON" they post. An enormous rally begins.

The previously panicked trader, realizing what happened, decides to capitalize on the moment the only way he knows how.

He logs into Bitcointalk.org and posts, "I totally called the bottom."



105. Post 5487654 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: windjc on March 03, 2014, 06:53:49 PM
While I don't think the bear market is over and I thought we would bounce to the 700s before finally finding a bottom, its SO NICE that all the trolls are gone. Every. Last. One. Of. Them.  Crawled back into the crevice of their parents spare bedroom. Haha!

I think the bear market is over... not just because of this rally, but because the fear and despair when Mt.Gox was crashing was over the top. Anybody who was nervous about Bitcoin sold then (or at least, 90% did, which is all that matters).



106. Post 5648956 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: bpnave on March 11, 2014, 09:57:54 PM
Hey I'm new here, but I thought I'd go ahead and share my speculations.


As you can see, to me, it seems as if we may be in for a third "echo" (not repeat--as I've been told markets don't repeat, etc)

source: http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/bitstampUSD#tgSzm1g10zm2g25zl

(Please let me know if I'm breaking rules or something...I don't want to be disruptive!

You are doing the one thing everyone else is supposed to be doing!



107. Post 5681774 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: boumalo on March 13, 2014, 07:51:20 PM
All good news, no more Gox to stop us. Jet packs are full. Prepare to strap in, bears.

People should give no weight to "good" news to up the price because... yadda...

Clearly you're new here. This is the speculation thread. We do not require any factual data to support our assessments. There has been good news: the price will go up. One need only wait long enough.

I've been reading the last couple thousand pages from the sidelines thus I have a "moderate" understanding of how this particular "game" is "played", don't worry. I was just pointing out the power that people give to the news, usually unintentionally and without understanding the process.

Even speculation needs "stimuli", and some will provide "stimuli" to those who have developed an addiction for it. Even reloading this page 100 times a day (as most will be familiar with) is a way to quench the thirst for the news/stimuli addiction. We need mooooaaar data to speculate, or decide on what/when to sell or buy... links, rumors and everything. It's the way it goes. And, well, it's exploitable. That's just the reality of it.

That is a lot of pages to read!

Would you advise to buy hold or sell now? I have fiat waiting, I can't decide if I should wait a bit, I bought some already and I may buy if it dives or start going up

Definitely hold. We are definitely (probably) at the very start of the next several month long rally (it starts very slowly at first).



108. Post 5685363 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: Serge on March 13, 2014, 10:41:44 PM
Atlas Ceo on fox business
he said 1000s of signups yesterday

this new exchange coming up is a mega bullish news, hopefully few more spring up here in the states

Wow... it's not often you see a media discussion that's dominated by Bitcoin bulls teaming up on one skeptic! Smiley



109. Post 5730224 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 16, 2014, 04:12:07 PM
Is it my impression, or has there been a general clamp-down on discussion and analysis of the MtGOX heist and its leaked database?  Tongue

It's just your impression and, more generally, the impression of Bitcoin bears.

People who have a predisposed opinion that Bitcoin is a bound-to-fail concept thought that the failure of Mt.Gox was proof that they were right. They assumed that Bitcoin would have gone to zero by now and that we would all be constantly talking about it.

People who are optimistic about Bitcoin's future don't find the Mt.Gox drama that interesting.



110. Post 5844599 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: windjc on March 22, 2014, 07:10:13 PM
because I have about $200k in fiat ready to go all in at any prices that gets that low.

very juicy indeed

You think I'm the only one? Hardly.

The bulls could only run so far for so long. The same is true with the bears.

Bears like to talk about 2011. Its what they hang their hat on.

How many people were investing millions into bitcoin in 2011? I would doubt if the answer was more than 1 or 2. Probably zero. How many people are doing that now. A lot.

How many start-ups internationally existed funded solely for bitcoin businesses in 2011. How many today - hundreds, perhaps thousands.

I could go on and on. Sure, the bears could be right about this being another 2011.

I think it is much more likely that they are as "delusional" as all the to-the-moon bulls back in December.

We will see.

Of course you're right. Whenever the rally starts it will be quick and violent (again). Right now investors with deep pockets who are vaguely interested in Bitcoin just don't feel in an any hurry... but they will once the trend reverses.



111. Post 5844770 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: kurious on March 22, 2014, 07:51:40 PM
Price was on a steady decline last summer until it become clear that Gox's excuses for fiat withdrawal delays were bullshit. We don't have similar circumstances to put the brakes on capitulation this time.

I keep reading that and I still don't follow...



Fuck that's ugly. Kill it with fire!

They're real nice fried in a garlic sauce...

I wouldn't eat that thing if you shoved it up Katy Perry's pussy.

Seriously though Walsoraj, what did you mean = that Gox's fiat excuses being revealed as bullshit held the market up and prevented capitulation..?

I think he means that people gave up waiting for their fiat to withdraw and so they instead bought bitcoins and withdrew those... collectively, this looked from the outside like a big rally. I'm not saying that's what happened, but I think that's what Walsoraj was getting at.



112. Post 5884710 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: boumalo on March 25, 2014, 02:42:15 AM
ehhh, I don't like the way this looks, I said a few days ago I thought we had one more big dip left before we take off, and I still think that way.

<snip>

Wild guess on timeframes? <500 before the end of this month, >1000 by the end of April.

I did quite well accumulating between 500 and 450 the last 2 big dips, I'm still thinking we could see the mother of all triple bottoms before April hits.

of course, it's still just a feeling, a "wild guess".  Just be careful out there.

It is  the way I "feel" myself, one more big dip before we rise but a bigger and more agressive dip this time, a scary dip

Let's see

I totally agree about an upcoming big scary dip... but it I think it will dip upwards. A reverse dip. (very big and scary though)



113. Post 5896772 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: nakaone on March 25, 2014, 06:23:55 PM
Any predictions what will happen if this is true?
https://twitter.com/CanarslanEren/status/448418452701974528

If its true and assuming they refund people's bitcoins, then what will happen is that there will be a lot of happy people. Beyond that, not much will happen. A few people might sell some, but most people will hold. And overall community sentiment will be more positive. Probably not much difference in regards to price.


imagine just 10% of the coins are sodled - I do not get the redditors who say that that is bullish

I am happy for the guys having coins in mtgox

It's bullish. Period. Either those coins are in the hands of thieves or they are in the hands of the "rightful" owners. The only thing that would have been more bullish is if we had proof the coins were irretrievably lost.



114. Post 5956885 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: Dr. LY on March 28, 2014, 08:55:49 PM
Fairy God Whale, where are you now?!



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WiXMcsfvXE



115. Post 5959655 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: BBmodBB on March 29, 2014, 12:18:07 AM
Inspirational Buy All the Bitcoins Speech

Sons of the internet, I am AdamStgBit, and I see a whole army of my countrymen here in defiance of closed source centralized systems, you've come here to buy and sell on the free market, and a free men you are ( expect for Jorge, sadly...). What will you do without FREEDOM!?? WILL YOU BUY!?

"No! No! we will sell and/or hope for lower prices, if not, least we'll have some fiat, to pay the bills"

Ya ok, buy now and you might lose, sell now and you'll have some fiat to pay the bills.

At least a while...

And drowning in debt many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that, for once chance, just one chance! to come back here and tell the bankers that they may take our mortgage payment directly out of our accounts without asking, and even take the house after taking all our money, but they'll never take our BITCOINS!!!




* inspired by https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L21-vnlPk_o *


^FREEDOM IS AWESOME!!!!+1 WE LOVE YOU MAN!!! =)


SO MUCH AWESOME!!!



116. Post 6053927 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: magicmexican on April 03, 2014, 03:18:06 PM
CCMF?

In my experience, rallies don't officially commence until Walsoraj turns on his mega USD laser canons.



117. Post 6054368 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

It's been so long, I don't even know what to call what just happened... it was like a dump... but, the other way... some kind of freakish negative dump?  Huh



118. Post 6075895 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: jonoiv on April 04, 2014, 09:59:57 PM


I flipped the chart.  Looking at the reverse sometimes helps me form a decision.

I'm still undecided.


Anyone got any ideas on the TA ?  


The time is not UTC but actually GMT  sorry about that on the image i posted earlier.

(2:30 am UTC)   3:30am GMT

Hmm... can you flip both of those images horizontally and make a new picture with 4 images? Might help.



119. Post 6115603 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on April 07, 2014, 08:04:38 PM
What with Stamp now on a solo mini rally?

Now, and twenty years from now, a 1% rise is considered a rally.

*sigh*



120. Post 6399792 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on April 26, 2014, 12:41:04 AM
The only people buying now are people who sold higher. Look at the volume. Volume tells the story. We are very likely just at a consolidation stage on a trip back down. Don't get caught on the wrong side of the is/ought divide. China matters until it doesn't. Just because prices are stupid low doesn't mean they can't get stupider lower. Markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent if you don't manage your capital wisely.

There are silver linings. The good news is that the FBI will probably not get much for their coins. When the Chinese people will discover in a year or two from now how badly the PBoC and their government screwed them out of a leadership roll in crypto, it  may do more to foment revolution than Tienanmen Square.


Be smart. Be patient, and be in a position to scoop up bargains should they materialize.



You are basically advocating the following:

* Some guy on the street is selling a $100 note (guaranteed to be non-counterfeit) for $10
* You tell your friend who wants to buy: No don't buy it. He might sell it for $5 if we wait a little bit!

And then if the friend buys it anyway and the man is indeed selling the $100 bill for $5 the next day you mock him.

It's not really relevant price can go lower (unless you use margin)

Interesting point!



121. Post 6459066 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: gizmoh on April 29, 2014, 04:45:05 PM
A great squeeze is coming: Finex $17.2 million longs beware.  Roll Eyes

Sorry for the dumb question, but I"m not familiar with margin trading. Are you saying that the long positions will be squeezed (price crash), or that the short positions will be squeezed (price spike)?



122. Post 6546009 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: gentlemand on May 04, 2014, 09:29:47 PM
Suck it up, Bitcoin cultists.



Why are you wasting your time on us here then?

Not only that... why is Blitz a mod of a Bitcoin forum? Seriously, why?



123. Post 6546079 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on May 04, 2014, 09:47:22 PM
Not only that... why is Blitz a mod of a Bitcoin forum? Seriously, why?
It's probably because I'm a lizard banker. Alternatively, might be because I wanted to annoy the hell out of you specifically. Cheesy

Did you have different reasons for becoming a Bitcoin forum mod initially?



124. Post 6546776 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on May 04, 2014, 09:59:49 PM
You apparently don't know me well, I don't like altcoins, but I do like it when they upset the Bitcoin cultists.

This is the part that's hard for me to understand. Why do you like it when others are upset?



125. Post 6556688 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on May 05, 2014, 01:45:33 PM
Well yes, it's a shame that it is mostly Bitcoin cultists on the one hand and Bitcoin haters on the other, but that's the nature of controversial topics. I like Bitcoin, but I dislike the cultists because they rob themselves of intellectual freedom and attempt to do the same to others.

I just don't see the benefit, under any circumstance, of referring to enthusiastic Bitcoin proponents as "cultists." I think intellectual discourse benefits from the absence of ad hominem attacks. Not that I am suggesting any kind of censorship... I am just surprised that you would write such things.



126. Post 6556925 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 05, 2014, 03:41:23 PM
Well yes, it's a shame that it is mostly Bitcoin cultists on the one hand and Bitcoin haters on the other, but that's the nature of controversial topics. I like Bitcoin, but I dislike the cultists because they rob themselves of intellectual freedom and attempt to do the same to others.

Your description of bitcoin enthusiasts as "cultists" denigrates and robs participants of this thread of an ability to engage in meaningful communications.  I have difficulties understanding how a mod here can view the bitcoin community within such a polarizing framework.  You, as a mod, should realize that the bitcoin community is much more nuanced than this supposed black and white framework in which you seem to be attempting to put its participants.

+1



127. Post 6558415 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 05, 2014, 05:07:10 PM

I know that this is your favorite stuff , about bitcoin "cultist" , but shouldn't a mod know that it has already been posted 10 times in this thread?
Thought it was worth reading once again considering the current climate.

Quote
And as time passes and the inevitable fizzle-out of Bitcoin becomes visible, those believers will splinter. More will drop out of the cult. And the ones who remain will only grow more convinced, more zealous, more eager to share the good news.

Remind you of anyone? Cheesy Cheesy

Should I start posting usernames or just the link to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=mlist ? =))))))

Although I believe there is a bit of truth behind that article you can't argue that is comes from a person who is against BTC from the start and it doesn't even care to view the benefits the bitcoin protocol might bring.

+1

The article is onto something (many in here *are* cultists), but in their total dismissal of BTC the author isn't any better either.


It is misleading baloney to suggest "many in here" are cultists...   By many do you mean 100?  It is also degrading and disingenuous to suggest "many in here" are cultists.  








Try to stay objective, okay?

So now it's "degrading" to use the word cultist for, well, cult like behavior? I don't think so. As for the numbers, I don't have hard data, and I cannot have data because what I would call "cultish" is hardly a set-in-stone definition, but to give a few examples:

- Remember the guy who sold his house to invest it all in btc. Zero risk control, just puts all his wealth into one of the riskiest assets on earth. What's the overwhelming response in his thread? "Good on you! You won't regret it!". The dissenting voices are in the minority. That's cultish, in my book.

- The kneejerk reaction to mentioning the *possibility* of total failure of our little experiment. Please note, the exact likelihood of total failure (as in: price approaching 0) is up for debate, but I'm pretty sure a rational observer will admit that there is a real chance for the (publically traded) price to go back to 0, in case of catastrophic failure of parts of the network (like a major flaw on the encryption side), or some other event that causes an absolute loss of trust in the safety of the network. Try talking about that in here. The responses *should* be "Okay, that's possible, but unlikely." The responses *are* actually "No! Absolutely impossible! Logically invalid!". Go back a few pages when TERA suggested offhandedly what a blockchain "reset" would look like. That's cultish.

- The sense of "We're in this together, on the way up, and on the way down." It's only human to band together, but the article is spot on when it points out the phrasing of those "public messages" by well known BTC community members, that sound a lot like rallying cries in times price goes down. That's looks a lot like military esprit de corps, or, well, cultish behavior.

In case this is important to you, I still believe BTC has a real shot at success (where the exact type of success is up for debate). But I completely agree with Blitz: a lot of arguments in here are very clearly not motivated by rational analysis, but by make believe and selective perception. To call it "cultish" is confrontational, but not wrong, in my opinion.

I think what you feel is healthy skepticism I (and perhaps others) feel is unnecessary pessimism. For any new idea or technology, it's basically a given that it almost certainly won't work -- and there are hordes of people who will trip over themselves to be the first to say "that's a stupid idea." In the early stages (and Bitcoin is certainly in its early stages), the most useful observations and discussions about a technology are its potential benefits, not its pitfalls. The opposite is true for well established ideas / technologies. It is not interesting or useful to say "computers are great!" or "the Internet is great!" today because it is obvious, but if you have reason to be critical of these things, then you have an independent idea worth listening to!

People who think Bitcoin is stupid VASTLY outnumber those who are enthusiastic about Bitcoin's potential. I think being optimistic about Bitcoin, despite enormous social pressure to be otherwise, is quite noble.



128. Post 6558663 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 05, 2014, 05:23:49 PM
[...]

I think what you feel is healthy skepticism I (and perhaps others) feel is unnecessary pessimism. For any new idea or technology, it's basically a given that it almost certainly won't work -- and there are hordes of people who will trip over themselves to be the first to say "that's a stupid idea." In the early stages (and Bitcoin is certainly in its early stages), the most useful observations and discussions about a technology are its potential benefits, not its pitfalls. The opposite is true for well established ideas / technologies. It is not interesting or useful to say "computers are great!" or "the Internet is great!" today because it is obvious, but if you have reason to be critical of these things, then you have an independent idea worth listening to!

People who think Bitcoin is stupid VASTLY outnumber those who are enthusiastic about Bitcoin's potential. I think being optimistic about Bitcoin, despite enormous social pressure to be otherwise, is quite noble.


You have a point there (that crossed my mind as well, but I decided against mentioning it to keep it simple)... for any group to overcome overwhelming odds, some form of 'extreme group cohesion plus unwavering belief in ultimate success' is necessary.

Still, from my point of view, this unwavering belief in the /success/ of Bitcoin that is so common in here is just as irrational as the unwavering belief by the general public in the /failure/ of Bitcoin.

Can you appreciate this distinction, between the perspective that I understand might be necessary for Bitcoin to have a chance at success (i.e. the "cultish" fervor), and what I hold to be 'objectively true' (or an approximation of objective truth)?

Sure... some people posting here may be irrationally optimistic. I wouldn't call them cultists though (even if that's what I thought), because it's derogatory. If I thought that people were over-valuing Bitcoin, I would probably make a few posts along the lines of "You guys should stop buying and start selling, Bitcoin is cool, but it's not THAT valuable" and then if nobody listened to me I would just stop posting.



129. Post 6923071 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

!!!

Nice buy. Was not expecting that.



130. Post 7034741 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.48h):

Quote from: TERA on May 30, 2014, 12:06:01 PM
I think the persistence and panic of the current rally is being fueled by a number of leading indicators which have preeptively crossed. However, if we start dropping again, they could uncross and then it will take some more time before we can truly rally again (there will be flatness). If you look at the bid depth on bitstamp it hasn't even increased at all since we were at $430 a couple weeks ago.

I don't know TERA... there are a LOT of people holding zero bitcoins on the sidelines getting slightly nervous right now... if it goes to 700, they are going to start jumping in before they think it's too late... and then we all know how that ends



131. Post 7685391 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: molecular on July 05, 2014, 08:37:40 AM
bfxdata.com shows USD swaps just jumped by 1.5 million to 30.5 million
best swap offer now 0.4475 %/day

Beginner question: does this mean that it's now expensive to go long?



132. Post 7685438 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: medialab101 on July 05, 2014, 09:02:11 AM
bfxdata.com shows USD swaps just jumped by 1.5 million to 30.5 million
best swap offer now 0.4475 %/day

Beginner question: does this mean that it's now expensive to go long?


Yes. And it means that someone on Finex is either a crazy gambler or super bullish on BTC. Or more likely both.

Cool. Yeah... 0.5% per day is a lot. Reminds me of Pirate's ponzi Wink [which I believe returned 7% per week]



133. Post 7685571 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: davidgdg on July 05, 2014, 09:12:23 AM
bfxdata.com shows USD swaps just jumped by 1.5 million to 30.5 million
best swap offer now 0.4475 %/day

Beginner question: does this mean that it's now expensive to go long?


Yes. And it means that a lot of traders on Finex are either a crazy gamblers or super bullish on BTC. Or more likely both.

BTC swap rate demand is at 0.0016% (for going short on BTC)

USD swap rate demand is at 0.175% (for going long on BTC)

That's a hundred fold difference in interest rates. Incredible. Has it always been like this?


Is it really that incredible though? I mean... think about what it means to borrow bitcoins and pay back with interest. It's a very different commitment than borrowing US dollars!



134. Post 8077144 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.01h):

Quote from: lightfoot on July 29, 2014, 12:57:22 AM
If true, that would mean any further drops would result in miners reinvesting with purchases of Bitcoin and holding onto mined coins instead of buying fresh mining equipment.  It would essentially mean massive support.

What it means is if the price continues to drop it will be illogical to mine bitcoins with current equipment. The first to drop out will be the most inefficient, then the more efficient stuff.

However this will cause the difficulty to drop which will encourage mining again, etc.

What this means in practicality is one could look to the opinions of the miners as another data point on price. If difficulty goes up, it indicates miners are bullish (or insane). If it drops, it is bearish (or likewise insane). If mining goes way off the line with respect to price, it means either something really interesting is up, or miners have lost their fucking minds.

C

No, Raystonn is right. Before now, it was possible for miners, or wealthy investors that have hired miners, to "buy" bitcoins below market price by mining them. If it's indeed true that the hashrate is leveling out because the cost of power + hardware is equal to current market price at the current difficulty, then that means miners/investors need to actually buy bitcoins at the market price to get them now. It would be quite bullish.



135. Post 8083612 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.01h):

Quote from: Heartbit.io on July 29, 2014, 10:35:27 AM
Hey,

Anyone willing to give us a feedback ?

heartbit.io/app

thanks !

Logarithmic view?



136. Post 8444722 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on August 19, 2014, 09:26:19 PM
http://coinorama.net/

Bid sum shows signs of recovering. Probably at bottom (for today).

This turned out to be an epic call of unprecedented precision.

I demand respect and adoration from every bull in this thread. A brief statement about how awesome I am will suffice for now.

Everyone should know that Walsoraj is the ultimate bottom indicator. All hail Walsoraj.



137. Post 9098477 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.20h):

Quote from: nanobrain on October 06, 2014, 02:38:48 AM
Saw this over on ToF...interesting stuff for those who claim mining ops aren't over-extended


Also, this comment from Goat
Quote
bitstamp will notice this, who would risk 35k btc on a site where it could be locked down? my bet this is an old school whale who is friends or even an owner of bitstamp. i highly doubt its stolen funds. this is a big boy play.

A quote from Goat? Where is he posting these days?



138. Post 9138611 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on October 09, 2014, 08:56:54 AM
mmm, buy wall to give the shorts something to think about

Any guesses as to what price (380, 400, 420?) would cause a cascade of closing short positions?



139. Post 9515785 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.30h):

Cup and handle, anyone?



140. Post 9635931 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.34h):

Nice rally.



141. Post 11156791 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: macsga on April 21, 2015, 08:05:56 PM
WOW! 6000 BTC market buy and rising!!!!! Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

Where is it easy to tell that it's been 6000 so far? I assume that's across multiple exchanges.



142. Post 11282285 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: dwdoc on May 04, 2015, 04:07:30 PM
GBTC just had first trade.



Why do I not see it at this website?

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GBTC/quote



143. Post 11293460 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: gizmoh on May 05, 2015, 05:11:17 PM
Who would not want to sell 41 btc at $600 a piece?  Cheesy


http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GBTC/quote

My mind is boggled. That's about $25,000... so it meets the minimum bid requirements for the BIT. You can immediately arbitrage that if you re-buy the BIT. *argh*!



144. Post 11805208 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Quote from: inca on July 06, 2015, 03:21:53 PM
Actually just an uptrend is enough to get people buying

+1

This, and time.

I'm firmly in the camp that thinks Bitcoin doesn't need any fancy killer apps or major global events. It just needs time and steady rise (over the scale of years).



145. Post 12548284 (copy this link) (by chriswilmer) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: Peter R on September 28, 2015, 09:55:07 PM
Guys i have a feeling that the next bubble will be fucking nuclear...don't know when it will come, doubt it will be now, but when the world is ready, holy fucking shit  Cool

exactly.
2 years of constantly building more and bigger fiat channels towards bitcoin will - in case of another run-up - have a huge impact. next one will reach 5 - 10k  Wink  

My bet (why not be bullish, right?):

We slowly grow over the remainder of 2015 and early 2016 back to the $500 - $750 range. Between the spring and fall of 2016, we have a quadfecta of news that is positive for price: a 1MB+ block is included in the Blockchain, the halving is successful, the Winklevoss ETF launches, and there is a major currency crisis somewhere.

This precipitates the largest growth spurt in the history of Bitcoin. The growth spurt takes place in three bubble-phases over late 2016 and 2017 (and causes many people to bail prematurely), reaching a height of $40,000 before 2018 (and then crashing back below $10,000).

By the way, when you say bet, what kinds of odds are you putting on your scenario?  

I'll answer that in a roundabout way: if Bitcoin doesn't die in the next ten years, then I'm 98% certain we will have another hyperbolic run-up within that same time frame.  I think the probability of Bitcoin dying in the next ten years is ~25% (yes, I'm an uberbull).  So I guess I think the chance of another bubble (not necessarily as big or as soon as the one I described) is about 75%.  

Let's say my guess is that there's a 25% of 1 BTC being worth $0 in ten years and a 75% chance of it being worth $10,000.

Expectation value of 1 BTC ten years from now: 25% x $0  + 75% x $10,000 = $7,500
Net present value of one Bitcoin today (assuming 6% cost of capital) = $4,187

So according to my interpretation of the probabilities, the price of a bitcoin is highly undervalued right now!  



Didn't know we were still using this forum Smiley

I've been musing lately over what the value (at time = infinity) of a bitcoin would be if the 1 MB cap remained (and assuming, implausibly, that no other cryptocurrency took over). It would still be pretty high I think. I've seen a lot of calculations of how many domestic wire transfers there are per second, but has anyone estimated the number of physical gold transfers per second? Probably less than 1/sec I would think...