All posts made by fisheater22 in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread
1.
Post 13246278 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):
Recently Coinbase has been engaging in various promotionals to lower fees and increase their volume, so it should be no secret NOR conspiracy that their volume would likely increase, in part, because of their promotional efforts.
Kids say the darnedest things.
^
https://cryptowat.ch/coinbase/btcusd/4h
2.
Post 13246467 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):
Recently Coinbase has been engaging in various promotionals to lower fees and increase their volume, so it should be no secret NOR conspiracy that their volume would likely increase, in part, because of their promotional efforts.
Kids say the darnedest things.
^
https://cryptowat.ch/coinbase/btcusd/4hWhy don't you engage a bit about the point that you are attempting to make rather than merely employing a patronizing tone?
'Engage a bit'? You mean that huge red spike that pops out of nowhere to tower over everything else ain't enough?
Must've been pretty awesome 'promotional efforts,' like 'Trade one 1 BTC, get 10 BTC free!'
3.
Post 13246574 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):
I have Assburgers!
OMG, what's going on with your shitcoin?!
Any news?
This 20% price decreasing/day is brutal.
4.
Post 13246630 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):
^Shhh... No tears
5.
Post 13249807 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):
I would gladly email someone my "prrof" picture, if they wanted to post it for me.
I assure you, it is clever and amusing.
1. Click ==>
http://postimage.org/2. Upload image.
3. Post link.
[4] Don't argue with JayJuanGee. I think he has Assburgers.
6.
Post 13250170 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):
You do know it has been above 30 twice before, and with what's coming in we could easily see it double+ this
Well sure. How do you think the price got to where it is?
7.
Post 13250381 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):
Bye ignored...like the rest of your troll patrol!
They're just not totally srs pro traders like you and I.
8.
Post 13250448 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):
Bye ignored...like the rest of your troll patrol!
They're just not totally srs pro traders like you and I.
bye...ignored
No YOU! YOU'RE IGNORED! I IGNORE YOU!
FffFFffFFUCK YOU!
*Yeah, I bet you're reading this and trying to figure out how you can reply, now that you lied about ignoring me.
How does it feel, huh? Well?!
9.
Post 13250485 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):
Didn't they write something last week saying Bitcoin's going to the moon?
You're thinking WIRED.
10.
Post 13251008 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):
...
[4] Don't argue with JayJuanGee. I think he has Assburgers.
11.
Post 13289738 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
Couldn't they artificially pump up the price so all that mining hardware that must have cost fortunes,
can pay for itself as soon as possible?
If they could, why didn't they do it before their hardware became unprofitable, to simply boost their profits?
And why would anyone invest in a virtual asset which could be so easily manipulated?
12.
Post 13290306 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
Couldn't they artificially pump up the price so all that mining hardware that must have cost fortunes,
can pay for itself as soon as possible?
If they could, why didn't they do it before their hardware became unprofitable, to simply boost their profits?
And why would anyone invest in a virtual asset which could be so easily manipulated?
Because the mining gear that accounts for the 220 mil GH/s network hash rate increase, came online only recently. Probably early
november.That investment needs to brake even fast. There is clearly demand out there, even at these prices but not to sustain it with out China's "help".
So what you're saying is until now, miners could afford to make less money, but now that they're stuck with all the new HW, they have to get serious? Is that the gist of it, or am I missing something?
Chinese exchanges are in business to make money. Miners going broke doesn't add any new tools to the exchanges' manipulation arsenal. If they could manipulate the price, they're already doing it.
13.
Post 13290389 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
everybody ready for bitcoin's largest ever increase in difficulty?
Memories... What happened?
14.
Post 13291029 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
Couldn't they artificially pump up the price so all that mining hardware that must have cost fortunes,
can pay for itself as soon as possible?
If they could, why didn't they do it before their hardware became unprofitable, to simply boost their profits?
And why would anyone invest in a virtual asset which could be so easily manipulated?
Because the mining gear that accounts for the 220 mil GH/s network hash rate increase, came online only recently. Probably early
november.That investment needs to brake even fast. There is clearly demand out there, even at these prices but not to sustain it with out China's "help".
So what you're saying is until now, miners could afford to make less money, but now that they're stuck with all the new HW, they have to get serious? Is that the gist of it, or am I missing something?
Chinese exchanges are in business to make money. Miners going broke doesn't add any new tools to the exchanges' manipulation arsenal. If they could manipulate the price, they're already doing it.
You are coming off as a conspiratory-ridden troller, and really not someone who wants to engage in any kind of meaningful way regarding bitcoin.
If you really sold most of your coins at $450, like you said, and you do not believe in bitcoin, then get the fuck out of here and take your profits and invest in something more secure, in your opinion.
What are you talking about? What conspiracy? What $450? What's wrong with you?
Edit: OK, remember you now.
...
[4] Don't argue with JayJuanGee. I think he has Assburgers.
15.
Post 13291586 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
So what you're saying is until now, miners could afford to make less money, but now that they're stuck with all the new HW, they have to get serious? Is that the gist of it, or am I missing something?
Chinese exchanges are in business to make money. Miners going broke doesn't add any new tools to the exchanges' manipulation arsenal. If they could manipulate the price, they're already doing it.
They cannot sustain price manipulation for prolonged periods of time.But by simulating these parabolic rises they're hoping to create enough FOMO so that they could unload slowly on the market at highest possible price for as long as possible, now that they have ROI as a reason.Hash rate was steadily increasing even when the price was in the low 200's, so Chinese miners were profitable even then, otherwise they wouldn't have had a reason to invest huge amounts of money in these new 16 nm Asic chips.
Again, the scenario is exactly like any other in which more efficient gear comes on the market. This is exactly how mining is meant to work.
Let's play out this grossly oversimplified scenario:
You are A, one of the two miners (A and B) mining Bitcoin. A and B are mining at the edge of profitability when new, more efficient gear comes on the market.
Your options:
1. Don't buy new gear.
1a. B does buy new gear, the difficulty goes up, you're out of business.
1b. B also doesn't buy new gear, you both stay in business.
1c.
16.
Post 13291992 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
To be fair to small-blockers, there's simply no elegant way to scale Bitcoin.
Some things just ain't meant to be
17.
Post 13302475 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
Estimates for total market cap potential of bitcoin are as interesting as they are wide-ranging.
At the low end we have today's range $6-10 billion if bitcoin just does what it does today and nothing else.
At the highest end we have replacement of large swathes of the global monetary systems, financial assets and undiscovered uses from bitcoin's extensible nature ... $80-100 trillion range.
That said, i'd be shitting myself right about now if i was leveraged long...
18.
Post 13306844 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
Will 450 hold?
19.
Post 13309008 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
Wait, so we're below 440 AGAIN?
How is this possible?!
20.
Post 13309915 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
Wait, so we're below 440 AGAIN?
How is this possible?!
You are a fucking
goofball prophet, and each of your posts bring further supporting evidence of such a reasonable conclusion.
FTFY
... That said, i'd be shitting myself right about now if i was leveraged long...
Will 450 hold?
Wait, so we're below 440 AGAIN?
How is this possible?!
21.
Post 13310107 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
Satoshi talked about smallish consumer transactions like vending machines and porn. Did he fall into a math hole??
Can you quote a Satoshi post where he talks about porn?
Most of his posts were about technical things, and I didn't think he would talk about anything else. I haven't read all his posts, but enough of them to know the technical talk in them goes way over my head.
Not satoshi, but it's like the guy could see the future!
Not that i would approve (necessarilly), but illegal porn services would probably the ones to be more sucessfull with offering payments in bitcoins, much safer than credit cards that are used all the time to trace customers of illegal porn services.
With law enforcement going after online sex trafficking of minors with a vengeance, Bitcoin virtual currency is becoming the preferred coin of the realm for the sex industry.
22.
Post 13310567 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
I do what I want!
Thou hast also committed fornication with the Egyptians thy neighbours, great of flesh;
and hast increased thy whoredoms, to provoke me to anger.
...
Thou hast played the whore also with the Assyrians, because thou wast unsatiable;
yea, thou hast played the harlot with them, and yet couldest not be satisfied.
Thou hast moreover multiplied thy fornication in the land of Canaan unto Chaldea;
and yet thou wast not satisfied herewith.--Ezekiel 16:26
Stop craving the D, you
slut!
23.
Post 13311193 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
I'm leveraged long and this is the worst day of my life. If 430 doesn't hold, why, I just don't know what I'll do.
24.
Post 13311247 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
...
takes some brass balls ... you fukd
Permabulls... Crave massive
dicks balls.
25.
Post 13311376 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
Will 430 420 hold?
26.
Post 13329118 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
Was in the 600s for me. Been there, left flag, regret nothing.
BTW, check that o-ring next time you take her up, not sure if I stuck it back in right...
27.
Post 13329519 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
...
Again, short and long are somewhat relative. From bank to bank, from paypal to bank, for western union etc, it takes days... That's eons of time compared to bitcoin.
For small txs you can go with 0-conf.
What's the point of transferring money "From bank to bank, from paypal to bank, for western union etc.," if you can't spend it? Because that's what transferring "bitcoin, the store of value-but-not-money" is.
Unless you mean the novelty of transferring binary strings on the blockchain, ofc, but that sorta wears thin pretty quick. For me, at least.
28.
Post 13329630 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
What's the point of transferring money "From bank to bank, from paypal to bank, for western union etc.," if you can't spend it? Because that's what transferring "bitcoin, the store of value-but-not-money" is.
There is nothing preventing you from spending it, so...
Well sure there is, unless I want to pay double (and possibly more) for each cup of coffee, but Bitcoin didn't set out to be "like money, only more expensive and inconvenient," AFAIK.
If unclear, bank transactions take days, occasionally, not because of the slow 300 baud modems used by legacy finance, and not because bankster electrons move slower, but *because what's being transferred is a different thing altogether.*
29.
Post 13329839 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
Well sure there is, unless I want to pay double (and possibly more) for each cup of coffee.
The world revolves around fiat. You go to your nearest Bitcoin ATM, pull 200$ out and buy your coffees and stuff with cash. So, how is it not spendable? ...to fees that can be bypassed with sidechains, altcoins, cash, etc. We'll see how it goes in terms of the scaling solution implemented.
Err, those "bitcoin ATMs" are usually bitcoin vending machines, that *sell* me BTC, often at 19 fucking % markup. They don't want to buy my BTC any more than Coca Cola vending machines want to buy my can of Coke. So no, no bitcoin ATMs to help me spend my (useless without real money, apparently) BTC.
If we're talking about what this world could be, then BTC is just a pointless level of complication. I can imagine a world without money, where people trust each other (and not just for zero-confirm transactions).
P.S. please try to understand that Bitcoin is only a store of value as much as it's useful, and it's usefulness plummets if it can't be used as money.
30.
Post 13329991 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):
Well sure there is, unless I want to pay double (and possibly more) for each cup of coffee.
The world revolves around fiat. You go to your nearest Bitcoin ATM, pull 200$ out and buy your coffees and stuff with cash. So, how is it not spendable? ...to fees that can be bypassed with sidechains, altcoins, cash, etc. We'll see how it goes in terms of the scaling solution implemented.
Err, those "bitcoin ATMs" are usually bitcoin vending machines, that *sell* me BTC, often at 19 fucking % markup. They don't want to buy my BTC any more than Coca Cola vending machines want to buy my can of Coke. So no, no bitcoin ATMs to help me spend my (useless without real money, apparently) BTC.
Your paradox begins and ends by applying future problems (extremely high BTC fees, which would imply a very high volume of transactions where people are REALLLYYY taking BTC seriously and are paying a lot for being able to transact with it - which are all indications that BTC is quite big at that point) by coupling it to today's anemic infrastructure, which is a fallacy.
No, I'm offering you the current state of bitcoin ATMs (according to you, an essential layer for transacting in BTC).
Talking about the present, what is, right now. No "paradox." What are you talking about?
P.S. please try to understand that Bitcoin is only a store of value as much as it's useful, and it's usefulness plummets if it can't be used as money.
If I have 10kg of gold in storage, as store of value, I'm not expecting to buy souvlakia and pizzas with it. I understand that I will have to sell a few grams or a few gold coins for fiat and then use fiat. That doesn't render gold useless. ...
Gold is an anachronism, a custom, a convention, like shaking hands.
It has millennia of history, rooted in the times when it represented "the power of those who (by fiat!) deemed that it [gold] means wealth -- kings, rulers, with armies and shit."
Bitcoin has no more in common with gold than it has with dolphins or the internet. Just fucking stop already.
31.
Post 13330314 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
No, I'm offering you the current state of bitcoin ATMs (according to you, an essential layer for transacting in BTC).
Talking about the present, what is, right now. No "paradox." What are you talking about?
Then also take the current state of bitcoin fees and transact with it, instead of projecting forward to the point where it costs 3 times the coffee in tx fees.
If we are talking about the future, you will have to apply a corresponding "futuristic" reasoning for other aspects of the ecosystem.
I'm talking about the present. Regardless of how much I spend on fees, I can't buy gas, milk, pay my taxes or buy my dope from Pedro.
Not without turning it into fiat, at which point all the KYC/AML laws will apply, and will be introduced at your "bitcoin [buying] ATMs."
As long as that's how it's played, bitcoin's just a needless layer of complication.
Gold is an anachronism, a custom, a convention, like shaking hands.
Whatever you have to say about gold, the issue remains that it is indirectly spendable and a store of value despite not being directly spendable. And this is not an anachronism. It is not something that was relative a thousand years ago. It is something relevant TODAY.
Recently, gold has been a shittier store of value than USD. Case closed.
you have tried to suggest that you are bullish about BTC
You kiss your mother with that lying mouth?
32.
Post 13330496 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
...
i think the case is not closed. the price of gold is MANIPULATED downwards. that means the price has been artificially lowered. what that means is that todays price of gold is not it's true value.. and what that means is that gold is on sale.. obviously, there are reasons why gold and silver have been manipulated downwards.
Any reason to think the price won't be 'manipulated' in, say, 10 years? If no, why should I care if the price is 'manipulated' or not?
Are all prices manipulated?
here's a trick question for ya:: is bitcoin money or currency ??
According to AlexGR, neither. According to satoshi, it's A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. So money, I guess.
It's all in who you chose to believe
33.
Post 13330609 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
Are you not proclaiming to be bullish about bitcoin's long term success or do you happen to be skeptical and merely have an academic interest?
I'm NOT very optimistic of bitcoin's long and/or short-term success, mainly because nearly, though not all, the people who are NOT pessimistic about Bitcoin (and digital currencies based on permissionless blockchain paradigm, which is game changing, as a whole) seem to be very much, albeit not exactly, though sufficiently so to be off-putting, like you. Which is to say yourself.
It's both irrational and unfair, just like my hating The Dead when I was a kid (because I hated deadheads), but there you are
34.
Post 13331120 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
[...]
When I post here, always imagine myself as this:
...and write accordingly. Out of curiosity, how do you picture yourself when you post?
35.
Post 13346573 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
Merry Christmas Everyone!to the young  | and the old  |
36.
Post 13349907 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
... I am just not ...
*NOT
Impostor!
37.
Post 13362427 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
38.
Post 13404846 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
I post here under my real name. Why the hell would I use a VPS?
A virtual private server (VPS). jbreher thinks that you rent one to run your node, but you just have a cheap/old box at home, right?
39.
Post 13405023 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
... You want to buy a chewing gum => you use a shitcoin. You want to transfer 500$ or $5 mn, you use BTC.
Right. Because the market demands as many currencies to exist side-by-side as possible, to facilitate frictionless commerce (and provide
hookers and blow for Blockstream employment for money changers). So shitcoins for buying shit, GumCoins for my gum and shitty hard candy needs, CoffeeCoins for my coffee etc., and Bitcoin, useless as money, for storing muh wealth.
..unless I end up using BeanieCoin for storing wealth, of course, then BeanieCoin. Oh, and if BeanieCoin can process enough TPS to buy gum & shit, I also might use it as money. Removing the need for the whole multi-currency convoluted bullshit & fulfilling satoshi's dream of BeanieCoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
@JayJuanGee: Please tell me you're not mentally ill/differently enabled, so's I wouldn't feel so conflicted about laughing at you.
40.
Post 13406385 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
back up we go
The thing that's happening right now... the very opposite of up... What's the word I'm looking for?
41.
Post 13409933 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
[...]
Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
42.
Post 13410031 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
... If central banks had stuck to their original premise of being a safety net ...
If cars had stuck to their original premise of being alligators with wheels
43.
Post 13412500 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
... I think you're point has significant merit ...
I liek the cut of you're jib
44.
Post 13412535 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
If we're happy about today's # of uses, users, and transactions... 1.75MB equiv will be plenty.
When all of the world's wealth is stored in bitcoin (sometime in 2017), fewer users = richer users. That's the third law of thermodynamics.
45.
Post 13412750 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
If we're happy about today's # of uses, users, and transactions... 1.75MB equiv will be plenty.
When all of the world's wealth is stored in bitcoin (sometime in 2017), fewer users = richer users. That's the third law of thermodynamics.
Lambie, in this iteration of your shell, you seem to be such a passive aggressive kind of FUD spreading troller, who still seems to be quite detached from reality in your exaggerated ways to make negative points regarding bitcoin.
Even though bitcoin enthusiasts are expecting grandios networking possibilities with bitcoin, which ultimately causes exponential growth (and price appreciation), there is almost no way that bitcoin could subsume or absorb any majority proportion of the world's wealth, even in the the next 5-10 years, and even in the best case scenarios for bitcoin.
If Bitcoin were to subsume, even 1% to 5% of various wealth storage and/or payment systems in the next 3-5 years, that would result in bitcoins valued over a million dollars per BTC.. so your exaggeration of 2017 seems out of this world in its level of preposterousness and trying to suggest that any bitcoin bull would believe such fantasies.
TL;DR? (What I mean is make it longer, blander, with more words, so I'd feel totally used if tricked into reading.)
ty
@notme: not true re. dehydration. Also not iron, rust (FeO), and even that shittily.
46.
Post 13412799 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
...
TL; DR: You are a fucking idiot if you have concluded that 3 short paragraphs is too long for you to read/comprehend.
See, you're finally learning to condense your thoughts.
You have nothing to say, so 3 short paragraphs is 3 short paragraphs too long
47.
Post 13413739 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
Just a heads up but Bitcoin is still 430ish as it turns 2016. I'm in the UK (so basically the future)
Just letting you Americans know.
You are a very stubborn young man. For the last time, what is the basic principle of your invention? Is the secret of your airplane muffler more important to you than your life?
48.
Post 13431178 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
When I re-read my post it sounded a bit terse. That was not my intention.
Aaaghhh!!!
49.
Post 13435908 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):
50.
Post 13445756 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):
In conclusion, Kenya is a land of contrasts.
51.
Post 13505437 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):
@inca: Did you know that
"it is not just the [disgusting cockroach] body that can survive decapitation; the lonely head can thrive, too, waving its antennae back and forth* for several hours until it runs out of steam, Kunkel says. If given nutrients and refrigerated, a roach head can last even longer."-- http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fact-or-fiction-cockroach-can-live-without-head/
What's it like, finding a kindred spirit in a scurrying household pest?
*If you can call it thriving...
52.
Post 13530693 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):
Your thoughts re. JayJuanGee vs. flagpara debate, ChartBuddy?
53.
Post 13532821 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):
54.
Post 13534413 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):
55.
Post 13538204 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):
[...]
Don't you read the news? It appears you do not.
Poor thing. Here, I'll help.
[...]
Such deadpan self-importance...
56.
Post 13541188 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):
Pretty quiet here lately, how's everyone doing?
57.
Post 13555565 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):
Yep. It's not great you guys :& Last chance to buy above 420?
58.
Post 13560923 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):
No. This has nothing to do with the block size.
SFYL
Gud buye, 390...
59.
Post 13561186 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):
60.
Post 13563090 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):
Hearn's immaturity and disloyalty isn't even worth our contempt. His contributions and reckless actions will be forgotten and we will move forward with this grand project. There is no stopping this; our efforts are being realized.
Chin up, Buttercup!
61.
Post 13563180 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):
So satoshi Mike Gavin sold us out...
Who's still manning the barricades? Anyone?
62.
Post 13564723 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):
... To put it in plane language...
+ there are two dimensions in growth
TL;DR.
63.
Post 13566439 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):
Oy vey! There go my shekels
64.
Post 13566990 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):
...
It appears to be too much of a coincidence the timing of it all with this --
https://youtu.be/R0iArSIU0Z8?t=47m16sLooks to me to be a coordinated attack by R3.(42 banks against bitcoin)
And we would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for you meddling kids!
But really, we did. We did get away with it
65.
Post 13567223 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):
Still almost $26MM in leveraged longs on BFX. If this results in a margin call cascade, we could go under $200 again. Nobody can post dollar margin until Monday.
Bring it on! I had no ammo when it happened, exactly one year ago. You were busy chasing trolls that day (and talking about 4 Punch Raiders).
You mean you're not all in?!
Below $375, I am a buyer. Come on, make it happen!
66.
Post 13567384 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):
People that are censored don't get featured in NYT articles and mentioned in R3 testimony broadcasted from every tv channel, bud!
Why can't the mainstream press just leave our Bitcoin alone?
67.
Post 13567523 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):
People that are censored don't get featured in NYT articles and mentioned in R3 testimony broadcasted from every tv channel, bud!
Why can't the mainstream press just leave our Bitcoin alone?
Mainstream presstitutes are just property of the financial oligopoly. Do I need to tell why banks can't leave bitcoin alone?!
That's plumb awful! What's to be done?
Can't we crowdfund a bitcoin television station to expose statist bankster lies? I'm pretty good with electricity, used to make the telly picture all snowy with my sparky coil, I volunteer to be the CTO.
68.
Post 13567588 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):
I do not want to be rude, or anything, but this is not a religion. There can be no heretics. And if a single person, with a single article can hurt "this much", maybe the system ain't that strong enough after all- yet?
Never understood why would anyone follow a "leader" here, and strangle the kitten of the "other tribe's warchief". This is so stone age, and explains why still no consensus, hint hint.
What are you talking about? This has nothing to do with the system. The system is unharmed and the maths behind it are impenetrable (in the todays world). This is about the sheep of this world and the corrupt media. Most of the media quickly picked up on this as the ultimate truth even though Hearns words have no meaning anymore and are backed by nothing but bias and rage (due to the failure of his project). I'm quite annoyed and tired of this constant nonsense. These people need to be shamed for all eternity.
So Lauda, how much code have you contributed to Bitcoin? How long have you been involved with it?
In short, what makes you the authority on Bitcoin, as opposed to Mike?
69.
Post 13568041 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):
So Lauda, how much code have you contributed to Bitcoin? How long have you been involved with it?
In short, what makes you the authority on Bitcoin, as opposed to Mike?
The amount of my contributions are irrelevant nor would I disclose my contributions; not to you nor anyone else at this moment.
Translation:
I think you need WordPerfect to open .cpp files, not sure. Would never straight-up say "I don't code" tho, because there's something wrong with me. I'd rather be seen as a batshit paranoiac than a clueless buffoon that I am. I'm not an authority; I'm just someone who's trying to help Bitcoin and certainly not someone who was bought off by banks and backstabbed everyone. Stop defending him, he does not deserve it.
Translation:
I'll insinuate that people far more knowledgeable than I are lying because they're "bought off by banks" to "backstab everyone." Because I'm being paid off by theymos to think that.
And who knows who theymos is paid by, that's above my station.
70.
Post 13568573 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):
Core
Effective 1.75-2MB Block capacity
[...]
71.
Post 13577225 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):
Hearn will be like a ticking time-bomb waiting to go off at R3C ... he's bitcoin's biggest asset right now. Can you imagine that arrogant little snipe not getting his way inside a corporate IT project, just waiting to slip the knife in or totally blow-up the project in a PR nightmare intended to destroy its credibility??
Unpleasant Fact #2: He's not unique. The whole Bitcoin core team is exactly like him.
Discouraging.
72.
Post 13577434 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):
[...]
he has a fundamentally self-destructive ego and sociopathic tendencies ... that would likely overcome any legal threats taking him into mutually assured destruction situations (e.g. hard-fork) ... i.e. he will blow up R3C without any thought of the cost to himself when the time comes.
Unpleasant Fact #3:
Unlike Bitcoin, the fate of R3CEV doesn't hang on a brother going rogue. Antifragile
They are precisely not like him in that they have personalities that actually prefer to avoid attention/conflict and write code (use technology)
Hahahahaplease! You're still covered in tears and snot from Gavin forking up your coin, and now Mike's unique?
73.
Post 13577578 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):
I'd like to know a lot more about how the NYTimes journalist, Nathaniel Popper who wrote the Digital Gold fiction, was able to time the release of his Hearn hit piece exactly for R3C's benefit at the washington hearing?
Also the tenor of Popper's article is way overstating Hearn's importance to bitcoin, historically and recently and he is almost certain to know he is doing this after his research into the specific area of personalities involved in bitcoin for his Digital Gold book. So he has proved to be a nasty little propaganda tool who should be watched closely ... as closely as he spies on us I guess.
haha tears and snot?!
Tears and snot.
Cry some more about those nasty journalists (puppets of Nasty Saurian Jewess you're too frightened to call because pussies) not leaving your bitcoin alone
Anyhow, core now irrelevant, miners have spoken.
Enjoy your Bitcoin
Classic
74.
Post 13579318 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):
Gmax threatened to rage-quit, too. Mike just beat him to it. Much like the mythical ouroboros...
Don't forget Luke Jr & Gavin. Basically all of them except maybe Wuille have threatened to rage quit if they don't get their way? Then Peter Todd beat everyone to it and already semi-rage quit when Ghash got 51%. Can we get a 100% rage quit count if nobody is allowed to be dictator of Bitcoin?
wumpus is the only guy who matters ... and he'll never quit, don't even think he rages, just codes like a commando
Unpleasant fact #4: Commandos, while expert in fieldcraft, can't code their way out of a paper bag
... it may seem like that but we are in the process of a cleansing and some trash is leaving, so you might be confused by the trashy bankster trolls currently infesting us like a bad case of SSD or lice
You didn't break up with me, I broke up with YOU!
75.
Post 13585860 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):
Once there was a way to get back homeward
Once there was a way to get back home
Sleep pretty darling do not cry
And I will sing a lullaby
76.
Post 13585983 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):
This is completely false and a misinterpretation even of the fake Satoshi post. You're typing flat out propaganda.
You are stating assumptions as facts and assumption is the mother of all fuckups. You do not know whether it is fake or real and therefore ignore serious risks involved.
Support Classic. If you do not, Bitcoin will die and you will get rabies. By the way, it is I, the real satoshi.
You do not know whether
it this is fake or real and therefore ignore serious risks involved.
77.
Post 13589082 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):
what a day. Just heard a rumour that Blockstream may be having their next tranche of funding cancelled, and then I almost die laughing at brg444 on his knees begging chinese minors to stay with core...
And I mean BEGGING...
[...]
78.
Post 13694421 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):
Heady times, gentlemen, heady times!
79.
Post 13704119 (copy this link) (by fisheater22) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):
Big blocks, small blocks, broken cinder blocks!
Who cares?! Buy my shoe!
The ravages of Bitcoin civil war. Horrifying
