Jihan Wu is apparently tired of Gregory and Friends treating Bitcoin like their own personal plaything and tinker-ground.
Max blocksize limit must be decreased not increased. What Core devs accepted, as max blocksize increase road map, is already on the verge of gambling with the future of bitcoin. Arguing with big blocktards like Jihan Wu is a waste of time. He'd better move his pool on mining altcoins.
Jihan Wu a big block retard because he wants to process a "few" more of our tx's?
What pool are you running?
I agree the network adopting segwit and later LN is will be a historical moment in bitcoin.
segwit+LN is a fundamental shift ( way more then a 2MB HF would have been ) it WILL change the game, for the better or worst?? no way to know...
It would be worse, think about it...
Simply increase the block size as that satoshi said,
or change everything about Bitcoin because some beardy said.
Segwit fucks the miners, (oh and the decentralised nodes) LN fucks the miners.
The fees market fucks the users.
RBF fucks the retailers.
Segwit will never happen.
The miners hold the hash power.
It is cores last few weeks of presuming to control Bitcoin, I suspect.
By October 2015, when I set up a plan to begin to trade BTC, my average cost per BTC was about $502, and so I began to trade, and today my average cost per BTC is about $440. Furthermore, I have dollars and BTC stacked on both ends, so I hardly feel trapped. I keep saying this, but stubbornly, you continue with your own seemingly judgmental narrative.
Wow, how many satoshi do you own/trade with?
yawn, altcoin gloating, how boorish.
Who's gloating...?
Decred.. rethink digital currency.
Generally when I refer to the status quo in my various posts on this blocksize limit raising topic, I am frequently asserting that both XT and Classic have failed to meet their evidentiary burden of production and persuasion in order to convince the status quo to adopt them or to work on their adoption. Saying that XT/Classic have failed in this regard is not the same as saying that seg wit has succeed in this regard, even though likely I have said both, and even though of course, all of us should continue to recognize that seg wit remains a work in progress that is advancing little by little and continues to enjoy overwhelming levels of support demonstrating that its chances of becoming part of the status quo is quite likely (even though that outcome remains part of the future).
Times are changing. It is a dynamic world out there.
Core inherited their "coding" position by default.
The miners got into bed with core, believing they could deliver.
Core cannot deliver.
Divorce proceedings have started.
Miners will keep the blockchain, Core can keep their code.
Times are changing. It is a dynamic world out there.
The miners got into bed with core, believing they could deliver.
Miners will keep the blockchain, Core can keep their code.
such shit FUD ... Core delivers everytime, >100 high quality contributors serving up huge quantities of quality code
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4tqb59/bitcoin_core_v0130rc1_binaries_are_available_for/miners have spent not a milliBitcoin producing quality code (or even funding some Core devs (i have no idea why it's a no brainer for wealthy idiot miner to hire a Core dev or two??wtf idiot miners)) so until they do they will the run the best code out there, Core.
And Core have spent bugger all on mining?
The idiot miners didn't think they had to write their own code, of course, because they are idiots?
When the miners have written their code, Core will need to start mining their alt coin.
Do the idiots at Core realise that?