All posts made by stackoverflow in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 11087949 (copy this link) (by stackoverflow) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):
Price action is weird lately, no bounces/buy pressure?


2. Post 11089550 (copy this link) (by stackoverflow) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):
bitstamp in full bear mode this afternoon  Huh


3. Post 11155415 (copy this link) (by stackoverflow) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):
another chop chop week!


4. Post 11197522 (copy this link) (by stackoverflow) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):
man, trapped again!


5. Post 11204054 (copy this link) (by stackoverflow) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):
220 turned into resistance now, bulls better break it soon!


6. Post 11216079 (copy this link) (by stackoverflow) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):
anyone have a clue what's up with btc-e today? back from the dead it seems  Grin


7. Post 11216402 (copy this link) (by stackoverflow) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):
well this is definitely a suspicious move from a suspicious exchange, staying out of the market for now!


8. Post 11216528 (copy this link) (by stackoverflow) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):


9. Post 11216783 (copy this link) (by stackoverflow) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):
Quote from: SkyValeey on April 27, 2015, 10:32:09 PM
Great rise but looks very fishy. Maybe big fraud with stolen $ at btc-e? Some big whale account hacked etc.?
I wish we'll know the reason of this rocket:-D

very fishy indeed! +1

time will tell!


10. Post 11223172 (copy this link) (by stackoverflow) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):
back to previous channel, all that lousy btc-e move did is replenish momentum indicators for another shot at sub 220!


11. Post 11223520 (copy this link) (by stackoverflow) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):
Quote from: Wings1987 on April 28, 2015, 02:56:56 PM
Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 28, 2015, 02:32:36 PM
Dump failed

Starting to think $220 is to bears what $300 was to bulls

Kind of surprised

I think a lot of you forget that $220 or so is mining cost for a lot of operations. It would be surprising to me if we went lower for a long period of time. If you truly believe that is the case you should not be invested. Everyone remember how much hash rate dropped off the network in the Jan 15 drop to $166? If we had stayed at those levels and the hash stayed shut down there would have been major network problems for weeks. Block times/transaction times would have been a disaster. Watch the media coverage if that happens. It will not be good for anyone. Bear or Bull.

And before anyone argues that the Chinese miners have costs lower than that. ASIC development and deployment has slowed to a crawl compared to most of last year. If there really was money to be made in China wouldn't we be seeing huge farms coming online? It wouldn't take much to push the rest of the world out of mining if that were the case.

Actually difficulty/hashrate does not affect the working of the blockchain, difficulty is made artificially high when the hashrate rises to keep block time stable. The blockchain will move the same regardless of high or low hashrate (drastic drops in hashrate can cause high block time until it adjusts, but that's all).


12. Post 11224046 (copy this link) (by stackoverflow) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):
btc-e went haywire again, don't try to find a logical explanation for this, it weird ... period!


13. Post 12235609 (copy this link) (by stackoverflow) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):
Is the block size increase required: yes

Is the need imminent: no

Does it have to compromise the anonymity and the decentralized nature of bitcoin: no

Does it have to be the compromised shitcode of XT: definitely not


14. Post 12235653 (copy this link) (by stackoverflow) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):
Quote from: btccashacc on August 25, 2015, 07:39:31 AM
Quote from: stackoverflow on August 25, 2015, 07:38:10 AM
Is the block size increase required: yes

Is the need imminent: no

Does it have to compromise the anonymity and the decentralized nature of bitcoin: no

Does it have to be the compromised shitcode of XT: definitely not


so what is your choice?

The block size can be increased without rigging the code, and without creating all this fuss and dividing the community, but looks like there are evil alter-motives to this whole XT crap!