All posts made by Traktion in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread
1.
Post 2528248 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):
price is floating up on light volume, and even small sales are enough for it to get hammered back down. No doubt about it, this is a fake rally designed to let people sell high. Bail while you can! Full disclosure, I'm short from $106.5
Yes and we have the makings of a 3rd straight day of higher prices on progressively lower volume. This happened last week on the 9-11 (no pun) and we wen't down afterwards. It is a tell tale downward formation (if it holds)...
+1
[On Bitstamp prices...]
It's looking like a triple top - three failed attempts to get over the 108 bar, with retraces back to 102 each time. I doubt we will see a forth.
However... the last retrace only touched 102, with a sharp bounce back. This starts looking a bit like a rising triangle, which is bullish. From this perspective, getting over 108 is a smaller leap.
There is a good deal of resistance over 108 though, which would need a lot of buying power to punch through. Therefore, I'm about 85% bearish for the trend for the next few days. I have orders in around 101 and 91 to catch the retrace back to the 18th or profit from another 10% fall beyond this.
P.S. I bought at 99 and sold at 107 since the 18th. I missed the first spike (sell price too high - by 0.5 BTC annoyingly!) and then just missed last night's dip (buy was at 101, and only 102 was reached). You can't win them all though!

2.
Post 2528325 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):
price is floating up on light volume, and even small sales are enough for it to get hammered back down. No doubt about it, this is a fake rally designed to let people sell high. Bail while you can! Full disclosure, I'm short from $106.5
Yes and we have the makings of a 3rd straight day of higher prices on progressively lower volume. This happened last week on the 9-11 (no pun) and we wen't down afterwards. It is a tell tale downward formation (if it holds)...
+1
[On Bitstamp prices...]
It's looking like a triple top - three failed attempts to get over the 108 bar, with retraces back to 102 each time. I doubt we will see a forth.
However... the last retrace only touched 102, with a sharp bounce back. This starts looking a bit like a rising triangle, which is bullish. From this perspective, getting over 108 is a smaller leap.
There is a good deal of resistance over 108 though, which would need a lot of buying power to punch through. Therefore, I'm about 85% bearish for the trend for the next few days. I have orders in around 101 and 91 to catch the retrace back to the 18th or profit from another 10% fall beyond this.
P.S. I bought at 99 and sold at 107 since the 18th. I missed the first spike (sell price too high - by 0.5 BTC annoyingly!) and then just missed last night's dip (buy was at 101, and only 102 was reached). You can't win them all though!

Agreed, it is tough to stay out of this market, but doing so reluctantly.
ps - I almost did what you did at 100 (but held back :-( )
I only went half in and kept an order in at 85 as insurance. It was tricky to know which way it was going to go before the 18th (IMO), so I played it a bit safe!

3.
Post 2538455 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):
price is floating up on light volume, and even small sales are enough for it to get hammered back down. No doubt about it, this is a fake rally designed to let people sell high. Bail while you can! Full disclosure, I'm short from $106.5
Yes and we have the makings of a 3rd straight day of higher prices on progressively lower volume. This happened last week on the 9-11 (no pun) and we wen't down afterwards. It is a tell tale downward formation (if it holds)...
+1
[On Bitstamp prices...]
It's looking like a triple top - three failed attempts to get over the 108 bar, with retraces back to 102 each time. I doubt we will see a forth.
However... the last retrace only touched 102, with a sharp bounce back. This starts looking a bit like a rising triangle, which is bullish. From this perspective, getting over 108 is a smaller leap.
There is a good deal of resistance over 108 though, which would need a lot of buying power to punch through. Therefore, I'm about 85% bearish for the trend for the next few days. I have orders in around 101 and 91 to catch the retrace back to the 18th or profit from another 10% fall beyond this.
P.S. I bought at 99 and sold at 107 since the 18th. I missed the first spike (sell price too high - by 0.5 BTC annoyingly!) and then just missed last night's dip (buy was at 101, and only 102 was reached). You can't win them all though!

Well, that worked out well!

It all panned out as expected, with both my 101 and 91 buys coming in last night. The latter was a pleasant surprise.
After looking at the state of the Bitstamp order book, I just sold all for 102, taking a decent profit.
I'm not certain where my next buy in point will be, but I'm thinking somewhere between 85 and 95. I have some thinking to do first though.
4.
Post 2539221 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):
Wow, this is interesting. Looks like MtGox is really learning how to F themselves (not to mention a lot of their customers).
Looks like Gox is going to lose a lot more market share after this one, rightfully so and good for us.
I'm gonna sit this one out until things clarify themselves. Did I get my shooting star?

Predictions from this fellas?

http://www.bitcoincharts.com/markets/bitstampUSD.html
Look at that same chart, zoomed out.
To get as many bids as asks at 108, you have go right down to 80!

Ranging from 90-100 looks easily possible. Less than 90 doesn't look off the table either.
I currently have speculative orders in at 91 and 81, while I monitor the action from a distance.
5.
Post 2539411 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):
http://www.bitcoincharts.com/markets/bitstampUSD.html
Look at that same chart, zoomed out.
To get as many bids as asks at 108, you have go right down to 80!

Ranging from 90-100 looks easily possible. Less than 90 doesn't look off the table either.
I currently have speculative orders in at 91 and 81, while I monitor the action from a distance.
Ahhh, I didn't realize there was a fuller chart available - Thx.
Be really really careful with your placements. You might very well make a profit but if the volume there is so low that it will slice through and won't bounce off the bottom till it hits resistance (which may be at $60 - $70). Looking at the chart last weekend I came up with these key support levels: $90, $82, $60, low $50's and possibly 20's. Nothing really new with my numbers but I did verify some of the patterns with the past bubble correction.
Yes, approx. 91 and 81 are my immediate goals. I suspect there will be bounces to profit off these resistance points. I would expect to buy in again lower should the price permit.
6.
Post 2549213 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):
Can we put up some more insane walls? Because no matter what happens we need to make sure Bitcoin won't go up and make us money. That would just be bad!
While there is volatility, there is money to be made!

7.
Post 2648098 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):
Are we at 180 yet?

8.
Post 2648155 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):
http://www.bitcoincharts.com/markets/bitstampUSD.html
Look at that same chart, zoomed out.
To get as many bids as asks at 108, you have go right down to 80!

Ranging from 90-100 looks easily possible. Less than 90 doesn't look off the table either.
I currently have speculative orders in at 91 and 81, while I monitor the action from a distance.
Ahhh, I didn't realize there was a fuller chart available - Thx.
Be really really careful with your placements. You might very well make a profit but if the volume there is so low that it will slice through and won't bounce off the bottom till it hits resistance (which may be at $60 - $70). Looking at the chart last weekend I came up with these key support levels: $90, $82, $60, low $50's and possibly 20's. Nothing really new with my numbers but I did verify some of the patterns with the past bubble correction.
Yes, approx. 91 and 81 are my immediate goals. I suspect there will be bounces to profit off these resistance points. I would expect to buy in again lower should the price permit.
Well, I was about right for this phase. Unfortunately, I wimped out at 98 just before the drop, as an insurance against it going up! I should have stuck!
Still, I made a good BTC profit regardless and bought the other half at 91. I'm hoping to sell on a bounce up to the high 80s, then buy back at the low 80s. I'm hoping to gain a few more BTC in the process and claw back some USD losses.
EDIT: P.S. Unfortunately, I was away during the weekend and couldn't trade it out. Ofc, the last few weekends it was dead... when I was free to trade!

9.
Post 2659994 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):
Yes, approx. 91 and 81 are my immediate goals. I suspect there will be bounces to profit off these resistance points. I would expect to buy in again lower should the price permit.
Well, I was about right for this phase. Unfortunately, I wimped out at 98 just before the drop, as an insurance against it going up! I should have stuck!
Still, I made a good BTC profit regardless and bought the other half at 91. I'm hoping to sell on a bounce up to the high 80s, then buy back at the low 80s. I'm hoping to gain a few more BTC in the process and claw back some USD losses.
EDIT: P.S. Unfortunately, I was away during the weekend and couldn't trade it out. Ofc, the last few weekends it was dead... when I was free to trade!

[On Bitstamp]
An update on my position. I should have bought in the high 80s as was my original plan, but held out hoping to regain the loss, which was foolish! We hit about 89 and then plunged into the 70s, so it would have been a good strategy. I made a loss there - that's twice I should have stuck to my original plan over the last couple of weeks! Still, you have to cut losses and move on to the next trade!
I recently bought in at 78, being unconvinced by the rally. A head and shoulders then appeared to be form and has now largely completed with a fall back to low 70s. As I think we're still in a downward trend, I suspect 70 won't hold and I pulled by 71 buy position (half my trading fund).
I'm now sitting on the side and waiting to see how things pan out over the next few days. I'm still tempted to try a trade at 71, as there seems to be substantial support. However, I doubt there would be much of a bounce and as the head and shoulders pattern has just completed and I suspect enthusiasm for another rally may be low.
10.
Post 2661048 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):
Bitstamp is taking a bit of a nosedive ... back to $72
@ IAS - Yes yoda just told me to trim my position a bit and go sit in the sun

- sometimes you have to make a small sacrifice to get what you want !
@ Ultraviolet - I hear you, and would certainly not be going long here, but the risk of spike to $xx before we break $70 is ... apparently decreasing as I write ! I was going to say, quite significant lol
You can thank me for buying back a bit of my short

1000 BTC wall at $71 on Bitstamp seems to have been gobbled up... or at least shuffled/spread a bit!
11.
Post 2661894 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):
Bitstamp 70.00
...
69.9.

Walls demolished!

12.
Post 2670277 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):
Yeah ... that looks like a bullish formation to me ... NOT
I guess you covered your short then

Actually, I did close my short.
We dropped almost 40% without any major rebound.
Edit:

I bought back in at 65 (Bitstamp). 63-64 has been tested 3 times and has held. My guess is that the price will rally for a while now.
13.
Post 2672928 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):
If people are expecting the price to only fall to $30, we are only about double that now.
How bad would you feel if you had bought at $4 instead of $2 at the end of the last crash? Sure, you would have double the money at $2, but you could have bought in at a lot worse time than $4.
Just saying...
14.
Post 2681399 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):
Trying to remember: after a corpse bloats & floats to the surface, bobbing all nasty-like around ~69-79, does it keep floating or deflate & eventually sink

What a lovely metaphor!
I think the answer is, it usually bobs about
three times and then sinks.
15.
Post 2689340 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):
I bought back in at 65 (Bitstamp). 63-64 has been tested 3 times and has held. My guess is that the price will rally for a while now.
A quick update.
I sold at just under 75 on Bitstamp yesterday, as there seems to be little in the way of upward momentum. There now seems to be a vague triple bottom and/or downward triangle forming around 70. I suspect selling pressure will break through this and we will push back down towards 65 and possibly lower.
I think I will sit on my hands and buy when it feels right, rather than putting an order at this time. There doesn't seem to be much support above 60 on the books and I'm unsure whether 65 would survive another sell off.
16.
Post 2689584 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):
I bought back in at 65 (Bitstamp). 63-64 has been tested 3 times and has held. My guess is that the price will rally for a while now.
A quick update.
I sold at just under 75 on Bitstamp yesterday, as there seems to be little in the way of upward momentum. There now seems to be a vague triple bottom and/or downward triangle forming around 70. I suspect selling pressure will break through this and we will push back down towards 65 and possibly lower.
I think I will sit on my hands and buy when it feels right, rather than putting an order at this time. There doesn't seem to be much support above 60 on the books and I'm unsure whether 65 would survive another sell off.
If only I had done the same. Funny, your numbers matched mine...
Thanks for sharing your observations with selling pressure as I haven't been watching much. I have seen the larger blocks in buys stagnate though.
And look at this double double reverse bottom descending triangle. What do you all think?


Yup, that illustrates it pretty well I think!

"Boobs and Fat Hanging Arm Pattern" - LOL!
17.
Post 2696656 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):
These negative divergences against rises in price have been VERY VERY accurate indicators of moves down:We have the longest one yet. I'd say the price is really wanting to adjust down but those huge buys with walls changed a bit of the natural movement.
Will be interesting to see what happens.

It looks to me like the day traders are moving the price about in the short term, but the swing traders are sitting on the side lines waiting for a stronger signal.
We have the price bobbing about within a short range, complete with some big 'show' orders, but nothing has really moved much for 48 hours or so.
What will the stronger signal be? Well, I'm standing by my previous position still - sold at 75 (Bitstamp) and plan to buy back in the 60s (say, 66). I still can't see the enthusiasm for a strong upward move at this time, although some bigger movements will come sooner or later.
18.
Post 2701695 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):
i should've bought more
I should have sold later!

19.
Post 2701721 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):
Will 90 fall tonight?
It can't keep rising at this rate. I'm sure we will see a retrace of the recent upward move. Sub 80 within 24 hours?
20.
Post 2705840 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):
Yesterday taught me just *how* pathetic my attempts at reading the Bitcoin market are, and *how* irrelevant both TA & common sense are to this market.
Trying a new strategy today. Got me some black candles burning on both sides of the monitor, crayons for drawing pentagrams & magikal symbolz, got The Lord's Prayer queued up to loop backwards in Pro Tools. As soon as my cat learns to arch his back & hiss at the chart, i'll be set for a new day of trading


I think you just have to be prepared for nothing to be foolproof. As long as you win
most of the time, you're still better off trading than doing nothing (IMO)!
21.
Post 2717610 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):
I sold at around ~75 coming back up, but I haven't bought back in.... Yet.
Snap! I bought at 65 and sold at 75. I should have held on!
22.
Post 2729627 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):
I like my support/resistance lines on the body of the candles, not wicks. We are sitting below 2 resistance lines if that is the case. Interesting to think we might have broken out of a descending triangle, but down and now come back up to meet it. Updated - And look at the negative volume divergences (2) with an up price. That had been a good reversal indicator, but not lately. Also, topping out on RSI.

That's an interesting chart. $100 is definitely a key battle ground and it has psychological meaning.
The last bear run broke $100 after the first two tests (May and June) held. Previous support levels often become new levels of resistance.
Compound with the highs getting gradually lower (about 155, 135, 115), with this final high barely breaking $100 and it paints an interesting picture.
Unless something big happens in the coming week to vault us cleanly over $100, I suspect breaching $100 again for any extended period will be unlikely for quite some time.
23.
Post 2735317 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):
hihgher highs, higher lows. shortterm uptrend. let's see for how long... 105 should be interesting
I think you need to zoom out a bit!

All I see is a 2nd failed attempt to climb over $100 within the last week.
24.
Post 2735340 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):
hihgher highs, higher lows. shortterm uptrend. let's see for how long... 105 should be interesting
I think you need to zoom out a bit!

All I see is a 2nd failed attempt to climb over $100 within the last week.
By zooming out, you lose clarity. Just like letters can fog up and look like other letters, when looked at from a distance.
Alternatively, you can't see the wood for the trees.
25.
Post 2736915 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):
I picked up a few coins today, sort of as insurance in case we run but also as I just hate not having any Bitcoins, yes, outside of 1 Casascius, I didn't have any! Sitting in pure fiat was too much for me. It is a pretty conflicting state to be in, loving BTC but not liking the current market/price/etc. All or nothing is probably not the smartest anyway. Enough self justification?

That said, what I noticed today was some VERY big buyers being unable to manipulate the price any higher. I say manipulate as the slippage was just too much. They were bad businessmen (unless they get a rally started). Probably the same "bad buyer" that stopped a crash below 100 on a Sunday weeks ago. Probably the same guys buying all the way up recently. It really looks like resistance at 100 and a little bit beyond is just too much.
On the one hand (me being a HUGE BTC BULL) it was funny to hear crickets after that 5000+ BTC order went through. It felt good to be calm. I thought "It just isn't working anymore. How are they going to unload? How deep are there pockets?"
On the other hand, you never know when the public at large buys into the rally. From sentiment on the TA boards/threads, it seems like people want to see us hold over 100 and perhaps even get past 107 or the like. Well, that is going to take a lot more buying than we saw today.
And remember, for all those whale buyers we've seen lately, don't forget those whale sellers from before the recent rally.
I picked up a few on Saturday for similar 'insurance' reasons, but I sold them off today at a small profit.
I still have a handful of BTC remaining, but I felt the need to make a choice and stick with it.
Even though I'm very bullish long term, I just don't think we will stay over $100 for any length of time until long after 2013.
26.
Post 2739963 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):
Not much longer now. The 12 hour chart is unbelievably bullish. The bears in the low 100s are going to be massacred.
12 hour chart? massacred? really?
I agree, everything thing I have is screaming upward, that this is only just the beginning.
The short term chart does look like there may be a break out. There is a rising triangle, which is pretty bullish.
I'm still not convinced that the breakout will last, but I've bought a chunk of BTC again and may sell into the breakout, should it occur.
[It is also painful not holding much BTC. Holding so much fiat feels... dirty!]
27.
Post 2743229 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
Not much longer now. The 12 hour chart is unbelievably bullish. The bears in the low 100s are going to be massacred.
12 hour chart? massacred? really?
I agree, everything thing I have is screaming upward, that this is only just the beginning.
The short term chart does look like there may be a break out. There is a rising triangle, which is pretty bullish.
I'm still not convinced that the breakout will last, but I've bought a chunk of BTC again and may sell into the breakout, should it occur.
[It is also painful not holding much BTC. Holding so much fiat feels... dirty!]
After seeing how the day has developed, I've sold out again (for about the same price as I bought in!).
It still doesn't look like $100 is going to be breached and sustained (or $95 on Bitstamp).
28.
Post 2746591 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
The 2011 bear market was not caused by the bubble pop. I was there, the situation today is profoundly different, you'll have to take my word for it I do not have the time to go in to detail.
Its going up to 180 before we see any dumps worth talking about, I have no doubt.
You said that before the last dump too!

29.
Post 2747435 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
Quietly sitting on the 100 day EMA after rebounding on the 200 day EMA.
It feels like the quite before the storm. Not so many negative signs as before the bounce, that bounce was on relatively high volume and there's still people willing to buy. I wonder how much is the withdrawal problem affecting the price - I'd say quite a lot.
...
http://www.bitcoincharts.com/markets/mtgoxUSD.htmlLooking at a 60 day chart (in reference to previous charts), it looks very much like we've
just passed the peak of this cycle. I suspect momentum will gather for downward price pressure from here.
30.
Post 2749965 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
It's been like 4 attempts at 100/100+ that have failed. Unless price begins to move up, sells will come.
And they will be met with buys.
How else would there be a sell?
31.
Post 2753787 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
I love how all the bears/bulls come out and act smug right when the price moves their way even it's for a reason none of them anticipated.
The charts were telling everything.

So....

+1
The writing has been on the wall for a long time. While there is always a chance of a breakout, markets tend to be cyclical. Whatever the 'trigger' is to turn the market isn't really important, tbh.
32.
Post 2753789 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
Quietly sitting on the 100 day EMA after rebounding on the 200 day EMA.
It feels like the quite before the storm. Not so many negative signs as before the bounce, that bounce was on relatively high volume and there's still people willing to buy. I wonder how much is the withdrawal problem affecting the price - I'd say quite a lot.
...
http://www.bitcoincharts.com/markets/mtgoxUSD.htmlLooking at a 60 day chart (in reference to previous charts), it looks very much like we've
just passed the peak of this cycle. I suspect momentum will gather for downward price pressure from here.
*cough*

33.
Post 2754088 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
Is there any bad news I missed?
No, just the bull trap closing.
When will people realize that we had very good news for the last weeks, but still the price goes down because price is driven by price action itself?
I rarely bother considering actual events while trading. Sure, they can be trigger events, but cyclic movement seems to count for more in the short/medium term.
34.
Post 2754290 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
What is the target buy price then, gentlemen?
I'm thinking high 50s at the highest, but suspect at least low 50s will be challenged within the next few weeks.
35.
Post 2754297 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
Isn't it bullish that some company pays the equivalent of +$10M for a Bitcoin gambling site? Also, as the buyout is done in Bitcoin, won't this result in buying pressure? (or is the buyout amount secured already?)
I wouldn't mistake long term bullishness for short term cycles.
Almost everyone here is bullish long term or we wouldn't be here at all. The question is, what is happening over the next days/weeks/months, IMO.
36.
Post 2754763 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
So gentlemen, what will be the lowest point in this cycle? 55? 50? Lower? Will we touch the 40s?
I'm going to wait and see, but I suspect we will hit lower lows (65 @ bitstamp) than during the last cycle.
37.
Post 2754963 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
So gentlemen, what will be the lowest point in this cycle? 55? 50? Lower? Will we touch the 40s?
I'm going to wait and see, but I suspect we will hit lower lows (65 @ bitstamp) than during the last cycle.
if the trend reversed already then it may not be lower than $80
Ok, you're predicting $80 then?
Anyone else?
38.
Post 2761639 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
It looks like we have a short term triple top forming. This is particularly clear on Bitstamp.
I suspect we will see another big drop (testing the last low) in price later today.
39.
Post 2761684 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
interesting part is that people who are waiting for confirmation of trend reversal (which i think already happend and bubble deflated at $65) for $120 mark then they will have to buy back half the coins they could have at $65.
People here often show 2011 bubble to compare to 2013 one but they seem to don't see that no matter what, after one bubble there will be another 10 times bigger. This was the case 3 times now and will happen again. Then why one is trying to hit the bottom to buy if they can just buy now, sit, relax and enjoy the ride to the top? They will profit anyway and trying to hit bottom may as well end up in losing coins.
Doesn't everyone want to maximise their wealth?
If you can buy at $50, rather than $100, you are going to have double the wealth/Bitcoins, no matter what the price ends up being.
That doesn't mean everyone has to buy/sell. You should do what feels best for you.
40.
Post 2761708 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
IAS, I think we will definitely visit the '50s but I'm not sure if it will happen so fast as in your extrapolation. My impression is that we have entered a "slowish" phase, and I don't expect impulsive moves downwards for the moment, just sideway trading + a few dumps that will gradually take us down for a while, mixed up with bounces and traps.
Regarding the SatoshiDice thing, I'm honestly not expecting big dumping by the shareholders who received the monies. My guess is that the big dump related to the SD buyout already happened, insiders dumped before the thing hit the news, as usual in both BTC and FIAT world - and that IMO explains at least partially the dump that took us to the '80s from the high '90s.
The dumping of SD shareholders don't seem to me like a probable bearapocalypse, what really intrigues me is when the SD buyer bought his +100k coins. Did he bought in the last weeks? In the last months? +100k are big volume, and I wonder how much of the big moves upwards triggered in the last weeks are direct consequence of the buying of the new owner of SD. If he did most of the buying in the last weeks, and thus is responsible of the impulsive move upwards from $66 to $104, I think the lack of buying pressure will be much more relevant than the eventual "dumping" of SD ex-shareholders.
That would be compatible with a long period of consolidation, typical with a post bubble correction scenario. If it is true, it will give bears a long time to pick their moment to buy.
In fact, until this blow off phase occurs, I suspect there will still be further for the price to fall.
41.
Post 2761722 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
interesting part is that people who are waiting for confirmation of trend reversal (which i think already happend and bubble deflated at $65) for $120 mark then they will have to buy back half the coins they could have at $65.
People here often show 2011 bubble to compare to 2013 one but they seem to don't see that no matter what, after one bubble there will be another 10 times bigger. This was the case 3 times now and will happen again. Then why one is trying to hit the bottom to buy if they can just buy now, sit, relax and enjoy the ride to the top? They will profit anyway and trying to hit bottom may as well end up in losing coins.
Doesn't everyone want to maximise their wealth?
If you can buy at $50, rather than $100, you are going to have double the wealth/Bitcoins, no matter what the price ends up being.
That doesn't mean everyone has to buy/sell. You should do what feels best for you.
of course they want to maximise profits but the problem i am pointing to is that nobody know when bear market will end. There is no chart who will tell you this. All i read here is just pure wishes.
We have history as our guide. While it doesn't repeat perfectly, there are often similarities.
This is why observing charts is useful. We know with a reasonable probability that certain formations will lead to certain results.
Will you get it right every time? Of course not. To ignore patterns and probabilities and to claim that it is pure guess work is not a valid assertion though.
42.
Post 2772887 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
...they are buying BTC to transfer and sell ... they still want dollars, they just want to get them out of the country as soon as possible without using suitcases.
...
Thanks

love it.
Don't get me wrong ... there *ought* to come a time when nobody wants dollars. But when that will be is anyone's guess. TPTB will do everything they can to prop up the house of cards for as long as possible.
For the last ten years Japanese Gov Bonds have traded at ridiculously low yields ( = high price) and many have tried to call the turn and short them, seeing the situation as unsustainable (which it is ultimately). The trade has become known as 'The Widow Maker' due to the number of people who have crashed and burnt trying to call the turn.
Unrealistic and unsustainable valuations can last for a very long time, defying all logic and fundamental analysis.
That said, the moment of truth would appear to be approaching IMO ... just don't bet the house quite yet

One reason you need fiat is to pay off the
thugs state. If you don't, they start to threaten people with guns and cages.
While ever there is taxation requested in state fiat, there can be no free market for currency.
However, that doesn't mean that Bitcoin can't thrive. It just means there are reasons why people need state fiat.
43.
Post 2772904 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
If your libertarian romantic ever plays out I rather think we are facing the extinction of the human race.
Why would rejecting institutionalised violence cause the extinction of the human race? Are peaceful people incapable of functioning without being threatened from day to day?
44.
Post 2774362 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
If your libertarian romantic ever plays out I rather think we are facing the extinction of the human race.
Why would rejecting institutionalised violence cause the extinction of the human race? Are peaceful people incapable of functioning without being threatened from day to day?
Institutional violence is just a result of urbanization, the entire population is urbanized, and
dependent of the financial system to keep them from dying from starvation.
IF you are serious start a farm.
Eh? You don't need institutional violence in order to have a financial system. Why would you think otherwise?
45.
Post 2779350 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
That looks like a pretty good sign. I wonder how much of that is day trading though?
I doubt they would hit the block chain. While you are trading at an exchange, you're just playing with numbers in the exchange's database. It's only when fiat/BTC are withdrawn that any action occurs.
That said, I'm sure you will get some people who withdraw all of their trading BTC each night for safe keeping.
46.
Post 2780487 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
Translation: "I have run out of any legitimate arguments in the face of overwhelming evidence, and instead will resort to fox news style spin of those negatives."
I'm not sure what language you speak, but it can't be English if you believe those are accurate translations.
Again, what "overwhelming evidence"? The price has dropped a lot and so therefore must continue? Nice one, brainbox! I'm so overwhelmed I almost can't bring myself to fin
The "evidence" the bears have been pointing to unisono is the pattern one can see on the 3 month chart. 3 x lower highs and 2 x lower lows. The idea is that this pattern will continue and next we'll see a lower low (<$67). One can even find similarities within the patterns and the predictive method used is extrapolation of the pattern.
I'm not ruling out a lower low. One would probably put it at $50 and incidentally we would then have reached the post-bubble low for a second time putting in a double bottom with extremely high volume and huge probability of a bounce there.
There would then (during the bounce back up) be talk of both reversal and bull trap / dead cat bounces.
If we subsequently break $50 after that, there will be the long-awaited capitulation. Bulls will be broken and people who didn't sell substantially post-bubble would start considering it and some will. People will leave the forums pissed off at this scam that is bitcoin and media will start some negative talk. There would be long squeezes of leveraged bulls who fell for the trap and downward accelleration. Raw irrational panic. People who were waiting for cheap coins will still be waiting, infected by the fear and panic and shocked their bearish dreams came true. They would
not buy until things turn around substantially. Many coins would change hands at the real bottom, however, and this is when real money is made and lost.
I hope the bears are happy about me describing this fantasy. Again: I don't rule it out, but neither should the bears rule out the possibility we won't put in a new low below $67 and just sneak slowly sideways/up helped by good fundamentals.
There's no "evidence staring us in the eye". Noone knows, everyone believes.
Good post, but I would add that it isn't just the
current chart which is bearish; there is a common theme to all bubbles.
Bubbles are essentially malinvestment, fuelled by irrational hype/panic, which pushes the price way beyond where the fundamentals would otherwise leave it. Whether it is tulips, shares, houses or Bitcoins, it doesn't really make much difference. Those who are bearish in the short/medium term are likely scholars of the many previous bubbles which are littered throughout history.
Ofc, the trick is knowing where the price forms a floor. How much more is Bitcoin worth now than January, when the bubble started forming? Considering it was about $15, is it worth twice that now? 3 times that much? More? How much has changed since January to justify this?
If the answer is 'not a lot', then don't be surprised to see the price continue to tumble. Personally, I think Bitcoin has gathered more momentum and it has survived another dangerous bubble. I'm unconvinced that it is worth more than 6 times what it was just 8 months ago though - maybe 2-4 as a gut feeling, though.
47.
Post 2780501 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
...

as you can see, their wasnt very much $ volume on the way up
But their is a FUCK load on $$ volume on the way down.
I would expect to see volume lvl off for a while, bitcoin gets kinda boarding
then a year later, bitcoin its 3 times the size it is today

I think you need to zoom out a bit further...


48.
Post 2780557 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
I think you need to zoom out a bit further...


ya if you zoom out more you can see the smart money take good positions early
the volume we got on the way down from 266 tho was Crazy!

bitcoin
Well, there was a lot of stupid money exiting those same positions that the smart money was buying into - we always have sellers to match the buyers after all.
The question is though - what has changed since January? Granted, exposure has certainly increased - does that mean BTC is worth 6 times more, 7 months later?
49.
Post 2786105 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
someone is laughing at single digit believers. And me too

BTC velocity would have to drastically increase for single digits to be viable at this stage, IMO. At single digits, the available BTC wouldn't store enough value to be able to support payments. This is the reason you can effectively ignore the single digit argument -- Bitcoin would have to completely fail as a payment medium, or all the speculators would have to go away, in order for us to get there.
i know, but its good you said this because people tend to froget about this or maybe still don't understand.
I wonder also how long it would be for double digits to be gone for good. Maybe it's not that far away considering new and new entities starting to accept bitcoin each day.
:-)
It's also why the $10K valuations aren't as ridiculous as they sound -- try plugging in, say, 10% of visa volume into the equation :-) Of course we have a Tx limit to deal with first though...
My missus (economist) was initially convinced BTC would fail simply because there aren't enough of them...

I don't think any short/medium term bears would argue with that bullish position in the long term. The question is whether this bubble with fully correct
before increased adoption begins to push up the price again.
50.
Post 2786120 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
Has anyone noticed how little volatility there is at Bitstamp compared to MtGox at the moment?
Bitstamp:

MtGox:

P.S. It looks like BitStamp just took a mini nose dive...
51.
Post 2832139 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):
i don't get why it's okay to sell a speculative item like say, a trading card or an online game item, but selling a bitcoin is so drastically different?
i suppose you have a lot more volume when working with bitcoins
Statism frequently ends up using arbitrary threats. There is little in the way of principles guiding such laws - it's just 'might is right', with some lobbying thrown in.
52.
Post 2832158 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):
So, is this a proper breakout over 100 or just another temporary blip before the next plunge?
If 100 doesn't hold, it will be interesting to see if we fall back to above or below 90 (EDIT: changed from Bitstamp value!). If it does hold, it could mean we are entering a bull market.
I'm standing by my bet of us still being in a bear market for a few more months yet, but I'm finding it hard to predict where it is going to go currently. Perhaps that is because we are getting close to the bottom (or have passed it!

)?
EDIT: BTW, take a look at the chart from mid-June. 100 was a support for two rallies which failed to breach 115. 115 was the support level for much of May.

53.
Post 2842482 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):
Head and shoulders completing for the day? Both volume and price points to it pretty clearly on MtGox.
The volume is still high on Bitstamp, mind. The pattern is there though.
Could we see a blow off back down to about 101 MtGox/93 Bitstamp?
54.
Post 2842988 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):
I'm wondering where some of you are getting the idea that the trend is about to reverse. Because of the 5 USD retracement we just saw? Or maybe I'm missing something that the candle watchers can see but I cannot.
The way I see it, it's not entirely clear if, in the short term (24-48h) we'll continue to go up or will stabilize at this level, but I see very little indication that we're going down right now.

That's what I'm seeing anyway.
55.
Post 2843359 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):
That's what I'm seeing anyway.
The volume trend line isn't nearly as linear as that. Head and shoulders may confirm but I think we bounce at 103-104.

Sure, it was only supposed to be indicative.
The volume has fallen at each buying period. The below shows it more clearly:

Anyway, it will be interesting to see how it pans out.
56.
Post 2846833 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):
[...]
Sure, it was only supposed to be indicative.
The volume has fallen at each buying period. The below shows it more clearly:

Anyway, it will be interesting to see how it pans out.
Not being snarky, but honestly wondering:
That H+S pattern didn't materialize, right? Or is there something like a double right shoulder?!
Correct. Even a perfectly formed H+S pattern may not complete, but statistically, it usually does.
I played the head and the right shoulder and made a small profit, but the dip after the right shoulder didn't materialise.
57.
Post 2848600 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):
Correct. Even a perfectly formed H+S pattern may not complete, but statistically, it usually does.
I played the head and the right shoulder and made a small profit, but the dip after the right shoulder didn't materialise.
you couldn't resist telling us about your profit huh?

Ha! It was only small, I assure you!

58.
Post 2848661 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):
@prof7bit
I guess you're asking Traktion, since he suggested the pattern, but even though I didn't agree with him, your "find in less than 2 minutes" criterion is a bit unfair. Depending on how well trained you are, it could take you 30 seconds or 20 minutes to find a pattern, irrespective of whether it is really there or not.
When Traktion first posted, he also had a 15 min view. I'm not experienced in determining candlestick patterns, but I *could* see how (on the 15 min view) a left shoulder and a head had materialized, and a right shoulder was possibly forming.
I mainly disagreed because of the volume acting atypical.
Sure, the volume was a bit dodgy (especially on Bitstamp), but I thought it was worth a punt. The head and the right shoulder panned out as expected, but there wasn't the full reversal back to the neck line. It was still worth trading (for me anyway).
EDIT: Although we are heading towards the neckline now on Bitstamp... the pattern is rough though, granted.
59.
Post 2852462 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):
Not only has the gap between MtGox and Bitstamp increased to about $10 again, but the order book is starting to look like a mirror image.
MtGox:

Bitstamp:

It appears that Bitstamp is far more bearish than MtGox. This is surely a reflection on people trying to buy BTC to get out of MtGox?
I suspect Bitstamp is leading the market now too, which makes me wonder whether the 95 support level is about to give way.
60.
Post 2920568 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):
Over $13 between MtGox and Bitstamp!

61.
Post 2926674 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):
Triple top forming since the first started at the end of July? Third peak on falling volume. Thoughts?
62.
Post 2932984 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):
Over $15 between MtGox and Bitstamp...
Does someone know something we don't about MtGox?
Bitstamp is looking a bit triple-toppy still, but Gox has got a bit carried away with itself.
63.
Post 2938135 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):
Triple top forming since the first started at the end of July? Third peak on falling volume. Thoughts?
It looks like Bitstamp is struggling to stay over $100, with the 3rd attempt within 24 hours barely touching it (so far).
Incidentally, this looks a bit like a 24h triple top and a 1m triple top combining. Are we going to see a fall to 90-95 or will $100 be fully breached regardless?
EDIT: I notice there is about 5k BTC asks sitting between $100 and $101 too on Bitstamp.
64.
Post 2950535 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):
This is hilarious. Look at the book.
We don't need an 11k whale buy and 2k wall (like what took us from 94 to triple digits). Half that will do.
We're primed for a major surge up. The whale buyers have been quiet for a couple of days. They have very strong motivation to put the push on soon.
While a 6k injection of fiat would be sufficient, a 10k buy and a 3k bidwall (same outlay as the move from 94) would really smarten up the market and secure previous acquisitions for those who pushed us past 88, 95, 100, 110, etc.
Yee-haw, pass the popcorn.
Look at the books elsewhere and the picture is completely different.
Bitstamp is pretty even, with the asks having the edge... at $10/btc cheaper.
MtGox has issues and people want to get their fiat out of there. Whether they just buy and hold BTC or sell them elsewhere (such as Bitstamp) is debatable, but there is an unusually large demand for coins, well above the rate offered elsewhere.
In short, I'd be careful what you read into MtGox's price/order book. There is more than a whiff of panic there, IMO.
65.
Post 2962525 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):
However, if price rises in other exchanges, that can only be because of bitcoin demand exceeding supply. You cannot twist it anywhere.
I would therefore closely follow the pricing in Bitstamp and others, and that has been on a rise lately. It is tempting to think that the going price is $120 (Gox), but I would more likely put it at $103. If I were to buy, I would not try to send money at Gox to buy at 20% premium, I would use Bitstamp.
Bitstamp has 5k less coins in their Ask compared to 1-2 weeks ago. Most likely, they have all been move to Gox to sell.
I believe the buying pressure in Bitstamp has just consumed the coins.
Gox situation is special. I don't believe that their bid side comes from true demand, because it is so much easier to use other exchanges for buying, and their price is also much lower. To me it seems that most of Gox bids are money trying to escape Gox in the form of bitcoins.
This money is orginally as Gox-USD, and most of the owners want it converted back to USD after escaping from Gox. It does not change the total bitcoin supply-demand, because it is both originally and eventually USD. Bitcoin is therefore used only as a value transmit mechanism for Gox-USD.
So it's a run on Gox then ...
A 20%+ risk premium over the other main USD exchanges would certainly point in that direction.
66.
Post 2962980 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):
So it's a run on Gox then ...
A 20%+ risk premium over the other main USD exchanges would certainly point in that direction.
MtGox 24h Volume: 46280 BTC
Bitstamp 24h Volume: 11791 BTC
Makes no sense, you don't cash out of Mt. Gox by buying bitcoin rather than by waiting a month for a USD wire.
Do the math, if you're a whale with that much buying power you have let's say at least 100k USD on gox.
So if you'd like to "cash out", you'd have to buy @ ~$115 (let's make it easy and ignore the slope). So you get 100.000/115 = 869.57 - 2.61 (0.3% Fee) = 866.95 BTC.
Now you transfer them to an other exchange (Bitstamp) to cash out to USD (again we ignore the slope which is even higher @ bitstamp), so:
866.95 * 99.98 = 86677.66 - 260.033 (0.3% Fee) = $86417.63
So you just lost $13582.37 because you didn't want to wait a month.
/€dit: Looking on the volumes of the recent rally and the fact that there was a single 1500 BTC buy order taking down the $115 wall, I think it's safe to take those numbers * 10.
I suspect people are more concerned about getting their money out at all, than just waiting a month. Why else would you pay a 20% premium?
If you were buying coins now, you wouldn't be wiring funds to Gox and paying a 20% premium. The only people who would pay that are those who (unfortunately) have fiat funds there waiting already.
67.
Post 2963094 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):
I suspect people are more concerned about getting their money out at all, than just waiting a month. Why else would you pay a 20% premium?
If you were buying coins now, you wouldn't be wiring funds to Gox and paying a 20% premium. The only people who would pay that are those who (unfortunately) have fiat funds there waiting already.
Also, Gox would be for traders. Try trading on Stamp, it is hard. You could keep your coins on Stamp and trade with some on Gox as there is the action.
I trade regularly on Stamp, without any major issues. TBH, it tends to be a bit less erratic, IMO.
I take your point though that traders are looking at relative prices, rather than absolute prices. I'd still be a bit concerned about Gox's future, considering the way the market is pricing the risk already.
68.
Post 2963407 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):
I suspect people are more concerned about getting their money out at all, than just waiting a month. Why else would you pay a 20% premium?
If you were buying coins now, you wouldn't be wiring funds to Gox and paying a 20% premium. The only people who would pay that are those who (unfortunately) have fiat funds there waiting already.
Also, Gox would be for traders. Try trading on Stamp, it is hard. You could keep your coins on Stamp and trade with some on Gox as there is the action.
I trade regularly on Stamp, without any major issues. TBH, it tends to be a bit less erratic, IMO.
I take your point though that traders are looking at relative prices, rather than absolute prices. I'd still be a bit concerned about Gox's future, considering the way the market is pricing the risk already.
Yeah, the price movement is on Gox (and originates there). Look at this last movement. Nothing happened on Stamp for a while, then suddenly a $4 movement and then it backed off. I am also really worried about Gox. It might end up being nothing, but how long ago did that 2 week freeze on wiring money end? About 2 months ago or so? And it was only supposed to take a few weeks to get back to speed (backlog as Gox said). Now - NO WORD, zero...
Sometimes that makes trading on Stamp easier!

I find that it mostly carves its own patterns these days though, apart from these big moves.
IMO, you don't end up with prices 20% higher than elsewhere unless something is very wrong. Whether it is panic at not knowing what is going on or whether some big players
do know what is going on, who can say?
69.
Post 2965501 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):
I suspect people are more concerned about getting their money out at all, than just waiting a month. Why else would you pay a 20% premium?
If you were buying coins now, you wouldn't be wiring funds to Gox and paying a 20% premium. The only people who would pay that are those who (unfortunately) have fiat funds there waiting already.
Also, Gox would be for traders. Try trading on Stamp, it is hard. You could keep your coins on Stamp and trade with some on Gox as there is the action.
I trade regularly on Stamp, without any major issues. TBH, it tends to be a bit less erratic, IMO.
Try making trades of +300 coins at Bitstamp without MAYOR slippage and then report back please...
Even on Gox, the slippage is a huge profit killer for traders - on Bitstamp is just impossible to daytrade for anyone with a little more than play money.
As I only have play money, this isn't of concern to me!

70.
Post 2987342 (copy this link) (by Traktion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):
IMO the bull party is over. What can be seen in the charts is the topmost Elliot sub-wave, with it's 5 sub-sub-waves, although the last one is about to begin,
and may be ill defined. I am certain that a correction is coming, dropping the price to the 112 - 114 range, followed by a (slow?) rebound to maybe 117 - 118.
The uber-bulls are going to interpret this as a bear trap, but I believe it will be the prelude to more drops, after a couple of days.
We can see declining volume on MtGox over the last 4 days, with the pattern following an ascending triangle (up towards 125). I would say that is more bullish than bearish, tbh.
http://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school:chart_analysis:chart_patterns:ascending_triangle_cThat said, it has been a steep climb, especially on Bitstamp and maybe we are in for a breather. I'd like to make a trade or two over the next few days, but holding still seems to be the most obvious plan for me atm.