Freeman, I thought you were going to see us after the new year because this rally isnt going anywhere. I shorted at 420, regretted my decision and hopped back in at 420-430. Shit atleast I can admit it. What's your story? I thought you were all fiat until sub 400
If I remember correct my last trades were: buy 315, sell 418, took a vacation, and then when I could I did short above 440.
I am not even sure what my exact entry is but I feel good about said position for now...
You've just summarized a massive amount of incorrect posts in your favor. Nice try. Anyone acting on your input at this point deserves what they get. You may or may not be talking your book, but either way I rank you with Kwukduck. Good day, sir.
Yep, freeman is a shill until I see proof he sold at 420. I thought he was legit at the time he said he was out at 420. I left as well. Very stupid to follow anybody's lead, I know. I was lucky enough to get back in right around the same price but lost the opportunity to short at 450, 470 etc. If BTC does go below 400 within the next 6 months I'll eat everything I said. But till then, I consider freeman to be a person or entity casting bait for sheep.
The logarithmic uptrend is broken on the five year chart. If you wanna zoom out, zoom out motherfucker. It's the scalability problem. It's gotta get a lot worse before it gets better (IF it gets better) because some people are so stupid, they require an extreme amount of pain before they learn anything.
You're not trading efficiency for censorship resistance. Majority mining power is concentrated in one country with a totalitarian government. The People's Bank of China has a million man army behind them and they could take over our network with a few phone calls. The only reason Bitcoins functions is because the ChiComs LET it function. That battle has already been lost. So smallblockers want to keep bitcoin from scaling for NO REASON!
So we're going down or sideways. If we go up, new users are attracted, blocks fill up, transactions slow down and get expensive, then we have to go down or face a network congestion failure.
They got us. The bad guys won. Subsidized electricity and consensus governance brought us down. Meanwhile a bunch of other cryptocurrencies are waiting in the wings to claim the prize we fucking threw away.
Why get so emotional regarding the topic?
And, what is the big deal if some alt takes over bitcoin?
If there is a better alt, then let it pave the way, and we can all jump on board that one...
The fact of the matter is that there is no alt that is even in any parameters of close to bitcoin...
Name one?You can't because you are just spreading bullshit FUD regarding non-important and speculative matters...
Your matters are so speculative that they are even beyond the scope of this speculation thread because they are lacking almost any foundation... especially ones concerning the supposed pending take over of some not-yet identified alt coin.
RIPPLE .
Is that supposed to be a joke. If Ripple is BTC's replacement count the ***** out, I am not moving over to some centralized "trust based" coin. If that's the name of the game I'll stick to cash.
BTC is king, just the developers need to start delivering on their promises instead of bickering about this blocksize issue. The unspoken problem with this blocksize debate is how much resources it is taking away from developing opportunities just because nobody can agree on a damn block size. Meanwhile, Ethereum is gaining ground there is no denying it. I'd rather ETH take over than Ripple, but my main wish is for this blocksize thing to get solved reasonably so that btc can see some REAL development and we can see the network effect take action. Swallow the smaller coins' good features making them obsolete. We don't need positive news from mainstream media, we need to make our own positive news that is so compelling that mainstream media picks it up.