All posts made by DanielT in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread
1.
Post 10152633 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):
And then a massive dump ensues.
Can we translate that into Latin? I'd like to have it chisled in marble atop the first Bitcoin bank....
Edit: Done:
Et tunc sequitur ingens tuber
E plurubus dump 'em
Casus is a word with multiple meanings, it seems to work better.
Et tunc ingens casus sequitur.
2.
Post 10152900 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):
Imagine if those were dubstep drops.
3.
Post 10157729 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):
So many butthurt permabulls, LOL. The fundamentals point towards lower equilibrium price.
No demand for coins beyond the necessary market cap for commerce. Too much supply.
4.
Post 10157789 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):
So many butthurt permabulls, LOL. The fundamentals point towards lower equilibrium price.
No demand for coins beyond the necessary market cap for commerce. Too much supply.
Idiot. 99% of the price is speculative not medium of exchange.
Well that was the case at $1200, but now there isn't anyone to pump aymore.
5.
Post 10177588 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):
Haha, but where are those sub $200 coins?
Don't worry, they might come in a few hours.
6.
Post 10177782 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):
Don't worry, they might come in a few hours.
inc as we speak. but we gotta make a bottom reversal on volume up to bulls
Remember that BTC has low liquidity. As some people want to hodl even more, we need lower prices to satisfy their hunger.
7.
Post 10185290 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):
It seems that last three days were bulltrap, not sure yet.
8.
Post 10266404 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):
DRAMATIC MUSIC!
9.
Post 10266475 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):
wtf??
Yeah, it seems like a correction.
10.
Post 10277424 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):
Today 60% of the government's revenue goes into paying interest on the public debt
You just can't admit you are wrong even if this post of yours contradicts your previous one.
which was created by criminal borrowing by the neocon government, 20 to 12 years ago (and only keeps growing).
Was the irresponsible handling of debt somehow due to the actions of the banks?
That borrowing came together with austerity measures (= taking more from the people, giving them less) and radical privatization (= giving people's property to banks for a pittance).
That happened after the debt got out of control.
11.
Post 10277864 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):
Neocon governments, austerity and privatization are things that the banks love and push for.
People are responsible, not the banks, if tax evasion was failed to be curbed and the finances weren't straightened. This could have been done many years ago.
In the elections last year they swore to remove Dilma after she tried to lower the prime rate. They fully supported the candidate of that same neocon party, and almost got him elected in spite of him being despised even by his own party.
ROFL, she already raised it again, haha... If it wasn't increased, inflation would be higher than it is (it is already high).
http://www.bcb.gov.br/?INTERESTYou only offer naked claims. There is no reason for me to answer anymore.
Mind you, and if you're misinformed I'm here to make it crystal clear, THAT'S EXACTLY how it's done.
So tell me how the debt is in the name of the Greek goverment? With what money did they pay the state expenses?
12.
Post 10280792 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):
i will bet my nuts that we will see the $400 in at least 7days, if not i will let you beat my nuts with a hammer
I feel sorry for your nuts.
13.
Post 10282012 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):
Well, $400 in less than 7 days seems improbable, so it would be reasonable to bet that we will see it in at least 7 days. More is more likely. Still, the whole thought makes me squirm a bit.
That wouldn't make to sense to bet. Only the most die-hard permabears would insist that we will never cross $400, someday...
14.
Post 10292779 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):
15.
Post 10293586 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):
Price action
Disappointing
Choose one
16.
Post 10293671 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):
Relevant question: if the price were to go below 1400 CNY, which it won't as it seems like, would that trigger another round of stop losses? I wonder.
The panic threshold looks like more 1000- CNY.
17.
Post 10300170 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):
Another pump, is this the long-awaited bullish take off? /sarc question
18.
Post 10321082 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):
Noob question. Is there a way for one to somehow value this instrument for market vs intrinsic value.. Any ratio performance driver?Or something similar in a way to 3 financial statement forecasting model for equities or is TA the only way to ride?
No. (no need for a longer answer I suppose)
19.
Post 10329991 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):
It seems like another pump and dump.
20.
Post 10379611 (copy this link) (by DanielT) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):
We've had boring oscillations this week. What does this mean? Sub-200 or start of bull market?