the bank note is a promise

What it´s SR coins?

In on page 7777.

Gentlemen!
Less bickering, more buying!
311 is unacceptable

Now that Crypto is dead, in what should I put my money?

Now imagine if i had my wallet.dat stored on this piece of trash Flash Voyager. It worked good for some years and then it started to greet me with this message. It's DEAD. Unrecoverable data.

Then... i read about this

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2rz30w/trezor_why_its_absolutely_not_ready_for_mass/cnkq3wi

Then i'm asking myself, where's that dumb pig Fonzie to tell me about how easy is to use bitcoin ? And not even for me, but for the average Joe. Exchange Fail (again, lucky that they got the money to reopen it), Trezor Fail, Memory Stick Fail, Keyloggers, Exploits, and i can go on and on like this for hours.


Now i need some bulls to tell me one reason for why the price should go up and not down in the abyss. One argument, please, because i'm tired of idiots! And after i'm tired of idiots, i'm tired of hypocrites that are acting like virgins in front of a gif (a cgi scene) i posted (they even reported it instead of ignoring me). Just a fucking .gif that didn't hurt nobody. Hypocrites that i'm pretty sure they've watched/played violent movies/games before, where they showed much more realistic effects, many more head removals, bombs, genocide, terrorists and name whatever the fuck you want. But they suffer when they see a complete cgi (horseshit quality) gif.

GTFO!

Not really.People, including yours truly, still have problems withdrawing from Bitfinex.For some dubious reason my account's USD balance on exchange is -18$(negative) even though my BTC balance on exchange is in the thousands of USD. Any withdrawal attempt is automatically canceled for this reason: "Negative balance on wallet exchange".
Please don't full GOX on us bitfinex, pleeeeease.

"The researchers collected Google Trends search query data from January 2011 to July 2013"

LOL BTC is a beast and it loves beast number 666!

What, no pr0n?  



Britain 'succeeds' from The Union might also be true. 

Here you go: https://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate?timespan=all

Hmm... Not too sure about that. This two months rule seems a bit arbitrarian to me no? I don't see any reason to it.
Especially as nowadays everyone knows about halving. It's not like people are surprised by it!

Here's your reason:

Lol no, let's not be greedy.

U.S. stocks at new record high
U.S. economy adds 287,000 jobs in June
The S&P 500 closed above 2,137, surpassing the previous all-time record set back in May 2015.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/07/11/investing/stocks-record-high-dow-jones-sp-500/

Watcha be talking about, Jasper?

Unemployment rate is 4.9%, stop getting your info from stormfront zerohedge.



But you're telling me that these unemployed will stop investing in the market, cash out their massive investment portfolios, and reinvest the resultant $3.76 in bitcoins?


http://www.statista.com/statistics/205240/us-underemployment-rate/
"Underemployment refers to a job that is insufficient in some important way for a worker" - wikip
TL;DR: You think you deserve a better, cushier job; the market begs to differ.

...don't deserve...?lol

I had 31 BTC on Bitfinex. It was likely one of the hacked addresses.

I hope they compensate all of the stolen coins. Though to do that they probably lose more money than they have which requires that they go fractional reserve which also means they eventually become Mt Gox 2.0.

 

...ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is a vacuous platitude. Vacuous platitudes are from the planet Kashyyyk. But this vacuous platitude lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it; that does not make sense!

When everything is devalued to hell and food is expensive etc. who will pay the expensive money for your valuable bitcoins?

Yeah but it's business after all, kinda sucks but do people expect them to put, we're incompetent and somehow managed to loose $70MM? That'll go well with prospective traders if they ever want to recover

I was able to log into my Bitfinex account. Of the 31 bitcoins I have a balance of 20 bitcoins (which I will withdraw immediately once the option is available). I have 412 USD and about 7000 BFX (tokens).

I have no idea why I have dollars on there, I've never had dollars on there. I'll be buying bitcoins with them and withdrawing those as well.

As for the whole token concept. I had been working with an international company for quite some time and we had been trying to come up with a way to sell shares to raise our initial funding. With the company being based in Belize with Bitcoin as our main currency and the blockchain being used for tracking our shares we would not be like any other company. But with half of the board living in the US and not wanting to lose US customers we had to figure out a way to word things so that we were not offering "shares" or "dollars" or anything else that had some sort of legal connotation. We played around with the idea of tokens because any company can sell tokens. We planned on selling a set amount of them being a percentage share of our company. But when talking to lawyers we found out that linking a token's value to shares of the company would defacto turn it into shares and subject us to all sorts of rules and limitations that just wouldn't work for us. I kinda lost confidence in our business model when we still decided to go with a "token" type of setup but not a limited number and turned it into more of a membership model with not much reward (that I can see) for being a member. But I'm just the IT guy so I am leaving it in the hands of our marketing guy to figure it all out.

I would like to see Bitfinex define what exactly a BFX represents and make sure it is set in stone. Otherwise I will just cash them out. Their initial value is being set to $1 each.

If they are actually representative of a percentage share of their company with dividends then I would consider keeping them. But they likely cannot say that legally, so they become a very shitty centralized alt coin with unlimited printing ability that you can't use for anything.

annnnndd its worthless.


i guess this means, its not a shares of bitfinex.
and this token will shit out some money when/if   they recover the stolen funds ( unlikely ) , get money from venture capitalist ( unlikely ), if bitfinex turns a net profit after they paid all expenses ( unlikely to be more than a few 1000$ a month distributed amongst  75million tokens....)

worthlessness
i see this token dropping to near zero
i'm really fucking disappointed, i was looking forward to owning a piece of bitfinex.

I'm going to guess that the way Bitfinex has handled the debt is illegal on multiple levels and they are going to be hearing from the likes of CFTC again. You don't see anything like this happening in the real world.

666

the price is wrong!

like for real we should be pushing 800.

Corps or hackers? Come on, we all know who is dumping these coins and why.
People are panic selling just because we are losing trust after these big mamas getting hacked even with the best security possibly implemented in them.

That would be nice. lol

But of course the consumer does not benefit from negative interest rates, just the banks. You have to pay to have your savings in the bank.

My point was simply that is is not a conspiracy, it is Bitcoin having problems within itself.

I have little respect for any sides in this battle, whether it be Core, or the likes of Roger Ver. I also struggle with people who think 'it's a black ops / conspiracy' and nothing is actually wrong with Bitcoin at all.

I have inside news that Gox will open again, they will pay to their old customers what they can when they open, then refill their wallets with the trading fees, like Poloniex did.

They will also accept Litecoin

Now you know why Bitcoin and Litecoin are skyrocketing, buy while you can

The mere fact that there is controversy does not mean that the controversy is valid.

If you got a bunch of nutjob shills that are able to convince others to whine about a bunch of stuff that seems to make sense (but really does not make sense) based on a bunch of misinformation, that still does not make the astro-turf controversy valid.

I don't know what you are talking about.

It seems that you are accusing me of the thing that you are doing, and for what purpose?  What point are you trying to make?

I think that you are trying to confuse matters, and you are framing the current situation in some kind of incorrect way... also known as mischaracterizing the current situation including your attempt to describe what is core and what is core's role and what is seg wit in the scheme of the current situation..

Core and it's vision of bitcoin still constitutes the longest chain, in the last couple of years we have had three named proposals that were aimed to be hostile attempts to take over BTC by creating a hardfork and changing governance.  First, XT then Classic, then the current version of BU et al.  So far, none of these hostile take over attempts have been successful, but they do not give up on spouting various kinds of threats and attempting to get more and more people (maybe miners, etc) to get on board with their vision.  Sometimes, especially recently, they also dupe folks into actually thinking their threat is actually going to take place and to threaten the well-being of bitcoin.

The fact that bitcoin is not changing does not make it "centralized" as you like to conclude, but so far it is still showing that a centralized kind of take over is not an easy thing to accomplish - even with this most recent attempt that did seem to at least have some kind of smoke screen of support that was showing 50% of the mining or something like that depending on how you piece meal together the miners and whether they would actually follow if a hard fork were to occur.

So segwit is another question that is separate from core, but it is a scaling and malleability "solution" that has gone through the official channels to be proposed, then discussed, then agreed upon and then coded and then tested and then gone to the signaling stage.  Initially, it was a pretty non-controversial upgrade, but the whiners have seemed to have gotten a lot of misinformation out there about segwit but also the whiners are quite a bit disingenuous anyhow in terms of really having bitcoin's interests at heart - rather than buying into bullshit conspiracy theories.  So yeah, in the end, recently, this seg wit proposal seems to be getting into the 30% of support on the mining end, and of course it seems to have larger levels of support in other non-mining circles.  We are about 6 months into seg wit signaling, and maybe it will continue to increase, and maybe bitcoin will have to figure out a way to survive without seg wit. 

Personally, I am thinking that seg wit is so obviously a good thing that it is likely going to end up being implemented in one way or another - even if it may take bitcoin a couple of years to get there.  But what do I know?  There are a lot of unknowns in the future, which makes it difficult to predict with any kind of precision, but I can still venture my own estimations.

Venezuela..

'

so the BTC-e issue is what a 'big shrug' to the bitcoin world....price is not affected...is that what people seem to see/think now?

would be nice not to be at the 'whim' of another gox issue that slams price down for a year

(still, have the bcc fud to look forward to and the 2mb thing in 3 months.fun times)

btc...the hot mess girlfriend you can't leave.....sigh

Don't pass out on Freemont street like I did. You might wake up in plaza hotel with a strange lady. Lol