LOL

[edited out] nutildahs posts sneaky cunt.

What are talking about you fool. Nuttildah brought this claim to our thread. Why would you need to come into contact with us you twat. The list is what nutildah references as evidence of bob following through on his promises. JJG cut nutildahs post away for extra sneakyness. Nutildah commented moments after we made the post and said it was one year ago not 2 days. He never said you were not paid or got the party position paid.

He is implying you either got the money or you got a party shouted for you.

If he is using that as as evidence of bob going through with his promises then you need to take that up with him.


Blame him for quoting this as evidence of bob being trustworthy and reliable. If you got neither then that is not my problem. You have a right to deny it, end of. I have edited the post to say the list is inaccurate now.  Nutildah only says it was one year ago not 2 days. He never says that payment or party place didn't take place does he?

Anyway glad to be here now looks like a great place to hangout.

LOL like 99% of our posts are not made in a self moderated environment you sneaky scumbag. Why edit out nutildahs post then??? yes because you see he is implying that bob followed through on his promise to pay that list out. Not that it really matters at all to the central point that bob was in the wrong originally.

Good luck defending the fact you are a moron. Why cut away his post when he brought that posts as a reference for bob being reliable financially? post  the entire thing you twat we never heard of that list before he presented it as evidence of presumably someone following through on their financial promise. What you think we randomly found that list and used it as evidence ?? nutildah posted it , then moments after we made our post he never said it was incorrect he said it was 1 year not 2 days ago. We accepted that. He never said actually bob never really paid them out or paid for their party place. Got it.

Sorry but that all looks very off topic and inaccurate mr  non achieving servile dreg.

Can you present some substantive posts that have been deleted by us...looks like a false allegation. The only posts deleted were those that did not adhere to the rule in the initial post.

Anyway thanks for the warm welcome. This thread appears Unmoderated. I mean just glancing through it there seems no structure at all it seems more like a free for all. However sure we will be keeping to the topic and only replying to strictly other peoples comments.

I mean I can create a thread for you to come and explain you allegations if you like? Anything we originally presented as a statement of fact will be indeed a fact. Unless you can prove otherwise. Now stfu and get back to discussing the movement of bitcoin you trumped up little twat mr non achiever. Never heard of you in all these years. Precisely because you never achieved anything LOL

Anyway guys bitcoins price bouncing up a little hopefully... good for for all those legendary members that still need to rely on the btc dust from their sig spamming.

Great to see all the old faces faeces in here.

Thanks but don't touch my car

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9FYBjSc3cU


micgoosens... get out of here they cried. (in vain) ....

Can't wait to discuss bitcoins price movements with you all regularly.

Bitcoin is going to 8k anytime time now I have been studying the charts and reading the tea leaves this morning. Also wading in to the markets myself.. You will all eat tomorrow. Keep spamming those sigs guys. I don't want you starving. YOu put up a shabby enough resistance as it is. (zero) lol

JJG claim he EDITED OUT nutildahs post because .....errr reasons. LOL yeah like you wanted to make it appear I just pulled that list up on my own. He presented that LIST in his link as evidence of bob paying up after he says he will. That is the point of him posting it there. We had no knowledge of any list or any interest. It was only when we noticed several names on that list were leaving red trust that it stood out.

Nutildahs post implied and was presented as evidence of bob being trustworthy??? Why nutildah post a list of people bob has said he would pay or shout for a party as proof of being trustworthy if it had not happened.

He is implying that.

You deleted nutildahs post because you want it to appear that I randomly made that up. FUCKING SNEAKY

You don't also note that nutildah does not even deny it he just says that was a year earlier. I NOTICE ALSO YOU did not note that was correct after nutildah pointed it out IMMEDIATELY and quote the old version your quote does not reflect that post since about 5 mins after it was made. Since that was done with in minutes you must have been lurking there.

So your ONLY valid gripe could be we should not have taken nutildahs implication as true without investigating it. THAT IS IT. Nothing deceptive about it. Names on the LIST NUTILDAH linked to were appearing on trust list leaving red BEFORE we mentioned it. Since it was noted it was a year before then that already nulled the CONNECTION with any possible financial reward. You are pretending that our post still implies this. That is sneaky too since about 5 mins after it was said to be a year earlier it was ALTERED to not even make that possible connection. Hence the time machine post and the adaption on our post.

It does not AT ALL invalidate the rest of the thread. That is based upon independently verifiable observable instances. If you want to claim this I will create a thread where I will pull you weak ass arguments and excuses to pieces ... YES OR NO want that thread ?? YES OR NO?

I bet we get a lot of excuse from JJG now and he will not have a thread just me and him debating the original trust abuse from bbl. JUST YOU AND ME JJG you sneaky little scammer supporting pleb.

What you give or do not give a fuck about is of no concern of mine you non achieving fucking loser. You're nothing here on this board and nothing would have been any different if you had never joined. Got it you servile scammers supporting pleb??

Good now that is sorted out you sneaky peace of shit. We can all discuss bitcoins price direction. Not listen to your slanted and sneaky accounts of events where you like to prevent the full context being presented.

Anyway come to a thread YOU AND ME JJG you waste of board space and debate the entire debacle from the start or stfu you sneaky cunt.

I'm not really seeing anything drastic (upwards bitcoin price) until well into new year now.

Tell rick to relax that fist...then you can perhaps contain yourself in future you washed up mess.

Next time don't come to someone elses threads who merely presents observable instances of the boards history and start screaming your homo erotic fantasies and swearing at them. Then start crying when you get some blowback you fucking wussy gimp.
Got it.

Tell your your butt buddies here to give each other reach arounds in private.

All the people in here with no bitcoins worrying about where it is heading next is funny. Going up long term is all you need to know about it. 222222 posts from 100 ppl giving each other reach arounds and splattering humor that is toe curling everywhere. YUCK.

Try having some bitcoins, worrying about the potential value of your sig spamming dust is pathetic.

1. Nutildah linked to the list as evidence of bobs paying out people he promised but because I listed it I am to blame LOL
sorry that is sneaky and you know it. You omitted nutildahs post exactly for that reason. That is clearly what he is implying.
It means little in the full context of the trust abuse anyway. Which was changed within 10 mins max anyway as soon as he pointed out the date issue.
JJG trying to make something out of nothing and omitting nutildah of all responsibility. Sure we should have known better than to accept any reference that shit stain presented. Anyway means little was just a nice little bit of icing on the very solid and robust cake.

2. JJG is scared to debate the entire debacle from its roots one on one. Because we will crush his arguments and excuses. As per usual. JJG is a fucking non achieving loser. Where are his achievements that made one scratch of difference??
So makes excuses WHY NOT to debate with us one on one. There is no other reason not to meet our challenge.
Now stfu and debate or move on pussy.
/ end.

@Cryptotourist (our new best pal)

Give us something to sink our teeth into here. We really want to stay and hang out. What can you offer? We need something with some meat on. Otherwise hard to interject on a bunch of skint kids who found out about btc yesterday guessing which way it is going. If you don't have 100btc just hold until 100k.Stop worrying about the short/mid terms. You don't have enough to mess around just hodl or you will get cleaned out 100% they prey on human psy.

8k max by xmas anyone wishing for more will be disappointed.

I like that france have now started crypto/bitcoin as part of the national syllabus = promising. Therefore not opening the cold storage until 50kusd  min.

Those claiming bob has more btc than ourselves. Groundless speculation. If bob can sign 1000btc + only then will we accept this. Even then if a few alts get a good run that will need to be upped drastically. So STFU and that is of no importance to our current dispute. There is not hate speech the fucking idiot need to admit he was wrong to start claiming presenting observable instance of prior events on this board = getting fucked too many times in the ass. He can debunk our points of fuck off. Simple as that. To go crying to red trust is wussy gimp behavior. Pathetic washed up gimp.

Anyone with a sig and holding over 100btc is a greedy scumbag. Give others a chance here on this forum. Give the newbies the sig dust.