why is the price stagnant? Why do I have a feeling someone has been dumping BTC for a long time, thus suppressing the price.
Will the price reach upto $550 at the end of January, 2016 ? The rate at which it is going up it feels like the price will reach it's peak upto $550 but not more than that until the next reward halving (probably in mid-July, 2016). Till then, please hold your coins
People need to dump some coins now as I'm waiting for a long time to buy
BTC @$220.
At least we need to dump some coins temporarily for buying and hoarding them again
What software is that buddy? I like the presentation
What's BTH? I couldn't find any explanation of BTH from ChartBuddy's explanation
Chartbuddy provides a chart which shows the change of the market depth with time.
Chart shows the market depth for the last hour, the beginning of the hour at the back, latest time at the front. The bids (what people are willing to pay) stack up on the left and the asks (what people are wanting to get paid) stack up on the right.
A depth chart indicates how much it would conceivably take to shift the price. Note that orders can be cancelled so judgement should be applied. Large orders produce a large vertical part on the chart or a "wall". By watching how walls are added, moved or removed, it is possible to make a judgement of market sentiment (or arguably just observe attempts at market manipulation).
The large numbers at the top are the latest values for the closest bids and asks. The difference between these is the "spread".
World times are also listed for several major cities.
ChartBuddy's graph for Bit Finex is slightly wrong this time I guess!
I noticed it was $440.42 at 11:00:47 AM.
I understand youre frustration, it feels like ages. Segwit is under testing atm.
I can understand why it takes time, but my prime annoyance would be others holding its implementation hostage to force other changes. I read one of the Chinese pools were saying they wouldn't drop it in without a block size increase too. No doubt there'll be the r/btc freaks clubbing together to fuck things up too. Then we have another few years of pointless dicking around and playground diplomacy.
Whoa there! A fork is not a joke that without a prior consent it will be implemented just like that.
It needs time and several clarifications before coming to a solution.
And once the discussion of Segwit has started it will be implemented no matter how much whining takes place.
Developers need time. They are not restless like us.
You mean, everything's fine?
Is the solution still r3kt?
Yes? Good, this is fine.
Bow down before the one you serve. Y...Stop spreading unnecessary attempts of spreading FUD.
The blocks seem to be full due to the fact that miners are placing all of their prioritized transactions in the blocks creating a jammed up situation.
By prioritized I meant the ones which have higher mining fee.
Thats why the network is being clogged up. And thus the higher block size.
