All posts made by David48l in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread
1.
Post 9076605 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.19h):
One btc buy at 352
.
Waiting for buy at 300$ if arrives
2.
Post 9092024 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.20h):
buy?? sell?
3.
Post 9633994 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.34h):
i have it
4.
Post 18283360 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):
I want to trade my BTU too !
I changue your BT Unlimited for my BT Core,
treatment?
5.
Post 18283373 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):
OKAY WILL WHOEVER IS FOR A 1MB LIMIT PLEASE STEP FORWARD I WILL PERSONALLY SMACK YOU UPSIDE THE HEAD! :-D LOLZZZ
Bring on the 10MB blocks. The network is not run on netbooks anymore.
Its a problem? really?
6.
Post 18283455 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):
Changue bitcoin cores for bitcoins unlimited...
Ask me
7.
Post 18308454 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):
95% hashrate activation seems crazy. I can't understand why they ever thought that was going to happen.
They know it
. and remember....
to artificially limit the scaling up in favor of the private blockchain of companies and banks. This is your job.
Then alternatives appear .... private blockchains
8.
Post 20333969 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):
we have bitcoin gold and bitcoin cash, great
9.
Post 20333995 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):
Why is the UAHF considered just an altcoin when the UASF would have been deemed the true BTC?
If UAHF gains significant support and hashing power how is it not a threat?
It's called hypocrisy
10.
Post 20369161 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):
but it's about ensuring the network is de-centralised.
I've seen all kinds of stupid explanations on these forums for what constitutes "decentralized". The current bitcoin core explanation is basically "the ability to run a node". Lol? Then you got Adam and the 400 MB block gang who didn't even bother to come up with some type of poorly constructed defintion. In reality, it's the ability for people to mine the coins directly which requires commodity off the shelf mining hardware - meaning the network is currently completely centralized. Therefore, anyone who actually cares about decentralization would be campaigning for a PoW change to GPU,
otherwise there's no reason for bitcoin to exist.
If everyone mined that would help de-centralise the network, however there is no PoW change that fixes the current one's problems.
GPU's, different algorithms, they all simply kick the centralisation problems a few months down the road. We need something new, but until that comes we are stuck with what we've got.
There's no reason for any common man off the street to support bitcoin unless he can mine it himself. Supporting bitcoin at this juncture simply means helping Jihan Wu and a handful of other monopolies become richer. Bitcoin would likely have already died if it wasn't for altcoins that could be mined then converted to BTC, otherwise the ecosystem would be entirely walled off.
But what do you say ?, what gives value to bitcoin is its usability, people buy as an investment and barely know how it works, you think they are going to put to mine? LOL. If bitcoin did not have core 4 and 5 dollar commissions many more stores would use it, more value, more people, more stores, the exponential price. But the core company is not interested
11.
Post 20573114 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):
Large blocks = Gold
Segregated Witness = Fiat
Asia wants gold.
USA wants to print money.
changing bitcoins block size via politicalbattle destroys its gold like property.
So you're admitting segwit destroys bitcoins gold-like properties.
When 100% of hashpower and most actors and participants have agreed that Bitcoin have to have Segwit, then that's Bitcoin and if it doesn't have Segwit, it isn't Bitcoin. If, tomorrow, almost everybody agrees to have bigger blocks, then that will be Bitcoin and smaller blocks won't.
How is that so hard to understand?
That's a good explanation. But what happens if 51% of hashpower want bigger blocks but Core Developers refuse?
51% would be an attack. In fact that how it is defined: "The 51% attack". Consensus is somewhere around 95%. No consensus? No change.
It is undeniable that we have had the utmost consensus on the segwit issue, so: It is Bitcoin.
Miners have power, Core does too, Exchanges too, other major players and users/participants too... If almost everybody except core agree on something then you can be sure Core will be unable to avoid it.
then, 6% of hashpower can block consensus? sounds good
12.
Post 20573168 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):
The most important thing is Bitcoin's price is nicely stable. I expected massive volatility with all the fork panic, but it's been fairly flat for the last five days.
According to core a hardfork was very risky
13.
Post 20573493 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):
The most important thing is Bitcoin's price is nicely stable. I expected massive volatility with all the fork panic, but it's been fairly flat for the last five days.
According to core a hardfork was very risky
there hasn't been a hard fork in case you hadn't noticed.
Explain that statement, in my ledger I have 2 chains working
14.
Post 20669584 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):
Good morning Bitcoinland.
Still hanging in over $3kUSD/4kCAD basically going sideways at $3259USD (Bitcoinaverage) while Altcash continues to slide down to $208USD.
As difficulty drops on the Altcash network, transactions will speed up, allowing more people to dump their free altcoins while they can still get something for them.
Let's see what segwit brings.
Many voted for bitcoin price to reach $3,500+ by the end of this month but my prediction something might go over 5000 $+ + because it is going very fast while everyone else holding .
Many of us voted $3500 because it was the highest option available in the original poll and you can't change your vote.
The last 2 options were added after it burst past $3000 a couple if nights ago.
realice dos transacciones, una en bitcoin core y otra en cash.
Fee btc 1.4eur
Fee bcc 0.03eur
No digo mas. Tardarón lo mismo, contando que la dificultad de bcc aun no esta ajustada. Además de la campaña por parte de Core mineros intentando sabotear el ajuste automatico cada 12h. Realmente patetico, pero aquí la gente como corderos con los ojos vendados
15.
Post 20970226 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):
16.
Post 25572725 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):
17.
Post 25576921 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):
I can hardly believe that nobody sends spam to the bitcoin cash network with the amount of attacks that bitcoin cash is receiving in forums and social media.
It sounds pretty hypocritical to say that they are attacking the bitwit network when they do not stop attacking bitcon cash.
If they could attack the bch network with spam they would do it, there is simply no spam in any chain, it comes out too expensive
Bitmain and friends is spamming Bitcoin. If the low fee transactions actually go through then they have a more than 50% chance of mining their own fees back. Even if they don't they've driven up everyone else's fees to pay for it.
For anyone other than Bitmain to spam Bcash they'd have to buy it and kiss it goodbye forever as no one other than Bitmain is mining it. Who'd want to bother doing that?
With the amount of spam that they say they are sending the truth that it costs me to find transactions with really low rates, I must have bad aim
https://blockchain.info/unconfirmed-transactions
18.
Post 25577133 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):
The people, and without encouragement to offend, are very ignorant and manipulable. But it's not your fault if you only read censored forums and falsified threads. I encourage you to compare several points of view and draw your own conclusions. Do not let other people think for you
19.
Post 25577381 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):
The people, and without encouragement to offend, are very ignorant and manipulable. But it's not your fault if you only read censored forums and falsified threads. I encourage you to compare several points of view and draw your own conclusions. Do not let other people think for you
That's the kind of retarded banality Roger would come up with. Just sayin'.
The answer to transactions without corfirming, is simply spam
But nobody is able to show me 10 transactions at a reduced rate, there are supposed to be thousands
20.
Post 25577534 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):
this is falling low. It is also called hypocrisy
I'm a self-made multi-millionaire.
I don't give a fuck.
How little it costs to read a little
https://twitter.com/BTCNewsUpdate/status/936666638404980737
21.
Post 25578923 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):
All you have to do is visit
https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#24h scroll down and easily see that over half the transactions in memory pool paid a miner fee of 0 - 5 satoshi/byte. Are those legitimate transactions or spam? Most likely latter.
Being more than half spam because I can not find a single transaction with a really low rate? Excuse my ignorance
22.
Post 25599293 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):
Beware your message can be censored.
Yesterday I spoke in this forum about unconfirmed transactions to know if they were spam or not
All my posts have been deleted
PS: this post will be censored in 3 ...., 2 ......., 1 .......
23.
Post 25600216 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):
Beware your message can be censored.
Yesterday I spoke in this forum about unconfirmed transactions to know if they were spam or not
All my posts have been deleted
PS: this post will be censored in 3 ...., 2 ......., 1 .......
It's because you're not welcome. Make like a tree and bounce. We're trying to Wall Observer in peace.
How unfortunate your comment, I've been in this for more than three years and I thought that this censorship did not reach this forum.
Just comment on the unconfirmed transactions to see if someone could clarify if they were spam or not. Nobody could prove it, then they censored me.
and now comes an unpresentable and tells me that I'm not welcome here
haha Let's add intimidation and harassment to the list of regrettable behaviors
I am ashamed of you
24.
Post 25600283 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):
Yesterday I spoke about the unconfirmed transactions in the "wall observer" forum, many commented that they were spam transactions in the network to discredit it.
After several exchanges nobody could show me a bitcon transaction with really low rate.
This morning all my posts have been deleted. wtf? I thought there was only censorship in reddit.
Has someone else happened to you?
You are a pack of lies. Multiple people showed you plenty of times. Prick.
Maybe the liar is you.
I only asked them to show me a transaction with the really low quota to consider it spam.
I'm still waiting, instead, they censored all my posts.
Maybe you should rethink your basics and stop thinking what you are told to think
25.
Post 25601324 (copy this link) (by David48l) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):
Just comment on the unconfirmed transactions to see if someone could clarify if they were spam or not. Nobody could prove it, then they censored me.
No. You don't get it. Fuck off. This is not a thread to discuss transaction esoterica.
Take it to another thread.
Debo reconocer que sus argumentos son realmente contundentes
https://imgur.com/BC1nlGk