All posts made by Crazy in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 2005953 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: ineededausername on May 02, 2013, 03:40:04 PM
We might have to be a bit patient though.
Heh, if by a bit you mean 3 or 4 years, yes a bit.



2. Post 2026722 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: michaelGedi on May 04, 2013, 04:17:59 PM
listen - and I'm sure I speak for more than myself.

I don't give that much of a shit about your self obsessed bitcoin adventures.

you remind me of this guy: http://instagram.com/itslavishbitch#


now take your lavish life-style that I can only assume was originally funded by daddy's money, and your running bitcoin trade commentary to another thread please


NB - I don't like the ignore button personally as I like to see the conversation as a whole... just understand there is a time and a place, and that is in your own seperate thread


EDIT - I'd prefer to say no offence intended, but you need a wake up call
This. I'm never one to give much of a damn about "offending," and clowns belong in the circus. Keep the crap in your crap threads; ideally your "journal."



3. Post 2028823 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Stop worrying about if someone heard of something, worry about how you can use the damn thing. That's what matters.



4. Post 2029990 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 04, 2013, 10:07:09 PM
I think your problem is that you realize 100 million new facebook users in 3 months is quick adoption, but refuse to do the math concerning what the same number of users of Bitcoin in the same timeframe irrefutably means to USD/BTC rate.
Facebook users found utility, new BTC adopters aren't adopting for practical utility (because their is essentially none relative to reality), they're adopting for the gamble of making more in a quick flip.



5. Post 2033821 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

If you're trying to induce a panic sell off you don't do it at 4AM EST/1AM PST. Just taking profits, as usual.



6. Post 2062898 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Omg, please tell me it is. Please.



7. Post 2062939 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Rampion on May 07, 2013, 06:36:11 PM
Yes it is.
LOL. Do you know the back story for that insanity? I called him a clown before but now it seems much more fitting.



8. Post 2062998 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Geist on May 07, 2013, 06:41:59 PM
Yes it is.
LOL. Do you know the back story for that insanity? I called him a clown before but now it seems much more fitting.
Isn't he just showing off all the silver he owns?
Do you put silver pots on your head, hang it off your ears, and generally pour silverware all around your body like a lunatic? Cheesy



9. Post 2063084 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Geist on May 07, 2013, 06:50:03 PM
If I had that much money? I don't think I would care much about public opinion. Hell, I'd make all my silver into a suit of armor and run around town in it. XD
Guess we all conduct ourselves in different ways. I surely wouldn't use his "limo" service after seeing who (or what) is running it. Class and professional demeanor speak volumes about a person. If that's how he's representing himself on TV to the general public, imagine his private life.



10. Post 2063151 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

I think degrees of speculation cause the ridicule (and swimming in silverware). There is, after all, a reasonable and unreasonable degree of speculation.



11. Post 2063232 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: micalith on May 07, 2013, 07:07:25 PM
when the charts are flat this forum reminds me of school just a wee bit



12. Post 2063248 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: telemaco on May 07, 2013, 07:10:33 PM
Zuckerberg says people will get bored of Facebook if they don't bring new ideas like bringing Bitcoin to FB
To FB? For what? So I can pay them to show me more useless posts from my friends?



13. Post 3575087 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on November 14, 2013, 12:09:59 AM
It worries me the talk of an impending crash is waning.

Don't worry - the higher it goes the faster and harder it will fall.

I don't care what the uber bulls think - this happened before and it will happen again, it's only a matter of when.

Yup.  Going to suck balls when it crashes from $4k to $600 for a few seconds, and then back to $1.2k.

Very scary stuff.
? Pretty cold. For everyone that get's in $1201+ it is actually quite scary. Or are you talking from the perspective of an early adopter who is going to be ahead no matter what? These forums are fun to read Cheesy



14. Post 3575102 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on November 14, 2013, 12:19:50 AM
? Pretty cold. For everyone that get's in $1201+ it is actually quite scary. Or are you talking from the perspective of an early adopter who is going to be ahead no matter what? These forums are fun to read Cheesy

?

It's a joke..  stop thinking so hard.
If you think that's thinking hard I'd hate to see your high school or college transcripts.



15. Post 3575111 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: samson on November 14, 2013, 12:20:30 AM
We saw a 30$ dip on Gox earlier. If a crash was underway it would have happened then. We quickly recovered though, so I dont think we'll see another 20-25% dip till we'll be kissing 500$.

Again this would merely be a correction. When a crash happens you will know about it as everyone will be running around asking hos this could possibly happen.

It can and will happen. Maybe not now but it will happen.
Oh noez, dis tyme iz diffwent!



16. Post 3575130 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: bizz on November 14, 2013, 12:22:11 AM
Same as waiting for a crash below $200 or waiting for a price over $100k. Both are unrealistic crazy talk.
What? It was <$200 less than 30 days ago. lol...



17. Post 3575147 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Can we assume that equating 50% drop to 1523% increase is unrealistic too? Cheesy



18. Post 3609544 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

I'm so confused. Sad

What is actually driving this movement in China? It must be upper 90% speculation? And why are the moves so tight? Any blip in China and we almost immediately see equivalent movement in US markets. Just bots? Or something else?

Full disclosure: I sold at ~$310 and yes I'm sick about it.



19. Post 3610265 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):




20. Post 3618773 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on November 18, 2013, 02:31:51 AM
Is something happening in china we are unaware of?
God I wish I knew of some news source or forum dedicated to their market. Sad



21. Post 3618799 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Joenaes on November 18, 2013, 02:57:20 AM
China is still at 3500+, so no worries?
Spoke too soon



22. Post 3618846 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Is BTCChina tanking or something? Last posted trade was 6 min ago @ 3420



23. Post 3618883 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Miz4r on November 18, 2013, 03:08:22 AM
Is BTCChina tanking or something? Last posted trade was 6 min ago @ 3420

It went from 3200 to 3600 within 1 hour.. going back to 3420 seems like only a minor correction and still a crazy 200 CNY increase from an hour earlier. Wouldn't be surprised if it cools down a bit more.
The value is irrelevant, the fact that bitcoinity is no longer getting trading information is what's important. Unless that's just a bitcoinity problem. Which it's not.



24. Post 3618944 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Yeah, looks like volume is causing some lag @ BTCChina. Maybe a large sell off?



25. Post 3619301 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Underwhelming, I don't think that will move the market in any direction.



26. Post 3619327 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: bassclef on November 18, 2013, 04:08:08 AM
Underwhelming, I don't think that will move the market in any direction.

but good news for the future of Bitcoin in the US.
Couldn't agree more.



27. Post 3621265 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

BTCChina is laggy under volume. A selloff will come very choppily if it happens



28. Post 3621328 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on November 18, 2013, 09:04:31 AM
China's just holding at 3888.80 now.[/s] No, Bitcoinity is broken? China not updating for 6 minutes.
That's lag. Last posted trade was over 8mins ago. There it goes. China dumping.



29. Post 3625100 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Voktar on November 18, 2013, 04:20:31 PM
I have heard price was not sustainable since $13/btc, and guess... we are at $640 and going up, and price will be sustainable at $1000 and $10000 because more people are buying that selling, that's pure logic.
Do you know how much USD/day it will cost to sustain a price of $640? Or $1000? Have you done that math? You do know that BTC is still inflationary, right?



30. Post 3625123 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: RoadStress on November 18, 2013, 04:27:21 PM
3600 bitcoins per day * 640=2m$ per day to sustain it?
At least. That's new money, based entirely around speculative movement, not utility.



31. Post 3625157 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: RoadStress on November 18, 2013, 04:29:40 PM
3600 bitcoins per day * 640=2m$ per day to sustain it?
At least. That's new money, based entirely around speculative movement, not utility.

Do we know how much money per day we had the last 3 weeks? 2m$ per day doesn't seem too much with this rapid increase. Many walls were eaten and if we consider that not all mined coins will sell the same day then it's a lot less.
No I don't believe that $2m/day was a serious issue these past few days/weeks, but that's the nature of a bubble, everyone is rushing. But the more that rush in the more money it costs on a daily basis to sustain it and eventually, the new money won't feel safe. When that happens, the slow and steady decent will begin, or it'll come tumbling down.



32. Post 3625172 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: BRADLEYPLOOF on November 18, 2013, 04:31:16 PM
Who in their stupid minds would sell off their mined coins?
Someone who has to pay the bill. They're not free to mine, you know that huh?



33. Post 3625192 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 18, 2013, 04:32:24 PM
this is why bears are going are getting killed
bitcoin has no utility!?
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Outside of turning "some money" into "more money," yes the utility is very limited. Hence why 99% of your day to day transactions don't occur in BTC.



34. Post 3625218 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: RoadStress on November 18, 2013, 04:36:06 PM
Why are you comparing regular models with Bitcoin? Why is this a bubble and not a mass adoption somewhere on Earth? What are the differences? How do you know now there are just people rushing in and not wider bitcoin usage?
Usage where and for what? I'm open to that notion but I have no news of such possibility. For what use are they being adopted that I'm unaware of?



35. Post 3625415 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: RoadStress on November 18, 2013, 04:40:24 PM
Why are you comparing regular models with Bitcoin? Why is this a bubble and not a mass adoption somewhere on Earth? What are the differences? How do you know now there are just people rushing in and not wider bitcoin usage?
Usage where and for what? I'm open to that notion but I have no news of such possibility. For what use are they being adopted that I'm unaware of?

It seems that the most of the traffic comes from China. I bet you don't know anything about China and why are they using Bitcoin right now. Until you find out you can't emit any statement because you just don't know. There can be several reasons. Maybe the communist party doesn't allow people to have more than X amount of cash on their possesion, maybe it's hard to move money there, maybe maybe maybe.

Edit: made a quick google search and found this "China employs strict currency regulations that are designed to prevent large amounts of currency moving out of the country" So there is a real use there if that's still the case. I bet there can be many more that for us maybe are useless.
I didn't say there was no other usage, I said I'd like to know what they are because I'm unaware of them. Did you miss the part where I said I'm open to that sort of information that would alter my opinion? The fact is if you ask anyone that question, you'll get back "store of value" or "investing" or "moving money out of a country." Two of those are of course not really utility if it's self evident, right? If the only utility the currency possesses ceases to exist, i.e. no longer reliably stores value but instead loses value or can't hold value because no one will buy, is it no longer a currency since it now has no utility? Heh. China using it to move money... sure, might be true. But if you think they won't clamp down on that bitch when they want to, you're mistaken. That's shaky ground to place such valuation. But some people love to gamble, so best of luck.



36. Post 3625436 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Carlor on November 18, 2013, 04:50:57 PM
If there is anyone with a brain in the communist party, China will not take any kind of action against bitcoins.
If I were a Chinese leader I would praise the great Satoshi Cheesy
Yeah see, I don't foresee a nation that controls and manipulates 99% of its economy to embrace something "free market."



37. Post 3625960 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

A bit off topic, but what's the best way to get USD into any of the exchanges quickly*? I used to use bitinstant but that's down. Wires all seem to take 10 days. I need some capital ready to soak up the blood bath Sad



38. Post 3627448 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Can someone explain why it still takes days if not weeks to get money into exchanges to purchase BTC? Infrastructure? What a load of shit.



39. Post 3627469 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: ardana123 on November 18, 2013, 07:42:39 PM
LTC is the most elaborate pump and dump scheme ever. Goes up 125% for no reason
Made me LOL. And BTC is up because?

Quote from: Blitz­ on November 18, 2013, 07:43:19 PM
Max Keiser is a pump'n'dump scammer.
Couldn't be more true.



40. Post 3638927 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Is China off to the races again? Cheesy



41. Post 3744663 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: marcelus on November 28, 2013, 12:13:02 AM
Whatever happened to Proudhon?
Last I saw he was sounding like a bull. Very disappointed in him Cheesy



42. Post 3748217 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: DaRude on November 28, 2013, 07:22:31 AM
I don't have an issue with people talking LTC in terms of its effect on BTC. But bragging how much you made with LTC is just pumping and belongs to a troll box with the fontas crowd
This whole subforum is pumping.



43. Post 3748279 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: macsga on November 28, 2013, 07:31:45 AM
4. HOLD!!!
5. Until you desperately need the money follow rule #4.
So this must be all the "adoption" I've been hearing about. Cheesy



44. Post 3762997 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Looks like China is still setting the tone for this valuation. Kinda funny actually.



45. Post 3772230 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: kurious on November 29, 2013, 10:31:57 PM
Confession - I went a little bit into fiat at 1215, so I am hoping for a bit of a correction.

Hey - it's no fees weekend, am I forgiven?
No need to confess. In the heart of every bull they know deeply this is highly overvalued. You just have the balls to admit it.



46. Post 3788926 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Real action is going to be China today. Volume is up for the new day and it's bearish.



47. Post 3788975 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: OldGeek on December 01, 2013, 04:00:25 AM
What makes you say this?


Of course it can change, just pointing out early movement for the day. Seems to set the tone for China.



48. Post 3789032 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Obviously this hasn't happened yet, and I'm not suggesting it will, but under heavy volume I notice that BTCChina seems to suffer from the ole Gox lag. I wonder how things would turn out if China got their first taste of a lagged panicked selloff.



49. Post 3789065 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: OldGeek on December 01, 2013, 04:13:41 AM
Has there been a change in public sentiment?  Has the news media over there panned btc?
Wish I knew, I've been asking around here if there's any forums dedicated to their market but no one has ever mentioned it. Hard to gauge sentiment in different markets. They've had quite a run though, they're overdue for a lot of profit taking.



50. Post 3789072 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Absolutely.



51. Post 3789089 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

It doesn't seem like whale action either.



52. Post 3789104 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Someone seems to be stepping in on BTCChina. This always seems to happen, however it was quite delayed this time. Wonder if whoever has been propping things up is running low on capital.



53. Post 3789148 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

They've had very tightly aligned movement for awhile. I know some of that is due to automated trading, but I feel like there's something more involved. Not necessarily nefarious, but big movements always seem to occur simultaneously in either direction.

Quote from: Beta-coiner1 on December 01, 2013, 04:29:49 AM
Trends still indicate 'buy bitcoin' is at record highs.
That's a lagging indicator.



54. Post 3789203 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

I think if China can't reclaim support at 7000 they'll test 6000 by the end of the day.



55. Post 3789247 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

I'm not sure what to think of it but China has tested 7000 like 3 or 4 times this week. Not sure if that's bearish or bullish Cheesy Bearish they keep testing it, bullish they keep finding support (thus far).



56. Post 3789338 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: OldGeek on December 01, 2013, 04:57:49 AM
Ratz.  That one triggered my stop loss.   Roll Eyes
Custom bot for that?



57. Post 3789371 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: OldGeek on December 01, 2013, 05:04:05 AM
You could say that.  It's a DYI job.  The main components are an empty soda can, a length of mono filament fishing line*, and a used paint brush.

* I only use 20 lb test.  If you are after bigger fish you need stronger line.
Sounds dangerous.



58. Post 3789430 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

You can't troll trolls. Cheesy

And in related news, that 6900 wall on China just disappeared like Houdini.



59. Post 3789491 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

What the hell are you people talking about Cheesy



60. Post 3790641 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

I have a feeling this little rebound is a bull trap. I feel like this will test 6000 or lower before it's all said and done but I could be wrong. Also, I don't think a whale was responsible for that.



61. Post 3790860 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Vycid on December 01, 2013, 08:30:46 AM
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1roulj/china_telecom_accepts_bitcoin/
Overblown.



62. Post 3790949 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Can BTCChina reclaim 7000? I want to sleep but I need to know Sad



63. Post 3791056 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: neutrinox on December 01, 2013, 08:54:13 AM
Did you guys hear about the kid who showed the bitcoin sign on ESPN? He just received 26 000 $ worth of bitcoins! This is perfect material for a viral news story!
Look at this -- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6826653

Quote
It's worth noting that a very large percentage of these donations are coming from a very small number of parties. Notably over $10,000 each from https://blockchain.info/address/1F8UFEeVJGXUzR9TWfBMkyqbipjM...

and

https://blockchain.info/address/1JSDMMDybTZ9nEZgMUtTXQSW4hGR...

Not sure how valid it is, but if it's true it sounds orchestrated.



64. Post 3791115 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: neutrinox on December 01, 2013, 09:00:06 AM

Not sure how valid it is, but if it's true it sounds orchestrated.

It's true that there were some very large donors. But my guess is it went like this: Some whales quickly realized that they could buy huge publicity for bitcoin by sending large amounts to this kid. I do not believe the kid himself was involved in any orchestration.
Nah I don't think he is either, I just mean someone with some money to spare saw an opportunity to manipulate the media and they capitalized. Not exactly ethical, and if the media does any research (I know, laughable), they might reveal the news as such. That'd play into their "pump & dump" rhetoric quite nicely.



65. Post 3791177 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: macsga on December 01, 2013, 09:08:33 AM

Not sure how valid it is, but if it's true it sounds orchestrated.

It's true that there were some very large donors. But my guess is it went like this: Some whales quickly realized that they could buy huge publicity for bitcoin by sending large amounts to this kid. I do not believe the kid himself was involved in any orchestration.
Nah I don't think he is either, I just mean someone with some money to spare saw an opportunity to manipulate the media and they capitalized. Not exactly ethical, and if the media does any research (I know, laughable), they might reveal the news as such. That'd play into their "pump & dump" rhetoric quite nicely.
Ethical; VERY overpriced word really. What is ethical? Any ethics is "stored" within one's pants IMHO. Is media ethical? Is the human community ethical? Are you or me? Ethics is scarce these days (and from what I can recall, we haven't seen some pure ethical people since the golden age of Pericles).

On the matter now: Any publicity is a good one. So pros for whoever orchestrated this. Wink
Can't argue with that Smiley

Quote from: Vycid on December 01, 2013, 09:10:09 AM
I believe the kid promised to donate everything beyond 2 BTC to Sean's Outpost, so it's not hard to spin those big transactions as donations.
Ah I see, didn't know that. Definitely softens the story. Will be interesting to see how it plays out nonetheless. I have a feeling it'll be buried in the shuffle of other news or marginalized to tech-related outlets, though.



66. Post 3791231 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Vycid on December 01, 2013, 09:15:56 AM
Most editors are sporting a raging Bitcoin boner right now
Probably due to their position

That didn't sound right



67. Post 3791260 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

I'd actually like to know how many writers that published positive BTC news articles actually own BTC and neglect full disclosure. Curious if that would violate some laws due to conflict of interest. You know things might shift when you get the media doing the pumping for ya.



68. Post 3791376 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: philip2000uk on December 01, 2013, 09:35:46 AM
what about the ones that have bank accounts and promote banks and have money in tax havens.  Oh and also most banks are in a tax have, it's the Square mile called the city of london corporation, that's not even london it's a completely different thing, has different laws and so that's why all the banks are HQ'd there.
I'm not really sure what you mean, but if you're saying what I think you're saying I don't think that's necessarily a fair analogy. Right now BTC is being traded as a brand new asset class. It's not like anyone in the public eye is actually promoting a generic "bank account" and if they were, how would they possibly gain from doing so?



69. Post 3791476 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: neutrinox on December 01, 2013, 09:47:29 AM
what about the ones that have bank accounts and promote banks and have money in tax havens.  Oh and also most banks are in a tax have, it's the Square mile called the city of london corporation, that's not even london it's a completely different thing, has different laws and so that's why all the banks are HQ'd there.
I'm not really sure what you mean, but if you're saying what I think you're saying I don't think that's necessarily a fair analogy. Right now BTC is being traded as a brand new asset class. It's not like anyone in the public eye is actually promoting a generic "bank account" and if they were, how would they possibly gain from doing so?

Yeah but come on you can make the same accusation for pretty much anything the reporters write about. Maybe they own an iPhone and give nice reviews for them, which basically strengthens the ecosystem and thus benefits the reporters. Or maybe they write a nasty story about democrats because they like republicans better. How about giving US economics positive articles because they live in US and don't want to have a depression? They could also throw dirt at bitcoin simply because their boss tells them to do so, because the boss has an interest to keep bitcoins from spreading. Drawing the lines becomes impossible.
I think all those benefits would be quite marginal, if even recognizable. Consider that people on TV who speak positively of equities of which they have a stake but don't disclose their position can be fined or jailed for that (at least, I believe so).



70. Post 3791551 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

No because you would see no significant gain from mentioning something positive about Euros.



71. Post 3791793 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: neutrinox on December 01, 2013, 10:10:07 AM
You can say the same about bitcoins. With a 12 billion dollar market cap it's not very easy anymore for one person to move the price.

And what if I own some Apple stocks trough a hedge fund or something? Should I not be allowed to say publically that I think iPhones are nice phones?
I don't know. Just thinking aloud. It'd probably be limited to anything considered financial advice, not necessarily just positive reporting.



72. Post 3792113 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Man if 6500 CNY doesn't hold, shit's about to get hectic.



73. Post 3792327 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Vycid on December 01, 2013, 11:54:25 AM
Looks like a double bottom just printed on all 3 exchanges.
Only exchange that matters is BTCChina hehe. Wouldn't call the bottom just yet, though.



74. Post 3793086 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Oh boy, 6500 CNY support has collapsed. :\

See ya'll at 6000



75. Post 3793211 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on December 01, 2013, 05:50:03 PM
Just think- 4 days of US banks more or less not open. Next week is going to have an orgy of new money on the exchanges. :-)
China's been dictating the course of this movement from the beginning. I doubt the US will have any significant impact.



76. Post 3793510 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Someone just dropped a shit ton of $ on BTC china trying to hold this thing together. It's going to hurt when it doesn't work.



77. Post 3793559 (copy this link) (by Crazy) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

I'd love to meet the bull that just attempted to stop China's free fall. That was a valiant effort indeed.