All posts made by electerium in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 10720093 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

is there a way to look at orderbooks on bitcoinwisdom??



2. Post 10720101 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

someone(s) is doing their damndest to collect as many coins between 296-299 right now in finex.



3. Post 10720113 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

bearstamp orderbook looks awful for breaking 300.

it's all finex and china if we're going to do it.



4. Post 10720812 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on March 10, 2015, 04:43:12 AM
Wow, how is the finex price 7 dollar higher than stamp. Never seen it being higher than 2$ before . 7$ is a big opportunity for arbitraging


Because someone has plunked a 7k wall up to $300 on stamp.

Whoever it is is not a sophisticated trader or he would have walls on multiple exchanges. losing $5/coin selling on Stamp is costing him at least $35,000 for that wall.

only makes sense if that 1 person(s) are trying to buy all the coins on finex/china and just using stamp to keep the price under 300$ knowing that they have the lowest volume and it takes 24hr to wire money onto the site.

I think it's within the realm of possibility just examining the orderbook and how staggered the walls are at 296$+ on stamp.


But thats easily a many many million dollar operation. If someone wanted to buy millions of coins cheaply, they couldve just entered the auction themselves/

also stamp hasnt broken $294 so none of those walls have been touched.



5. Post 10730745 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: ImI on March 10, 2015, 09:53:52 PM

lol! it took exactly 18h of standstill to get beartards back on the table.

Far better positioned to stay above $300 right now than we were 24hr ago.


A 6k wall still exists on stamp, and as some of us discussed here last night, the staggered walls at $294 have never been under threat.

While at Finex it looks like a lot of the guys who wanted out at 300 got out earlier and there isnt a wall.



6. Post 10730789 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: inca on March 10, 2015, 10:19:35 PM
Bitstamp has fallen to #10 in volume. Seems like bitstamp would buy that wall themselves and sell it later for profits and free up some volume to get some fees flowing in again.

They are about to be passed up by Kraken and local frickin bitcoins in volume lol.

What is a bit strange is that if you or I had bitcoins to sell on stamp we would move the wall higher to get a better price for our sale. That is move the wall up higher as the market lifted the other exchange prices. The persistent existence of lower prices on stamp suggests to me that there is no money on the exchange to arb the coins on sale there. There may be no genuine buyers or sellers left.

I'm with this reasoning here.


The wall was as great as 7.6k last night up to $300 on stamp, with bidside as low as 3k.


Theres no real $ on bitstamp and it seems possible that someone is just using stamp to collect a lot of coins under 300.



7. Post 10730844 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on March 10, 2015, 10:34:02 PM
If they wanted to collect coins, why wouldn't they just market order everything that wasnt theirs on $300? Or, some of the 7k+ that has been on or under $300 on BFX? Doesn't make sense.

It also doesnt make sense for it to be a real wall, unless they think this is the best way to offload a bunch of coins... (other exchanges rally, people go nuts on his wall, what happens after he don't care)

too obvious to market buy up to 300

then you run the risk of your wall being eaten on stamp. It's best to keep the artificial wall and constantly buy small pieces.



8. Post 10741439 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

being sideways at 290-300 is far better than being in a full on bear market for 15 months.


People should also take note that there is global uneasiness with the general economy of the world. While many of those equities markets have shaved off few % points, and lost billions in value (incl. gold), bitcoin has risen along with very bullish outside indicators (finra, 21, tmobile, etc.)

Gist being, investors have taken quite a bit of a beating the last few weeks globally, and we're supposed to sit here and convince them that investing in bitcoin is more preferable than sitting on the sideline or staying in traditional investment vehicles? Not... happening.


Being sideways for a month or two while the traditional equities markets continue to shave off points little by little might be the best thing for bitcoin. It would be a compelling narrative leading up to a SEC/DOJ decision on the etf, gemini, or a major tech company fully integrating bitcoin into its platform.



9. Post 10742407 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

while a lot of smart people are arguing that bitstamp has been uncoupled to price, it has hit $294, and a lot of those walls are now under threat.


Could be a signal that 300 is now attainable.



10. Post 10742431 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 11, 2015, 09:23:24 PM
32,000$ by mid 2017?

what did i missed???

Should i book from now my vacations?

32,000$ by mid 2017 is my prediction.

I've seen utility and usability grow enormously the past year, and i hear of many cool projects in the works. Market has been and continues to totally ignore all this and has been only focused on finding a bottom, I believe we found that bottom and we're heading up now, when the ball really starts to roll, poeple will come back and take another look at bitcoin and find that it can be very useful to them. Bitcoin will begin to fulfil its promise of being better more useful and cheaper, the world will take notice, we'll see it being used as a parallel currency here and there, china will have no choice but to reviste its ban on bitcoin use in order to participate in the "digital economy",  and then...



ok fuck it setting new target: 320,000$ by 2020

the ETF is a do not pass go, do not collect $200 kind of scenario.


With it, possibilities are endless.

without it, we are screwed.



11. Post 10742487 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: spooderman on March 11, 2015, 09:27:31 PM
fuck the etf.

the etf is completely necessary for bitcoin to attain a high valuation (and by high, let's say over 12b, previous ATH).



12. Post 10743497 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: uhoh on March 11, 2015, 11:10:34 PM
Stamp is gonna break soon

those walls are real close. 20k close


we're going to find out real soon whose bullshitting and who isnt.



13. Post 10743552 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

ok ok here we go on stamp.




14. Post 10743690 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on March 11, 2015, 11:31:18 PM
Who's gonna be the first to take us back up over 300?  Stamp? Finex? China??

finex.


stamp has zero volume.



15. Post 10743713 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

wow.

those walls on stamp are legit and being touched



16. Post 10743767 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

stamp > finex right now


someone is obviously waiting for orders to post up on stamp.

very interesting!



17. Post 10786462 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

I have no fucking earth idea what is happening right now but I have my seatbelt on.



18. Post 10787619 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: brg444 on March 16, 2015, 06:32:32 AM
Winklevoss twins speaking about Bitcoin at SXSW tomorrow in Texas, surprised no one has mentioned this. I didn't even know about it until my wife told me that she's going to watch.

I assumed that most people here also read the /r/bitcoinmarkets daily trading thread. Anyways we had some discussion on this yesterday:

http://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/2z3b2d/daily_discussion_sunday_march_15_2015/cpfgylz

There are a lot of skeptics that this alone will be the spark to lead to the next rally (I'm talking about their exchange). It's an overestimated aspect if you want my opinion. Besides there were a lot of other bullish news that the market didn't even care for. The ETF on the other hand...  Roll Eyes

the exchange itself shouldn't move the market at first but I expect that the potential announcement of it being "sponsored" by X major US bank will give us a lift.


if the platform allows for leveraging that would be monumental and all but confirm that the ETF is coming.



19. Post 10791523 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: Afrikoin on March 16, 2015, 03:41:12 PM
Is 5 years a reasonable estimate for Bitcoin to become a global legitimate trad-able asset class? - for individuals and institutional capital eg pension funds?

Serious question

Shorter I think. Once Gemini launches the ETF clock starts. We will know within a short window how likely the etf can be a reality. Everything relies on Gemini, however.



20. Post 10794865 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

I think this is what we can expect the next few weeks:


Lots of sideways action between 280-295
Lots of Sat/Sunday pumps
Lots of Wednesday-Sat dumps


People clearly feel that there is an imminent announcement. Whehter it is gbtc, gemini, or another huge VC investment, or even COIN news, people are going to buy up lots of coins between Sunday to Monday night in anticipation of an announcement.

Fundamentals are clearly improving, and in retrospect, we should have all gone long when Gemini stated that they plan to launch with a US facing bank that will provide full fledged USD services.

If you're sitting on the sidelines, I'd look to buy later in the week.
If you're looking to dump a heavy position, do it early in the week and always refresh reddit, twitter, and have sms news alerts before you pull the trigger.

I'm not necessarily convinced anything is on the horizon besides Gemini (which should have a monumental impact given that China currently holds about 75% of trading volume-- but if you remove btcchina they probably hold somewhere between 35-60% of all volume). But if Gemini launches with capabilities beyond buying and selling, and if this US facing bank is crazy bullish on bitcoin, it will pave the way for COIN and literally set an absolute floor for bitcoin in terms of value. A lot of people don't understand that a lot of institutional $ doesnt really move around. We're talking about roths, pensions, etc. All of those monies literally sit unmoved for years and decades. It will ensure that barring some zero day exploit, bitcoin will have an absolute floor in a post-gemini, post-etf world. Literally "cheap" coins will be a figure of speech.



21. Post 10808139 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

I would expect a little more downward pressure by the end of the week.


This is the cycle you're going to see for the next few weeks heading into Gemini's launch and how and who this US facing bank is, and whether there will be a joint statement of further relationships with Bitcoin.

Youll see lots of Wednesday-Friday dumps and sideways action with Sat-Mon pumps in anticipation of news.



22. Post 10865778 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Im sick of reading you people post about the swaps on bfx.


It

means

nothing



Until you are in a middle of a massive dump/spike either way, where a squeeze literally occurs, the past few months have told us that it means nothing. Someone has been eating USD at .11% and the overall market doesnt care.

China controls 75% of the trading market, and until Gemini or Coinbase begin operating in NY, CA, TX, VA, MA we are going to see a lot of pump and dumps.



23. Post 10895774 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

Quote from: coinableS on March 26, 2015, 07:52:17 PM
It's 3:50 AM in Shanghai... how will China react to the BIT news once they wake up? I'm thinking bulllish, those China men really know how to rally.

them and the HFTs should be permanently kicked out of bitcoin.



24. Post 10913257 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

my winkdex app has stopped updating at 854am est.


anyone else?



25. Post 11269293 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

shorts are climbing back up on finex.


That's just pure gambling imo. Large institutional bank invests in bitcoin, no real slippage in price over weekend, fresh news cycle on monday.

i dont understand why anyone would short here.



26. Post 11269319 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: podyx on May 03, 2015, 06:50:44 AM
shorts are climbing back up on finex.


That's just pure gambling imo. Large institutional bank invests in bitcoin, no real slippage in price over weekend, fresh news cycle on monday.

i dont understand why anyone would short here.

Yup, definately looks like we'll be heading up for the moment

It's like they all used lvl 1 thinking:


Omg thursday pump to $238 over, slippage to $233 over weekend, ok we're back to normal, let's pile on the shorts again!!!

back to $225 we go!!!


I mean, is there any real money to be made shorting back down to $220-225 after thursday? Seriously?


You are shorting on normal weekend dip in volume where there is a small amount of slippage and your premise is that everything has returned to the norm so we must be going back down to $225?

Yeah, that's so fucking worth it, shorting from $233 back to $225 on zero volume against a fresh news cycle.

awful reasoning imo.



27. Post 11286384 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: BayAreaCoins on May 04, 2015, 10:42:02 PM
I wouldn't buy GBTC at 1750 per coin, but I could do 380 and 420 like some have. By the time I would cash out some of my 401k and get taxed and penalized I would end up spending more than that per BTC, so to be able to roll a bunch of my 401k into bitcoin is well worth the added cost of each share. I am planning on buying GBTC shares with 10% of my incoming 401k contributions once the ask side is built up. For every $1 I put into my 401k my company contributes $2, so I am very excited about this.

Wouldn't you be far better off making a loan to yourself from your 401k avoiding the tax/penalties and then buying Bitcoin with that for 1/2 price?

Or is that too much work and your 401k doesn't mean that much to you at this point in your life because the majority of it comes from your company & you don't need it yet?
 
This is the first time in my +2 years of fucking around with Bitcoin that I would not recommend it to a friend... something feels fishy.

Definitely a little fuckery in the ether.

Are we discussing the difference between personal investing or institutional investing, because I think you're getting confused about the difference here, especially on the buyside.



28. Post 11286393 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: itod on May 04, 2015, 11:11:48 PM
The shares I sold at $133.7 were shares I bought within my self-directed Ameritrade Roth IRA.
You do not have to be an accredited investor to buy or sell shares of this stock, whose value is backed by the number of bitcoins it holds.

This GBTC thing is such a joke. It's obvious that each of these long-announced big-things-turned-fiascoes leave a BTC in worse state then before, because of broken expectations that some serious funds can get hold of BTC without sending money to unregulated exchanges. Please, please, never again announce "Big money in BTC" before there is a real mechanism for it to reach there, you make more harm then good even if you are thinking that being positive can't do any damage. Well, it actually can when many expectations get broken again and again.

Explain to me if you are in charge of an institutional fund (e.g. endowment, pension) why on earth you would wire 20$million to bitstamp/finex/coinbase and buy bitcoins?


The irony of GBTC is that there is no liquidity, which is the same exact issue that we had before GBTC, and still will have until an ETF becomes approved.




29. Post 11286502 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: itod on May 04, 2015, 11:31:57 PM
The shares I sold at $133.7 were shares I bought within my self-directed Ameritrade Roth IRA.
You do not have to be an accredited investor to buy or sell shares of this stock, whose value is backed by the number of bitcoins it holds.

This GBTC thing is such a joke. It's obvious that each of these long-announced big-things-turned-fiascoes leave a BTC in worse state then before, because of broken expectations that some serious funds can get hold of BTC without sending money to unregulated exchanges. Please, please, never again announce "Big money in BTC" before there is a real mechanism for it to reach there, you make more harm then good even if you are thinking that being positive can't do any damage. Well, it actually can when many expectations get broken again and again.

Explain to me if you are in charge of an institutional fund (e.g. endowment, pension) why on earth you would wire 20$million to bitstamp/finex/coinbase and buy bitcoins?

Have you read what I've written? That's exactly what I've said: They would never, ever, send money to unregulated exchanges. It's simply against their basic policies. Institutional money has no mechanism of acquiring significant amount of BTC, except for the FBI auctions which is not usual way how they do business. Even if they want to buy BTC they can't, putting aside question whether they want to do that or not. That's why I've said any "good-intended" announcement of big money entering BTC which ends up being false, leaves much more damage then idiot who announced it imagined.

we've known probably since late fall 2014 that only investors who had shares of GBTC for more than 12 months would be eligibile to trade them on the OTC market.

What's happened today is no surprise, there's no liquidity.




30. Post 11315520 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

as speculators we've done our part.


No matter when you bought in, what your avg position is, this is no longer in our control. We pushed this commodity into the spotlight, gave it value, and now it's time for the big guns to take over. The 2-8 million of us in the world have given it 3 billion of value.

Without us, they dont have business opportunities to change the world.

Now it's up to them to do what they do--- business and generating economy-- to take us to the moon.


Guys, it's over for us, and the slow value decline/ lack of big pumps over the last 6 months are those signals, weak hands out, boat is filled up and we've set sail. This thing now trades like every other commodity or equity the market, up +/- 5% daily 99.9% of the time. The times of +/-15% daily is over.

Let the big kids move in and take it wherever it goes.



31. Post 11846463 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

how big of an idiot do you have to be to help run up LTC from 3.8-->4.8 the same day the bubble pops?



32. Post 11846489 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

Quote from: Sitarow on July 10, 2015, 10:36:37 PM
how big of an idiot do you have to be to help run up LTC from 3.8-->4.8 the same day the bubble pops?

Someone that wants LTC for one reason or another?

strawman



33. Post 11846540 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

Quote from: degreiving on July 10, 2015, 10:45:06 PM
how big of an idiot do you have to be to help run up LTC from 3.8-->4.8 the same day the bubble pops?

Someone that wants LTC for one reason or another?

It's been said that LTC is BTC's leading indicator.  But not by me, so let's not think about that now.
We'll be just fine...

so a 200m market cap leads a 4b market cap?



34. Post 11937108 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

looks like gold vs USD spot

basically spot gold price in USD vs USD relative to world's currencies

I hate those charts because the scales are always manipulated into confirmation bias.




35. Post 11965387 (copy this link) (by electerium) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: aztecminer on July 25, 2015, 05:33:56 AM
soon 1 oz of silver will be worth 320+ bitcoins ..

your a fucking MORON

but you realy knew that so good night bitch.

and 1 bitcoin can buy your brains Roll Eyes


problems with bitcoins:


A. "dumb people" are going to lose bitcoins if and when more people use them.

B. "dumb people" are going to lose bitcoins through malware hacks.. security for bitcoins is gimped for newbs .

C. eventually bitcoins will be forced to 'create out of thin air' more bitcoins. and bitcoins is not being straight forward about this thus it is being a scheme.

D. when more users do adopt bitcoin pc's will require a hard drive just to hold the blockchain, and everytime that hard drive fails will be forced to download the entire bloack chain again.

E. security has been gimped with bitcoin at exchanges.. and just about every single time a bitcoin exchange is hacked the perputators never get caught .. the coins are just gone.. noone ever gets busted ..

F. every single transaction is recorded in the blockchain.. no privacy at all... none zero.

G. we got people talking about "soft forks" to make new units of currency.. it might not be talked about but it sounds possible entire wallets being forked right out of the blockchain.


it is very doubtful all the problems with bitcoin can be resolved in time to become the replacement currency you all wish and hope for .. its going to be gold and silver.. they are going to surprise you and everyone holding bitcoins is going to take a massive haircut.

Problem is I cant send gold or silver across the planet in 15 seconds.



H. and you cant buy anything without a pc or phone either.

I. the entire economic infrastructure will have a serious vulnerability.


there ya go.. goodnite.

Unless you think WW3 is coming, you are a moron.


A complete financial fiat collapse = WW3 will ensue.

Everyone will demand that their debt be forgiven, and countries where govts end up dissolving over night will become the focus of a new world war.


Otherwise, I dont think we end up seeing hyperinflation, which would be a precusor and the final true bat-signal that war is coming. What's more likely it seems is that the world plunges into depression and there is a massive re-ordering of wealth. If that happens, I can assure you that GOLD and SILVER, although extremely valuable, will not supplant bitcoin. If you are a wealthy person looking to flee a country or to smuggle wealth overseas, you wont be looking at GOLD or silver as wealth preservation, they are far too difficult to move. Diamonds, gemstones, and state secrets as a physical asset will be much preferred over gold and silver.