Satoshi was/is not a person. Bitcoin was created by the Zionists who control the ASIC fabs via their control of usury. Bitman is likely a Zionist operative (@Dorky had documented their ties to Israel as one supporting evidence, and I documented that ASICBoost was preordained by Satoshi in the design of Bitcoin). Bitcoin is creative destruction of the nation-state central banks they control in order to gain a one-world reserve currency they control surreptitiously (a workaround for political resistance to the NWO), done in an obfuscated manner which causes all of you who hate them to actually work on their behalf. Deception, compartmentalization, and sufficient plausible deniability to appease nimwits is their modus operandi.

Craig Wright even fucked up the probability math in one of his recent nchain whitepapers and had to yank it. Craig isn't Satoshi, but he may be on the Zionist payroll.

Bitcoin was designed to be a reserve currency, not the transactional currency. The onchain scaling is to be achieved with $10,000+ transaction fees to kick the peons offchain. The $billionaires will pay these transaction fees to the Zionist who control the mining and most of the BTC (who the fuck do you think controls Satoshi's stack).


You're incredibly stupid. Far beyond what can be expressed in words. So stupid in fact, you're incapable of recognizing how stupid[indoctrinated] you are.

Anyone who believes commodification of proof-of-work is not impossible propaganda or who believes Lightning Networks will result in anything other than an oliigarchy for Bitcoin, is ignorant of the technological details. Bitcoin is designed such that it's an insoluble problem w.r.t. to it's centralized control by the Zionists. It's designed to go into their lap no matter what action is taken by the free market.

We're participating in and helping to promote the construction of the 666 system. Cherish the gloating.

If you were intellectually honest, you'd admit there's no way to prevent the oligarchy control of Bitcoin. It's inevitable if not already so behind the veil of mining. Research has shown for example that as the revenue for miners from transaction fees exceed the revenue from the programmed block reward, the incentives change such that it will fork off into an unbounded number of forks. This is because miners then have an incentive to bribe other miners to mine of the block they won, by sharing transaction fees. And the Byzcoin design didn't solve this dilemma. The only way to prevent this outcome is for a (probably surreptitious) oligarchy of mining to form.

And your research for BU was more or less debunked.

It's an insoluble problem as long as the only consensus algorithms are proof-of-work, proof-of-stake, or (a permissioned set of validators for) Byzantine agreement. I've studied this very deeply. Have you Peter?

Last time I checked, it seemed MP et al were hoping a PoW system that requires unbounded memory would rescue them from those who control the ASIC foundaries, but I had pointed out that it can be DoS attacked (because the requirement for memory is unbounded). Even if it worked, it wouldn't resolve the incentives incompatibility of transaction fees. Is there a new epiphany I should be aware of?

MP seems to underestimate the forethought of the Zionists. He's a large whale unaware of the whaling ship and net that will devour him someday. He's serving a useful role though and they'll play along for the time being.

Not interested. When Trilema publishes their "research" in a manner that doesn't require busy people to wade through endless masturbation in the logs, then there will be peer review.

Deflecting your inability to address specifics with vacuous bravado is not very convincing.

I don't need Trilema to generate for myself a few $millions up to a cool $billion or so, and to accomplish important implementation on the decentralization issue. Why would I waste my time wading through that Btcbase masturbation. I didn't see much in the way of viable plans over there in the past.

Sorry but I'm not impressed.

I'm leaning towards the notion that Trilema is a grouping of sycophants, as is this thread. As if controlling the narrative here or there is actually important.   A bunch of guys who want to think they're with all the smart and cool guys. Groupthink myopia. Defending the decentralization of Bitcoin with a grouping of sycophants is illogical because the latter is centralization (politics).

Do you guys really spend your time regularly monitoring this thread and the Btcbase logs (and posting adolescent memes). What an enriching and interesting lifestyle.

Where's the humor? Do you still make fart jokes with your underarm also? Do you guys ever step back and look at yourselves from an outside perspective?


You wish to amplify the Streisand effect even more? Please do.

Hopefully you'll make it so arduous for newbies to signup to BCT that it will become entirely the dying echo chamber that sycophants wish for it to be.