All posts made by Laosai in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread
1.
Post 13876009 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):
Bitcoin now has a rather nice flag formation after the rise from 200-500 with little media fanfare. The alt's are waking up and the halving is approaching. The only thing keeping bitcoin back is the blocksize debate which will soon resolve either by a HF with majority of miner support, or with Core acquiescing to the demands of the market and miners (3 weeks!) and fixing a 2mb blocksize HF in the roadmap.
It isn't hard to see a perfect storm for bitcoin during times of further turbulence in the major markets, where negative rates are being introduced in Western economies as central bankers start to lose control. Previously there has been a hunt for return and yield with QE and cheap money post 2008 being used by banks to bid up stock markets and levitate asset prices. ZIRP has turned everyone into a speculator with cash offering negative returns and the markets looking crash prone now bitcoin may start to look mighty attractive as an asset class in the coming months with it's unique monetary properties.
How many times have we heard this before. "Oh, Bitcoin's fix is just around the corner. It's already in the works. It's just as if it has already happened."
Time after time we think it's over only to turn around and find out we haven't gotten ANYWHERE. XT, Classic, Core Roadmap....
All that has happened is that some miners sent a letter to Core saying they don't want any trouble, they just want a time frame on the hard fork. Why would Core listen to them any more than us? Core knows that these guys will avoid a contentious hard fork like the plague and so they can be ignored with impunity.
Core guys say "fuck you" to Gavin, Mike, Jeff, Coinbase, Bitpay, Bitstamp, The Winklevi, us, etc but they are supposed to just cave immediately to some Chinese miners who have more to lose in a fight than anybody else? Does core have a history of being responsive to stakeholder concerns?
Dream on. It ain't fixed until it's fixed. Until then, holding is risky, selling is prudent and buying is just plain naive.
You're maybe a bit pessimistic. Whatever core or classic, one of them will become the fix.
2.
Post 13879386 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

and market is ( or was at least ) pricing in this Mage FUD
buy buy buy!Ahah! Like this point of view

But yeah seems like the size issue is actually gonna be resolved more or less democratically!
3.
Post 13879624 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):
We're already seeing blocks fill up on this pump. I'm curious as to how a rally can be sustained when confirmation times take hours.
Yeah, right, whatever.

The last six months regarding the average block size look pretty stable to me, with a slightly upward trend in the chart.. and that upward trend in the approximately 60% capacity arena potentially could be nearly completely resolved by seg wit.
https://blockchain.info/charts/avg-block-size?timespan=180days&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=After seg wit goes into effect, then we can assess the situation and regroup... ..
In other words, transactions etc seem to be going pretty well on the technical side of bitcoin, and maybe some of the public is coming to realize that there are really not any technical problems in bitcoin, and accordingly, if you keep doubling down in selling your supposedly existing coins based on these upward BTC price movements, we may be relieved of you from bitcoin and your baloney posts very, very soon.
Okay, currently blocks are around 0.65 MB, almost double from one year ago (0.35 MB), while the average max. size is around 0.9 MB (assuming almost 1 in 10 blocks is empty). The local minimum average block sizes have been steadily going up in the past half year (which you call "pretty stable"):
- Sep: 0.39 MB
- Oct: 0.43 MB
- Dec: 0.49 MB
- Jan: 0.53 MB
Until mid 2015, the local
maxima rarely came above 0.4 MB. That's anything but stable. At this rate, the shit hits the fan in a few months from now.
This graph shows the picture a bit more clearly.
https://blockchain.info/charts/avg-block-size?timespan=2year&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=7&show_header=true&scale=0&address=Well thanks for the graph.
Indeed you can't really call that stable... I wonder what will happen if it hits the 0.9 before anything is done... Will the tx simply queue? They'll be proceeded in order or randomly? Maybe taking the fee into account?
You gotta take that into account too, even currently lots of tx might have no fee at all. For this one well they should do less transactions and pay a fee with it. That should help a little no?
4.
Post 13880297 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):
400 held!!!!! That means I don't have to close my short...yet.
Actually watching a wall on the wall observer thread. Whoooda thunk it?
The catch is that the was was invisible. Heluva thing watching bulls batter it over and over without making a dent.
Apparently the market had the opposite reaction that I had to the miner letter. Optimists, I guess.
I don't think it means something until it means something.
From what i see you're just incredibly pessimistic. You have more faith in then crash of btc that more bitcoiners have in its success ^^
Seems like you were wrong though. I don't really understand why you have no faith in this currency. No reason for it to go down from what I know.
5.
Post 13880323 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):
We're already seeing blocks fill up on this pump. I'm curious as to how a rally can be sustained when confirmation times take hours.
Yeah, right, whatever.

The last six months regarding the average block size look pretty stable to me, with a slightly upward trend in the chart.. and that upward trend in the approximately 60% capacity arena potentially could be nearly completely resolved by seg wit.
https://blockchain.info/charts/avg-block-size?timespan=180days&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=After seg wit goes into effect, then we can assess the situation and regroup... ..
In other words, transactions etc seem to be going pretty well on the technical side of bitcoin, and maybe some of the public is coming to realize that there are really not any technical problems in bitcoin, and accordingly, if you keep doubling down in selling your supposedly existing coins based on these upward BTC price movements, we may be relieved of you from bitcoin and your baloney posts very, very soon.
Okay, currently blocks are around 0.65 MB, almost double from one year ago (0.35 MB), while the average max. size is around 0.9 MB (assuming almost 1 in 10 blocks is empty). The local minimum average block sizes have been steadily going up in the past half year (which you call "pretty stable"):
- Sep: 0.39 MB
- Oct: 0.43 MB
- Dec: 0.49 MB
- Jan: 0.53 MB
Until mid 2015, the local
maxima rarely came above 0.4 MB. That's anything but stable. At this rate, the shit hits the fan in a few months from now.
This graph shows the picture a bit more clearly.
https://blockchain.info/charts/avg-block-size?timespan=2year&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=7&show_header=true&scale=0&address=Well thanks for the graph.
Indeed you can't really call that stable... I wonder what will happen if it hits the 0.9 before anything is done... Will the tx simply queue? They'll be proceeded in order or randomly? Maybe taking the fee into account?
You gotta take that into account too, even currently lots of tx might have no fee at all. For this one well they should do less transactions and pay a fee with it. That should help a little no?
A tiny minory of tx are processed without fees (214 in the past 24 hours, see
https://bitcoinfees.21.co/ ). I think these are mostly payouts of mining pools to miners (what's the point of including a fee to pay yourself?), but I'm not sure. Miners can pick and chose which tx to process. So if there's a persistent lack of capacity, expect the ones with the lowest fees not to be processed. They will be stuck for some days until they expire.
The challenge will be predict what fee you need to pay to avoid your tx to end up stuck. Kind of like going to the supermarket and having to price yourself the items that you buy, running the risk that you'll never make it past the cashier because the price you picked was too low (while the cashiers serve the highest paying customers first).
Ahah! Ok so all tx do have fees.
It gonna be hard having a good estimation of the fee you gotta pay. But what if you're wrong? Will your tx be stuck until it's randomly chosen to complete a block? Or will it be lost until a miner finally accepts it as the fee is high enough compared to other tx of a block?
What I mean is: will it be random or it might get stuck until the end of the time if other tx always have a higher fee?
6.
Post 13880523 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

knock knock knocking on heavens door
Mah. Don't say that. I'm sure it gonna get backed by lots of buying trend ^^
Well we all know that 400 is a huge ceiling. Lots of holders want to get rid of part of their investment at such price.
7.
Post 13880904 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):
Well I knew it wouldn't hold. We gonna test the 400$ ceiling for a few days until the market decides between the 420 and the 380.
8.
Post 13881429 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):
Ahah! Ok so all tx do have fees.
The fees currently paid, even for first block inclusion while 'blocks are full' are near zero.
Urgent first block inclusion right now costs 0.03 USD and if you want to go +1-3 blocks, you can drop that to ~1cent. Spamming the blockchain is, for all practical intents and purposes, a very low cost activity.
Do you have somewhere where you get those informations? Cause it would be usefull to follow this price trend.
9.
Post 13881755 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):
Ahah! Ok so all tx do have fees.
The fees currently paid, even for first block inclusion while 'blocks are full' are near zero.
Urgent first block inclusion right now costs 0.03 USD and if you want to go +1-3 blocks, you can drop that to ~1cent. Spamming the blockchain is, for all practical intents and purposes, a very low cost activity.
Do you have somewhere where you get those informations? Cause it would be usefull to follow this price trend.
Sure:
https://bitcoinfees.21.co/Which fee should I use?
The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 30 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top.
For the median transaction size of 327 bytes, this results in a fee of 9,810 satoshis.9810 Satoshi / 100.000.000 x 398$ = 3.9 cents for a 327 byte tx and 2.98 cents for a 250 byte tx. Again that's for first block inclusion - calculated with 30 satoshi per byte. And there are others paying 1-10 or 11-20 etc (you can see the breakdown).
Edit: Uploading photo... right now fees for first block are even lower at 20 satoshi/byte:

Wow! You're full of useful links buddy ^^
That's cool. Even though I got no idea of how you make the equivalent byte/ satoshi (I mean how many bytes does my transaction take depending of the number of bitcoins i send) but it gives you a raw estimation nonetheless! Thanks!
10.
Post 13882433 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):
Wow! You're full of useful links buddy ^^
That's cool. Even though I got no idea of how you make the equivalent byte/ satoshi (I mean how many bytes does my transaction take depending of the number of bitcoins i send) but it gives you a raw estimation nonetheless! Thanks!
The size of the transaction is not relevant to the btcs you are sending. You could be sending 0.01 btc or 10 btc and the tx size could be the same.
However if you had an address that has its 10 btcs as a result of gathering, say, 1000 donations of 0.01 btc there, then while trying to send these 10 btcs you would essentially be transferring 1000 x 0.01 btc, so at that point you'd be looking at a pretty large tx in terms of bytes/kilobytes.
Ok so that means that as long as I send my money from one unique adress I don't have to pay much more than a few satoshis?
11.
Post 13882441 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):
Fuck me. It's hard to imagine a worse call. Well, the market has spoken and the market always gets the last word.
Depends if you can hold your shorting. Price is going to fold further. It's impossible to hold the 400 forever.
12.
Post 13884076 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):
Damned, I was sure we were going to crash after the 400... good I waited, I'm hesitating into oppening a short right now!
13.
Post 13889804 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):
Is Blockstream working on one of those Turing complete scripting languages for smart contracts as a sidechain at all? Are they in competition with Ethereum?
imo, there is no need for a turing complete stack language for specialized use cases like smart contracts. this is bullshit and is coming from ethereum fanboys. security is the first target all other targets have to follow.
ethereum is a hype whithout a single proof in the wild so far.
I would say there is a use for that, that you're a bit harsh on eth here ^^
But that would be really strange to use btc for that. No need to complexify and corrupt the security of btc.
14.
Post 13889987 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):
Is Blockstream working on one of those Turing complete scripting languages for smart contracts as a sidechain at all? Are they in competition with Ethereum?
imo, there is no need for a turing complete stack language for specialized use cases like smart contracts. this is bullshit and is coming from ethereum fanboys. security is the first target all other targets have to follow.
ethereum is a hype whithout a single proof in the wild so far.
I would say there is a use for that, that you're a bit harsh on eth here ^^
But that would be really strange to use btc for that.
No need to complexify and corrupt the security of btc.And this is why i'm neither a proponent for the segwit softfork.
I'm sorta tired with the upgrade rush.
Bitcoin is not a sprint, it is a marathon.
Agreed!
Not being able to scale to the adoption is not a real problem. Compromising the current security and potentially losing the trust of years of survival... Now that's what i call a problem.
15.
Post 13918700 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):
...
On the next reward halving hundreds of millions of dollars in obsolete mining hardware will be sold cheaply privately or online. This will open a window of vulnerability giving an attacker the possibility to buy a huge amount of hashing power for very little money and execute a 51% attack.

Right, or simply a mega factory mine which hasn't bought into the latest generation gear & is stuck with hangars already built out & running.
Unable to mine by the rules, so no longer invested in BTC, but able to form an axis of evol with other newly-obsoleted factory mines & wreak havoc

This is a very strange experiment.
But that could be the best opportunity for governments to take control of btc ^^
16.
Post 13949316 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
This thread has far too much activity, the price can only rise right now :3
17.
Post 13949844 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
A drunk sailor forcing a kiss? Shocker, boys coming back from war are usually so demure and polite... Of course she didn't expect it, look at her body language (hand stiff and by her side). Douche move, worse than Hitler (who never forced his attentions on anyone, AFAIK) but, so what?
And losing her family in the Holocaust plays into this ...how?
You're an ass, that's how.
And you're a bitch. Why would it be OK to force this kiss?
18.
Post 13950168 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
I'd say it's exactly that xD
But the rise is already done I'd say, now it'll be stable around 430!
19.
Post 13950175 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
AHahahah!
That's why they reached consensus this time xD
20.
Post 13950186 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
So it's either it'll get to 450 or send back to 370. Let's see how it'll go this time. Fasten your seatbelts

Why would it go to 370 after a consensus? I don't understand, the price can't drop after everyone agrees ^^
21.
Post 13950434 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
Ahah! Well glad to see they worked hard to find a decent solution

22.
Post 13950625 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
C'mon, bulls! If ever there was an opportunity for a decent pump...
To Market to market, to market, to buy a fat pig.
Home again, home again, jiggety jig.
Blew it. Again.


Lol! I'm currently watching it right now! Thought about it too

23.
Post 13952655 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
OMG it goes up so fast Oo
24.
Post 13953074 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
i have never seen such a rapid pace in the price increase, i knew it might be fast but 5 dollars per hour is just insane
$5 insane? I guess you haven't been around long enough to see the legendary Bitcoin volatility at work. Here are a 2 consecutive Chartbuddies from the day of the Silk Road bust including the panic and the "dead cat" bounce. That was a lot of action for 2 hours.


In Bitcoinland what goes down must come back up.
Ô tempora Ô mores, it was something else at this time xD
25.
Post 13953372 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
it would be nice to get some estimate as to how much hashing power behind this meeting
oh wait these are pool right?
hahahaha they own 0 hashing power
Really?
How can the mining pools only be able to impose a consensus? Will the miners follow the idea?
26.
Post 13953448 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
it would be nice to get some estimate as to how much hashing power behind this meeting
oh wait these are pool right?
hahahaha they own 0 hashing power
Really?
How can the mining pools only be able to impose a consensus? Will the miners follow the idea?
my bad i forget they speak on the behalf of their clients, and some pools are private apparently.
Ok that's the miners behind who agrees, representative then :-/
27.
Post 13953603 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
I like your new signature quotes, but I miss the old avatar... I guess this is a zero-sum game after all?
I miss my Classic avatar too. The video in the pics from Russia thread reminded me how much I like it!
It will change back soon. And the sig quotes get rotated. Too many good ones to fit in 3 lines.
Thermos should let us pay to disable other users' option to not display sigs!

Cool, btw, you offer Theymos enough money, he'll let you do whatever you like... He's a very liberal capitalist, from what I understand.
"liberal capitalist" == soul to sell no?
28.
Post 13953914 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
Gonna see a little down for some times!
29.
Post 13954549 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
200,000 Gox coins incoming next. Everybody check yer bucket.


PS. I wonder if Jimbo made a claim for his lost 50? Jimbo?
What the fuck is this? Oo
30.
Post 13954859 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
200,000 Gox coins incoming next. Everybody check yer bucket.


PS. I wonder if Jimbo made a claim for his lost 50? Jimbo?
What the fuck is this? Oo
Now you're being culturally insensitive. That's a canadian national pastime.
ahahah xD
Well I did the same when I was young but that's a bit surprising on a bitcointalk thread xD
31.
Post 13959127 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
look at those full blocks! but it's ok, we'll have some more room sometime in the middle of next year.
I've never had any delays or other issues sending bitcoins. What is your problem with full blocks?
Paying the suggested fee of 5000 satoshi per KB everything gets confirmed pretty soon. Haven't had any delays in a long time: miners need to be paid.
Miners get paid 25 BTC per block. if half a million people want to send some coin on the same day, they can't all do it, no matter how high the fees are. Higher fees kill marginal transactions. marginal transactions are where the growth comes from, and it's where death comes from.
Yeah but no one really need to be confirmed in the hour no?
Me I don't care when I make a transaction it can be let for a few hours it's not important.
32.
Post 13960530 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
Ahah ^^
Well this was a nice pump.
BTC always works this way, it'll go up again.
33.
Post 13963946 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
Referring to
my post of earlier today which observed the 2 previous attempts at breaking through the resistance level I called the "Gox Resistance Field", I did a bit more research on the state of the market at those two points in comparison to where we're at now.
What's interesting is that on the two previous attempts, the market showed signs of exhaustion on multiple indicators at once.
However, on this current (3rd) attempt, all those same indicators are coiled into a much more favourable state. Momentum is with us, Relative strength index is in a favourable range (for the first time), volume growth is positive, steady and not overcooked.
Could be interesting. For example, the 3-Day MACD will cross in about 10-20 days at current projections. (Much faster if there's an early rally and slower if we go horizontal). The market can go up and down between now and then but in general there looks to be much more buoyancy in reserve. Exactly what's needed to successfully traverse the fabled and perilous
Gox Resistance Field (GORF).


Very interesting reasonning, thanks for sharing and doing what this thread is made for

34.
Post 13966737 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Just something I saw. It would fit perfectly. To the Elliott Wave Pattern.
The 5th wave is the only thing which doesn't fit perfectly. Could have been a bit higher... But still.
I also like how it sold off after we barely touched 3000 CNY.

So huge drop incoming?
Well just oppened a huge short so I agree with you. We gonna see a small dumping in not long.
should this pattern hold i guess we'll see 420 maybe 410, before moving >750 ( given this the agreement holds together )
just keep that inmind.
Yeah of course. Unless btc sees a real failure, any drops can be nothing but temporary.
35.
Post 13973420 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
market price totally incorrect right now.
Actually, before the latest block size/Mike Hearn ragequit the price was fairly stable in the $430 range. The price dropped at that point.
Now we're back to the safety of that $430 range.
From here the price should slowly rise due to the normal factors.
Hopefully you're right Elwar unless any more self obsessed idiots in public positions want to try & destroy bitcoin AGAIN !!!!
Let's hope this is te only thing able to harm btc. I'm a bit skeptical though, this up trend seems too good to be true...
36.
Post 13973914 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
Good morning Bitcoinland.
Still stuck around $440, eh?
Let's get this thing moving up.
Hello!
Would be cool to go through a 420 first as I just opened a short :p
I don't expect the 450 to be broken so soon. Not even the 445.
37.
Post 13985537 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
Where's the moon I was promised
The webbot says: soon.

Well, if webbot says so, who am I to deny it?
38.
Post 13994351 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):
I swear to god that if I can't get profit with my short I stop trading :p
did you barrow coins to sell into the bear trap O_o?
Bah, price gonna crash! We'll test the 380 soon (guts talking here!)
39.
Post 14017177 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):
The fact that 90% of bitcoin holders bought bitcoins just to "get more fiat money" means that they all have a sell point and there will be very few huge run-ups.
But that's ok because it creates liquidity and stabilizes the price so bitcoin can actually be used as a currency.
Perfectly correct statement.
Most people are not really in btc itself. But it avoids huge buble inflation it stabilizes the price and the inflation of btc so it's a rather good thing.
40.
Post 14017705 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):
Blocks are full again. I think this will now probably happen any time the market tries to pump.
I don't see much upside but there's a lot of potential downside.
The bulls have a couple of days to break resistance at 450$. If they fail, there will be a lot of panicky downtrend.
Especially considering the hope from the halving price rise has decreased a lot since everyone is waiting it :-/
41.
Post 14073206 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):
Decision point comes closer. And it doesn't look good for Bitcoin.
Transferred 100% out of cold storage into several exchanges.
Hodler for 4 years no more.
Yes sell all before the halfing in supply, sound strategy

Yeah sounds not too stupid.
Considering the whole world is actually stacking coins expecting price to rise after halving.
EVERYONE expects the price to rise. What will happen if everyone gathered coins before halving and want to sell after the halving?
That's right. A big fat decrease.
42.
Post 14073215 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):
The movement of the ETH market keeps me amazed. Light, fast and with a strong bottom. Maybe even too fast, because I'm getting afraid to trade and I'm beginning to feel like a hodler. It is a weird sensation, but I kind of like it.
Ahah ^^
Well the whole question about ETH is: will it be sustainable?
I don't see how ETH can sustain its own growth. Eth isn't even used currently am I wrong?
43.
Post 14080622 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):
Buyt they said, to the moon they said :-/
Never gonna break the 450
Never gonna let you down (under the 400)
It's all roller coster in that range
44.
Post 14080900 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):
Bitcoin is abdicating its first mover status as electronic cash by not allowing the consumer market to make general purchases. Others will gladly take its place and enjoy the liquidity.
I don't understand what you're talking about.
We can't make general purchases?
45.
Post 14080959 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):
Buyt they said, to the moon they said :-/
Never gonna break the 450
Never gonna let you down (under the 400)
It's all roller coster in that range
That's crazy talk.. especially regarding "never".
Surely, we have been floating largely in a price range of about $370 to $450.. for what seems like a hell-of-a long - however, there is no "never" in bitcoinlandia... like your post seems to be emphasizing..
we could go up with prices, or down...
I'm kinda thinking that up is a bit more probable than down, but what the fuck do I know?
In any event, each of us should attempt to kind of be prepared for prices to go in either direction, at least for the short term.. .. especially in this particular $370 to $450 range.. .. and $450 seems more likely that $370... but we should keep a little fiat in our reserves to be prepared for the less likely occurrence of $370....
Surely UP would be nice, but should we just try to enjoy a bit while we are here in these seemingly low market cap territories, and maybe attempt to accumulate a few more coins.. and even to shore up our plans for the upward choo choo.. whether that comes within 6 months or 18 months?
So, we should try to accumulate coins, even if it is just one or two coins within the next several weeks, but who really knows for sure for how long we are going to continue to languor in these price territories? Within the most likely probabilities of the bell curve, BTC prices could languor here for as short as 8 hours or could be as long as a year or more... Most likely there is going to be a upward breakout within less than the next 6 months. but chances are pretty decent that such upward break out will happen sooner than 6 months. Thoughts?
Hmm... Seems like you didn't get the joke.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQIt was not the funniest ever made though I'll admit it.
46.
Post 14081237 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):
btc is not for small purchases it's for big ones

Which makes it a bit useless in a daily use... Which is a shame :-/
47.
Post 14081332 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):
Bitcoin is abdicating its first mover status as electronic cash by not allowing the consumer market to make general purchases. Others will gladly take its place and enjoy the liquidity.
That's it. I'm getting back into altcoins. Thanks Blockstream!!
Yeah.. .thanks Obama.

By the way, which possible alts are you gonna try out? I may follow your lead... because this bitcoin governance is just bullshit and seems to be taking way too long in causing bitcoin to become the dominant world currency...
We gotta just figure out to which coyn are we gonna go?
There are nearly 700 choices, but I am sure any of them would be better than this bitcoin crap.
I was thinking about LIQUID coin... .. At least the name seems to be heading in the right direction.
http://coinmarketcap.com/assets/liquid/However, if you have a better choice, I will consider that, too.. I'm flexible like that.

Don't hesitate to PM me if you've got a good candidate.
Honestly I'm more and more doubtful about btc future.
48.
Post 14086016 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):
I hate to see other coins succeed.

Ahahah xD
Well on a more serious manner, I hate useless shit succeeding. Eth is not a coin, it's not a currency and shouldn't be treated as one.
And let's be serious, if they wanted our sympathy, they shouldn't have spammed reddit like that...
49.
Post 14086459 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):
I hate to see other coins succeed.

Ahahah xD
Well on a more serious manner, I hate useless shit succeeding. Eth is not a coin, it's not a currency and shouldn't be treated as one.
And let's be serious, if they wanted our sympathy, they shouldn't have spammed reddit like that...
I think it's us that needs their sympathy. Innit?
Sympathy?
Why would we need sympathy when we got bitcoins!
BTC
BTC
50.
Post 14095258 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):
http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/strafzinsen-sparkassen-wollen-geld-lieber-im-tresor-bunkern-a-1080523.html#js-article-comments-box-pagerhey're going to go with Capital Controls...which means they anticipate a bank run in Germany on Monday morning. LOL
It's finally starting to come unglued!
Germans that can only remove E50,oo from an ATM per day + Rapefugees all over the place?!
I see Civil Unrest enmasse in Germany within 48 hours of Capital Controls. Germany is an industrialized nation, they are not Greece.
When bank goes against the official line like that you KNOW SOMEHTING IS COOKING UP. This one is in line with somewhat logical reaction agianst NIRP (cos in Europe they will even have a DIRECTIVE about that). Bigger picture? Banks are getting ready for another 2008 - but this time they won't need taxpayers money to save the banks - they will need EVERYONE'S money to do that - and unless everyone take money out (Run on the Bank) they will tax every single acocunt with negative interest rates - bail in directive is being cooked up by the EU already - so now it is endgame- Check:
http://independenttrader.org/are-we-waiting-for-another-2008.html Sorry I don't read German so I didn't understand anything in your article.
Why are you talking about German banks going bankrupt?
51.
Post 14164060 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):
Time to go up again?
Just a litle litle bit upper! I need really tiny like 1 or 2 dollars up nothing more!
52.
Post 14204823 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):
If my understanding is correct, bitcoin and ETH are something vastly different.
ETH can't be superior because its purpose is different. Bitcoin is not even attempting to do what ETH does.
Also we are in need of more commercial breaks in here.
You're understanding is perfectly correct. But nobody understands it. Thousands of idiots own ETH without even understanding what it is and what is its purpose...
This is why btc can't lose to ETH, simply because it doesn't fight it. It's like claiming a fork is better than a knife. They're too different to be even compared.
53.
Post 14204921 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):
This is why btc can't lose to ETH, simply because it doesn't fight it. It's like claiming a fork is better than a knife.
Bitcoin is the swiss knife in the crypto world. It can be used to fit all your needs.
Oh? You can seal a contract with btc? Then please what can you say you lend me 50btc and we seal the contract through btc?
54.
Post 14205633 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):
Nah, if you insist on the army knife analogy, Bitcoin is the French, the
French army knife.

Everything you need. Everything you need to get screwed before you surrender, that is.
Actual French army knife:
http://www.amazon.fr/Survivor-Couteau-Fourreau-transport-ceinture/dp/B004MGAEV8It's even cheap

55.
Post 14378931 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
More like, whale missing in action... Whale(s) forgot to turn on the fake volume bot, or did it on purpose, for some unknown reason.
I absolutely don't understand. This seems like nothing strange to me. Where do I miss the point?
56.
Post 14387377 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):
i feel a disturbance in the force
Yeah, bitcoin broke the balance in the crypto world

57.
Post 14396916 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):
price breaks 420 once again, here what i have to say:

If you believe it gonna go up again once

Not so sure of that.
58.
Post 14416104 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):
Man I miss chartbuddy. Without it this thread is less than useless.
Useless might be a bit strong. But it's sure that the thread loses lots of interest without ChartBuddy!
59.
Post 14419853 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):
Yup.

This is why women were never allowed in the political process for thousands of years. Each one in the picture is basically just a large, naive child, but women never actually grow out of this. They could be 16 or 30, it doesn't matter. You may as well allow 10 year olds to vote and witness the devastation that occurs afterwards.
Those bitches who want to actually have some rights. It's not because they're 50% of the population that they should have any right to speak up.
60.
Post 14420437 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):
Yup.

This is why women were never allowed in the political process for thousands of years. Each one in the picture is basically just a large, naive child, but women never actually grow out of this. They could be 16 or 30, it doesn't matter. You may as well allow 10 year olds to vote and witness the devastation that occurs afterwards.
Those bitches who want to actually have some rights. It's not because they're 50% of the population that they should have any right to speak up.
By now we should all acknowledge the inevitable truth: whatever race, gender, country, layer of society, political party, education or shape of ears
Roach has is obviously far superior to that of all the rest. As such, it is finally proven that he is not a frustrated individual but in fact an Ubermensch.
Obvious. It's the plain and literal proof. Nothing can be done about that you just gotta admit it and live on!
61.
Post 14421365 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):
You can't help this thread without its savior, the great ChartBuddy!!!
62.
Post 14422482 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):
Good morning Bitcoinland.
Still no Bitcoin price movement to track or discuss?
At least baseball is back.

Well, can't complain to have a stable price finally!
And 420$ wouldn't be bad to start the halving, it would allow people to sell at a reasonable price before crashing!
63.
Post 14422845 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):
According to bitcoinwisdom, 0 volume across all exchanges.
Crypto's ded

Crypto's ded,
Long live crypto!
64.
Post 14435991 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):
$421 boring action man. Somebody wake me up from hibernation if/when we hit $700 or something.
Lol! Well I hope you get some time xD
65.
Post 14449418 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):
Who's this beautiful gentleman?
66.
Post 15508555 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):
I just hope the btc won't be too overpriced... It would be followed by a huge crash just after the halving :/
67.
Post 15526938 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):
What???
Blockchain.info says that the block reward for block # 420000 is 16.666 BTC ?
The fees no?
It's 15btc plus 1.666btc of fees?
68.
Post 15526947 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):
Block 420001 has a negative amount of transaction fees (-4BTC)

Ok for this one I don't know xD
Maybe the whole thing is a bit fucked up no?
Because of the halving and all...
69.
Post 15529355 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):
Panic buying started?
Panic everything.
Market is completely crazy right now, not the right time to move.
70.
Post 15529710 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):
Yeah looks like it.. shitload of people sold but price kept rising and now they are like "

, i don't want to miss this train, buy buy buy"
Shitload? Looked like just one to me.
Doubt it's just one.
If it's just one he's not only dumb, but also much poorer right now than before.
71.
Post 15532914 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):
So where's the big rise
Just wait some 2 months and you'll see it

Hmm... Not too sure about that. This two months rule seems a bit arbitrarian to me no? I don't see any reason to it.
Especially as nowadays everyone knows about halving. It's not like people are surprised by it!
72.
Post 15568120 (copy this link) (by Laosai) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):
Happy halving.
Firefighters celebrating at work today


Ahah!
Thanks! Happy halving to you too, funny to see a btc cake though ^^