I always use the chart from BTCchina. I found it more reliable.
Ok, here is the chart from China.
I can't decide which variant of the neckline is correct there.
Use the one that tells you the opposite of what you want to hear.
If you are bearish and think that failure to cross above the neckline confirms your theory, use the lower line. If you are bullish and think that successful crossing upwards confirms your theory, use the upper line.
Very interesting. I wonder if that is only for IRAs. I'd love to get my HSA invested into bitcoins, and Fidelity does offer HSA investing...
Hilariously, what we think of as digital signatures (cryptographic) are pretty much just an afterthought to most of those laws. Typically, those laws are about fax machines, and web buttons labelled "I agree" and other such nonsense.
Hilariously, what we think of as digital signatures (cryptographic) are pretty much just an afterthought to most of those laws. Typically, those laws are about fax machines, and web buttons labelled "I agree" and other such nonsense.
Bullshit. If you made a website with the following elements:
"I own all your shit now" and a button stating "I agree"
A visitor clicking said button would not transfer ownership.
Similarly a "these are Risto's coins" message is not a contract and isn't binding.
You ever buy a house? Odds are really good that one or both of the agents in the deal uses a website that presents documents with a fancy version of the "I agree" button. They don't usually use it for the closing or the note (where you agree to pay the money back) because those need to be witnessed, notarized and recorded. But for everything else (purchase contract, disclosures, etc), it is a bunch of clicking.
I feel bad for Matt Miller. He was doing bitcoin community a favor for his 12 days of bitcoin experiment and the noobs screwed it all up , manipulated by CCP.
the guy from bloomberg?
what is CCP?
They run EVE Online.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCP_GamesIn a truly free laissez faire system nothing is "too big to fail." Tax exemptions come from governments, what market ever gave anyone a tax exemption for anything? Let alone a laissez faire market. Don't sacrifice intellectual integrity to prop up a political agenda.
Laissez Faire capitalism, which in the US was brought
in by back starting with
Reagan, first allowed banks and corporations to grow and merge without limits. (Once upon a time, there was a US government that ordered the breakup of AT&T because it was too big. Would you believe that?)
Hilarious.
The AT&T divestiture was in 1984. Guess who was sitting in the oval office that year? (I gave you a hint.)
Also, you may want to read up on
the Glass-Steagall Act. It was neutered by the executive branch in the 1960s, and finally repealed by Clinton. From your recent posts, it sounds like you learned both economics and history from the same DNC fundraising pamphlet.