All posts made by icekiss in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread
1.
Post 2212517 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):
If you are offered to swap as often as you want, with your new envelope randomly holding double or half the money of the one before, then you should swap endlessly often (lets say: as often as feasable).
After all of your swaps, the chance that you get more than 100$ from your envelope is almost 50%, the chance that you get less than 100$ is also almost 50% (and a small chance that you hold exactly 100$).
However, if you get more than 100$ in your envelope, you get at LEAST 200$, but possibly much more. If you get less than 100$, you will still never get less than 0$.
Every swap will increase your expected return (too lazy to research the exact equation though).

2.
Post 2215755 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):
there was just a single sell of 650BTC that obliterated the wall at 122

3.
Post 2216432 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):
bitcoinity is working fine here.
4.
Post 2223700 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):
Something might just start to be happening. The walls around 121 are starting to get eaten for the first time (200BTC at 121.39 in the last minute)
5.
Post 2223819 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):
that wouldn't be me much of a price move

But it depends on trading volume, which is still too low for that. There are still 440BTC sitting at 121.33 and 2930 to get to 120.97.
It would need a lot more volume to destroy those walls.
Just thought it interesting that they even get attacked at all, at that volume, looking how massive they are...
Right now I am waiting for bitstamp to go down, which is sitting at 117.4/118.2 (Bid/Ask), which is very high in comparison to the average offset to mt.gox of the last days.
6.
Post 2232721 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Yes, I think so. Due to the fact that the bidwall on Mt.Gox is now at 122, bitstamp is a bit too low.
Now the bids on bitstamp are at 118.35, and asks at 118.39 -> walls should start to get nibbled.
"Movement" is very relative though, looking that moving the walls up by 1$ would take about 1500BTC...
Edit: I am really curious though: What would happen on bitstamp if mt.gox started to rise significantly, say to 125 (or, make that 135)? There just ISN'T enough fiat on bitstamp to buy up the walls...
7.
Post 2233232 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
I think mt.gox may be starting to move - at least we are seeing new 24 hour highs (123.6)... (though, to be fair, we saw them at 9:00 as well, and then stalled again)
Wall nibbles, anyway (500BTC to 124).
The biggest move of the day is still the bid wall movement from 121 to 122. Which says a lot about how little is happening here...
8.
Post 2234486 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
a 1000BTC ASK wall just appeared at 123 on mt.gox

If it does not get pulled it is enough to reverse our current slow upward creep...
9.
Post 2234561 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Probably someone who wants to drive the price down to be able to buy cheaper.
it appears to be well coordinated too: just now on bitstamp a 500BTC ask wall appeared at 118.35
I am curious how much movement this will generate...
I'll wager a prediction: if the price does move down, those two walls will follow.
Then again, I can't image how they expect to get much movement at current volume, with 2000BTC needed just to get below 122BTC on mt.gox.

10.
Post 2235339 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
yep, 660BTC just got bought. That probably wasn't the intent of whomever put that wall there...

11.
Post 2236800 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Well, I have just (20 Minutes ago) sold my BTC on bitstamp at 118.97, looking how its a high for bitstamp in the last days, and mt.gox is relatively low (119 to 122.5 is a price difference of only 3.5).
Time will tell me (quite shortly) whether it was wise, as I can rebuy cheaper, or dumb because I have to buy in again at the same price.
The good thing is that the price can't really run away (since there are endlessly many sell offers before it reaches 120).

12.
Post 2236918 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
I just don't see bitstamp rising much higher at the moment, not even to 120.
The problem bitstamp has is that while it is rising (as you described), mt.gox is falling (ever since that 1000BTC ask wall appeared, there has been downward pressure). And while bitstamp has been getting stronger - they are sustaining about the same volume as mt.gox at the moment

- they still can't defy mt.gox price leadership endlessly. Not when there is a huge mountain of BTC to buy up at the same time...
13.
Post 2236947 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
What plans? Continually sell at 118.xx and buy again at 117.xx to lower your fee cost?

Hey, if you can reliably rebuy at 1.5 below what you sold, making 1$/BTC profit, you can raise the number of bitcoins you own. Whats wrong with that?

Of course, the catch word is "reliably" - if you have to rebuy higher half of the time, the strategy isn't working.

14.
Post 2237001 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
I donīt believe that the price on bitstamp, drop back to 117.xx, with this buying pressure right now.
There is lots of buying pressure, right. But it can't move the price, and at some point the buyers are out of fiat. Then its the turn of the sellers again (just the nature of every exchange ever

), which
will move the price (simply because the ask walls are way weaker). This equation only changes if mt.gox rises significantly, amplifying the buying pressure.
I just don't see bitstamp rising much higher at the moment, not even to 120.
The problem bitstamp has is that while it is rising (as you described), mt.gox is falling (ever since that 1000BTC ask wall appeared, there has been downward pressure). And while bitstamp has been getting stronger - they are sustaining about the same volume as mt.gox at the moment

- they still can't defy mt.gox price leadership endlessly. Not when there is a huge mountain of BTC to buy up at the same time...
We are falling? Didn't really watch, but we are between 122-123 more than 4 hours.
from 123.5 to 122.5. So "falling" is really saying too much. But yes, there is downward pressure. The price just can't really fall because of the bid walls, same as bitstamp can't rise because of ask walls (though to be fair, there is much more fiat on mt.gox, so movement
is easier there then on bitstamp a.t.m.).
By the way, did anyone notice that in the last days we often had bitstamp and mt.gox pulling in different directions? Like right now mt.gox is pulling down while bitstamp is pulling up? Wonder when for the first time bitstamp will win and mt.gox follows...

15.
Post 2238395 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Whooho!
Was afk for a while, and coming back see that most of my buy order at 117.11 got filled

Definitely of topic for this thread, but that was just too cool. *veryhappy*
16.
Post 2238675 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Yeah, it was pure luck. And completely crazy that such a big sell stops precisely at my bid (it did not fill it completely, just mostly).
17.
Post 2238847 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Yeah, it was pure luck. And completely crazy that such a big sell stops precisely at my bid (it did not fill it completely, just mostly).
Love that when it happens
Anyhow I love even more when the bid is filled completely, even if that means that the very bottom was a little lower

I do too. But looking as I was not even hoping for anything like that, it was cool enough as it was.
It definitely was a nice surprise on coming back.

Back to the topic of walls: 123.0 ask wall on mt.gox just getting eaten up. No more real walls to 124 then, lots of smaller orders though.
18.
Post 2238893 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
123 ask wall broken through (with a 250BTC buy). That was fast...
19.
Post 2244006 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
I get "Website currently unavailable", and the API doesn't respond either.
So I'd say yes, bitstamp is currently down.
Oh well, not like there was much happening anyway...

20.
Post 2244907 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
We are also just getting the answer to a question I posted yesterday: What happens on bitstamp if mtgox rises to 125?
Answer: The price is stuck at the slope (currently at 119.79), which gets eaten, but way way slower then the price on mt.gox rises -> spread is growing. And no way to day trade, obviously...
Arbitragers, where are you when we need you?
I'm all in as well, what else you gonna do during a slow steady rise...
21.
Post 2244951 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
yes, the order book on bitstamp is already looking way healthier: new bids are appearing, and asks are slowly but steadily getting munched up. It's just taking some time.

22.
Post 2245056 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
As much as I like the fact we broke through 125, I am concerned about the trading volume (or lack thereof) lately. The current price levels can hardly be considered meaningful when a single large order could wipe out days-worth of gains (or losses).
From the past few months we know for a fact there are huge players out there who just aren't trading now, they just sit on the sidelines and they're waiting for something. If they decide to get back in, it may not be pretty
That is always true, even at much higher volumes. The lower volume is because mt.gox is losing its dominance and fiat from mt.gox takes a long time to appear on other exchanges, so they can't take up the slack yet.
I think it is a very encouraging sign that we are apparently managing the shift in exchange importance without any major crashes. After all, BTC move much faster, and could easily crash the price to lower levels. Luckily the mt.gox price still has too much credibility for that.

23.
Post 2245206 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
bitstamp: everything short of the 120.0BTC wall just got bought up (wall is 350BTC).
Yes, there are still huge ask walls on bitstamp, but they got reduced by something like 2000BTC in the last 24hours. So there is definitely a lot of fiat pouring in. It just isn't sitting in the order book (which would be extremely stupid anyway, looking as how it can be used to buy cheap coins instead

).
And I am watching bitstamp on bitcoinity: those walls aren't being retracted - they really are being
bought!
And "tiny" is the wrong adjective at least for bitstamp: It is handling around 25% of all BTC trading volume by now.
24.
Post 2245234 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
I'm not speaking about relative volume, I'm speaking about the bid sum. On gox you still have x20 the amount of fiat compared to Bitstamp, which is expected - it's much slower to move fiat than coins.
Right. Which is what I am saying.

25.
Post 2245484 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
120.0BTC ask wall on bitstamp bought up.
With such a low volume, we should go well above $130 to welcome a new uptrend. Let's see how strong is the bull's hope.
I think since we broke through the mt.gox wall at 124.5 (tonight around 4:00 UTC) we can call this an upward trend instead of just jitter.

EDIT: 126.0BTC wall on mt.gox getting eaten fast (400BTC eaten so far)!
26.
Post 2245655 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

look at the changes in asks and bids: lots of asks pulled, and lots of new bids inserted.
though I've also got a question: what is up with green downward bars on the bid side?

27.
Post 2245983 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
While the relly at mt.gox is taking a small breather, at bitstamp BTC continue to be bought up.
Ask wall at 120.5$ just got broken through. And isn't it crazy that the ticker for the last 2 1/2 hours on bitstamp looks like a moving average? There aren't
any downticks
at all.

Edit: pic as proof:

28.
Post 2254628 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
There was just an interesting ask wall of 130BTC at 122.75 on bitstamp. It did not last long...
But interesting because it gave me the chance to rebuy the coins I foolishly sold at 123.0 yesterday. Still a small loss after fees, but almost nothing.

I am all in again

29.
Post 2254683 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
420BTC bid wall at 123.5 at bitstamp.
Damn that was close

Edit: wall moved up to 124.0 (and shrunk to 390BTC)
30.
Post 2254761 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
bitstamp:
Wall got bought up (well, 356BTC out of 400BTC anyway, so its not a wall anymore).
Would not have thought that would happen so fast, with all the buying pressure...

31.
Post 2254784 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
bitstamp:
Wall got bought up (well, 356BTC out of 400BTC anyway, so its not a wall anymore).
Would not have thought that would happen so fast, with all the buying pressure...
400
BTC is such a small amount that I wouldn't even call that a wall. Maybe a mini-wall.
But I get that Bitstamp and Gox standards are different.
believe me, 400BTC counts as a (small) wall on bitstamp...

200
BTC is a miniwall, 1000
BTC is a really big one

32.
Post 2254835 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Well, be happy for the buyer. He managed to buy 400BTC without having to move his wall upwards by a single cent. I love that when I'm buying.
He did move the wall up from 123.5 to 124.0, with the bid wall standing at 124.15. So I guess it was a fair offer and both buyer and seller can be happy about a deal well struck.

33.
Post 2255060 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
I am seeing a very interesting technique being used on bitstamp right now:
Instead of placing a huge ask wall, someone is setting down ~40BTC orders spaced 0.01 apart. But only a few at once, and filling them up as they get eaten.
This means that the upward trend does not get broken, it just slows down to a crawl. And the person gets to sell all of his BTC at high prices, because the confidence of the buyers is unshaken.
Pretty slick operator, if you ask me...
34.
Post 2255236 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
I am seeing a very interesting technique being used on bitstamp right now:
Instead of placing a huge ask wall, someone is setting down ~40BTC orders spaced 0.01 apart. But only a few at once, and filling them up as they get eaten.
This means that the upward trend does not get broken, it just slows down to a crawl. And the person gets to sell all of his BTC at high prices, because the confidence of the buyers is unshaken.
Pretty slick operator, if you ask me...
If you could see the pattern with your bare eyes, it's hardly subtle. HFTs would eat this kind of obvious pattern for breakfast in real markets, the price would run constantly just out of reach of all but the highest bid, knowing they had a big fish on the line. Just my 0.02
I don't think the bots on our exchanges are that sophisticated yet...
But you are right, there are still obvious ways to improve on it: don't place as many orders in advance, and vary the spacing, timing and amount more, to make it look disconnected.
Still, it is working, and he is doing it at the right point of time, so he is slick enough.

Edit: here you can see him placing new sell orders:

35.
Post 2255398 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
You have to ask yourself why someone's so desperate to sell off a large amount of Bitcoin.
Looking at the buy pressure on both bitstamp and mt.gox - not enough for me to follow his lead, not even short term.
And yes, ask wall at 128.0$ on mt.gox just got eaten! (850BTC)
36.
Post 2255684 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
bitstamp:
Sliding ask wall at 124.57$ broken through! (It started around 124.40$, ended at 124.57$, and varied in height but was up to 1000BTC tall, and if I count restockings, I'd guess between 1500BTC and 2000BTC overall.)
1200BTC to reach 126$, which means that the spread between bitstamp and mt.gox is growing again, bitcoins can't be bought up fast enough.
37.
Post 2255781 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
wall report:
mt.gox: 129.0$ getting eaten fast (400BTC so far)
bitstamp: 330BTC bid wall at 124.72$ just appeared. No interest in touching it, just buys eating away at the ask walls.
38.
Post 2255857 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
bitstamp is really racing today: broken through 125$ (no real walls, but about 500
BTC in orders). 670
BTC left to 126!
The ask wall at 127.72$ simply got pulled again because nobody bought and price moved away. Completely senseless, why not just buy into the walls if you are placing it that close to them?

39.
Post 2255983 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
bitstamp is really racing today: broken through 125$ (no real walls, but about 500
BTC in orders). 670
BTC left to 126!
The
ask wall at 127.72$ simply got pulled again because nobody bought and price moved away. Completely senseless, why not just buy into the walls if you are placing it that close to them?

You mean bid wall right? Bid wall is on the buying side, ask wall is on the selling side.

Yeah, sorry, typo. Meant bid wall of course.

bitstamp running along: now up to 126.2$!

40.
Post 2256201 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
I would say we have definitely entered panic buying mode.

What was that about a stability period?

41.
Post 2256309 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Gonna be nibbling on $130 soon. I wish the slow steady climb would continue though... if it goes up too fast it's going to rebound quite hard.
First 500
BTC from the wall at 130 already gone.
And so what if there is a hard rebound? It just means that if you play your cards right, you can profit more than once

. After all, how can you increase the number of bitcoins you hold if price never falls? Ok, you can always invest more fiat, but even that gets harder the more expensive the coins are...
42.
Post 2256702 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Usually it's sell at resistance and buy at support. Doesn't always work though when the buying or selling pressure is too great, use your own judgment.

I would normally have tried to exploit the 130 wall to catch the price correction for a nice small profit. The problem was that I had no idea what the price was supposed to be on bitstamp (since it was still catching up from a 5$ offset), and no walls around either to help. So I let it pass.
Appears that currently bitstamp is trading at an 1.5-2$ offset.
43.
Post 2256757 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
I think were done for today. Or maybe even the weekend. That would be fine with me. Lets not get over excited. That usually results in a crash.
I don't think the action is over for today. mt.gox appears just about ready to retest 130 again (and will most likely fail once more - still about 5000
BTC there).
44.
Post 2257534 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Well, took a bit longer then expected, but we are back at 130!
unfortunately, bitstamp is lagging behind, so all I can do is watch from the sidelines

Edit: Wall at 130 just got reduced by 600
BTC!
45.
Post 2257712 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
I think were done for today. Or maybe even the weekend. That would be fine with me. Lets not get over excited. That usually results in a crash.
I don't think the action is over for today. mt.gox appears just about ready to retest 130 again (and will most likely fail once more - still about 5000
BTC there).
YeH, probably not the action itself but i can see it stay around 129 for a few days. But i can also see myself veing wrong

Eh, I was half right at least. I will take what I can get.
It's great to be able to watch this live if you were already all in before it started.

46.
Post 2257838 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Can you believe Mtgox still didn't fix their shit?
How is that even possible?
bitstamp is still working beautifully.
But Mt.Gox just proved that it still is most definitely the price leader - all the other exchanges, including bitstamp, are just following, and lagging behind while doing so. Mt.Gox is back to having up to 10 times the volume than bitstamp a.t.m.
47.
Post 2258068 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
?
Link, explanation, anything?

48.
Post 2258252 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
mt.gox:
800BTC bid wall at 130.5, we were almost back to 132. I think it's gathering steam once more.
bitstamp:
still lagging behind short of 128
49.
Post 2258333 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
I'm thinking of switching from Bitstamp to Mt.Gox. It's kinda annoying that Bitstamp just doesn't seem to want to go up together with Mt.Gox. I feel there are a lot more trading opportunities on Gox. :/
I don't want to end up with fiat on mt.gox that takes me a month to get out. Besides, often enough bitstamps lagging has kept me from making hasty trades, forcing me to ride out an upswing. Think of it as enforced trading discipline

Besides, fees at bitstamp are about half of mt.gox, and the whole enterprise seems to be run way more professionally. There is a reason both fiat and bitcoin at mt.gox are going down (I think of the Dwolla issue more as a catalyst to get that shift moving).
50.
Post 2258361 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Hey, while I wasn't looking bitstamp punched through its resistance and is reaching new daily heights!
Cool


51.
Post 2259366 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
There's definitely tension in the air. Lots of panic selling as soon as there's even a slight downturn on Gox...
Pah, I am still wating for the "panic selling". bitstamp seems hardly to have noticed that mt.gox is not charging ahead anymore...
52.
Post 2259515 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
bitstamp:
Mini ask wall (240BTC) at 129.39
significant, because this is the first thing to move the price on bitstamp down from the daily high of 129.9
bitstamp sometimes really does require patience, more so than mt.gox...
53.
Post 2259612 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
bitstamp: ask wall (barely shrunken to 230BTC) moved down to 128.75
mt.gox: looks like we will fall below 131
54.
Post 2259971 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Still waiting for my chance to buy back in. Nobody trading on bitstamp atm.

And I'd like to avoid buying back in at 127.7 if I can help it.

55.
Post 2260037 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Oh well, price was starting to run away.
Bought back in at 128, +0.5%
BTC - could have gone better, but could have gone worse too

I am all in again. (okay, that is my default stanze

)
56.
Post 2260148 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Oh well, price was starting to run away.
Bought back in at 128, +0.5%
BTC - could have gone better, but could have gone worse too

I am all in again. (okay, that is my default stanze

)
I think you could have waited a little longer, the price is likely to oscillate between 126 and 129 on Bitstamp for a while before continuing the trend. And since it's (almost) weekend we're probably going through a couple days of consolidation again.
Maybe I'll see a chance to do another sell/buy cycle - price at bitstamp is up to 129

But I'll watch mt.gox closely first, whether the rally really won't continue for now.
Don't want to be in fiat if it does

If it goes up to 130 without mt.gox starting to rise equivalently, I'll definitely resell...
57.
Post 2260535 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
bitstamp:
that was very satisfying: an 400
BTC ask wall appeared at 128.7. Put my bitcoins in front of it. After a bit of leapfrogging, most of my bitcoins were sold, when the wall moved a whole point down!
Rebought my bitcoins minutes later at 126.5

58.
Post 2260646 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
I don't think so, but many here are trading on 1.5% profit...
bitstamp:
that was very satisfying: an 400
BTC ask wall appeared at 128.7. Put my bitcoins in front of it. After a bit of leapfrogging, most of my bitcoins were sold, when the wall moved a whole point down!
Rebought my bitcoins minutes later at 126.5


I am long term bullish, and so try to stay in bitcoins. But whenever I see a chance to increase my bitcoin holdings by selling/rebuying, I'll do so. Otherwise, there would be little point in watching the charts and walls, now would there?

I believe in the effects of compound interest

59.
Post 2261665 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Please party on without me.

I'm finished trading for the day. It's after midnight here, and it was quite a headache to get in once mt.gox started creeping upwards again (was 1/3 in fiat) since bitstamp reacted
really fast this time around.
Luckily a 400
BTC bidwall appeared, which is still creeping downward. At 128.1 I couldn't resist anymore and bought in again.

60.
Post 2271201 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Welcome to the greatest social experiment the world has ever known.
I beg to differ on that: The internet is the greatest social experiment the world has ever known. Even bitcoin has been born from it!

61.
Post 2274103 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
420
BTC bid wall at 133.3 got bought. Seeing as we are still at weekend volumes, I'd guess that is enough to stop the upward movement for the moment. It got me to lower my buy order anyway

regarding bitstamp: yes, it is waiting on gox. It was very close in price before the upward swing, and in recent times, 4 or 5 points spread really isn't all that much. Looking how bitstamp has quite a wall in front of it (3000
BTC to 131), it takes a bit of incentive to really drive buys up.
62.
Post 2274559 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
new 500
BTC bid wall appeared at 133.68 (well, miniwall really, but it is the weekend

)
Edit: only a 400
BTC wall now, and pulled back to 133.0
Edit2: everything up to 134 just got bought up, a few hundred
BTC worth of buys. New height.
63.
Post 2274660 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
mt.gox is up to 135, volume is rising. It appears we are entering rally mode again.
bitstamp is still asleep (129.5)
Decided to buy into the walls to get in again, the spread between bitstamp and mt.gox is getting too high.
(bought in 0.5$ higher than I sold 18 hours earlier, but it was definitely time for my exit strategy!

)
64.
Post 2274687 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
mt.gox is up to 135, volume is rising. It appears we are entering rally mode again.
bitstamp is still asleep (129.5)
Decided to buy into the walls to get in again, the spread between bitstamp and mt.gox is getting too high.
Still 2k to $135
Edit: 1k
nope, just 1k
Edit:

65.
Post 2274723 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Yes, it is still 1k. But if people are really waking up again, that 1k won't last long. Get your cheap coins while you still can.

bitstamp at least is agreeing with me, and slowly but steadily rising. Waiting there will likely make buyin just more expensive.
66.
Post 2274728 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
105 to $135.00 now.
Where are you seeing that?
I still see 1k.
Clark Moody, IRC and btccharts.com
I am watching bitcoinity
Edit: I think I see: You are talking about
to 135, ShroomsKit and I are talking about breakthrough

67.
Post 2274814 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Alright, I am away for a few hours. mt.gox is asleep again, bitstamp constantly buying up coins.
Curious what I will see when I get back.

I am predicting a new attempt at 135 on mt.gox shortly

68.
Post 2277484 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Yeah but, 131 is ~1800 coins away. Fundamentally, nothing has really changed.
Yup, true. But slowly up we go... after leaving 131 behind, it should move veery fast.

at current rate i think the wall is eaten in 2 or 3 days.. there's also a +1k short @ bitfinex that at some point will close its position so it can go faster then we think.
depends on movement on mt.gox. If price stays more or less the same, then yes, it will take a while. But as soon as it is established above 136 (bid wall above 136), volume on bitstamp will rocket up and those walls will go down very fast indeed.

69.
Post 2288466 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Pah, typical. Half an hour before I have time for trading comes the big price move

Lets see whether staff will still happen now that I am watching for it...
70.
Post 2289214 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
up we go

71.
Post 2289280 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
I am reasonably certain that this action did not create a downward trend. Indeed it may have even stopped one from forming - especially if the person responsable contributes by buying up cheap coins (lets call it "dump and pump"?)

72.
Post 2294408 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Ha! Sold my bitcoins at 126.99 (bitstamp). Now I just mustn't miss the dip...

73.
Post 2296279 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
Nice to see I called it right to sell at 127 (bitstamp)

Now if I just knew how low it goes...

Btw.: I decided based on technical analyses as well. It was telling me we were and are in a downward trend.
What it (obviously) can't tell me is when the trend will break.

What is up with the bitstamp feed at bitcoinity though? It's dead for me, while the one for mt.gox is working fine

Edit: Wow, that was quite a buy! about 2k
BTC upwards in one go, right through 128!
74.
Post 2296405 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):
The movement is undecided, which means we are still in a downward trend.
The 2k
BTC buy is enough to make us go up in the short term (which means I rebought at 125[bitstamp]

), but whether it will be enough to start a trend reversal? No idea what so ever...
75.
Post 2307368 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):
X_x almost 50 % of Bitstamp's ask sum (~14.31k) is sitting on the way to 132.
Two days ago it was 2k.

Which made me very sceptical about how bullish bitstamp actually is - too much selling pressure in the form of orders. Looking how close bitstamp and mt.gox are, it made me sell this morning at 127.13 (bitstamp). Was then obviously unhappy that the price continued to creep upwards (both mt.gox and bitstamp), but right now mt.gox does seem to get downward pressure, and bitstamp is following.

76.
Post 2307427 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):
I wonder for how many will buy back those who now sell 127,6 ...
Oh, as always all I am hoping is to buy back in a bit cheaper...

Its looking good right now

77.
Post 2307607 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):
pah, should have bought in at 126.13, but was too choosy. Took 127.0 instead, thus still paying .5 more than necessary. Damn reflexes!
Oh well - up we go!
78.
Post 2403623 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):
on bitstamp a wall just bought up to 115.

And I don't have any
BTC to sell

79.
Post 2645413 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):
Hey, mtgox just went lower than bitstamp (83.4 to 83.6).

That hasn't happened since mtgox stopped withdrawals!
I guess that means that mtgox is price leader once more, and we can expect bitstamp to continue to fall once mtgox stops. (very simplified view, of course

)
80.
Post 2645876 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):
just a status update: mtgox is breaking through the about 1k BTC bid wall at 82 right now. (bitstamp is trailing behind)
81.
Post 2645933 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):
If frozenlock or Rampion didn't make their occasional statements of believing in BTC (and you don't read the thread often enough), you could think they or me, etc. are really bears.
I can be somehow trolly with my bear position, but I'm pretty sure most here are long term Bitcoin supporters.
Like Blitz said, if we're not having fun, what's the point?

Increasing the number of your bitcoins?

82.
Post 2645970 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):
Small bounce?
Mtgox just about has to. Bitstamp should fall quite a bit, though (I cant't see any reason why it should stay higher or even very close to mtgox).
Edit: Then again, the big sells on mtgox still don't appear to be stopping.

(just saw 500BTC sold at 82.00)
83.
Post 2646053 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):
Small bounce?
Mtgox just about has to. Bitstamp should fall quite a bit, though (I cant't see any reason why it should stay higher or even very close to mtgox).
Bid side on Bitstamp is actually still looking pretty strong. 5100 coins to 75, 2600 coins to 90. Waiting for a nice 1k sell to prime us for the 70s.

I know. Why do you think bitstamp is trading higher than mtgox at the first place!?

So I am doing the same as you - waiting for a nice big dump of at least 1000BTC before even
thinking about trying to catch a bounce...

84.
Post 2648895 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):
That should be the end of the panic selling for now. Rebound coming up... (I hope

)
Edit: Pretty sure by now, definitely a rebound

85.
Post 2648961 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):
Anyone been moving your orders back yet?
I caught the bottom perfectly this time around - my offer got bought at 75.17 (bitstamp, lowest was 75.11).
Now to watch how it develops. Ready to sell again on very short notice...
86.
Post 2649013 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):
88 fell, 79 fell, next horizontal support is at $50 and you guys are calling bottoms. Too funny.
Even a bitcoin crash is not a straight downward movement. We had a retrace from 82 to 89 just a day ago (bitstamp). Didn't keep the price to crashing down again afterwards, but if you see a chance to catch that upward movement, why not take it?

87.
Post 2662068 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):
1500BTC ask wall at 70 on bitstamp. Bitstamp is leading the down move. mtgox won't have any option but to follow behind.
This will go lower on both exchanges, and fast...
88.
Post 2715299 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):
I'd say we are starting to see the predicted violent fall...
89.
Post 2753188 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
The satoshi dice selloff has started.
And for the first time in quite a few days, mtgox is finally following the downward trend set by bitstamp...
90.
Post 2753258 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):
The satoshi dice selloff has started.
And for the first time in quite a few days, mtgox is finally following the downward trend set by bitstamp...
what? noone has even "received" their buyout..
just bots.. as usual.. nothing to see
What's that got to do with anything?
There are enough people around who can anticipate the effect this will have and are frontrunning.
I was already all in fiat anyway, but the first thing I did upon seeing the news was pulling my bid (it would have been filled by now otherwise).
I am convinced that the
BTCs sold by satoshi dice shareholders will crash the market pretty severely. And so are alot of other people. It becomes a self fulfilling prophesy at that point...
91.
Post 3081916 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):
right now a selloff on bitstamp is drawing mtgox down. The position at 143.6 is being sold of peacemeal (and slowly, there still isn't any volume on gox).
Volume on bitstamp is much higher than on gox right now

.
92.
Post 3082369 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):
NOW mtgox has woken up too (finally). Down we go...
93.
Post 3083255 (copy this link) (by icekiss) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):
Boy am I mighty glad by now that I spotted bitstamp going down today (even posted so in this thread). At that point I sold on mtgox for 143.6$. It's been crashing downwards ever since.
