All posts made by dragonvslinux in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread
1.
Post 52595208 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):
2.
Post 52603404 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):
3.
Post 52605133 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):
Bulls so sad they can't even touch the 200DMA.
touched already. where is your short if you have balls enough?

My risky as f**k short is here. Not got wrecked quite yet


He's got no balls, no short and no coins

But you need coins for shorting, surely

4.
Post 52605233 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):
My risky as f**k short is here. Not got wrecked quite yet

all the best, buddy!

Thanks, I'll need all the luck I can get at this rate

5.
Post 52605719 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):
My risky as f**k short is here. Not got wrecked quite yet

all the best, buddy!

Thanks, I'll need all the luck I can get at this rate

#REKT
Calm down, I'm hanging on by $11 here. I'm tempted to double down on my bet in this resistance zone to be honest
Update: Ok now I've been tapped out 
6.
Post 52605825 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):
My risky as f**k short is here. Not got wrecked quite yet

all the best, buddy!

Thanks, I'll need all the luck I can get at this rate

#REKT
Calm down, I'm hanging on by $11 here. I'm tempted to double down on my bet in this resistance zone to be honest

your position size did sound much larger than this above.

it shouldn't of... that short was the riskiest play i've made in months. position size was fuck all

7.
Post 52608745 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):
Prediction of the future award goes to:
dwdocAnyone notice the timestamp on this:
9/22/19. Given the price was $8012 on this date (last week), this guy deserves a medal.
Check out these two charts; the top one is the NASDAQ 1987 thru the present; the bottom one is BTC last 6 months. I think we go up from here...

Oh, forgot to say this is from June 2013

8.
Post 52609242 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):
The price is below the 200 day MA on Coinbase for 5 days now...
But finding support from the 100 Week MA which has more relevance imo. Stuck between the two at the moment at least.
9.
Post 52732630 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):
200 Day MA & EMA
bear cross confirmed for October 14th by MA & EMA forecasts.
The crossover price is currently forecasted at $8,710 (EMA) and $8,725 (MA).
Here is a close up of the strong resistance from these moving averages, starting to look similar to when the price rallied into the death cross last year:

10.
Post 52736827 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):
200 Day MA & EMA
bear cross confirmed for October 14th by MA & EMA forecasts.
The crossover price is currently forecasted at $8,710 (EMA) and $8,725 (MA).
Here is a close up of the strong resistance from these moving averages, starting to look similar to when the price rallied into the death cross last year:

So, let me get this straight. You are predicting BTC prices to be going down, while we are in a bull market? You might be correct in the short term, but you are likely going to need a quite a bit of luck with that in the event that you are putting very much reliance on such negative projections. AmiNOTrite?
I don't believe we're still in a bull market no, but that's complete subjective to the time-frame. Why do you assume I'm putting such reliance on negative projections? I hodl long-term and accumulate more as the price drops. A short call doesn't necessarily mean I'm going to trade it, and in this case I definitely wouldn't as a bounce is due at anytime to re-test $9K, so clearly way too risky. It's simply what certain indicators and comparisons are telling me. I don't just blindly follow them, that would be ridiculous.
Just because probability is telling me one thing, doesn't mean it will occur, that should be obvious to be honest.
Buy the f**king dip. That better?
11.
Post 52745677 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):
You guys do know that nazi racist piece of filth will get this site closed down
Shut down for what? Everyone that voted for Trump is a Nazi. We outnumber you shitlibs.
Hitler also got most of the votes back in the 1933 with 43%, also didn't make everything else that happened ok.
You might outnumber us for now, but the tables will turn eventually. Rest assured, they always do.
#Notaliberal #Notanazi
12.
Post 52746306 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):
Full moon tonight, anyone believe in these astrological reversals? Could go either way by looks of it, we're due another big move either way it seems.
13.
Post 52765027 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):
"Fun with fractals". Kind of like "Fun with flags", just as interesting and just as (ir)relevant


14.
Post 52768449 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):
As mentioned
elsewhere, he was also giving away these t-shirts if people wore them for the rest of the day

In case anyone has forgotten (or been living under a rock for several years):

15.
Post 52829606 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):
Current Weekly outlook: TD Sequential 9 currently up for grabs this week, haven't seen one of these since April 2019 and July 2018.
Full moon didn't do sh*t to decide, hoping this week can define a direction for the following weeks/months.
Looking at three potential scenarios long-term, as shown by
A (bullish TD 9),
B (wedge breakdown) and
C ("bullish TD 9).
16.
Post 52831070 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):
This is a nice chart, it does give me the impression we haven't spend long enough in the green band, given half the time is spent there.
It looks like we could resemble a 2012 style correction, whereby we break out of the support band but are rejected and return to support.
Either way. long-term accumulation is coming in my opinion.
17.
Post 52832493 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):
Current Weekly outlook: TD Sequential 9 currently up for grabs this week, haven't seen one of these since April 2019 and July 2018.
Full moon didn't do sh*t to decide, hoping this week can define a direction for the following weeks/months.
Looking at three potential scenarios long-term, as shown by
A (bullish TD 9),
B (wedge breakdown) and
C ("bullish TD 9).
Next week looks set for a bullish TD Sequential 9 on the Weekly chart that hasn't been seen since July 2018. Back then this led to a 40% increase in the price of Bitcoin followed by 4 months of consolidation. This scenario is labeled "A". Extrapolation C is the inverse of the "bearish" TD 9 in April 2019 that led to a continuation of the bull trend. Hence, C is labeled as the "bullish" TD 9 but would be the most bearish scenario. Scenario B is the extrapolation of the 2018 wedge breakdown, as documented in Part 1 of the Bitcoin repeating history series.
The two year vpvr "average price" is referenced as a key level to break (and close) above at $8376. I am not sure if I understand the overall proposition, of the above.
Shouldn't three possible scenarios be something more closely resembling: 1) Up 2) down or 3) flat?
How could you have proposed three possible scenarios that are: 1) Up 2) down or 3) up? Confusioning!!!
Updated the quote, highlighted the relevant scenario. The "bearish" TD 9 in April was bullish af basically, hence if the opposite occurred the "bullish" TD 9
could be bearish af.
Obviously anything could happen, like another 8 different scenarios that somewhat overlap. I just like my comparisons to see that this current price movement isn't that unique at all.
Hope that it explains it, not very good at explaining these things. Only making drawings really.
This wasn't meant to tell you
where the price is going, but potentially
why, same as Part 8.
18.
Post 52851468 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):
damn those red candles
Unless you just put in a last minute short before the breakdown

19.
Post 52851626 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):
OK so people can stop panicking & cuckolding, selling all their coins. The Grayscale news was positive, stop dumping & BTFD.
Copy that. Just closed out most my shorts from $8k area, already had limit order fllled at $7500

To the moon.
20.
Post 52857494 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):
tag for follow
So the advise now is to keep accumulating?
Business as usual with good discounts.
21.
Post 52866354 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):
Now over half way to the breakdown target of the descending triangle that most people have already forgotten about, despite it being very much still in play.
Not long left to go now. If you're not already accumulating, you're doing it wrong

22.
Post 52874547 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):
Nice call, it does look increasingly likely that BTC will fall to the $5-6k area, this is what I've been saying
since before Bitcoin broke down from the descending triangle. However I'm expecting it to be short lived and bounce back sharply. Ideally a tidy v-shaped bottom to come, followed by longer-term consolidation somewhere between $8-12k, but that's just a hope and theory. This $200 bounce means nothing but short opportunities in my opinion, going up to the rejection level of $7750 100 Week MA (old support).
23.
Post 52876066 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):
Death cross? What Death cross! HAHA
This one below, the 50 Week crossing the 200 Week confirming a long-term bear trend. Bit of a late signal from breaking the 200 Day MA, but crossing none the less. It's normal for the price to rally into the death cross, in fact in 2014 and 2017 it happened on both occasions, ripping 20%+ to the upside in the short-term before dumping 50% further in the long-term. It's best not to confuse the short-term bullish results of the bear cross on hourly/daily time frames, with the longer term weekly/monthly outlook of what this implies, but you're also welcome to assume a 4 hour candle changes everything and we're going to the moon regardless


Don't get me wrong, I'm accumulating under $8k, but also trying to be realistic about the long-term perspectives of the bear cross based on previous price history.
24.
Post 52896469 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):
Extrapolating the 50 & 200 Day MA bear cross. But we rallied above it, it's negated now isn't it? Apparently not, history bluntly tells us.
$12K
this month is still possible though, in my honest opinion, as well as $6K by next year. Sorry to be the bear again

Please don't blame me, blame previous price history.
It's time to talk about the bear cross that was confirmed yesterday, the 50 Day MA crossing the 200 Day MA. 3 out of 4 of Bitcoin's bear crosses have been bearish long-term indicating a further 50% drop in price (2011, 2014 and 2018). In the shorter-term, Bitcoin also twice rallied by 50% in two of these occasions (2014 and 2015) before continuing higher or falling back down. Only 1 out of 4 of these cases it came at the end of the bear market, in 2015. Archived
25.
Post 52899143 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):
This evening I'm looking at the smaller time frame for the 0.786 moon level ($9,731.54) and the 0.5 doom level ($8905).
Already long from the wick at $9,800 like a moon boy


26.
Post 52904468 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):
Waking up today to a traders market then. 0.5 to the 0.786. Back down to the 0.5 then? I imagine there will be some futures based selling action today to catch up from missed opportunities over the weekend. Namely, the doji reversal sharp sell off from the October 26th. There's a big gap that arguably will be filled eventually down to $8900 (200 Day MA).

27.
Post 52929509 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):
I think this price is the definition of a neutral market, meeting up with the 200 Day MA again. Investors would call it a "fair price", traders will wait to see which direction is taken.
Anything could happen moment coming right up... BTC style. Indicators claim Daily/Weekly/Monthly are strong buys while Bi-Daily/Hourly are strong sells.
This is the battle between the longer term bullish trend and the shorter term bearish momentum.
28.
Post 52940801 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):
Starting to see the comparison now between 2016 and 2019. Note the similarity in the support from the 100 Week MA (grey line) during the bullish correction.
Continued dip support from the 200 Day MA would help this theory to play out. That and the upcoming bull cross circled in green, if price can hold up at higher levels.

29.
Post 52952039 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):
Crypto meme of the week for me, courtesy of
cryptocurrency memes.

30.
Post 52980331 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):
Currently testing the
descending triangle resistance on the 4 hr, therefore next hours candle close will be important.
Bare in mind the 1 hr will be on a TD 9 so don't be surprised by any big price moves...

Please note, I'm not getting "rekt" at the moment. This was a
neutral call due to the 200 Day MA support invalidating the bearish setup for me.
I'm posting this for benefit of seeing if we invalidate the bearish pattern of a descending triangle, and return to the classic bull flag.
31.
Post 52980699 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):
Currently testing the
descending triangle resistance on the 4 hr, therefore next hours candle close will be important.
Bare in mind the 1 hr will be on a TD 9 so don't be surprised by any big price moves...
Please note, I'm not getting "rekt" at the moment. This was a
neutral call due to the 200 Day MA support invalidating the bearish setup for me.
I'm posting this for benefit of seeing if we invalidate the bearish pattern of a descending triangle, and return to the classic bull flag.
"Please note, I'm not getting "rekt" at the moment."
Good for you.

I am also going to note that you should not be relying too much on stupid-ass charts that attempt to treat bitcoin as if it were a mature asset and fail and refuse to incorporate either bitcoin's currently low level of adoption and underlying s-curve exponential components that bias UPPITY rather than other scenarios (such as flat or downity).
In other words, TLDR, you deserve to get rekt (even if you are not) if your chart relies on too many incomplete presumptions.

Too many assumptions, not enough logic. FYI my trading account is only ever 10-15% of my BTC holdings, so go figure

If I get "rekt", is because my BTC hodl is going up. If I win, it's because I'm losing overall BTC value.
Some people

32.
Post 52984041 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):
Currently testing the
descending triangle resistance on the 4 hr, therefore next hours candle close will be important.
Bare in mind the 1 hr will be on a TD 9 so don't be surprised by any big price moves...
Please note, I'm not getting "rekt" at the moment. This was a
neutral call due to the 200 Day MA support invalidating the bearish setup for me.
I'm posting this for benefit of seeing if we invalidate the bearish pattern of a descending triangle, and return to the classic bull flag.
"Please note, I'm not getting "rekt" at the moment."
Good for you.

I am also going to note that you should not be relying too much on stupid-ass charts that attempt to treat bitcoin as if it were a mature asset and fail and refuse to incorporate either bitcoin's currently low level of adoption and underlying s-curve exponential components that bias UPPITY rather than other scenarios (such as flat or downity).
In other words, TLDR, you deserve to get rekt (even if you are not) if your chart relies on too many incomplete presumptions.

Too many assumptions, not enough logic. FYI my trading account is only ever 10-15% of my BTC holdings, so go figure

If I get "rekt", is because my BTC hodl is going up. If I win, it's because I'm losing overall BTC value.
Some people

Hey. Fair enough if your trading portion is only 10-15% of your total holdings. That is decently prudent, so I find difficulties criticizing you on that aspect.
Your remaining assertion about the meaning of "getting r3ckt" is quite a puzzle.

You seem to be trying to suggest that either there is NO way for you to get r3ckt or that getting r3ckt means something other than a traditional understanding of it.
I do agree that if you are trading with ONLY about 10-15% of your total holdings then it becomes quite difficult to get r3ckt in any traditional understanding of the r3ckt concept.
Now, get out there trooper, and trade some BTCs!!!!!!!!! That's an order.

You're right it's possible for me to get r3kt™️, probably from fakeouts where I was in the right short trade but got tapped out at a loss prior to my hodl position continuing to lose money after I've lost my hedge. When it comes to bull traps I generally try and avoid them, as if I'm already 85-90% long, I don't want to increase my risk. It's worth considering though.
This probably explains my natural trading bias to some degree, maybe my TA requires a disclaimer because of it. But ultimately I apologize for being the pessimistic bull, that by your standard deserves to get rekt™️, but so far hasn't and is otherwise unlikely to happen due to position sizing, risk management and generally avoiding bull traps. The only way I will get truely rekt™️, is if BTC goes below $4K. Then I iz a r3kt™️ moonboy like any other post-2017 moonboy hopes and dreams getting r3kt™️ r3kt™️ r3kt™️.
To let you down even more, I won't be going out there to trade any satoshis, I'm avoiding buying resistance that's a big open space of bull trap, as well as avoiding any foolish bear traps wicking under the 200 Day MA. I'm remaining neutral, believe it or not. Even if I'll retain my bearish bias regardless of lack of confirmation.
Just got a new job to start dollar-cost averaging though, hope that makes you feel better.
33.
Post 52984102 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):
My bad, I'm waiting for confirmation, but planning to short the bullish broadening wedge with a tight stop loss if that's ok with you?
If you could confirm within the next 96 minutes before the close it'd be appreciated

I drew this chart just for you. To show you that we're in a bullish pattern, but I still want to short it


I'll long again at the 200 Day MA (the support trend-line) I promise

34.
Post 52987613 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):
My bad, I'm waiting for confirmation, but planning to short the bullish broadening wedge with a tight stop loss if that's ok with you?
If you could confirm within the next 96 minutes before the close it'd be appreciated

I drew this chart just for you. To show you that we're in a bullish pattern, but I still want to short it


I'll long again at the 200 Day MA (the support trend-line) I promise

Most of those lines are gobbledy gook to me, and when I said get out there and trade I was suggesting that you follow your own system, whatever that may be.
My system hardly ever makes any changes based on my anticipations of BTC price direction, which is good for me, because I rarely, if ever have much of any kind of anticipation of BTC's short-term price direction that would take me more than 5% or so off of my usual 50/50 disposition.
Fair point, no explanation to random over drawing on my clutter chart

Fortunately price blindly followed the path though so I've done as you've asked


It always surprises me being able to copy & paste trends and watch them actually play out

35.
Post 53032616 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):
lol, I will come back later to visit Peter Schiff Twitter account with a screenshot of his Twitter picture. at least in the next few months, I have done this before to the people closest to me and I am embarrassing my friend when he has to watch on all TV discussing the price of bitcoin in 2017 then in my country, see it later
You should bare in mind these are two tweets out of dozens (if not hundreds) of Peter (anti-Bitcoin) Schiff saying that Bitcoin will continue to crash, to $1K, then $1, etc, etc.
When someone is fundamentally 100% bearish about Bitcoin, acknowledging their negative tweets seems completely irrelevant.
36.
Post 53147027 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):
Do we get to vote on a new poll now? $7,500 is done. $6500 next?
37.
Post 53160088 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):
I'm starting to think the sell-off could be done. I also don't doubt we could go lower, but for the second time this year I see the possibility of a low.
This was my TA from
2 months ago (when the price was >$10K) that had a target of $6,875. This particular descending triangle didn't entirely play out, but the breakdown target has now notably been reached regardless. If you're still selling or shorting, you're doing it wrong.

Time to start accumulating


38.
Post 53163361 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):
Current state of play....Wall observer is neutral:

Bitmex is slightly short:

Market sentiment is extremely fearful:

Time to accumulate

39.
Post 53174474 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):
I think we're done here. It's taken more than two months, but the original bearish target looks complete, at least by a margin or error being $116.

Now we just need a strong bounce back above $7400-$7500 and we're good in my opinion

40.
Post 53248212 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):
It's an interesting perspective from the BTC value view, very different from the 1 Year Hodl Waves when viewed in USD value:

Either way, the HODL waves shows the same result: 1 Year hodlers have stopped selling. This nicely supports my accumulation theory:
41.
Post 53249954 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):
Starting to see another "Fun with Fractals" pattern forming. If it plays out, expect some boring price movements for a couple of weeks as well as a re-test of $6,600.

Perfect
accumulation time imo

42.
Post 53267179 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):
Time for a bounce. I rarely look at the 3 Day chart, but once the TD Sequential gives a 9 Buy signal, I like to pay attention

Just waiting for a green 2 to move above a green 1, which the current candle has been flirting with and closes by days end.

Notably finding support from the 200 MA too

43.
Post 53274788 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
According to the chart, the behavior clearly indicates that we are at the beginning of a good bullish rally.
4/ Also keep an eye on Bitcoin Network Momentum
At this point in prior cycles, we saw rapid increases in on-chain BTC volumes for 6-10wks b4 bull market started
Worth watching for now to see if this repeats following recent uptick
@woonomic
version with coinmetrics data is 🔥

Source:
https://twitter.com/PositiveCrypto/status/1202627555016220674It's true we're still holding up a form of support trendline from the start of the year regarding network transaction volume which is a good sign.

We did dip below it briefly but popped up above again.
44.
Post 53293583 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
By the way, I am still on the lookout for a reliable dead man switch arrangement. I'm afraid if anything happens to me, my family won't be able to collect. Any tips? Should I open yet another thread "out there"?
The best way I can see this working is by already transmitting the transaction, to a wallet that your family already own, but with a time delay of anywhere between a few months and a decade (depending on your desire for maintenance). I'd like to think this can be done by transmitting into a specific block in the future with
nLockTime (
discussion here), but I may be wrong. Possibly there are features within the lightning network that can facilitate this as well but again not sure.
This would act as the most reliable insurance for worst case scenarios, and don't already have shared custody set up, but more importantly would guarantee that your family get your Bitcoin, at an eventual date of your chosing - without the need for the switch, which is a single-point-of-failure in itself. What if you don't have access to your switch for example? Pragmatically speaking this is what you want I believe, a permanent solution dependent only on the variable of time, as opposed to your access to a switch.
Hope that helps with the brainstorming.
hat talk
One day, I wish to have one of these hats.
45.
Post 53293953 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
By the way, I am still on the lookout for a reliable dead man switch arrangement. I'm afraid if anything happens to me, my family won't be able to collect. Any tips? Should I open yet another thread "out there"?
The best way I can see this working is by already transmitting the transaction, to a wallet that your family already own, but with a time delay of anywhere between a few months and a decade (depending on your desire for maintenance). I'd like to think this can be done by transmitting into a specific block in the future with
nLockTime (
discussion here), but I may be wrong. Possibly there are features within the lightning network that can facilitate this as well but again not sure.
This would act as the most reliable insurance for worst case scenarios, and don't already have shared custody set up, but more importantly would guarantee that your family get your Bitcoin, at an eventual date of your chosing - without the need for the switch, which is a single-point-of-failure in itself. What if you don't have access to your switch for example? Pragmatically speaking this is what you want I believe, a permanent solution dependent only on the variable of time, as opposed to your access to a switch.
Hope that helps with the brainstorming.
Thanks for your reply, dragonvslinux.
Unfortunately, your proposed solution doesn't cut it for me.
My family are mostly nocoiners.
Besides, I don't like to set up a transaction to a different address. IMO, the coins shouldn't move if there is no need to cash out.
What I would like to do is send an encrypted email with instructions on redeeming a wallet through its seed - and send it NOW.
The dead man switch I am imagining would just send the key to decrypt the email containing the seed.
Fair enough, just to point out the coins would never move unless you fail to update/overright your nLockTime transaction. This means your family could already have the key to the encrypted email (or ideally a veracrypt file for increased security), but they would't have the coins until the transaction is mined (when you fail to update your transaction).
46.
Post 53304939 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
Bulltrap to breakdown currently in play on 4hr. If $7300 doesn't support the price, it's in trouble again. This is why I don't like symmetrical triangles


The green line cutting through the wick is the signal for a long trade on the 3 Day chart

47.
Post 53308440 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
That moment you go to dollar cost average your weekly paycheck, and you find your bank is having downtime

Also the moment you remember
why your investing in decentralized infrastructures.
48.
Post 53310478 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
I wish we'd just crash below $6,500, to rip the bandage off and cause some real pain. This fucking around Bitcorn is doing, is starting to piss me off. She's all over the place last few weeks...
Calm down Bob, if BTC recovers and starts to climb perfect and if it has to go down, no problem, we will buy more, I know that this scenario does not solve your situation, but let the laggards accumulate a little more satoshis.

I really don't see what the problem is, if Bitcoin continues to move sideways, you can accumulate more.
If Bitcoin crashes below $6500, you can accumulate more.
49.
Post 53313368 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
This is not fine
Meh, not remotely worried. Show me sub $5,000 before I start to panic. Even then I’d spend 5 figures (GBP) on a load more coins.
Not panicking just want $100000 BTC now
Me too.
Still don't get this sentiment, people wanting a higher price already. Surely people want as long as possible in order to accumulate? Dollar cost averaging? I agree that no ATH by 2022 would be a concern, as would dropping below $5k (arguably) but for me more $4 and we'd be in trouble. We'd all be able to get a lot of BTC if there wasn't an all time high until 2021/2022 that's for sure. This tells me we still need to go lower and consolidate for longer, sentiment is still in "impatient bull" mode.
50.
Post 53322961 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
I realise that probably no one wants to hear it here, but it does look like price is forming another descending triangle on the 4hr. There are enough touchpoints against the resistance downtrend line (including wicks), although we do only have a few on the support, but arguably not three (basic requirement imo) that are far enough apart still. Regardless, we all about Bitcoin's history of
descending triangles, as well as hodlers deniable of them, so I think its worth bringing it up

I also don't think this is a big deal, it's measuring a 9% back down to $6,500, rather than to lower lows. The breakdown zone is calculated as being between 18th and the 25th (Christmas day haha). I could see this being the final drop before a big move up, or the continuation of the bear trend. I'm actually feeling pretty neutral mid-term about the market right now, even if shorter and longer-term I'm back to being bearish again, which is merely what certain technical indicators are telling me.
51.
Post 53327415 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
There is a strong resistance at 6.4k, but a one closer around 7k, look like this one holds and I am not sure anymore we head to 6.5k... the move is really slow right now and 7.1k is probably a decent price to buy.
Decided to buy 0.31 BTC today with a target around 8k for mid January max. There is another rally expected because the charts and the RSI look really similar to Mach-April 2018!
Best of luck!
$7k holding is
absolutely critical. If it breaks, prepare for maximum rectal and testicular discomfort.
Today's short-term outlook, 12hr TD is on a Red 9 buy signal however the 3 Day is on a short trade (Red 2 breaking below the Red 1), despite the 200 MA support around $7K.

This shows a battle between the shorter and longer term trends in play, while the Daily and Weekly charts have returned to being fully bearish after the dead cat bounce to $7,800.

Price is continuing to test the 0.382 fib retracement (yellow line) from the $3.1 to $14k move after getting rejected by the median price of the bear channel (orange line).
52.
Post 53330358 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
Cheer up Wall Observers, $6,500 might of been the bottom

53.
Post 53334931 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
Here's my short term outlook on price, I won't post a new topic as it might upset people, even if it is a neutral call


Another day, another descending triangle . I first tried drawing this on the 4hr chart, but without being able to include the support touch-point of December 2nd, I've gone with the Daily chart in order to have a minimum of 3 touch-points on both support & resistance trends, with sufficient time in between. There is an interesting difference between this descending triangle and others in Bitcoin's history however.
Unlike most of Bitcoin's descending triangles that lead to lower swing lows, the measured move target for this particular triangle is approximately $75 higher than the swing low of around $6,526. I'm therefore remaining neutral while anticipating a final-ish flush out, as the measured move target of 8% could quickly develop into a double bottom or higher low bullish scenario.
Support: $7,186
Target: $6,600
Resistance: $7,400
Breakout: 16th-21st December (after 75% of the triangle has completed)
You can ignore the indicators, they weren't meant to show up

54.
Post 53343874 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
[charts]
Here's my outlook of the Weekly time-frame on a 4 chart like a weirdo


Using the 2100 & 4200 MAs on the 4hr chart (like a weirdo) gives us the 50 & 100 Week MAs on a zoomed in time-frame. Although we already had the bullcross on these Weekly MAs, on a 4hr chart ("in real-time"), we are now seeing the bullish crossover with the price sat underneath it. This follows two weeks of rejection fom the median of the bear channel , continued failure to maintain support above the 0.382 fib retracement (of the $3,100 to $13,850 move), as well as arguably initial rejection from the bull-cross itself that "IRT" occured yesterday.
With the volume dropping off and another descending triangle being established, this is enough reason to be bearish right now.
Doesn't look good in my opinion. Only "hope" for me right now is the
current descending triangle is a fake out / bear trap.
If you'd prefer to look at something bullish, then check out this chart I came across. It has nice proportions of 0.5 volitility and 2x time (half the depth and twice the length):
2011/2022The is also similar to the 2012 descending triangle extrapolation I made a couple of months ago that's also quite similar:

[/charts]
55.
Post 53359376 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
Whatever was causing the ridiculous long / short ratio on Bitfinex has somewhat eased. It is now only sublime.
Note: this is caused by a sudden uptick in the number of shorts, not a decrease in longs.
Volatility, she is coming.

The strange thing the Bitfinex long/short ratio was due to over-leveraged longs, that are worryingly still parabolic and at ATH with RSI completely oversold:

The reason the ratio dropped ironically due to the short interest, as opposed to a long squeeze. I don't see this as necessarily a good thing:

On the Daily chart, you can see there has been a 50% increase in shorts today, so far:

But the longs still remain over-leveraged by a factor of 5:1 (80%), as opposed to the high of around 15:2 (87% approx):

Still expecting a drop to around 2-3:1, which is also the 200 Day MA for the ratio, or 4:1 minimum. for a more reasonable 50-65% long leverage personally.

Until then I'm still expecting a long squeeze personally (dump in price), that clearly hasn't occurred. Ratio squeezes don't count for me.
56.
Post 53361349 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
For those of you bored of the longer-term chart, am seeing a bullish breakout on the 1hr with the measured move of a bullish penant breakout wicking as high as $7285.
Still needs to clear the $7130 resistance level (triangle breakdown). I'd however expect a swift rejection from the 200 MA around $7240 (the orange line), as well as the 100 Week MA at $7245 - the silver dotted line. If we get above $7150 and can turn it into the support, would be a pretty bullish case of a classic beartrap:

57.
Post 53377209 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
Notably, if we also extrapolate the second part of the correction in 2015, then we are not only looking similar, but also on target

58.
Post 53377880 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
Good morning WO!
Observing @ $6,620
Very soon $6,500?
Nope, we gonna witness $100k first.

You think we're more likely to go $93.4K higher then $100 lower? Ok

59.
Post 53377914 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
Good morning WO!
Observing @ $6,620
Very soon $6,500?
Nope, we gonna witness $100k first.

You think we're more likely to go $93.4K higher then $100 lower? Ok

Stop messing with the hypothetical, dragonvslinux. You party poop.


I do however see the argument for this being a "fake out", as previously referenced. The measured target of $6,600 has been met from the descending triangle breakdown, $6500 doesn't necessarily have to happen, it could easily be a double bottom or higher high. This is an obvious take profit zone for shorts, not a shorting area.

Either that, or within a few minutes we'll be there

PS - This needs to come to an end first. This is getting ridiculous.

RSI at 96 is virtually unheard of, even for Bitcoin related TA.

60.
Post 53378129 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
On another note, go day traders on the 10 minute chart.

You can do it, $6556 is being defended with strong volume, also within 1 cent.
61.
Post 53378241 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):
Good morning WO!
Observing @ $6,620
Very soon $6,500?
Nope, we gonna witness $100k first.

You think we're more likely to go $93.4K higher then $100 lower? Ok

Stop messing with the hypothetical, dragonvslinux. You party poop.

Either that, or within a few minutes we'll be there

My TA says we need a new Wall Observer poll. $6,500 hit to the cent on Coinbase.

62.
Post 53382764 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
Now $100K?

In one hour
10 minute candle, coming right up...
63.
Post 53386547 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
Looking good on the accumulation chart right now, found support from the base of the accumulation zone after wicking below it.

A recent argument for
$6,500 being the low can be viewed here.
64.
Post 53387514 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
Thanks to everyone in this thread who
put up with my TA supported me in
becoming a Full Member, you know who you are

65.
Post 53387588 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
Thanks to everyone in this thread who
put up with my TA supported me in
becoming a Full Member, you know who you are

Now you can go for a HAT
Ironic you should mention that, I just uploaded a new hat avatar. I'm afraid it's not one of the Wall Observer™ Official ® hats however.
Maybe soon I will apply though

66.
Post 53395112 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
Christ on a crutch. Longs are almost 10x shorts on BFX. This is the most crowded trade on the planet. But shorts still paying longs on Bitmex. Wtf is going on.

Couldn't of put it better myself:
This is the most crowded trade on the planet.
My only thoughts is would you incrementally dump Tether for Bitcoin over the course of a month

Maybe this tells us more about the future of USDT, rather than the price of Bitcoin.

67.
Post 53399764 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
I feel like I'm getting deja vu now. It could just be due to alcohol, but what if $6,430 was the low? I remember when $3,130 didn't look like the low either. It also looked like we'd probably go lower, due to the technicals. Now $6,430 doesn't look like the bottom as well. Maybe we don't get obviously defined bottom, yet again.

I've said it multiple times, I think we're going lower, to the $5k area, but that also
this could actually be the bottom.
68.
Post 53402291 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
I feel like I'm getting deja vu now. It could just be due to alcohol, but what if $6,430 was the low? I remember when $3,130 didn't look like the low either. It also looked like we'd probably go lower, due to the technicals. Now $6,430 doesn't look like the bottom as well. Maybe we don't get obviously defined bottom, yet again.

I've said it multiple times, I think we're going lower, to the $5k area, but that also
this could actually be the bottom.
Compare it to the 2014 bear market. It looks a lot like it.

Already done, two versions extrapolating the 2014 correction
The bullish:The bearish:These charts can't both be right, so am still waiting for confirmation as to which is wrong. Likely the second chart however.
Either way, both point to the idea that this is a long-term accumulation zone, hence I'm accumulating.
69.
Post 53406559 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
Lot's of shitcoins in that sleigh, too... might cause more disloyalty....
Rudolph might be a bit pissed off, too; having to pull your fat ass around (along with the shitcoins) without any help.Shitcoin moon is coming, to the detriment of BTC no doubt, holding it back like a kid on a leash.
But it will flow back into Bitcoin eventually, you can use it as an opportunity to stack sats

70.
Post 53419104 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
Making my first time-based prediction: The next low for #Bitcoin will be between February 6th-11th 2020.
February 10th 2014 low: $553
February 10th 2015 low: $215
February 11th 2016 low: $361
February 9th 2017 low: $925
February 6th 2018 low: $5,873
February 8th 2019 low: $3,344
Note this is
time-based analysis, not price based. This does not indicate lower lows, but when the next low will arrive (whether lower or not).

For example, a low around $6,850 re-testing support in early February such as
this chart.
71.
Post 53427668 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
72.
Post 53431839 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
73.
Post 53437930 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
74.
Post 53438878 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
Nice outlook, I'm also thinking this is more a possibility right now. It'll take a bit of time and confirmation for me to be convinced, but it's more than possible by looks of it.
75.
Post 53443243 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
If Bitcoin maintains the proportionate halving-on-halving decline in gains (-68.68%), this means the next halving would "only be" 900% increase (31.31% of previous).
That's still a 10x from May 2020 until some unknown date in the future (that could also be proportionately estimated in fairness). I can deal with that

So
unless we go down to $2K by May 2020 (that I highly doubt), then 10x to $20K, then the halving clearly isn't priced in.
Even an exponential decline in halving-on-halving gains would still be around 600-800% I imagine.
76.
Post 53444811 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
Hash Ribbons is close to a buy signal, both on Daily and Weekly time-frames

Click quote for more info regarding the indicator and it's buy signals.
Daily chart 2011-2015 - Reliably signaled bullish price movement following recovery of miner capitulation with price follow through:
Signals (2011-2013): $4.08, December 27th 2011 | $5.09, May 20th 2012 | $6.46, June 22nd 2012 | $20.55, February 2nd 2013
Daily chart 2015-2019 - currently signalling recovery stage of miner capitulation, awaiting price follow through for buy signal:
Signals (2015-2019): $234, January 28th 2015 | $234, February 5th 2015 | $238 May 29th 2015 | $612, September 4th 2016 | $3652, January 11th 2019
Average of 1 signal per year in the past 9 years.
Weekly chart - has been flirting with recovery stage of miner capitulation, similar to August 2016:
Signals (2011-2019): $5.28, December 26th 2011 | $6.35, June 18th 2012 | $23.80, February 4th 2013 | $227, January 26th 2015 | $231, May 25th 2015 | $3533, January 7th 2019
Average of 1 signal every 18 months in the past 9 years
Literally flashing green in front of my eyes

the Weekly is also bull-crossing:

If these buy signals come through, I will become an uber bull

77.
Post 53456507 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
The
Hash Ribbons indicator is currently signalling a buy. Closing the day at current price would be the first buy signal since January 11th 2019 at $3,632.


The Weekly is yet to print the buy signal (also only half way through the week), so no confluence between these time-frames yet, but still:
If these buy signals come through, I will become an uber bull

78.
Post 53456718 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
The
Hash Ribbons indicator is currently signalling a buy. Closing the day at current price would be the first buy signal since January 11th 2019 at $3,632.

Sorry but had to post again, still can't get my head around this. Most indicators are telling me we're going down. Hash Ribbons is telling me the bottoms in on a long-term scale.

Why do I care about Hash so much? I don't, I care about an indicator that's given 9 signals in 9 years with 100% success rate of calculating post-bottoms in the market (or best accumulation prices). Therefore, if this signal is wrong, it would be part of the 10% unreliable signalling, meaning on a Daily time-frame at least, there is a 90% chance
the bottom is in 
79.
Post 53456795 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
The
Hash Ribbons indicator is currently signalling a buy. Closing the day at current price would be the first buy signal since January 11th 2019 at $3,632.

Sorry but had to post again, still can't get my head around this. Most indicators are telling me we're going down. Hash Ribbons is telling me the bottoms in on a long-term scale.

Why do I care about Hash so much? I don't, I care about an indicator that's given 9 signals in 9 years with 100% success rate of calculating post-bottoms in the market (or best accumulation prices). Therefore, if this signal is wrong, it would be part of the 10% unreliable signalling, meaning on a Daily time-frame at least, there is a 90% chance
the bottom is in 
This signal might still work, but there is a simple technical explanation for hashing rate stagnation (or minuscule decline).
The reason is that upon decline from $14K to $7K and simultaneous prior increase in hashing caused by the deployment of new generation miners (starting in about may-June), old trusty S9 miners become mostly unprofitable to run and there was A LOT of them, so it was a multi-month process of switching old gen off and new on. Large miners never do it in one swoop, it is a process.
TL;DR It is was not switching hashing OFF, it was a replacement cycle.
Not relevant. These signals have been back tested
pre-ASIC. I'm sure that any TA based miner would be able to pin point the relevant cycles with releases of different models of miners that end up on the market, or others that drop out of the market for that matter, in relation to these capitulation & buy cycles.
Me, I do not care for economics, only reliable technical indicators. It's signalling a buy and this indicator hasn't been wrong yet, I won't be betting against it for that reason.
80.
Post 53456814 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
TA is voodoo, it NEVER works reliably. Economics of the process is what actually works.
TA is based on probability, that is based on mathematics, 1s and 0s. The latter has been reliably tested for thousands of years. The former, for only a couple of hundred maybe.
Economics is based on a load suits in a room deciding whey think is best to do with their money, at the detriment of anyone else.
My faith in mathematics is inexplicably higher than any moronic human species based intelligence.
Believe what you want, I know what I'll be putting my money on: 1s and 0s.
81.
Post 53456900 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
TA is voodoo, it NEVER works reliably. Economics of the process is what actually works.
TA is based on probability, that is based on mathematics, 1s and 0s. The latter has been reliably tested for thousands of years. The former, for only a couple of hundred maybe.
Economics is based on a load suits in a room deciding whey think is best to do with their money, at the detriment of anyone else.
My faith in mathematics is inexplicably higher than any moronic human species based intelligence.
Believe what you want, I know what I'll be putting my money on: 1s and 0s.
TA has almost nothing to do with math, it is mostly interpretation of the prior data with Fibonacci numbers thrown in to give it a 'pseudo'-scientific feel.
However, if it works for you due to some 'hidden' parameter that you don't even realize exist, so be it.
Happy trading!
Technical indicators are exclusively based on mathematics, the source code would tell you this if you bother to read them, but never-mind.
82.
Post 53459623 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
TA is voodoo, it NEVER works reliably. Economics of the process is what actually works.
TA is based on probability, that is based on mathematics, 1s and 0s. The latter has been reliably tested for thousands of years. The former, for only a couple of hundred maybe.
Economics is based on a load suits in a room deciding whey think is best to do with their money, at the detriment of anyone else.
My faith in mathematics is inexplicably higher than any moronic human species based intelligence.
Believe what you want, I know what I'll be putting my money on: 1s and 0s.
TA has almost nothing to do with math, it is mostly interpretation of the prior data with Fibonacci numbers thrown in to give it a 'pseudo'-scientific feel.
However, if it works for you due to some 'hidden' parameter that you don't even realize exist, so be it.
Happy trading!
Technical indicators are exclusively based on mathematics, the source code would tell you this if you bother to read them, but never-mind.
Thanks @dragonvslinux's nice charts, i like it very much.
Talking about TA and Economics :
Economics (macro) tells an investor what to invest;
TA(micro) tells the investor when to buy.Smart and well put. Admittedly it's the economics of Bitcoin that drew me to this asset class, so I won't deny it's validity. I'm out of merit so bookmarked
Edit: Merited you, thanks micgoossens for +2, though next time maybe just merit the user's post yourself 
83.
Post 53460003 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
^
Pay your debts

Oh lol, I edited my post above, and already done

I see what you did now

Edit: Merited you, thanks micgoossens for +2, though next time maybe just merit the user's post yourself 
I'm clearly not great at understanding economics

84.
Post 53460683 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
^
Pay your debts

Oh lol, I edited my post above, and already done

I see what you did now

Edit: Merited you, thanks micgoossens for +2, though next time maybe just merit the user's post yourself 
I'm clearly not great at understanding economics

Why? It benefits two posters right now

I already explained

I'm clearly not great at understanding economics

TA is voodoo, it NEVER works reliably. Economics of the process is what actually works.
BTW: in the hypothetical surrogate TA observation that temperature is lower in the winter than in the summer (in northern hemisphere) what is more important: the "TA" observation or the knowledge of orbital tilt and planet rotation around the star?
Ah fundamentals v TA. An argument as old as the hills. The challenge being that economics is not the dismal science, but rather no science at all. And there is no rational economic explanation for short term price perturbations.
Think of it this way. TA is the study of the psychology of price discovery. TA is asking the question - what will the crowd do when X happens? And how can you make the crowd do Y?
True story. That psychology of price discovery, unrelated to economics, is also the psychology of "human rationality" or more specifically "the herd".
Humans are far from rational, instead they act like most animals in a herd like mentality: they lack basic intelligence when panicked or feeling threatened.
85.
Post 53474287 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

bollocks
BollocksWhat happened?
I was so afraid that we would moon before I buy my last fucking dip.
Go fucking down. Stay the fuck dawnn.
Everyone was saying we were going to $5K, including me. Obviously the idea was that you ladder bought $5-7K, in order to at least get some decent buy fills.
Oh well, maybe
next time in 2020.
Time to BTFD.
Hate to say I told you so

86.
Post 53474766 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
I'm blaming all the fucking mETH-heads out there for this volatility today. All the bullshit going back and forth between BTC<->ETH today is fucking retarded. ETH longs dumping into BTC, then dumping BTC back to ETH as it breaks north of $7.4k USD/BTC.
Fuck you, WhaleBears !!!
Bounce from
$7245 incoming. I've got a hunch.
87.
Post 53474863 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
DYOR

88.
Post 53482801 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):
And what if the halvening is priced in... but also a drop in price before the halvening is priced in too? I mean, if you were sure that the price after the halvening were to rally BUT, at the same time, you thought there is still a possibility for a lower price before the rally starts... Wouldn't it make sense to wait a bit before going all in even if you were expecting a rise after the halvening?
So the price of the halvening may be priced in and at the same time it may not be priced in (yet)... both at the same time! There's that!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principlehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_catAgree to this idea, I said something similar elsewhere... I feel as if the halving
speculation has been priced in, but not the havling itself - ie the economics of stock to flow, reduced supply & therefore difficulty feeding a stable demand. Even if it a takes a few months after the halving, supply will dry up fast enough in my opinion.
89.
Post 53499823 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
Always nice to see hash rate at new ATH


90.
Post 53500559 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
Always nice to see hash rate at new ATH


usually, it will turn in a price rise!
in the last days seems btc was accumulating around at 7150usd.
rsi has avalue of 50: read neutral.
macd and macd signal are matching.
Bollinger Band Width still reducing.
In a short time, the market will have to make a decision.... for sure
True story, at least it brings about eventual turn around in price, even if it takes sometime. Bare in mind that from the $20K price peak, Bitcoin's hash-rate continued to be parabolic for another 10 months, before crashing at the end of 2018 (when price dropped to $3.1K), even if it was to a level higher than the $20K peak. My point is it's usually a matter of months rather than weeks before price follows suit. Regardless, on-chain data such as hash ribbons, as well as the energy oscillator, are signalling accumulation buying, even if it'll last for a while:

91.
Post 53508145 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Pump soon? Target of this bullish inverse H&S is approximately 15% (head->resistance trendline) up to $8,500... if it plays out of course.

Notably this would take us to the top of the 6-month long Weekly bearish channel

92.
Post 53516759 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
So, btc was either first (by a mile) or dead last...You never know what you gonna get, but much better chance than even for btc outperformance (so far)
It looks like one think we're still guaranteed to get is volatility

It's a nice table though, good perspective for 2020.
Good morning WO!
Observing @ $7,346
Are we going bullish?
Not yet.
93.
Post 53528624 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
Looking at Mic halving contest thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5214437.msg53505853#msg53505853It looks like everybody has forgotten the retarded $100K+ in 2020 (weeee) dreams. Which is a very nice signal. But... what I can't really understand is... if most people is betting on a 6K-9K price for 1 April.... and considering two weeks before the halvening whatever front-running that there is will be in full effect (ie at its peak)...
Is most people also betting on a (final?) dump to $5K during the next couple of months? Am I reading this right?
I think a dump to $5K level before $10K, both in 2020. But the latter after the halving, as opposed to before. The fact that many more people have made short calls as opposed to longs this time fills me with confidence that would could reach $10K before halving however, and that the majority could therefore be wrong as per usual. Markets do like to have this effect on the general public.
To be honest, if it weren't because of the $14K pump of past year, current price would be perfectly right for the pre-halving time. In fact we would a bit ahead of schedule.
Once thing is sure, 2020 will be a very interesting (and critical) year for Bitcoin. And for all of us.
I agree from different perspective of moving averages & hash rate, I feel prices are still very much in line, only slightly overpriced at best.
94.
Post 53533293 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
What's this $1k bs I'm reading this morning?
Get a grip guys, you're scaring the noobs.
I don't think it's scaring the noobs, they all ran away when $6K was broken, then same deal with $9K level

Noobs will come back at $10-20K I'd imagine.
If Bitcoin price was a contest in doing something stupid (investing) for as long as possible (dollar cost averaging) - like standing in a ring weighed down, in a pool, touching a vehicle - we'd be on Day 2/3 by comparison I like to think. All the noobs would of already gone, with only the dedicated and hardened participants left.
95.
Post 53539002 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
This just got interesting


96.
Post 53539484 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
AYH
Yaaaaay

97.
Post 53542019 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
Latest theory on Wyckoff Accumulation pattern:
I still think that $BTC is in a Wyckoff Accumulation pattern. However, now I am using a different schematic since it appears we have exited Phase C without getting a spring.


Souce:
https://twitter.com/Sawcruhteez/status/1214306177292615680
98.
Post 53548114 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
Aspirin is a bad thing in case of brain stroke. The thinning of the blood make worse the hemorrhage.
So there are pro's and con's.
EDIT: Observing profit taking, sending BTC back below $8k
You were saying? Observing new Yearly high
just shy above $8,200 here on Coinbase

99.
Post 53548146 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
a note of sobriety
rejection here bakes in a return to the high fives in coming weeks
WUT....
As in $5900?

Or north of $50,000 (5 figures) ?
100.
Post 53548185 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
Starting to worry that newbies maybe entering the market again soon and looking for that "cheap discount" after missing the dip.

Apologies if someone already shared
this meme, only just noticed it.
101.
Post 53548190 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
Daily close was bullish... the 10 minute chart needs to chill out though. Only so many dips you can buy til you get rekt. Looking bullish af though imo.

102.
Post 53548256 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
I am prepared to cautiously state that this does not look like rejection however.
It seems like we've violently broken the falling wedge pattern with high volume. The odds for this are increasing with every hour.
My thoughts exactly. I'd still expect a re-test of this level around $8K before moving towards $9K, but then again, if it breaks through $8.4K I think it might pass on that.
I'm not down with that till we are solidly above 85..
We passed $85 years ago, keep up

103.
Post 53552607 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
Again..?

104.
Post 53553066 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
Capwearers be warned, BSV are calling you out as corrupt

Full list of Corrupted Capwearers
105.
Post 53556244 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
We are at $7,977.96
Lost the $8K it was not strong enough
Maybe so, although I think it's too early to tell. Volume came in to defend $7,850, so all might not be lost yet, even if we did fall through it with ease.
Regardless, I like the charts that you post, so merited another post of yours to turn you into a Member. More charts in this thread in future though please

106.
Post 53565039 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
I am prepared to cautiously state that this does not look like rejection however.
It seems like we've violently broken the falling wedge pattern with high volume. The odds for this are increasing with every hour.
My thoughts exactly. I'd still expect a re-test of this level around $8K before moving towards $9K, but then again, if it breaks through $8.4K I think it might pass on that.
I'm not down with that till we are solidly above 85..
We passed $85 years ago, keep up

Rejected, according to me...


Me too. Your post reminded of some "neutral" TA I published a few weeks ago that was looking irrelevant until this week.
Took a bit longer than expected, but got rejected by the respective resistance levels after reaching the extrapolated move #bearish

Not as convinced about the $5,800 new low target quite yet, but breaking $7,800 would be very bearish is this point.
107.
Post 53569326 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
Bouncing nicely off the 50 Week MA price and back into resistance, as shown on a 4hr chart, even if with lack of volume.

People draw their bear channel / bull flag resistance level differently, here's mine from the Daily chart.
I'm mainly see how this Weekly candle closes out now.
in.refs: rsi, macd, cmf
108.
Post 53572847 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
Decided as of Monday I'll be bearish


New target: $5,600, until proven otherwise. Fits with the bear channel we're in that everyone else has already identified.
Going to put my short-term bear cap back on folks.
109.
Post 53575598 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):
Decided as of Monday I'll be bearish


New target: $5,600, until proven otherwise. Fits with the bear channel we're in that everyone else has already identified.
Going to put my short-term bear cap back on folks.
Mmmhhh, what has changed your mood about it? That channel was already there. The only news of the past few days is that after the pump to 8.4K it retraced to retest 7.8K as expected and bounced back nicely. Next step could be some sideways and maybe then breaking upwards outside the channel.
I mean, it could also go back down as you say, but TA (if that's what you prefer) hasn't changed and price dynamics have been very positive lately.
$5.6K looks bearish AF at this time but hey, everything is possible.
Sometimes placing an order (or a short) can change an otherwise seemingly reasonable person's perspective, even though the facts may not have changed as much as the fact as their book has changed. Hahahahahahaha ..
I don't see a bull market on the Daily charts, although I can obviously see the argument on a Weekly/Monthly time-scale.
I just see shorting bear-cross resistance of long-term MAs as high probability scenarios, same as longing bull crosses for that matter (when price is re-testing that is).
TLDR: pre-emptive "sorry for your loss dragonvslinux" (ditto whiteboy420).
(not really). shouldn't be shorting king daddy in a likely bull market.

That's what everyone said last time at $9,500, telling me I just draw squiggly lines that make no sense and we're going to the moon.
]

While it turned out to be one of my best short-trades, probably because of the high-risk

110.
Post 53580155 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
Long the TD 9 sell signal? No thanks. Same as I didn't short the TD 9 buy signal either


Getting rejected again by bear channel resistance* by looks of it on smaller time-frames:
*Channel adjusted in order to reflect yesterdays close
We are at $7,977.96
Lost the $8K it was not strong enough
Maybe so, although I think it's too early to tell. Volume came in to defend $7,850, so all might not be lost yet, even if we did fall through it with ease.
Regardless, I like the charts that you post, so merited another post of yours to turn you into a Member. More charts in this thread in future though please

Thank you @dragonvslinux

You're welcome, more charts please.
111.
Post 53583475 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
lol, Soon you will change the thread title again.
Ranking up is possible! 3000If theymos ever introduces a new, higher rank it should be something like this -
LFC_BitcoinOG HODLERActivity: 2000 or 3000Merit: 2000 or 3000Posts:It would make sense. Especially now two years have passed since merit was introduced, it would highlight legendary users who have not only stuck around but also added considerable value to the forum in the meantime - which can't be said for most legendary ranked members it seems

Notably from BPIP, with a
2000+ merit requirement alone, it would be less than 66 members, based on users that have received 1000+ merit that is. I think activity would have to be 2000, in order to remain not too exclusive, or even just the same as legendary around 1000.
I know you weren't proposing it officially, but I was curious to how many users a new rank would include... not many basically.
112.
Post 53588740 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
Party of First Bitcoin transaction? 12 Jan 2009.
This image made me laugh a lot

113.
Post 53592186 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
Let's see how is doing BTC in CME:
- 61.8 FIB (8665$) is the resistance level for CME
- 50AM and 100MA crossed below 200MA
- there are 3 gaps pending:
over us at 12k
under us at 6.1k and 3.6K

I referenced this the other day, but I'll do it again. CME looks like a shorting opportunity. Whether you'd get rekt™ over it is another story, but that's what it looks like to me.

Note, as you can tell by the chart, I wouldn't be entering this position (on BTCUSD) until Wednesday, ie until the fractal pattern continues to consildate at the highs whilst failing to break through resistance. Even though the market is already open and I'm short-term bearish. For reference sake, this is the first 100 & 200 MA bear cross on CME, so there is no previous data to extrapolate*. However, if you had shorted this bear cross on BTCUSD last month, you would of made a tidy 25% profit from the trade:

Don't mean to be the
bearer of bad news, but bear crosses are bear crosses
*Now thinking I should of extrapolated the BTCUSD bear cross from last month, instead of the previous fractal, as would likely be more relevant with a target to low 6s instead of high 5s. But either way, there's a good few reasons why this is still bearish to me, not forgetting the bearish channel that's still intact.
114.
Post 53592944 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
While feeling short-term bearish, I always like to review the longer-term bullish scenarios, of which I already have a few. Now that more data has been crunched by the indicators I predominantly use (CMF, RSI and MACD), there is noticeably potential for a rounding bottom formation. The indicators and also confirming this possibility, this is first piece of evidence for a new ATH this year (that everyone has now seemingly ruled out):

CMF: bullish divergence approaching 0
RSI: Finding support from 40 (bearish level)
MACD: Losing bearish momentum
Price would need to confirm this pattern with a new swing low in
early February (6th-11th ideally), in order to continue moving higher in this manner.
Haven't published this on TV yet, was hoping to get some opinions or alternative perspectives from this thread

115.
Post 53594375 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
While feeling short-term bearish, I always like to review the longer-term bullish scenarios, of which I already have a few. Now that more data has been crunched by the indicators I predominantly use (CMF, RSI and MACD), there is noticeably potential for a rounding bottom formation. The indicators and also confirming this possibility, this is first piece of evidence for a new ATH this year (that everyone has now seemingly ruled out):

CMF: bullish divergence approaching 0
RSI: Finding support from 40 (bearish level)
MACD: Losing bearish momentum
Price would need to confirm this pattern with a new swing low in
early February (6th-11th ideally), in order to continue moving higher in this manner.
Haven't published this on TV yet, was hoping to get some opinions or alternative perspectives from this thread

This is a pretty optimistic view. I'd prefer that one too but what if this happens?

I'd say it's the most optimistic view I can imagine yes, without pointing a vertical arrow to $100K.
It'd also need to find that support in February to be considered as a valid possibility.
The new ath and $50k+ might take longer than we expect. Anybody here has enough patience to wait till 2023? (...for a friggin new ATH

)
Sounds great to me, more time to accumulate. Only so much fiat I can earn per year. Count me in!
Same view on 2014-2017 bowl.

From 2014's ATH to early 2017, it took exactly 3 years. But 20k ATH at late 2017, the triangle is bigger than the 1k. A lot bigger. My logic says the recovery from the last ATH (20k) should take a lot longer too.
See the triangle from 2014? It took 1 year to all the way down. Only then we started to consolidate for a year. Then rise. Looks like our current triangle is about to take MORE than 2 years. Maybe even 3. Fuck.
I hope It doesn't happen that way and we'll see a moon rocket straight to the new ATH after the halvening.
The only good news is on these charts, 200 Weekly MA is pretty much the safest bottom and you can't lose if you buy from that support line.
I agree with logic too, most of my bullish TA isn't expected a new ATH until 2021 at earliest (last I checked), even 2022 or later. It's likely to take much longer this time around to reach an ATH as you said, even break out of an accumulation zone (that's yet to really be confirmed). Or, like in 2012 that had a parabolic bounce back (a path we are still following post descending triangle breakdown), it will occur much sooner than anyone thinks, My primary reasoning for the above is the differences in this correction and parabolic bounce back compared to 2014. There are a lot more similarities with the 2018 and 2012 corrections, more so in recent weeks and months I'm finding, hence considering the above.
Appreciate your opinions, even if they remain similar to mine. The the alternative perspectives help develop my own analysis.
116.
Post 53599977 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
seems to be hesitating a bit right at the highest possible interpretation of the channel top...
The RSI on the daily is at 65, I think we have enough juice left in the tank to break this. Also the break of the pennant has a target of $8700. I think its going to happen.

Good call and agree, looks like we have broken out of the bearish channel now, at least from my best fit line, RSI still as room to go overbought* >70. If you use the wicks and not the candle bodies, than arguably we "could" still be in the channel, or modify the new one, but this is becoming less and less likely every $100 upwards that passes.

A close above $8,500 (0.5 fib retracement from $3.1-$14K move) would open the floodgates for $9.1K where the 200 Day MA resistance is lined up.
Looks like we might need to consolidate for a few days to a week, turning old resistance into support. Either that, or moonshot to $9K+

I'm still
eyeing up a short for tomorrow if price gets rejected by the 0.5 fib & 100/200 Day MAs on CME futures chart though


I've changed my chart and instead extrapolated 100&200 MA bear-cross breakdown from the BTCUSD chart, giving a higher target of $6200 level.
With the stop loss at $9100 (BTCUSD 200 Day MA), this would be now be a 1:3 risk-reward (rather than a 1:2).
*Don't listen to anyone telling you the RSI is "close to overbought" as being a bearish sign. Between 60-70, the RSI is BULLISH and nothing else.
Disclosure: Long-term bull hodler, short-term bear trader.
117.
Post 53602310 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
Weekly CMF is finally just 0.02 away from neutral. Last times this happened (after a drop below 0.1) was April 1st 2019 and June 22nd 2015


118.
Post 53606085 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
You can barely see it, but the Weekly CMF (chaikin money flow) has finally turned positive again (at least on Coinbase at +0.01), values last seen in April-September. Looks like the start of a trend shift, even if I'm still skeptical. The Week would need to close positive for this to be confirmed I'm assuming, otherwise it could act as a rejection from neutral level (0).

Noticeably Bitstamp is still -0.01, but the relevance is, we are at similar CMF levels to early April 2019

That's my bullish input for all you moon boys anyway.
119.
Post 53606164 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
chain monkey flow?
Yes: tensioning of your chain monkey.
Edit: Already got it before the image

120.
Post 53606354 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
That's my bullish input for all you moon boys anyway.
Not going to win too many friends in these parts by referring to peeps here (and assumingly HODLers and accumulators) as moon boys. But, hey, do what you feel that you must.
Sorry, that BTC prices are moving against your anticipations

......
Not really. 
It's ok I'm not looking for friends, just to learn from others

You're right, it did go against how I anticipated though, not going to deny that

Lucky I didn't get rekt™ shorting really. Didn't realise moon boys was offensive though, I thought anyone who believes a $100K BTC is possible in the near future was a moon boy by default. We're all moon boys? Maybe men still get offended by being called boys I dunno, I forget to keep check of these things.
Maybe moon men would be more appropriate, but doesn't have the ring to it.
121.
Post 53616013 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
That's my bullish input for all you moon boys anyway.
Not going to win too many friends in these parts by referring to peeps here (and assumingly HODLers and accumulators) as moon boys. But, hey, do what you feel that you must.
Sorry, that BTC prices are moving against your anticipations

......
Not really. 
It's ok I'm not looking for friends, just to learn from others

You're right, it did go against how I anticipated though, not going to deny that

Lucky I didn't get rekt™ shorting really. Didn't realise moon boys was offensive though, I thought anyone who believes a $100K BTC is possible in the near future was a moon boy by default. We're all moon boys? Maybe men still get offended by being called boys I dunno, I forget to keep check of these things.
Maybe moon men would be more appropriate, but doesn't have the ring to it.
“I like offending people, because I think people who get offended should be offended.”― Linus Torvalds
Fuckin' Fins! Here's a hat


avatar-sized

edit: No offense intended toward the offensible Fins

Legend! Just put this on, waiting to see how it looks

Joining the WO hat family thanks to xhomerx10

PS - JayJuanGee, will respond to you properly as appreciated your response, was meant to merit your post but hat to merit the hat

122.
Post 53616488 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
Guys, what do you think about Bitcoin? I am considering zone 9000 to enter a short position.
Most of us DCA, not to many doing the shorting business I think, only the pro’s maybe

Don't forget about the majority of noobs that get rekt™ in order to make the profit for others.
Guys, what do you think about Bitcoin? I am considering zone 9000 to enter a short position.
9K sounds like a random rekt™ level. The 200 Day MA is around 9.1K for starters, if we break above the current highs, we'll probably go there...
As someone else said though, put on your money on 100x no stop loss and just hope for the best, that's what most people do.
Helpful leverage trading video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvZ7K_0_SiY
123.
Post 53616704 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
Wow, that crypto bubble youtube channel is golden! Didn't know about it. All the videos are fucking genius!
Yeh they are awesome. Felt appropriate to share it for that song, but many classics on there. The guys a lyrical genius. Some of my favorites...
When moon?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wBg1lBKtygAll the small caps:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZwzttexaUM
124.
Post 53616733 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
Just edited my last post to reference this one too, then saw yours

Also; Old town road:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3TzVgGyBFs"I'm never selling nothing, I'm not selling nothing"Best crypto music since hodl gang came out
Edit: First post with new WO official hat 
125.
Post 53625490 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
If I had to title this TA, it'd be called
"The bearish case is becoming increasingly difficult to argue"
VPVR since $8K breakout in November 2017 says we are above the median volume line.
Closing above the $8350 level this week would look uber bullish on this indicator.
126.
Post 53634418 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
Price is looking like a textbook bull flag on 1hr/4hr charts, target for a breakout above the 200 Day MA would line upto around $9,850.

Might be time to put on the moon boots soon.
127.
Post 53638250 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
Good morning WO!
Observing @ $8,924
We need to find a way to stay above $9k
On smaller time-frames I see a way we can get back up there, but not so far a way we will be able to stay up there with 200 Day MA acting as resistance (dotted golden line).

Looking forward to some volatility leading up to the weekly close either way

128.
Post 53642199 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
Video shows garbage being dumped into a river (supposedly in ecuador), which seems to me to be one of the reasons why governments are needed.
Because the president there managed to stop this you mean? Looks like the constitution didn't stop anything

This wouldn't be an argument for the need of government, but clearly the failure of such systems.
129.
Post 53642460 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
Getting primed for over 9k$ btc
Already reached $9.1K...
130.
Post 53647436 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
No need to panic yet, just predictably getting initial resistance from the 200 Day MA ($9040) and overbought conditions on the Daily RSI (>70): "a textbook sell-off".
No doubt other indicators also called this top for traders to take profits (or set stop losses), but far from confirms $7K or even $6K prices are to come.
4hr chart
We are now trying to form a parallel bullish channel on the 4 hr chart at the 50 MA, getting back above the middle of this channel and 4hr MAs (around $8550 atm) would return bullish. This isn't a moment to be shorting in my opinion, price would need to break down below the bearish channel breakdown level now around $8,150, followed by the 50 Week MA and base of horizontal support at $7800. It looks neutral to me right now, a profit taking level for shorts, but not a time to be closing longs.
1hr chart
131.
Post 53650138 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
We are still inside of the ascending triangle. If bitcoin price can stay inside of this triangle, we can expect a good kump after 9600 USD. Lets wait and see if this bottom wall is going to work or not.
Thanks for sharing, I've been looking at the new bullish channel developing that could result in a bull flag with a relatively high target, but hadn't seen the bearish rising wedge pattern on the same chart

A breakdown from current levels could be more bearish than I had initially considered, especially now we are forming a bear flag on the 1hr with a target of aound $8200.
132.
Post 53650819 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):
Lol of the day:
Ridiculous: Peter Schiff Lost Access To His Bitcoin Holdings
The popular economist and well-known nocoiner, Peter Schiff, has said that he’s lost all of his bitcoins because of a forgotten software. He took his rant to Twitter, outlining that the lost bitcoin has no market value, on top of having no intrinsic value as well.
From Twitter:
I just lost all the #Bitcoin I have ever owned. My wallet got corrupted somehow and my password is no longer valid. So now not only is my Bitcoin intrinsically worthless; it has no market value either. I knew owning Bitcoin was a bad idea, I just never realized it was this bad!
https://twitter.com/peterschiff/status/1218911797626847234?s=21I had a boating accident, someone else had a kebab incident... he had a software accident!
Somebody already made a nice meme for Peter's event
https://twitter.com/CryptooIndia/status/1218939467970441216If you missed the previous Peter meme, click here:
https://twitter.com/CryptoBull/status/1215388111443722247
133.
Post 53672027 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
For all your encryption needs, I highly recommend
VeraCrypt. The continuation of the highly successful TrueCrypt project, it's free, open-source, and thoroughly tried and tested. The "open-source" part is especially important, and is considered a requirement for an encryption product that's worth your time and trust, as a closed-source product may have backdoors that no one can detect.
Need to store data on the cloud, but worried about others having access to it or the cloud server getting hacked? Simple! Just create an encrypted VeraCrypt container, put all your sensitive data in there, and then store the container file itself in the cloud. No one can access your files without the container passphrase, which only you will know.
I'm also a big fan of veracrypt, it's basically what truecrypt was meant to be (open-source) before it was liberated. I've been using it for years to backup my sensitive digital data and never had any problems with it, not even corrupt files. I'd also recommend getting a cold storage access laptop (one that you've removed the wifi card and bluetooth with no ethernet port) to access your containers if you do so regularly. The obvious point of failure would be keylogging malware registering your veracrypt container password (especially on closed-source OS's), then gaining access to your encrypted container - otherwise it's pretty much flawless encryption and security.
Hardware wallets are great for storying a handful of crypto-based keys, but veracrypt with a cold laptop is much more suited for dozens of keyrings and other sensitve data.
134.
Post 53674851 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
Weekly MACD close to a bull-cross (first time since February 2019, that would confirm a long-term trend change):
Daily MACD losing bearish momentum now heading towards bear-cross (notice the potential for a single candle fakeout 17/12/19 and 24/10/2019):
Monthly MACD bear-crossed (but is now trying to bull-cross again the following month creating potential as well for a "macd fakeout")

Weekly bulls vs Daily bears and exhausted Monthly bears. Still waiting for volatility given the indecision on different time-frames...
Also, don't trust the macd, clearly it can give out "fake" signals

135.
Post 53678771 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
People seriously leave their BTC long term on a random centralized website where they don’t control the private keys just to get a reported 4% interest?
You can get over 100% profits quite regularly just by HODLING.
Remember people leave their usd long term on random centralized websites and services where they don't control their funds, just to get a reported X% interest. It's apparently very common. Therefore, the idea that this (fiat-orientated) interest scheme is popular among (I'm assuming) fiat users is far from surprising, even if it's disappointing to see.
Fuck that!
Not your keys, not your BTC!
The popularity of these schemes implies that new buyers are entering the market in my opinion, which is a good sign however. Kind of like the way BCC showed just how ripe the crypto market was in 2017 by (literally) consuming lots of new users into the market... They were also promising daily interest if I'm not mistaken.
136.
Post 53679285 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
[macd reference]
MACD Fakeout or Trend Change?
As the MACD shows on the Daily chart , we are currently facing a not-yet-confirmed bear-cross today, lasts seen December 17th 2019 at $6,612. Since the breakdown from $10K last September we have seen 4 bear crosses, twice causing the price to drop
20-25% (September 21st & November 9th 2019), the other two two times were not-so-obvious bear traps before price rallied
40% (October 24th at $7,435 and as previously referenced).
Needless to say, there is more upside with this becoming a MACD fakeout, than a trend change to bearish on the Daily chart . It's also worth noting that while the Daily is bear-crossing, the
Weekly MACD is still close to bull-crossing, implying a lack of confluence.
137.
Post 53682621 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
138.
Post 53685291 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
Yeah right...
Peter Schiff did not signal shit, unless he happens to be Jupiter9, who also tends to spout out a bunch of woo woo nonsense.. attempting to assert causal relations between some factors that might be, at best, correlations.
What are you talking about? The sell-off was totally due to Peter
[/sarcasmlol]
139.
Post 53689321 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
Current outlook for the day "
Savage downtrend" on shorter-term time-frame.
If you're looking to trade long, I'd recommend waiting for this bear channel to break. Golden dotted line is 200 Day MA, purple dotted is 50 Week MA.

I'd expect a decent bounce from the 50 Week around $7,900 (Weekly MAs are in bullish formation, even if not all trending upwards), as well as the long-term bear channel resistance (flipping into support) that arguably we still broke out of (as well as arguably recreated under different touch points). Too many people are expecting capitulation to low to mid $7K from current level or a break of $8K, but I just don't see it yet. I see it as likely support, and usually I'm the one overly bearish.
140.
Post 53697789 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
Are we mostly bulls or bears in here?

Short-term bearish, further pull-back required imo. Mid-term neutral, long-term bullish.
I was hoping for a
macd fakeout on the Daily, but as of yesterdays close it has confirmed the trend-change from bullish to bearish.

The Weekly macd is still close to a bull-cross that could occur in the coming weeks, which is a longer-term bullish sign:

However the Monthly macd is worryingly showing an increase in selling pressure at current prices, which seems incredibly bearish given that the price is up 15% this month:

I was hoping the Monthly macd would also be a singe bar fakeout as the Daily macd has twice achieved in recent months, but this isn't looking as likely anymore

I'm aware I'm focussing heavily on the macd at the moment, but given the complete lack of confluence between the Daily/Weekly/Monthly, it appears very useful, as two of these time-frames will need to trump the outlier in order to create confluence. Right now, the Daily has started to line up with the Monthly bearish selling pressure, as opposed to the Daily creating a macd fakeout bear trap in order to line up with the Weekly bullish buying pressure
141.
Post 53699395 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
Every minute BULL
I will be angry if we go below $8,000 now because I made a significant buy last night.
If buying Bitcoin can make you angry, I recommend not doing it. I been dollar cost averaging since Nov 14th, even buying above $8K, so will be happy if it goes back down below it.
My m₿ p/h at work has crashed significantly in recent weeks, but fortunately it doesn't make me angry. I'm always hoping my m₿ p/h goes up over the coming months, not down.
If Bitcoin goes up, then my money goes up. If Bitcoin goes down, then my m₿ p/h goes up. It's a win win, as long as we don't crash below $5K after the halving

142.
Post 53705423 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
"Fun with Fractals"Breaking out of bullish falling wedge on 4hr? We have enjoyed some bullish ascending & falling wedge triangles recently, so not ruling this out.
Extrapolation (green bars) is based on the previous falling wedge breakout, that acted very much like a bull flag (grey bars), coming $100 from it's flag target.

Needs to break through local resistance of $8520 to confirm bullish momentum imo. Now testing horizontal resistance

143.
Post 53705976 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
Another argument for the $8K level acting as strong support from the "Y2D-VPVR":
A zoomed in view of the VPVR Year-To-Date (past 12 Months, mini bull and mini bear combined).
Shows the shorter-term volume control is around $7950, that also lines up as strong horizontal support.

Happy hodling fellow
BTCitcoiners!
144.
Post 53710733 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
yeah
we're fucked
Doomed I tell you

Going to zero obviously.

145.
Post 53715493 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
Turning more bullish Bitcoin today

Wouldn't be surprised at all to see a test of $10K this week based on 2019 extrapolation.
I'm now thinking $8K could very well be the swing low. That's enough indicators telling me we'll continue to move higher mid/long-term.
146.
Post 53715583 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
Bitcoin Price Indicator That Called 2019 Bull Run Flashes Green AgainBitcoin (BTC) plans to move higher and further squeeze bears in the short term, several price indicators suggest.
As the week begins, a group of measurements — some surprisingly accurate historically — are combining to make traders firmly bullish on BTC.
Guppy repeats April 2019 bull signal
Leading the positive signs is a useful but somewhat forgotten indicator dubbed the Guppy. This is a collection of exponential moving averages which has flashed green on the daily chart for the first time in around 300 days.
The interval is significant — the last flip from red to green for Guppy was on April 9, 2019, coinciding with Bitcoin’s rapid rise to highs of $13,800.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-price-indicator-that-called-2019-bull-run-flashes-green-againhttps://twitter.com/HsakaTrades/status/1220820646482997248I'm a bull one year older, but I'm still a bull.
Nice share, I forget about the Guppy as it's signals are so irregular. Unless I'm mistaken, the indicator is based on MAs, similar to the MA Ribbon (which is prettier, for reference sake

)
147.
Post 53717795 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
148.
Post 53719051 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
Welcoming back the volume post breaking 200 Day MA, there are you are my old friend!

149.
Post 53726956 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
Now that's some serious f**king volume x10 the average for the time-frame (5 mins chart "yeh i know") leading upto the Daily close (almost certainly above the 200 Day MA):

Still looking bullish af

MACD now bull-crossing due to the pump, only 16 minutes until the close...

Pretty sure I
warned people of a bear trap fakeout regarding the macd on the Daily that was looking bearish a few days ago

150.
Post 53727045 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
$9400 broken through on Coinbase

151.
Post 53733463 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
Another bull flag move to $9,800 looks possible this evening, even if my gut feeling is for some more consolidation/correction before higher highs.

Also, an analyst I follow closely as they do incredible analysis of many different indicators and perspectives, is now calling for a $11,500 target, based on a measured move of a larger cup & handle pattern that has confirmed. Personally I'm not a fan of these patterns, but I do trust this analysts judgement they them claiming it has confirmed:
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/K6uXzD2w-Cup-Handle-Confirms-Daily-Golden-Cross-Expected-to-Follow/And I thought I was bullish by calling for $10K this week

Either way, it's best
not to bet against (short) these parabolic moves in my opinion, it's like trying to cycle in gale force winds ie going against the grain.
152.
Post 53733815 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
Another bull flag move to $9,800 looks possible this evening, even if my gut feeling is for some more consolidation/correction before higher highs.
Preserve your gut within its current status, even if it feels a bit uncomfortable for you, on a personal level...
In other words, take one for the team... we don't want anymore bear calls from you... NONE....
You will thank me later.

Bears are part of the game. I am still not all in.
Can I order a flash crash to $5500 please?
I think a flash crash to sub $6K is a bit much to ask, maybe better chance of ordering of a slow grind back down to continue to bear trend over the next few months, until the halving with an eventual break of $6K. While looking bullish, we still haven't made a higher high (above $10.5K) or the long-term downtrend from $20K (lined up at $10K), and therefore topping out and breaking key support (probably $8.2K and $7.2K levels) would definitely indicate a continuation of the bear trend (lower highs and lower lows). That said, the chances of sub $6K are becoming increasingly less as time moves on, about $100 a week based on the 200 Week MA (currently at $5266).
Just because price is looking extremely bullish, is above the 200 Day MA, broken out of a bear channel, above the MA ribbons and guppy on the Weekly, and given a hash ribbons buy signal on all time-frames (as well as many other bullish factors)... it still doesn't fully negative the bearish structure of lower highs and lower lows.
153.
Post 53734154 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
So to answer the enormous question on everyone's minds right now, is it a block
halving or block
halvening? Google claims that more users are interested in the halving, rather than the halvening, regardless of the latter's grammatical incorrectness. It's safe to assume that Google's user's do not care of grammatical correctness. More relevantly, searches for the halving event recently reached an all time high. Searches for the halvening didn't reach all time high.

Suggestion: Let's roll with the grammatically incorrect phrasing of the block halving, rather than halvening, for the benefit of google searches.
(Even my spell checker wants to call it the halving, take the hint)
103 days
154.
Post 53739497 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
New yearly highs recorded on Coinbase... lasted for a few minutes

The bears are back in town or just more volitility?

Currently facing some serious selling pressure:

Nothing to be afraid of...
155.
Post 53739548 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
Oof. That dump... Observing $9,245
Just taking out some over-levered longs (as well as some shorts prior to that):
Source: https://twitter.com/BXRektStarting look like a general squeeze in my opinion. Still no need to panic, still within a
bull flag targeting higher highs.
Source: https://twitter.com/BXRekt
156.
Post 53739719 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):
[rip coinbase pro users]
[insert volitility here, coinbase close gap: $9343]
157.
Post 53745418 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):
Interesting perspective, I've seen an alternative version of a confirmed cup & handle pattern targeting $11,675, but the above chart is starting to look more relevant:
https://twitter.com/Sawcruhteez/status/1222309552475058176That said, I don't like the fact that they result in bullish movements only 60% of the time, it's a bit too close to flipping a coin for me. I don't know what the probability is of reaching the target, but I'm assuming it's can't be much more than 50-55% if the pattern confirmation is only 60% reliable.
158.
Post 53752176 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):
Getting very coiled up on smaller time-frame (1hr), I see a symmetrical triangle that's due to break soon enough, although we are still within a bull flag structure (as well as consolidating at the highs). Expecting some serious volatility very soon either way, at least by tomorrow leading upto the Weekly close that is critical for the price of Bitcoin at the moment.

159.
Post 53757417 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):
160.
Post 53767045 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):
This price action on smaller-time frame is boring

My next guess would be $9,200 to the 200 MA (on the 1hr) before breaking out of mini bear channel and back heading to resistance around $9.4K-9.5K. At least based on the current range, it's safe to assume the price will continue to bounce between support & resistance (until proven otherwise).

I think a break above $9575 will lead to high highs $10-11.5K and below $9140 will cause a correction to somewhere between $8.2-8.8K.
Looks like many are waiting for a big move, but as we can see from previous attempts to move the price one way, price remains range bound.
Longer-term patterns; obvious bull flag & cup and handle (both bullish), but not yet confirmed while within strong resistance zone.
161.
Post 53770310 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):
My time-based analysis for the coming days for anyone half interested. Published 6 weeks now and not influenced by recent price action

February 6th-11th 2020 - The Next Swing Low
162.
Post 53770796 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):
in my opinion TA is not a toolbox to predict the future (which is not possible seriously). but it can be a toolbox to get a statistical edge to more than 50 percent right decisions in trading.
example: will the daily close be above or below the support line below?

1.) if the daily close will be above the support line the probability is more than 50 percent that the price will rise again the next day.
2.) if the daily close will be below the support line the probability is less than 50 percent that the price will rise again the next day.
To me this isn't the support, or as clear cut as this. Closing below $9,288 would be a new Daily closing low outside of the support/resistance range which would be short-term bearish, as well as confirming the sequential trend-change with a Red 2, and at current prices a MACD bear-corss. Last time the sequential turned bearish was January 20th before another 5% correction, which isn't a lot, but it went further down is the point. Not to say this is a selling range for longs, as the 200 Day MA is closeby as well as local and long-term fib retracement support levels, 21 Week MA etc, but on a Daily scale things are currently looking bearish unless we can return to the neutral range around $9,300.
163.
Post 53770992 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):
in my opinion TA is not a toolbox to predict the future (which is not possible seriously). but it can be a toolbox to get a statistical edge to more than 50 percent right decisions in trading.
example: will the daily close be above or below the support line below?

1.) if the daily close will be above the support line the probability is more than 50 percent that the price will rise again the next day.
2.) if the daily close will be below the support line the probability is less than 50 percent that the price will rise again the next day.
To me this isn't the support, or as clear cut as this. Closing below $9,288 would be a new Daily closing low outside of the support/resistance range which would be short-term bearish, as well as confirming the sequential trend-change with a Red 2, and at current prices a MACD bear-corss. Last time the sequential turned bearish was January 20th before another 5% correction, which isn't a lot, but it went further down is the point. Not to say this is a selling range for longs, as the 200 Day MA is closeby as well as local and long-term fib retracement support levels, 21 Week MA etc, but on a Daily scale things are currently looking bearish unless we can return to the neutral range around $9,300.
YOU do believe that above. this doesn't mean an other do believe that too. and we should not discuss about what is the truth in TA. every TA guy do believe he is right otherwise he wouldn't do the trade.
Yeh of course that's just my belief, that goes without saying. In fact, I don't always believe I'm right, as I don't execute every trade. Only those I hold conviction in. Hence I believe the price will fall further based on the metrics referenced, but I'm not taking a short trade (or selling long), as I don't see enough short-term confluence at the moment. Weird huh?
but what is the truth in TA is that: the simpler the better.
Agree and disagree. When there is lots of confluence this is the best outlook, when there is a lack of it, it's best to explore deeper to try and understand what's going on.
EDIT: let's check my simple example (reason was just for demonstration) tomorrow again.
1.) if it will succeed I will say: "I told you so!"
2.) if it won't succed I will say: "The purpose was just for demonstration!"
I think if it succeeds your best off maintaining your modesty, if it fails, you can accept that you were wrong.
But hey, do as
you please, that's just my opinion remember
Edit: Tomorrow would be likely too early to tell if this the level you are talking about is support (based on the Daily time-frame), unless it moves above recent swing high of course. Likewise, it would also likely be too early to tell if what I believe is correct, until the sequential count is reversed, macd bull-crosses again (ie days later) and/or a return to the previous trading range. If you're trading a different time-frame to your referenced chart then please say however.
164.
Post 53771124 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):
Yeh of course that's just my belief, that goes without saying. In fact, I don't always believe I'm right, as I don't execute every trade. Only those I hold conviction in. Hence I believe the price will fall further based on the metrics referenced, but I'm not taking a short trade (or selling long), as I don't see enough short-term confluence at the moment. Weird huh?
"Weird huh?" not really because I do not trade either. just hodl.

I trade my published analysis, but not every opinion or belief that I have. For me this would be over-trading

but I'm seriously thinking about to flag my post with "I do not trade according to my analysis. Just hodl, guys! Because less then 10% (or 5% ??) can beat the market constantly via trading."

I only trade with upto 10-15% of my holdings, so yeh there is that factor, as well as taking profits in satoshis rather than fiat

165.
Post 53771806 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):
Edit: Tomorrow would be likely too early to tell if this the level you are talking about is support (based on the Daily time-frame), unless it moves above recent swing high of course. Likewise, it would also likely be too early to tell if what I believe is correct, until the sequential count is reversed, macd bull-crosses again (ie days later) and/or a return to the previous trading range. If you're trading a different time-frame to your referenced chart then please say however.
lol, I am a hypothetical short term trader not a hypothetical swing trader. tomorrow EOD in profit or not!?
I don't have much doubt you'll be in profit by eod tomorrow.... what I doubt is that you'll be in profit by next early week

If we're looking at the shorter time-frame, like the 4hr, then this seems totally possible, just not on the "Daily time-scale" for me.
Regardless, I admire your confidence.
166.
Post 53777130 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):
Suddenly looking pretty bullish on small time-frame after breaking through the volume zone within a couple of hours, now to see if it holds


167.
Post 53789479 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):
Looking like we're ready to pop upwards again, bullish ascending triangle on 1hr currently in pay, above the vpvr volume control


Moon shot coming up imo, or a massive dump

168.
Post 53796583 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):
Observing YH @ $9899.

edit: and auto mini-dump.

No need to panic imo, just facing strong resistance from long-term downtrend line (from $20 & $14K highs) as expected. Still within a bull flag structure:

I ain't selling nuffin.
169.
Post 53801097 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):
TA for the day for everyone else feeling bullish af


Target for the bull flag is $10,570. Would publish this on trading view but too lazy

170.
Post 53802710 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):
Amen to that. It's time to start getting really fucking bullish (in case you
weren't already bullish).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZYZoQQ6LJQ
171.
Post 53802788 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):
172.
Post 53806166 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):
I got my $3k number by extrapolating....
....
333,333.333333
hodl for 300k
I predicted a low of $3k about a year and a half ago and the next high around $300k..
The $3k low prediction held up pretty well and I'm no less confident in the 300k prediction since then, with about the same seriousness that I was saying "BTC to $10k" in 2014-2015..
I think $100k would be quite a conservative prediction for the peak after this next halving..
Nice prediction, interesting to hear you think it'll go to $300K next cycle. With most people believing that prices will only go 5-10x from ATH ($10K0-200K) until topping out, given the similarities with the recent 2012 style correction, I think we could be leading up to a much larger bubble top than 2018. I don't just mean higher, I mean more parabolic and for longer than 2017. Think 2012 leading into 2013 with a harsh "fake top" correction around $100K. Fiat collapse style parabolic, all the signs are there to take Bitcoin to an incomparable value with fiat.
173.
Post 53811010 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):
VPVR outlook: "This is fine". Long-term trend-line (based on Weekly candle highs) says: "Maybe I'm support, you've broken me". Still bullish.

Reference:
https://twitter.com/Crypto_Bitlord/status/1226745282974515200
174.
Post 53846488 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):
175.
Post 53855171 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):
Listen guys, but some users buy goods on this forum somehow staying anonymous, or am I wrong ?
You can buy goods on this forum or "other websites" and remain anonymous as a buyer, but ultimately if the goods are physical and requires shipping, it's not possible to remain anonymous (to the vendor at least) if you consider the simplest ways in which goods are sent.
And yet, maybe there is a person in the forum who could be a mediator between us? There is no way that this task could not be solved!
Agreed, it's merely a problem that requires a logical solution. While it won't be possible for WO users who want to receive chocolate to not reveal their shipping address, it would be possible to not associate these shipping addresses with a specific user. For example:
1. Create a file on something like mega.nz with an encrypted key, that reveals an email address to contact you for the chocolate.2. Send PMs to
WO users with a specific email address to contact you to receive chocolate.
3. Wait for users to contact you and deliver the chocolate to
unknown certified WO hat members.
Therefore, only WO hat members will be able to contact you for chocolate, without having their name/address associated with their username.
This would be the solution for users to remain pseudo-anonymous, true anonymity would not be possible for obvious reasons.
... use a dropbox.
Like put your chocolates in a railway station locker, downtown Wuhan for example. If anyone wants them they can ask for the combination.
I also like the dead drop idea though

Guys hello!
Today is exactly 2 years since I registered at this forum ! I do not write here often, (because of my bad English) but I read very often. During this time you've all become like family to me, and I would like to celebrate it with you.

Since I registered on the forum, my life has changed a lot, mainly thanks to the financial planning that I learned from you! I want to make every member of the WO`s a small gift in the form of a chocolate bar made by my close relative from natural products.
I have not yet figured out how to send the chocolate to those who want to remain anonymous, so I ask for your help with this.

+1, I would like chocolate now please

176.
Post 53867267 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):
That's weird, I was expecting most people here to say that this is last time we see sub $10K levels


This makes me more bullish

177.
Post 53867426 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):
Let's clear out this level and move on.

178.
Post 53869688 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):
For anyone looking for
bearish hopium of re-testing the 200 Day MA around $8,900, there is currently an
unconfirmed head & shoulders pattern forming on the 4hr.
Price would need to breakdown below $9,600 to confirm the measured move to $8,800 (approximately -8%). This pattern could easily be invalidated by a move above $10,300.

Bare in mind, we are above the VPVR point of control support at $9,785, with strong volume support around $9,300 level. Price medium and long-term remains bullish however, even a breakdown to $8,800 would still be bullish for me and act as a buying opportunity. Now the 50 & 200 Day golden cross has confirmed, statistically speaking the risk reward of buying the re-test of the 200 Day MA is historically very high, compared to simply buying the 200 MA re-test. Traders would lap up this long opportunity imo.

If there is a breakdown to the measured move, expect strong buying support around $8,550 - $8,950, where price previously consildated.
179.
Post 53875373 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):
To follow up on yesterdays TA, we currently are breaking down from the head & shoulders pattern with a close below the neckline.
...Bare in mind, we are above the VPVR point of control support at $9,785, with strong volume support around $9,300 level....

I have however channel the parameters of my parallel channel as I'm not convinced this bullish channel is invalidated yet*, especially now the 200 MA on the 4hr is also providing support.

We did find support from the VPVR point of control around $9,300 as expected, but this level will need to hold to avoid falling to the 50 or 200 Day MA (dotted lines).
For reference sake, this is the sort of "unclean" bullish channel I'm thinking could remain intact given the current correction:

A fall below the 200 MA would very much invalidate this outlook and would increase the likelihood of re-testing the 200 Day MA and longer term VPVR control. Still bullish.
180.
Post 53877672 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):
Coinbase VISA - I’m an early adopter, had it 3 weeks

(Covering my name)

haha scam card they printed it the wrong way round
Barcleys card Vosa

Damn that's a nice job. This reminds me I need one of these real ones soon. Barely got any fiat left anymore, what's left is put aside for btfd

Cash is crap, but Bitcoin debit cards are great.
Edit: Is this the wrong round though...? Looks legit to me.
Source: https://www.coinbase.com/card
181.
Post 53886200 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):
182.
Post 53890621 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):
$9770, the 61.8 fib retracement is a crucial make or break moment imo. Above it, we'd be clear to $11,577, below it, we'd look go return to the 0.5 at $8501 (as well as 50 Week MA).

Regardless, even falling back down to the 0.382 at $7,231, where the 100 Week MA is priced (as well as $4 off from the hash ribbons buy signal), would still be bullish.
Needless to say, we are still very much in an
uptrend.
183.
Post 53893131 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):
Core devs discussing privacy & scaling livestream:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGUH-lKO0k0
184.
Post 53894885 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):
The legend of Peter Schiff wins the
"Most clueless Bitcoin no-coiner" award at Unconfiscatable conferene
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JRLv1gHgLQ&t=112
185.
Post 53898837 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):
Acording to the simpsons (disclaimer shown briefly)


186.
Post 53910552 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):
Looking like a nice day of the week to dca into some satoshis

187.
Post 53915631 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):
CME chart is looking interesting, currently testing both the 200 MA on the 4 hr as well as the Daily chart (that are bullishly sloping upwards):

Volume has been dropping off, so as per usual expecting volatility to kick in based on bouncing of these support levels or falling to the "gap" of $8.5K:

Looks like it might be time to flush out some weak hands to make the next leg up stronger:

[/center]
HODL
188.
Post 53919236 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):
189.
Post 53919622 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):

We are now entering the "buy zone" in my opinion, between $8.2-$8.8K, 200 day MA & 50 Week MA will act as strong support:

While we're currently bouncing off the "extended" bear channel resistance trendline, $8.5K would be the average target, based on the fib retracement:
Also, the 4hr TD seuential is signalling a buy on a 9, at the 200 Day MA none the less:
BTFD.
190.
Post 53928992 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):
We've broken $8.5K and made new lows, but the 1hr is saying "don't short me" and "take short profits".
Will be interesting to see how this plays out with the 50 Week MA at
$8420* $8478. Macro traders will get pretty bullish over that price imo.

The "bigger picture" is telling me we've reached both the
0.5 fib retracement levels of $8462 and $8501, which I believe will be defended due to the confluence of support:

Am expecting a rebound from here or
$8.2K volume support either way
*Chart updated with 50 Week MA being tested on 1hr chart
191.
Post 53929232 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):
Gap filled!
192.
Post 53929906 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):
Gap filled!
On closer inspection the CME support confluence is notable. TD 9 buy signal, VPVR point of control, bouncing off the gap, 50 Day MA:

Just need some volume to return but institutions are panic selling other markets right now

Happy HODL days

193.
Post 53934448 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):
Not the best extrapolation, but enlarging the 2015 breakout of the accumulation zone (from the 200 Week MA to the swing high) - to the 200WMA lows and highs of the 2019 rally - lines up nicely with current prices. Not sure how relevant this is, but it gives a rough idea of what could occur in the coming months (as opposed to a major pump or dump).

This would also suggest a much longer cycle this time around if relevant, or at least a longer consolidation period than 2016. If you think about how much further price rallied, compared to in 2015, then this would make also make proportionate sense logically speaking. The green arrow represents where in the extrapolation we are, if the consolidation takes proportionately more time in this cycle. Notably this is also at the 21 Week MA, as was the case in February 2016 when price found support prior to consolidating higher. This also suggests there may only be a small dip after the halving, instead of the "buy the hype, sell the news" type correction that most traders are anticipating (and occurred previously).
194.
Post 53935298 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):
195.
Post 53935931 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):
This tweet caught my eye today

Third time BTC has experienced a leap year day.

This also means the halving is less than 3 months away
Source: https://twitter.com/BtcThis/status/1233723605915258881
196.
Post 53939785 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):
Love this hoody-wearing guy for his TA. Always manages to see the small details while focusing on the bigger picture:
The 30m $BTC chart is starting to show some striking similarities to what we saw on the 4h chart in December.


Shame it's on the 30 minute chart, but was starting to consider whether the 4hr
bear flag is a form of accumulation pattern on smaller time-frames.
Either way, regardless of being out of proportion, the similarities are there. The measured move target from my calculations would be around $9,500.
197.
Post 53940694 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):
My TA for the day, in order to contradict my
worst case scenario to around $7.4K, which I think is less likely. Not yet confirmed with a Daily close, but keeping a close eye on this one.
Daily MACD Signalling Seller Exhaustion at $8,500]
As can be seen by the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD), bears have begun signalling exhaustion on the Daily time-frame at current prices, though not yet confirmed with a closing candle. This colorful extrapolations is based on the most recent times the MACD's histogram went below -175 while trading the bear & bull exhaustion cycles, as opposed to the bull and bear crosses with the signal line as the MACD is traditionally used for.
The concern is decreasing bullish momentum of each rally (when sellers become exhausted >-175) with the lower highs on the buyer's end of the histogram, as well as other short-term bearish factors. None the less in each occurrence in the past 9 months bear exhaustion has signaled good entries for profitable trades or otherwise break-even trades at worst (such as the yellow and blue recent seller exhaustion).
In the background, the 0.5 fib retracements of the $3.2K to $14K as well as $6.4K-$10.5K move line up around $8.5K at current prices. The RSI is otherwise bearish with room to move to oversold conditions, as referenced below.
It's time to BTFD again.Not yet started new topic yet, waiting to see if the histogram confirms the seller exhaustion by the end of the day.
198.
Post 53945103 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):
So you really think bitcoin will reach $100k this year or the next one?

You're serious?

A little under $100K specifically. But why not? It's on track still.
199.
Post 53947650 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):
Starting to see a rounding bottom half formed on the 4hr. The green arrow is where the pivot
is could be based, the golden line would be the trajectory to hold to confirm:

Looking at the longer-term time-frames, the Weekly is finding support at key support, the Daily is losing bearish momentum:
[/charts]
BTFD & HODL
200.
Post 53947743 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):
Starting to see a rounding bottom half formed on the 4hr. The green arrow is where the pivot
is could be based, the golden line would be the trajectory to hold to confirm:

Some more hopium for the day looking at the 1 hr...

Ideally; test 200 Day MA today & get rejected, find support from rounding bottom support, break above 200 Day MA, find support again from it/rounding bottom, move up higher

201.
Post 53952383 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):
Daily candle close seems to be signalling hammer reversal:


Technically it was a near perfect gravestone doji, but bullish none the less as it was at the lows of a sell off


Source:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/doji.asp
202.
Post 53959734 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):
While I am a big adherent to Hanlon's razor, I find that my suspension of disbelief is increasingly unwilling to explain the manifest ineptitude of governments around this contagion by mere stupidity.
Unfortunately I have had the same line of thought.
What do you think about getting rid of that white space?

Save image ->
as jpg -> as png
203.
Post 53994424 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):
Time to start getting greedy WO bull gang

BTFD
204.
Post 53994589 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):
Zooming into the short-term 1hr time-frame for all the panic sellers out there, the base of macro support at $7,800 is being defended by high volume.

The RSI is attempting to leave oversold conditions, while this does leave room to move lower, this is also considered a buy opportunity by price strength metrics (even if between 30 and 40 the RSI is still bearish). The MACD has notably bull-crossed a few hours ago, though yet to see any relevant follow through. CMF remains negative, though on each dip attempts to move back to neutral area with bullish divergence (due to increase in buy pressure), as opposed to moving lower (with an increase in selling pressure).
As far as I can tell, the "worst case scenario" is currently playing out, without much room for prices to move lower (based on oversold metrics alone):
If you're selling at these prices, based on the shorter-term price movements, you're doing it wrong
BTFD
205.
Post 53994801 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):
Bitcoin buy signal!BNP Paribas just blocked transfers to Coinbase

Co-operative Bank did the same at $6.5K

206.
Post 53997288 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):
Guys, I hate to say it, I've been a long-term believer in BTC for a long time but it might be time to panic sell everything?
I'm joking lolz.
207.
Post 53997379 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):
Guys, I hate to say it, I've been a long-term believer in BTC for a long time but it might be time to panic sell everything?
I'm joking lolz.Yeah, sell everything, beginning with all your TP, and BTFD!

Don't worry, have liquidated over 90% of my capital now into Bitcoin

Arguably I panic sold my fiat

Guys, I hate to say it, I've been a long-term believer in BTC for a long time but it might be time to panic sell everything?
I'm joking lolz.Don’t be ridiculous!
Did you see the small print? Super close to testing and bouncing from
logarithmic growth curve at $7413. Everything is fine, just posting that for the lolz
If it breaks below this s-cruve, then you might not hear from me for a few years though

208.
Post 53997446 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):
Bitcoin holding up well against the S&P today... Looks like the "correlation" (that is very low) is wearing off now


Bouncing off the 200 Day MA with a 6% move upwards, always a bullish sign in my mind

209.
Post 53997878 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):
Are you kidding me! 13 pages to catch up since I went to bed. If this is 13 pages of nonsense I will be angry.
It's mainly just people such as yourself questioning why there are so many pages to catch up on

210.
Post 54000655 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):
Quick shout out to all WO bulls & bears for helping to make me into a Sr Member today. My 250th merit came from this post megalolz*


Thanks nutildah, though I now formally accuse you of "poaching rank ups", after also making me into a Full Member a few months ago
*Read the small-print!
211.
Post 54000744 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):
Quick shout out to all WO bulls & bears for helping to make me into a Sr Member today. My 250th merit came from this post megalolz*


Thanks nutildah, though I now formally accuse you of "poaching rank ups", after also making me into a Full Member a few months ago
*Read the small-print!Sending you 2 Merit’s for the achievement, now if you could take me off your fucking distrust settings that’d be cool
Done... confirmation available on Saturday #loyceclub
I didn't think you cared? Edit: PM'd you too bro.
212.
Post 54006936 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):
Reminder that we are at VERY strong support

Good call... I just longed a small position with 10x leverage at $7.8K, stop loss at the lows
Willing to get this position rekt.
213.
Post 54007454 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):
Leaving this here for reference sake... everything is fine, on schedule for the halving whether this is the bottom, or we go a little lower...
Source: https://twitter.com/ChartsBtc/status/1237480799445733376My outlook is that this pre-3rd halving price action looks more like the 2nd halving than the first, but make of it what you will.
214.
Post 54013536 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):
There goes all my fiat

95% in now folks... do or die moment is here!
215.
Post 54013673 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):
Thinking of putting $xx,xxx into corn today, I always say you need to keep spare fiat in your bank incase of emergency but this seems too good to miss out on.
Just throw it in already! Imagine your not at a casino table and take the chance
This is not financial advise!
216.
Post 54016987 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):
Cross-posting here to notify WO capwearers:
Could capwearers please make the effort to save their avatars as
png (rather than jpg or whatever) in order to make them transparent?
You know who you are.I feel like this is a bit of issue. I'm tempted to start a campaign PMing users from the WO thread, leaving neutral trust where appropriate if
gang etiquette isn't being followed.
I think we need to smarten up the
mother gang. Bitcoin's falling, a bit of professionalism wouldn't go a miss right now, otherwise we all look like noobs.
I'm trying to say you make us all look bad with your unnecessary white space background behind your caps, in case it wasn't obvious

Thoughts?

217.
Post 54017041 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):
Cross-posting here to notify WO capwearers:
Could capwearers please make the effort to save their avatars as
png (rather than jpg or whatever) in order to make them transparent?
You know who you are.I feel like this is a bit of issue. I'm tempted to start a campaign PMing users from the WO thread, leaving neutral trust where appropriate if
gang etiquette isn't being followed.
I think we need to smarten up the
mother gang. Bitcoin's falling, a bit of professionalism wouldn't go a miss right now, otherwise we all look like noobs.
I'm trying to say you make us all look bad with your unnecessary white space background behind your caps, in case it wasn't obvious

Thoughts?
Oh? Pressure to conform to the cult, with threats of
negative trust! if the marching orders are not obeyed? Well then, I will do absolutely nothing!
No:
neutral trust
Yes do nothing. You'll be fine. You are adhering the etiquette. To rebel, please re-save your avatar as a jpg and re-upload. Thanks!
218.
Post 54017073 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):
If bitcoin drops below $5,500, I'll delete this entire thread. Bring it, bears!
Archived!
219.
Post 54017140 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):
If bitcoin drops below $5,500, I'll delete this entire thread. Bring it, bears!
Archived!
Can you please archive all of 26281 pages?
I recommend contacting
LoyceV asap, he has the
resources for this.
Edit: And he loves to scoop and scrape.
220.
Post 54017164 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):
Cross-posting here to notify WO capwearers:
Could capwearers please make the effort to save their avatars as
png (rather than jpg or whatever) in order to make them transparent?
You know who you are.I feel like this is a bit of issue. I'm tempted to start a campaign PMing users from the WO thread, leaving neutral trust where appropriate if
gang etiquette isn't being followed.
I think we need to smarten up the
mother gang. Bitcoin's falling, a bit of professionalism wouldn't go a miss right now, otherwise we all look like noobs.
I'm trying to say you make us all look bad with your unnecessary white space background behind your caps, in case it wasn't obvious

Thoughts?
Oh? Pressure to conform to the cult, with threats of
negative trust! if the marching orders are not obeyed? Well then, I will do absolutely nothing!
No:
neutral trust
Yes do nothing. You'll be fine. You are adhering the etiquette. To rebel, please re-save your avatar as a jpg and re-upload. Thanks!
But that sounds like work.
Rebellion to gang etiquette either takes some effort, or a lack of understanding of saving images.
In your case, I don't think you're ready for rebellion. Sorry.
221.
Post 54017195 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):
If bitcoin drops below $5,500, I'll delete this entire thread. Bring it, bears!
Archived!
Can you please archive all of 26281 pages?
I recommend contacting
LoyceV asap, he has the
resources for this.
Edit: And he loves to scoop and scrape.We just came $60 from this thread being deleted

Miners are going to be fucked!
Shh, you'll upset the miners. They are very touchy about these things.
222.
Post 54017290 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):
Wait. What happens if miners decide to stop mining because its currently not worth it?
They capitulate.
223.
Post 54017366 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):
WO dudes watch the 200WMA. ridiculous!

And the rest


224.
Post 54017800 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):
I'm not deleting the thread. I'm a lying, dog faced, pony soldier.
I'm also the most worried I've been since the 2014-2015 bear market TBH.
Yup this is actually starting to worry me too... Even if a 40% drop in a day doesn't seem sustainable, it's not a good sign mid/long term if price is now in the $4K level.
We really need to close the Day above $6K levels in the next 15 minutes

225.
Post 54017832 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):
Anyone else feel like getting blackout drunk?
I wasn't planning on it til we broke $5.5K, now it seems appropriate!
Edit: Starting to think there are more 2019-2011 sellers cashing out... If you think about the traditional markets bull run since 2018 crash, it wouldn't surprise to see smart money coming into Bitcoin at the same. Now they are cashing out on stocks in a big way (since 2018), it wouldn't surprise me some of these "early adopters" are getting all out.
The volume speaks for itself, more volume today than we've seen since.... forever?
226.
Post 54017899 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):
After a 38% drop yesterday, an appropriate time to post what is believed to be the first ever HODL meme:
Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=375643.msg4023137#msg4023137On the flipside, just noticed by m₿ p/h at work for dollar cost averaging has nearly doubled
227.
Post 54018511 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):
Below 5k again. Double dip ongoing?
Last chance to buy below the 200 Week MA

228.
Post 54020545 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):
Feeling neutral today, neither bullish nor bearish. Starting to see some relevance in the charts now, for anyone who finds more philosophical-based TA relevant (feel free to tell me I'm a moron). Looking at the breakdown from around $8K to the new lows of $3.85K, the 50% retracement is around $5.9K, with the VPVR point of (local) control at $6K, this is the current resistance and "dead cat bounce" sell levels, with the volume and fib retracement confluence likely to act as strong resistance:

While retracing 50% of the capitulation is expected, the manner in which this happened (quicker than the 50% drop), gives me a lot of hope. Closing the day back above $6K would make the Weekly candle bullish (longer wick at the bottom than the candle body). Of course, a lot could happen over the weekend, but a break above $6K would signal further bullish momentum, regardless of current volitility, liquidity or volume (fibs are still fibs, volume is still volume, MAs mean very little right now).
On the Weekly chart, we did "nothing more" than wick down to the the 2 year-long strong volume support, that imo was likely the best buying opportunity for a tiny minority of investors (in the past 2 years). Try and look at things from a different perspective, if we had taken 1-3 months to get to this level, while this would obviously be very bearish (closing below the 200 Week MA around $5.5K - never done before) by bouncing strong from it back to $6K with a 50% move upwards over the course of a few weeks, this would actually be completely normal. The fact that these moves occured, both up and down, within 48 hours, is of low significance to me right now, merely indicating an increase in volatility that may or may not be sustained.

Somebody last night (can't remember who soz) kept saying "we could be back to $8K by tomorrow" and other such bullish hopium, but the reality is this member was completely right. Just as we reached $4K levels, it was clearly no time to sell, as prices had great potential to bounce back to the breakdown level of $5.5K, as we did, even if no-one expected this to happen within an hour - it did. Don't be surprised to see BTC make another 50% move upwards back to $8K, or below $3K, within an hour.
There's little to no point in me indicating the bearish suggestion right now, it's somewhat obvious. If we break $3.85K we likely break below $3K.
Word errors included.... still hungover courtesy of eddie13's great suggestion of getting blind drunk last night

229.
Post 54021634 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):
Critical moment for the day on the 1hr chart... closing above $6K would be uber bullish in my opinion:

Exciting times ahead

Tone Vays claims:
"The Bottom is Most Likely In!" - 90% chance he said
(But that we will likely drop below $5K again, one more time)
230.
Post 54029386 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):
Spain enters official nationwide lockdown.
So does France from midnight.
Looks like everyone is starting to take this shit seriously. Except maybe UK... I donno if it is because they are doing good or ignoring the problem.
Yup Belgium went on restaurant and gathering lock down from last night too... it's getting eery on the streets now, still fear is at 0% by my personal statistics, people seem ok.
UK is stupid, there is a litterally a clown that makes decisions as if it was a comedy show. Probably the only reason why BJ didn't decide to take anything seriously is because he doesn't want to align with "European standards" to offend brexit fools. The UK is not fine at all, it's just a few days behind

231.
Post 54029440 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):
UK is stupid, there is a litterally a comical clown that makes decisions as if it was a comedy show. Probably the only reason why BJ didn't decide to take anything seriously is because he doesn't want to align with "European standards" to offend brexit fools. The UK is not fine at all, it's just a few days behind

He is of course a Silly Billy but he is very sensibly totally deferring to the experts in this particular case. Whether they're right is a different and rather urgent matter. Total shutdowns can't be sustained and maybe the ones that are happening now are happening too early. Who knows? But no one should be waiting for any government's permission to do sensible things to protect themselves.
Silly Billy, you made me laugh

If this is case
(I'm not really following UK politics, only that BJ is a clown, makes sense he devolves responsibility), then the fundamentals of being a island country won't save it from the reality of a worldwide pandemic, it would only slow it down at best. Probably the EU states are doing the right thing at the moment, even if I'm searching for rebellious parties that ignore the wishes of the state, I do get it.
"Better to be safe than sorry", as Italy would probably say. The fact the UK has it's own currency is pretty relevant right now too, they clearly wouldn't want regulations to affect the value of the pound, as opposed to EU countries doing what feel is best, regardless of the Euro.
You can't take action when it's too late is the point, I feel a lot of measures put in place are in order to try prevent things getting a lot worse, as opposed to waiting for it to get worse.
The US is the place to worry about most.
I thought the issue was with Europe now? Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I believed what Trump says which is foolish.
232.
Post 54031921 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):
@mindrust, I fully expect you to buy back at your capitulation price or better.
If you get the chance.
Nice to see you back.
Am also thinking the same thing... $4.2K, $4.5K and $4.8K (33% positions) would be a good spread to get yourself back in to (slightly less) than what you had before. If you don't want to try and
"time to bottom" as it were, and simply get your position back if that's what you're hoping for. It's definitely what I'm considering if we close above $5.5K this week, not that you should follow my non-financial advise what-so-ever, I've been wrong enough this past month
I wish you the best either way, we've all been there. I panic sold in 2017 (when $6K went back down to $5K, before going to $20K), because I had previously got in at $5K before it went down to $3K so wanted to get out "break-even" and not risk having my money drop 40% again. In the end I had to get back in around $7.5K which sucked. Obviously this was completely different amidst the middle of a parabolic bull-run, and I think you'll be fine getting back in, but I feel your pain none the less.
At least now you will have stronger hands when you become a coiner again

Better to have panic sold at $4.5K, with the likelihood of having the opportunity to get back in, then to have held on til some lower level and panic sold then. I think everyone should panic sell once, in order to learn from the mistake. Better now than later.
233.
Post 54032066 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):
@mindrust, I fully expect you to buy back at your capitulation price or better.
If you get the chance.
Nice to see you back.
Am also thinking the same thing... $4.2K, $4.5K and $4.8K (33% positions) would be a good spread to get yourself back in to (slightly less) than what you had before. If you don't want to try and
"time to bottom" as it were, and simply get your position back if that's what you're hoping for. It's definitely what I'm considering if we close above $5.5K this week, not that you should follow my non-financial advise what-so-ever, I've been wrong enough this past month
I wish you the best either way, we've all been there. I panic sold in 2017 (when $6K went back down to $5K, before going to $20K), because I had previously got in at $5K before it went down to $3K so wanted to get out "break-even" and not risk having my money drop 40% again. In the end I had to get back in around $7.5K which sucked. Obviously this was completely different amidst the middle of a parabolic bull-run, and I think you'll be fine getting back in, but I feel your pain none the less.
At least now you will have stronger hands when you become a coiner again

Better to have panic sold at $4.5K, with the likelihood of having the opportunity to get back in, then to have held on til some lower level and panic sold then. I think everyone should panic sell once, in order to learn from the mistake. Better now than later.
Gosh... I agree with a lot of what you are saying, yet I am not sure dragonvslinux.
I agree that everyone has to make mistakes in order to solidly learn, but no serious bitcoiners should be playing around with all or nothing tactics, and any of us seriously recognizing the powerful fundamentals of bitcoin should be able to figure out ways to incrementally modify positions.
Fuck, even selling 50% should be really sufficiently enough to recognize how powerful it is to play around like that, but people have a tendency to get greedy... (yeah, of course, they label it "scared," but it is really a kind of greed).
You're right, as per usual, nobody should be playing around with all or nothing, but this is the reality for a lot of people. From my perspective I only learn from my mistakes - therefore I had to panic sell once in order to learn. Glad I did it then to be honest, rather than in 2018 when Bitcoin broke $5K (and would of seen my money go from 4x to break-even again). Sure it would of seemed like a good idea at the time, but I'd be kicking myself in 2019 and would of likely panic bought at $10K+ as a response. So sure this isn't the same for everyone, but if you're someone who learn's from your mistakes, or needs to make them in order to learn (points at self), the experience will give you the stronger hands you'll
need in the future. I am one of those people, I can't speak for mindrust or others but I know I'm not the only one who's like this.
To clarify I'm not suggesting anyone panic sell for the experience (it's gut wrenching stuff), but that if it's an inevitability for your learning process, due to your personality, then it's a needs must situation, hence "getting it out the way". Of course better money/risk management would be better than all or nothing for sure, no-one is doubting this rationality, but bare in mind many investors in the space have an "all or nothing" attitude that they will likely never shake off. When I'm in, I'm more or less all in, others I don't feel comfortable.
Reference: I'm 90% in and more than comfortable with that, any less than 80% I wouldn't be right now. I can't stand the thought of losing 20% of my money (see cap for fruther reference)
234.
Post 54032572 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):
Daaaaamn Paashaas forgot something on his update...
Belgium all places like bars and resto's are closed, Holland they are still open...
For reference sake, from where I'm based, they are
only "closed" to the public, not contractors for example. Most restaurants remain open for takeaways (90%), chip shops and takeaway places seem to be completely ignoring the regulation (or unaffected by it) and are still welcoming in the public . The public seem to able to stand in these places, but not sit down (or consume food), or use the toilet to wash their hands (from the sink)

Maybe the capital or Wallonia is bureaucratically different though.
So what happens, all the f*cked up dumb Belgians are going to the Netherlands to get there drinking in bars and restos and sh*t, little bit un responsible behavior

Belgians are far from responsible, just look at the country - it's literally been torn in half! While most of the population can't even speak their own native languages and have to resort to English it's embarrassing. None of the lack of responsibility surprises me. That said, I hope your not a Flemmish nationalist otherwise I'm gonna get negged

235.
Post 54032755 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):
Belgians are far from responsible, just look at the country - it's literally been torn in half! While most of the population can't even speak their own native languages and have to resort to English it's embarrassing. None of the lack of responsibility surprises me. That said, I hope your not a Flemmish nationalist otherwise I'm gonna get negged

The Dude is a hardcore Flemmish, please separate us from the French part

Just checked my trust page, think I got away with that. Was worried for a moment. I've been punched for less here

Daaaaamn Paashaas forgot something on his update...
Belgium all places like bars and resto's are closed, Holland they are still open...
For reference sake, from where I'm based, they are
only "closed" to the public, not contractors for example. Most restaurants remain open for takeaways (90%), chip shops and takeaway places seem to be completely ignoring the regulation (or unaffected by it) and are still welcoming in the public . The public seem to able to stand in these places, but not sit down (or consume food), or use the toilet to wash their hands (from the sink)

Maybe the capital or Wallonia is bureaucratically different though.
Naaah most resto's are very affected, they can't live on some take away, maybe some Italian pizza/pasta resto can, but like the more fancy resto's impossible, they will go through hell of a time, just as my local gym.... Also hell of a time...
I'm lucky, found a good resto for coming Friday, sleep over and private dining is still OK

Antwerp city is a ghost town as well at the moment.... Resto owners are royally F***ed at this time...
I don't know if this is the correct term for the vegetable "Hop shoots"?? But the farmers working a year and only these 4 weeks they can sell them to resto's... but non is open and don't wanna buy them of-course...

Don't get me wrong all the restaurants are screwed for income for sure, wasn't arguing that. Hence the "only" being in italics, but obviously didn't reference this relevance. My point was that they're not closed, even if they're losing money now. You're right that the more takeaway places appear fine, appreciating the extra income right now it seems, but it's coming
at from the expensive of the fancy resto's for sure. They aren't happy about it all. Hadn't considered the knock-on effect for the farmers (naively), good point, they will also be screwed over. I work in the food industry at the moment so I hear a lot of feedback, restaurants are stressed af at the moment.
Fortunately my gym is the great outdoors, so I still get my 250km cycling a week done

Still can't find any rebellious corona parties though, might have to go to NL haha.
236.
Post 54032955 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):
Belgians are far from responsible, just look at the country - it's literally been torn in half! While most of the population can't even speak their own native languages and have to resort to English it's embarrassing. None of the lack of responsibility surprises me. That said, I hope your not a Flemmish nationalist otherwise I'm gonna get negged

The Dude is a hardcore Flemmish, please separate us from the French part

^
Naaah why would that have to do anything with trust page

I was joking, maybe not obviously, but also;
I've been punched for less here

By less I mean for saying something less insulting, by here I meant Flanders. Capitalized for your sake

Flemmish nationalists can be very "sensitive" about these issues, and therefore unpredictable with their behavior. Glad to see you don't suffer from this
I otherwise PM'd you.
237.
Post 54033457 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):
Local bottom forming, and support strengthening, resistance remaining constant.
Breakout very likely, imho. But also a very good opportunity to counter-trade and dump coins on us.

what's next


Getting rejected by the 200 Week MA and volume point of control on the hourly time-frame isn't promising imo, it was looking like a nice breakout for a moment there.

I also feel looking at smaller time-frames when the Weekly candle is about to close in 10 hours is somewhat redundant...
238.
Post 54036746 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Source Twitter : @krugermacro
CME is not bitcoins friend

That's all I needed to see to confirm what I previously thought, so thanks a lot for sharing

+1
239.
Post 54036841 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Source Twitter : @krugermacro
CME is not bitcoins friend

That's all I needed to see to confirm what I previously thought, so thanks a lot for sharing

+1
Please explain..
Looks bearish! Institutional volume selling the open...
ain't checked stocks, but that "micro correlation" Bitcoin is suffering from appears to be continuing (that of bearish selling pressure). Just checked S&P, big bounce on the open, nothing relevant seen on Bitcoin = Even more bearish short-term, always long-term bullish though

Someone please merit this chart I'm out, then BTFD.
More info from someone paying more attention than me right now.PS, updated this though: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5188537.0 
240.
Post 54039630 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):
Who's buying the dip then? Bitcoin under $5K is a 75% discount folks. As LFC said a few days ago...
don't complain later on that you didn't stack satoshis at these cheap prices.
While the stock market bounces in a dead cat manner, and Bitcoin corrects and re-tests $4K level support, long-term this is actually very good imo. I think stocks have further to go down (long-term, like another 50% over the coming months), I don't think BTC has much further to go down (long-term, like $2.5K would be my lowest target, unlikely to be reached too). Bitcoin breaking the correlation with global markets is a
great thing, even if not in the direction we might all immediately hope for in the short-term.
BTFD
Not financial advise, but underlining BTFD hehe
241.
Post 54039731 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):
Does this means you didn't buy your coins back?

242.
Post 54039851 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):
Does this means you didn't buy your coins back?
:'-( No. Not yet.
Thought you put a limit buy back in at $4,500? Either way, while I don't think there is any rush in buying sub $5K, there's always that small chance that price bounces back strong at any time that everyone needs to be prepared for (just like breaking $3K like the chart you referenced or ones I published
6 months ago now:
be prepared for either scenario).
Quick scenario; Imagine if tomorrow the stocks plunged back down off the back of today's dead cat bounce... what
could happen to the price of Bitcoin is somewhat unpredictable, but I'd expect the inverse, like today's "decoupling"

It's hard to deny that people are buying the dip right now on the smaller time-frames*, even if prices will eventually go lower or re-test $4.5K again:

Some nice volume coming to the buy sub $5K again by looks of it

Either way: Don't panic buy or panic sell right now
*Whether this is simply day traders or long-term investors remains unknown so far.
243.
Post 54039981 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):
Local bottom forming, and support strengthening, resistance remaining constant.
Breakout very likely, imho. But also a very good opportunity to counter-trade and dump coins on us.

what's next

Getting rejected by the 200 Week MA and volume point of control on the hourly time-frame isn't promising imo, it was looking like a nice breakout for a moment there.
...
I also feel looking at smaller time-frames when the Weekly candle is about to close in 10 hours is somewhat redundant...
Sorry, i wasn't too wise in choice of words and i second your opinion. Not really optimistic.
But on the smaller timeframes: I chose it for visualizing the narrowing spread. Trading activity seems to be quite low, something might be in the air, imho.
Forgot to reply yesterday (too drunk, housemates birthday

) but please NEVER apologize for posting your charts or ideas in this thread - especially if I disagree with it. There is little to no benefit in everyone believing the same thing will happen, especially when a majority are usually wrong.
For example, while me and exstasie disagreed a lot in the recent past during the mini-bull (dead cat bounce) last year, this was beneficial because we could both benefit from each others alternative perspectives when shared. In the past few months, we have been sharing the same opinions a lot more often, and therefore the only benefit is seeing the same picture from a slightly different angle - therefore there is almost no benefit to either of us for this, or anyone else for that matter, as it only entrenches our own perspectives further.
Hence, often a don't have a response to exstasie's TA, because all I would have to say is "
I agree, thanks for sharing", which I find better said with merit than words.
TL:DR: Please continue posting your charts and opinions, especially if they contradict my opinions

244.
Post 54042396 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):
Local bottom forming, and support strengthening, resistance remaining constant.
Breakout very likely, imho. But also a very good opportunity to counter-trade and dump coins on us.

what's next

Getting rejected by the 200 Week MA and volume point of control on the hourly time-frame isn't promising imo, it was looking like a nice breakout for a moment there.
...
I also feel looking at smaller time-frames when the Weekly candle is about to close in 10 hours is somewhat redundant...
Sorry, i wasn't too wise in choice of words and i second your opinion. Not really optimistic.
But on the smaller timeframes: I chose it for visualizing the narrowing spread. Trading activity seems to be quite low, something might be in the air, imho.
Forgot to reply yesterday (too drunk, housemates birthday

) but please NEVER apologize for posting your charts or ideas in this thread - especially if I disagree with it. There is little to no benefit in everyone believing the same thing will happen, especially when a majority are usually wrong.
For example, while me and exstasie disagreed a lot in the recent past during the mini-bull (dead cat bounce) last year, this was beneficial because we could both benefit from each others alternative perspectives when shared. In the past few months, we have been sharing the same opinions a lot more often, and therefore the only benefit is seeing the same picture from a slightly different angle - therefore there is almost no benefit to either of us for this, or anyone else for that matter, as it only entrenches our own perspectives further.
Hence, often a don't have a response to exstasie's TA, because all I would have to say is "
I agree, thanks for sharing", which I find better said with merit than words.
TL:DR: Please continue posting your charts and opinions, especially if they contradict my opinions

No worries, i will

I just wasn't very precise, using the term "Breakout", which is commonly associated with a sudden UP move. I found the probability for a down move more likely, and i tried to correct that statement in my reply. We were both biased in the same direction, but my initial post was reading like the opposite. That was what i was apologizing for.
More and more traders seem to follow triangular boundaries on shorter timeframes. The lines almost always match, i tried to emphasize my "prediction" with the chart.
But you were right on the weekly candle, i tend to forget basic things like that more than often (points at his nickname).
Today i got hold of a bottle of my favourite vodka (made from milk), so maybe i'm the one that will be too drunk to reply later on today

Ah interesting, thanks for clarifying. You're completely right a breakout merely means a move in the price in one way of another, I made the assumption my bad, not yours. Thanks for not apologizing this time. You were also right the a breakout was imminent in that sense from the triangle pattern. And yes otherwise alcohol is very useful at the moment if you can't be bothered to pay too much attention to lower time-frames in play, you can thank eddie13 for this great suggestion, it's served me very well (apart from the hangovers I am left with when I go to work, but they wear off eventually - even if people think I've got corona for a moment before I explain I just got blind drunk). Just make sure to lock yourself out of any trading account or exchange and you can have a
laugh as price crashes

I otherwise love ascending or descending triangles, I don't like symmetrical triangle as I find them to be subjective continuation patterns with relatively little meaning apart from anticipating a breakout, or as likely a fakeout, so serve no utility. But also, triangle on smaller time-frames are always very dodgy imo. That said, if we can re-test the $5985 resistance level, basically break through $6K, then I'd start to look at the argument for a bullish ascending triangle on smaller time-frames. Think I'm drunk again, looking forward to your future charts posted in the best speculation thread on here

I'm all out at the moment, price is moving sideways and I have strict rules for triangles that don't apply yet (3 points of contact, for each resistance & support, including a perfect horizontal and not crossing a single candle body on the time-frame drawn). I'm so pedantic with my triangles, but fortunately this means I rarely acknowledge them until
perfect 
I'll otherwise call bullshit on any smaller time-frame TA on a Sunday, leading upto the Weekly close, you should know this about me. While I find the smaller-time frames interesting when there is lack of clarity on the Daily/Weekly, I'm really all about the longer term time-frames, a trade I can hold for a few weeks or a month, rather than a matter of days.
245.
Post 54042441 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):
alcohol is very useful
I bought 2 large bottles of lemon juice, 2 large bottles of honey, and 2 5ths of 100 proof Hot Damn (hot cinnamon liqueur) today..
I am developing a sore throat and runny nose right now and I'll be damned if I'm going to suffer through any sickness without a good supply of Hot Toddies..
Nice. Fortunately I (may or may not) live with a bar, so we are fully stocked... though can't sell any of it

Think we got a good a month's worth of alcohol prior to cancelling events, so all good here

Though financially gunna get rekt for now

I'm all out at the moment
Of BTC?
I'm just starting to think things are looking better for BTC right now..
Hell no, just out of TA. Daily/Weekly ain't telling me that much, I don't trust smaller time-frames, price is moving sideways it seems until proven otherwise.
Still btfd, all good here

246.
Post 54052106 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):
We Belges are on lockdown, I did some shopping like the rest of the horde, only her is one very big shop not for everyone, lucky I own a card, full with everything and very quiet inside ...
Man I bought an whole wine department I think

When resto is forbidden, then the dude will still find he's way to a good bottle of RED-WHITE or ROSÉ
You're also in lockdown if your not in Belgian

My escape routes are quickly closing in around me

I hope you didn't spend more than 30 minutes in a shop, this is now forbidden. I read some
tabloid toilet paper based newspaper claiming that the reason we are on lockdown is because some of us were naughty and didn't respect the previous restrictions, instead attending "lockdown parties"

Belgium closed all its bars, schools and restaurants just last week but during the weekend there were issues with people disobeying the measurements by having lockdown parties.
Police were called in the early hours of Friday night to break up the parties that have been happening over the weekend.
247.
Post 54054626 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):
Belgium corona lockdown is great, just went for one of my nicest ever 50km cycle rides. Traffic lights become irrelevant after 9pm it's liberating! Ironically, not many less people out on the streets this evening compared to previous evenings, much notably less cars... lots of people also having a walk for "exercise". Don't know what it's like in other cities... but not much has changed here apart from more restaurants are shut now. Night shops still open though, so enough people going out "shopping" it seems

248.
Post 54056511 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):
Day 2 of the Total Liquor Ban:
Think I'll take up smoking. Hah, j/k I already smoke but now I intend to smoke more. The "good" brand of cigarettes are ~$1.50 a pack. All the other ones taste like dirt. Somewhat ironically, the ones imported from China are the best. Hope the Mexican restaurant is still open as a good hot sauce can somewhat replace the buzz caught from alcohol, even if it is much more ravaging on the rectum.
Liquor ban, that's harsh! Think I'd also take up smoking if I didn't already in your situation, or try smack of something (not a suggestion). Ketamine must be getting popular in your neck of woods by now for sure! Grimey shit. Starting to realise I don't have f all bacci

Usually I'm stocked with 1-2 kg rolling for heading back to the uk, but ain't got plans to go nowhere soon from cheap bacci land. Also feel like it'll be a waste of money right now, it'll be the first product to get looted hard if the night shops close imo. I'd feel like such a clown putting a big chunk of fiat down on that
if there's a free for all in the near future. Either that, or take the opportunity to give up again. Addictions are no good in apocalypses, they will slow you down, make you weak and vulnerable to prey.
Starting to design my own
"mad max" style front bumper for my mate's muscle car, as a safety net. He's got the wheels for a decent looting vehicle, need a proper metal reinforced bumper, ideally with some good spikes, for it
if the time comes. Something that we can get in and out of places no problems, through most hardened materials, no parking outside nonsense. I don't think I'm really considering the "mid-term" situation here of shit being bad and getting better or worse anymore, I'm just planning for the worst case scenario right - shit totally going down over this. Imagine if you knew there was a chance civilization would starting crumbling in the near future, but you didn't prepare yourself for it? Your human animal instincts would be replaced by domesticated obedience, it's no good.
Also need to get a rifle, don't want to wait a few months to try and get hold of one, that'll be too late. Already put myself down as night shift guard for the gardens here that means we can live sustainability. I'm totally in the right place despite atm the borders closing in around me. Need some good weaponry to defend that shit though, hungry people are crazy. Fortunately, I've long considered that this civilization will inevitably collapse, just like every version prior to it, so have been mentally prepared for over a decade now. Just didn't consider it could be over this stupid virus, or happen in my lifetime to be honest.
249.
Post 54060779 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):
poor mindrust....

Not necessary.
Look at the bright side, now I know how it feels to be over-invested.
This is true, there is a positive in this: knowing how much you want to be invested.
I'll be honest this pump still doesn't feel real to me. Yes I am sorry. Yes I fucked it up but that's how I feel.
Don't apologize, it was your decision and shouldn't concern anyone else.
Did you fuck up? Are we really going to moon, or just coming back down further?
I can afford to lose $50/weekly on btc. No more, no less. I don't care what will happen to it in 10 years. I can afford to hodl that amount forever. I know It is not going to make me a millionaire too. Again, I don't care.
This is a really good minset

I guess dip buying made me greedy and greed is not good.
Greed made me lose control.
You want all and spend all then you lose all. That's what happened basically.
Lesson learned, I am starting over.
Greed takes over everyone, try not to take it personally.
Let's close that shitty topic now.
Ok. Take care.
250.
Post 54065589 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):
Afternoon all
New 2 BTC and investing in general - wanting to take advantage of the new world I entered at a very small 0.2 BTC @ 5.7k. Have plenty of funds and considering buying 1 - 2 whole btc as I'm gathering confidence that it'll return to 10k+
Discuss and help a newb out.
There is no Merit for you here, boy!
Do you ever wonder why more newbies don't come into the Bitcoin space? Maybe, just maybe, quite possibly, they are just genuinely trying to join the "community" here try and engage with it. That was their first post, as a sign that maybe new investors are entering the space. I'd say if this was the case, you might of made them feel that the community is too insular for them

Imagine if he has no idea what merit is, he'd now be researching it, probably realizing how cliquey this community can be at times

I always respect your opinions, but I'll also say when I disagree.
251.
Post 54065694 (copy this link) (by dragonvslinux) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):
There is no Merit for you here, boy!
Now now. This is a time for kindness and coming together.
I have one merit for him if he fingers himself on camera.
I'm interested to know if all this lockdown stuff does create a surge of new interest from people who until now didn't have the time or inclination to investigate.
At least now we'll know if they were begging for merit all along. I think most bounty hunters would go for this deal

But otherwise, lots more "average joes" are at home now, no doubt more on the internet, probably thinking "shit the economy is going to collapse at this rate, wtf am I going to do". Oh look, some stupid nerds think they programmed money to solve the problem -
many hours later - "might buy a small amount, just in case". Adds up to me at least.
I don't expect many other investors to be buying at these levels anyway, the charts still look like a bit of a shit show.