All posts made by thisisntbic in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 21545467 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: x2666 on September 05, 2017, 04:46:57 PM
It's hilarious to see people proclaiming BTC has recovered. YEAH RIGHT!!! Cheesy

DOWN TO HELL WE GO!

Have fun down there! Sorry to hear you sold at the bottom.



2. Post 21580517 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on September 06, 2017, 05:44:51 PM

it takes less than a grand to pump that ole girl up, so why not? may as well.
also they've got a scamference coming up where Jihan's gonna pump it some more, so they need it not to die just yet.
When is this wonderful free money event due to take place?
20-21/09 http://bitkan.com/event?from=bitkanen#features
other conferences with fewer scammers are available

tl;dr - Ver/Wu falsely support opponents of Bitcoin with a "better" coin that is doomed to fail from the start, while pumping opponents money into Bitcoin, and giving Bitcoin a real world, live quality assurance test that proves Bitcoin's resiliency.

---------------

So, I've been thinking about this, and bear with me as this "thinking" was more a bar napkin idea one night out with friends haha. McAfee said that Wu was the smartest person he knows (paraphrasing?). I wondered why he would say that; is it based on anything real, or is it more McAfee being his ridiculous self? I tried to look at it from another perspective than what I see from either side of the debate on this forum and reddit.

What if Ver/Wu team are not scamming Bitcoin faithful, but more so the big blockers and other opponents to Bitcoin? There have been how many attempts to create and overtake Bitcoin with an alternative (BCH, BU, etc)? All but BCH are/have been forgotten; I certainly don't remember most of them. What if all along they are proving Bitcoin really is the ideal coin?:

- Opponents say Bitcoin needs *something. //whatever the flavor of the month is; currently big blocks
- Build up hype, agree with them.
- Spin off Bitcoin *something (BS) alt coin at some arbitrary price implementing these ideas.
- BTC faithful dump BS to supporters of BS, pumping money into BTC that wouldn't have been there initially (aka, round about forcing opponents to put their money into BTC), essentially creating what looks like free money/BTC to us.
- BTC proves it is better and outlasts BS, solidifying it's ability to withstand huge pressures from internal conflicts  (as if this is a live QA test; BTC has shown its resiliency to many outside forces already).
- Repeat with next idea opponents to core say BTC needs via new BS coin.
- ?
- Profit Wink


OK, now tell me why I'm dumb Smiley haha.



3. Post 24256508 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

http://bitcoinsavingsplan.com/

This?



4. Post 24469349 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: Punisher1314 on November 12, 2017, 06:33:58 PM

Why so worried peeps? Grin


This^

Hasn't the weekend dump been happening (for the most part) on a weekly basis for months, if not years? Who cares if it's goes into BCH, or ETH, or LTC, or (insert other coin here).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sPvylTPCv8

(edit - grammar/typos)



5. Post 25493441 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

The only positive change over the last 24 hours on Coinmarketcap (top 100): Tether...



6. Post 25514304 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

Quote from: EtihadBitcoin on November 30, 2017, 08:44:46 PM
All coinbase users are F*'d up.

I think you mean the roughly 14,000 users:
"with at least the equivalent of $20,000 in any one transaction type (buy, sell, send, or receive) in any one year during the 2013-2015 period.
do[es] not include users: (a) who only bought and held bitcoin during the 2013-15 period; or (b) for which Coinbase filed Forms 1099-K during the 2013-15 period"


I believe this was posted earlier, but if not, here is a copy of the Narrowed Summons to Coinbase
https://www.scribd.com/document/365893210/US-v-Coinbase-order?irgwc=1&content=10079&campaign=Skimbit%2C%20Ltd.&ad_group=66960X1514734Xfb366f45a06c38b3049ba2d8889f39ea&keyword=ft750noi&source=impactradius&medium=affiliate#from_embed


Edit:URL and grammar



7. Post 25526846 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

Quote from: explorer on December 01, 2017, 03:34:50 AM

I think to evade US clutches you would need to fake your own death as a minimum.  

Thanks. That's kind of what I figured.  Undecided

Or a proper opaque blockchain.

Just sayin.
I was thinking about this same situation. Wouldn't it be possible to move your coins to a new address*^ and pay taxes on it now (2017) as if you sold it all. Then physically move, and declare whatever you have (if you have to) with the new addresses and live happily ever after when the price moons.

*I'm assuming you would set this up via VPN, TOR, or whatever, so that it can't be tied back to you as being a resident of USA and thus taxed when you try to leave (idk, IANAL/Accountant)
^Also assuming moving from one wallet to another is a taxable event (i.e. the whole Coinbase -> private wallet issue). I'm sure there is more I'm not taking into account; beer isn't helping me think of those either, haha



8. Post 25577511 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

Quote from: David48l on December 01, 2017, 09:49:37 PM
The people, and without encouragement to offend, are very ignorant and manipulable. But it's not your fault if you only read censored forums and falsified threads. I encourage you to compare several points of view and draw your own conclusions. Do not let other people think for you

That's the kind of retarded banality Roger would come up with. Just sayin'. Wink

The answer to transactions without corfirming, is simply spam

But nobody is able to show me 10 transactions at a reduced rate, there are supposed to be thousands  Roll Eyes

https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/

Do you need me to explain this to think for you? Or can you figure it out on your own?



9. Post 25578486 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

Quote from: David48l on December 01, 2017, 09:49:37 PM
The answer to transactions without corfirming, is simply spam
You are correct!

Quote from: David48l on December 01, 2017, 09:59:45 PM
Do you need me think for you? Or can you figure it out on your own?

Yes, think for me

https://blockchain.info/address/3GyeFJmQynJWd8DeACm4cdEnZcckAtrfcN
https://blockchain.info/address/16xShq4S9xfB5wg9ygsjGdWCNdNn3M5TB7
https://blockchain.info/address/1KYJySPCTYFCToK4zPghtDtaZzRAHjtA2v

Take your time, I know it's difficult to understand, lots of numbers, letters and what not.



10. Post 25741064 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

Quote from: jojo69 on December 04, 2017, 06:52:23 PM
fkin thermos moved btctalk to cloudfare, admitting 'it's prolly an nsa honeypot'. Roll Eyes
fkin meddling kids Angry

Wanna run that past me again in English this time?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2485318.0

It looks like everybody disappeared from the WO after this news.
 Shocked

yeah, it is a very sad day, the utility of this forum is diminished

Not that I plan on leaving here anytime soon, any recommendations as to other forums/platforms worth following (not reddit)?



11. Post 25939093 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.31h):

Quote from: realr0ach on December 07, 2017, 09:56:33 PM
NASA logo barf bag ready

The reason you might want a barf bag is that In-Q-Tel was the one buying up all the coins when they were $1, so purchasing bitcoin higher is essentially contributing money to the CIA.  If you think I'm kidding, no.  The only question is how many coins they control which were bought at next to nothing.

evidence or fuck off

This is not new information.

IDK about In-Q-Tel buying it all up, but I do know the various three letter agencies were mining BTC (and I would assume the various other CCs as well) in the beginning. To the effect of multiple wallets with thousands of coins each.



12. Post 25939367 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.31h):

Quote from: criptix on December 07, 2017, 10:17:55 PM
IDK about In-Q-Tel buying it all up, but I do know the various three letter agencies were mining BTC (and I would assume the various other CCs as well) in the beginning. To the effect of multiple wallets with thousands of coins each.

pics or it didnt happen  Lips sealed

there is a high chance that they own bitcoin too, but how much and if they created it will not be known in the near future.

Haha, if I had them I would!

I wish I'd been there and involved with it, but I wasn't unfortunately. I guarantee I'd have way more coins than what I do now Wink

More along the lines of someone drinking too much and talking about things they probably shouldn't have  Grin



13. Post 26500470 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.33h):

Quote from: Ludwig Von on December 17, 2017, 05:45:46 PM
Why would a system that allows cheating be needed?

Why kind of systems exist that prevent "cheating"? From sports, to computers, to financial transactions, all systems are vulnerable to being used in a way that is not intended...



14. Post 26501419 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.33h):

Quote from: realr0ach on December 17, 2017, 05:51:29 PM


Have you ever noticed bitcoin con artists always try to portray bitcoin as gold in visualization to pretend it has value?  Sorry, real gold and silver are far superior in fundamentals.

I don't follow your logic.

You continue to say bitcoin has no value due to being strictly digital, nothing tangible in the "real" world (unlike gold).

In that context, we should ignore everything you post, until your publish a book that I can hold in my hand and read; your posts are pixels on my screen, a digital representation of your thoughts, thus no value.

How do digital words have value, but digital money doesn't?



15. Post 26757737 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.34h):

With all (most) of the alts in the red too, anyone else find it ironic that today is the start of the "crypto" winter?  Tongue


Also, welcome back Peter R (as well as all these names I've never seen before talking shit)! I thought it was a nice touch how you clip out a small bit of Greg's post and spun it. I also found it great how you ignored a direct question earlier that would have caught you contradicting yourself, and instead you changed topic. Excellent, I'm sure you are a god at getting everyone all riled up on reddit  Roll Eyes

Still, my favorite is how you emphasize your "volunteer" work, and then proceed to itemize a list of accomplishments with some lofty dollar value attached that also just so happened to increase your stash (of course you weren't paid; I'm sure you gifted those coins for your wonderful voluntary contributions  Wink Wink).



16. Post 26778781 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.34h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on December 22, 2017, 11:23:50 AM
Breaking 24777$ prediction game


27/12/2017 bikerleszno
07/01/2018 ghandi
08/01/2018 savetherainforrest
09/01/2018 explorer
10/01/2018 bicoinpsycho
12/01/2018 speedwheel
13/01/2018 undeadbitcoiner
14/01/2018 northypole
15/01/2018 ivomm
16/01/2018 maca068
17/01/2018 bitcoinvest
18/01/2018 last of the v8s
21/01/2018 flamast2
24/01/2018 kartala
25/01/2018 orpington
...
If I'm not too young (post count wise), I'll take 22/01/2018



17. Post 27795177 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.37h):

Quote from: ghandi on January 09, 2018, 06:58:35 PM
3day chart seems to be drawing the perfect bubble...

In what way? Looks exactly like December 26th-28th, almost exactly where it is today except a bit higher. So, breaking bubbling upwards... again?

edit: further thoughts/ramblings, and grammar



18. Post 27796633 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.37h):

Quote from: ghandi on January 09, 2018, 07:15:18 PM
3day chart seems to be drawing the perfect bubble...

In what way? Looks exactly like December 26th-28th, almost exactly where it is today except a bit higher. So, breaking bubbling upwards... again?

edit: further thoughts/ramblings, and grammar

In the way the perfect anatomy of a bubble is described. Doesn't certainly mean we are going to crash. But currently it's not looking to bright.

Elaborate. There are multiple phases of a bubble, which do you see/think we are in? First sell off? Return to the mean? Both of those are right before great increases => bullish.



19. Post 27805552 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.37h):

Quote from: ghandi on January 09, 2018, 10:03:16 PM
"Return to normal" just passed by and we may be on the way down to the floor.

But i thought the same thing around at 4k USD and was wrong Cheesy

Haha, thank you for that. Too many times people make blanket statements on here without any explanation of their thought process or the logic behind it. Or even worse, a screenshot of a trading view with nothing else accompanying it. Those times I wonder what's the point, to prove they can take a screenshot?

There are a lot of smart people on this thread, it's the reason I've followed it for years; even before being able to afford my first bit of btc. For someone who isn't a trader by trade (ha), it's nice to have insight into why others on here think the price will move one way or another (even if they are wrong sometimes  Wink )



20. Post 27937067 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.38h):

Quote from: jojo69 on January 11, 2018, 08:39:02 PM
do you have a moment?



Bear with me while I read you a scripture  Grin

edit: awww, too young for pictures still? lol



21. Post 28686583 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.39h):

Quote from: rafanadal on January 22, 2018, 02:02:47 PM
mempool is clearing, lightning is active on mainnet and segwit adaption is increasing. this should be big and good news enough.
apparently not

Apparently not what? That the mempool isn't clearing? That lightning isn't active?

I'm assuming you're over 13 if you're using the internet alone; use your big words and sentences, or ask the adult with you for help. It's not that hard.



22. Post 28693041 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.39h):

Quote from: rafanadal on January 22, 2018, 03:04:13 PM
u mad u little crybaby ?

Apparently your so called good news, have had no effect on btc price, quite the opposite actually.

I'm mad that I/others have to read your drivel and that it's taking up space forever on this wall.

I am quite happy with BTC's performance over the last few years, and have no doubt I will be even more so in time to come.



23. Post 28714408 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.39h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 22, 2018, 10:10:56 PM
I think that in this context the BIG words of, "apparently not" only signify that BTC price had been continuing to have downwards price pressures in spite of news that should be unambiguously positive, in terms of BTC fundamentals.

That's what I assumed as well. My point was that they should say that and stop making people assume. At the time the price was changing +-$100; negligible compared to what we've been dealing with the last few days and weeks. Even now, the price is still within ~$100 of this morning; apparently the news/non-news is not having all that great an effect on price as they implied.

It's just annoying seeing "click-bait-esque" posts on here that the user adds nothing to the conversations. I'd much rather read through longer posts (like yours or even, dare I say it, r0ach's haha), at least I can try and glean something from them.

If I wanted useless posts, I'd go to r/btc. Oh well, my ignore list grows (like it matters, I'm a nobody here :p).

Edit: The next 24 hours are critical



24. Post 28855702 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.40h):

Quote from: realr0ach on January 24, 2018, 10:36:21 PM
merit me. merit meee  Grin


I cannot find the +merit for living above a restaurant button.

You would if you were the man Wink



25. Post 29269049 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.40h):

Quote from: AZwarel on January 30, 2018, 08:01:02 PM
... I still struggle to understand why he recommended it to me, yet never embraced it himself.  I just think it was mainly laziness on his part. ...


Isn´t it possible that your friend simply didn´t had the money to buy
BTC even when the Bitcoin price was low? I guess a few people that believed
in Bitcoin simply missed out due to not being liquid enough to invest.

I´m not sure from which country you are, but even in a wealthy country
like the US the average person is not exactly having a lot of money
that is available for investment.

63% Of Americans Don't Have Enough Savings To Cover A $500 Emergency

Maybe you should reconsider and gift him a few mBTC  Wink


That might be the case, but, from my personal experience, it is mostly BS. I did not earn a lot (eastern eu. country), i cut back on my spendings - like a LOT - to put it in bitcoin. Most people waste money on shit. New clothes they do not need, all kinds of social indicators of wealth like newest phone, car, jewelry etc. I have talked to some of my friends about investing in the long term back than; they have rather spent several bitcoin's price on vacations in 2015/2016, so they can post a facebook report on "look, my life is awesome". Now those vacations costs 15x-20x in bitcoin price :-D

I hear you, my man. My friends/family/coworkers were all the same way. I told them to get in when it was $250ish (2013), that it was potentially world changing, and I was laughed out the room. I still remind my old roommate about his response, "Yeahhhh, no thanks. I've got some gold coins, I think I'm good." Or my boss, when it dropped like a stone, "Ha! How's your bitcoin treating you now?" - He no longer speaks to me haha.

Back then, I was part of that $500 emergency group, as shameful as it is to say. I couldn't afford it; I was so far in debt from making some stupid mistakes when I was younger (well, more from stupid lawyer fees, but I digress lol Cheesy) that my credit cards/loans took everything (we're talking 10's of thousands). Still, I found a way to put $25-50 a paycheck into btc; skipped trips, partying, dating, etc.

Selling as it rose over the last 6 months, I can say I'm now debt free. Paid all my cards off, paid my student loans off, and I was able to put a small down payment and own my own place. I wish I'd kept all the messages from those same people over the course of December, "fuck you and your bitcoin". Sorry I'm not sorry, but it's never to late to join the party Smiley

As always, HODL; even better things are soon to come. Just don't think that's the end all/be all, spend some if it will make your life better. Just make sure not to sell it all Wink



26. Post 29269899 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.40h):

Quote from: toknormal on January 30, 2018, 08:55:16 PM
Bitfinex´ed on Twitter:
Quote
Bitcoin went up 17% in a single day, the day they got the subpoena.
and 26% the day after. [...]

https[Suspicious link removed]d/status/958420215301394432

Bitcoin surged 43 % in the 48 hours after the delivery of the subpoena.

So that now looks like they sh*t themselves and decided to pump the market to cash out in an attempt to recover all the USD they didn't have in reserve backing the Tether pool then. Exact same procedure as Gox when they found themselves in a fractional reserve situation - tried to recover to full reserve market manipulation with "fake money".

I´m still sure that we won´t see a real decrease in the Bitcoin price.
I think we will stay above 10k.

I'm sure we will. 1-2k incoming longer term. The entire year's growth is just gonna look faked now.


The price also surged over 30% in the 7 days leading up to Dec 6th (~8500 -> 11500). Should we assume they had insider knowledge they were getting subpoenaed before hand and started the pump prematurely?



27. Post 29286068 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.40h):

Quote from: TERA2 on January 31, 2018, 04:59:12 AM
Pop quiz: Convince an average low/middle class fiat-loving law-abiding person who doesnt believe in a failing or fraudlent banking system that they should use bitcoin, without talking about its price or making profit by trading it. Present what benefits they will reap by using bitcoin as opposed to banks, VISA, google pay, venmo, etc. Anything besides capital gain?


You are presenting false parameters in your shilling argument, tera beara... bitcoin is not merely meant to serve as a payment system, even though it may well accomplish such common use in that direction in the future, perhaps, but not necessarily in order to still have value and utility.

Yeah, if you create your own strawman, then you can more easily make some dumb -ass pie in the sky argument, that is not connected with reality.
If you are saying there are false parameters, you must be admitting bitcoin is only for overthrowing the fed, committing crimes, and/or making a profit... (or overthrowing the fed so you dont have to taxes on the profits)

Which of those payment methods are you in control of all your own money?
Gpay, VISA, Venmo: all built on top of the banking infrastructure, who hold your money and issue you IOUs. Replace banks with bitcoin, which is in your control.



28. Post 29343238 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on January 31, 2018, 08:40:39 PM
Buckle up

-snip-

No shill quotes please..

And even if you were not quoting that sociopath's rag..so what?  How is this good news?  Some local court ruling that bitcoin has value. Surprise..

Quote from: d_eddie on January 31, 2018, 08:42:48 PM
I wonder what great significance this piece of news might have. Is there any need for a Korean court to rule bitcoin has economic value and can be confiscated, so the proceeds go to finance state budget?

The Feds confiscated and sold Ulbricht's Silk Road coin and happily auctioned them without all that fuss.

I don't get it, the guy posts a bullish news article at a time when there is very little good news surrounding bitcoin (mostly just FUD) and you shit all over him? Who gives a shit if it's on that website? I doubt roger himself wrote the article (hint: he didn't). What's the guy shilling, Korean news? Lol.

How many governments have officially come out and said that bitcoin is recognized as having actual, real world value - not banning crypto currencies, or saying crypto is only used by criminals, etc. - especially in one of the biggest crypto markets in the world?

Did you guys lackadaisically brush off when Japan made BTC a legal currency? Or when Overstock.com said they were going to accept BTC, were you guys like, "whoopdi fuckin' doo, we all know it's got value, congrats company for figuring out what we already know"? No, we were all happy it was being adopted by a well known company where we could buy real things with our bitcoin.



29. Post 30916489 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: Jacques_Bittard on February 23, 2018, 08:33:14 AM
The ugliest truth of bitcoin is that it just isn't useful in any legal fields.

Bitcoin being accepted as legal currency in Japan and South Korea aren't... legal? Or do you mean, you can't pay most lawyers with btc? Actually, I'm sure you could probably pay off a judge/politician easier with bitcoin than cash haha.



Quote from: Jacques_Bittard on February 23, 2018, 04:54:54 PM
From that time I have earned a lot more then I did with bitcoin mainly with XRP, ETH and lately also EOS. For me, bitcoin is for bartenders and cab drivers who react on technical developments with a several year delay.

What are the technical developments of XRP, ETH, and EOS that surpass Bitcoin? It would be nice to know now, rather than a year from now.




30. Post 32627442 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: TERA2 on March 18, 2018, 09:48:50 PM
As I was browsing some other tradingview forecasts, I came across at least one bullish scenario that looks/sounds plausible.




Why do people draw bats all over charts? It never means or predicts anything

I believe it is mocking the original poster of the chart, implying that the lines they drew mean as much as a bat/batman pasted on top.



31. Post 35806837 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.53h):

I thought you guys already lost all your pants  Wink



32. Post 39294229 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.57h):

Quote from: jojo69 on June 03, 2018, 03:15:30 PM
There is a strong correlation between conspiracy theorists and low cognitive capability.  Make of that what you will.  
hmmm. many conspiracys are later found to be true. wake up people

"Many" = "<0.01%"

uh...no

However, regarding the moon landings specifically, it is true that many of the Apollo photos were faked or altered, which in retrospect was an extremely bad move as it has provided endless grist for the denier mill.

I find it very difficult to believe the moon landings were faked.

Considering the political environment of the time, the USA was in a race against a technically competent opponent full of very smart people, don't you think Russia, China, or any other country capable of doing so, would have called out the USA immediately? Embarrass the shit out of the USA by proving mathematically/showing that they did not in fact do what they said? I've never read or heard of such.

Edit: Regarding the photos, those I have no comment on. They could have been faked, sure; the actual landings though, I don't believe so.



33. Post 39306682 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.57h):

Quote from: Globb0 on June 03, 2018, 05:42:50 PM
Who cares? Technology is a genie that once let out of the bottle can not be put back in. It will be with us forever. Bureaucrats and systems of record and title transfer come and go. In the long march of time even mountains are reduced to dust by the simple flowing of water. Technology is like the water and Bureaucrats are not even close to being mountains.
No I get what you are saying. Perhaps blockchain will eventually find it's way into a few other places here and there where it makes sense to have it.

Though if the next 30 years go by and I still can't legally transfer a car title to another person for free via a decentralized blockchain solution, it won't mean much sweat to me as I'll probably be close to death anyway, lol.

If it does happen in the next 30 years it will be because political jurisdictions are in a sort of competition with one another. I wouldn't be surprised to see smaller jurisdictions implement as much of this kinda stuff as they can in order to attract expats.

IoT...

 to add and verify any new tills and its effortless for them. 

Quote from: Torque on June 03, 2018, 04:57:23 PM
Idk. This is meme kinda true. But there is a huge range of applications out there where we dont NEED blockchain, but it would still be really cool!

I would love to have my vehicle ownership represented by ...

Yes and in a perfect world, this is how it should work. You should have the power to transfer title of ownership of something you own directly to another party without a third party in the middle. But that's the problem. When state-run Bureaus of Motor Vehicles have centralized control of title issuance, transfer, and registration of motor vehicles, and of course make revenue off of that activity, then why would they ever relinquish that power back to the individual? They would make so many excuses has to why that activity should be state-run and not decentralized.

Also, I wouldn't doubt that state-run BMV's will eventually try to implement some sort of blockchain solution behind the scenes as a 'calling card' to say that they are trying to change and do something. But I don't think it would be more efficient that what they have today.

I believe something like this already exists. Started in 2007 in Estonia, called Keyless security infrastructure. There are companies now trying to use in other markets as well
https://e-estonia.com/solutions/security-and-safety/ksi-blockchain/



34. Post 39457943 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.57h):

Quote from: mindrust on June 05, 2018, 07:20:17 PM
bitcoin just had a 14.7% difficulty change upwards. that's the biggest since january. there sure is a lot of firepower out there somewhere.

The difficulty increased by 634 billion which is the largest increase in the history of bitcoin. The increase in this period alone is nearly equal to the entire network difficulty 1 year ago.

It probably has something to do with this:

https://adclair.com/gmo-introduced-a-new-miner-that-will-take-the-market-from-bitmane/

https://twitter.com/ynakamura56/status/1003908868114509824


Or this:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3359468.20;topicseen (S11's)

“I respect Bitmain, but we will bypass them," said CEO of GMO Masatoshi Kumagai.

Recall that in September 2017 GMO Internet Group announced plans to invest $ 320 million in the mining industry and the creation of a new generation of chips. According to representatives of the Japanese Internet giant, bitcoin is intended to become a “universal currency”, providing “unlimited economic freedom”.

I love their confidence and outlook on bitcoin.



35. Post 39588919 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.57h):

Quote from: RayX12 on June 07, 2018, 02:01:25 PM
Hashrate vs Price all time (log scale):





Interesting. Log scale shows an almost inverse correlation between hash rate and price.  I wonder if this holds true for more than just the past year (didn't realize graph was all time  Cheesy). Did price dip with that big increase in hashpower recently?

Of course correlation =/= causation.



36. Post 41319832 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.00h):

I find it absolutely hilarious how hypocritical the people in this thread are. The constant rhetoric in this thread is that shills/scammers resort to name calling, misdirection, and censoring attempts at silencing people who disagree with them.

anonymint came in here and provided an intellectually stimulating conversation for once; backed by a logical progression of his thoughts and where he derived them from (whether he is right or wrong is irrelevant). How many posters here actually do that? Maybe 10? Hell, even roach falls in this category!

What was the response to his posts?
- A few individuals read what he wrote, and had a decent discussion about it with a few even offering a well written rebuttal (they are part of the 10 posters mentioned before).

- Called a "fucking retard" or some variation with zero reference to what he said, let alone trying to refute it.
- Labeled him a bcash shill, which is laughable as he says it is shit in pretty much everything he writes
- You have banana man taking out his dick and trying to show people how big it is, talking about how much bitcoin he's bought and sold which has no relevance to the conversation at hand.
- Then there are calls for his removal and for him to delete his posts because it's off topic... as if 90% of the garbage posts on here aren't off topic.

Name calling. Misdirection. Censoring.

If anything, the absurd reaction to his posts leads me to believe he's more correct than not, and I have only just started reading it. This thread has fallen apart, because the few people that are interesting to read and who are actually contributing worthwhile information are slowly being driven away one by one.



37. Post 41324696 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.00h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 01, 2018, 10:57:37 PM

Yes.. thanks for that clarification thisisntbtc.. the troll/shills really needed your support because they are underrepresented today...



I think the reason you don't like anonymint is because not only are his posts longer than yours, they actually contain relevant information throughout.

Edit - Soooo, are you saying you are a troll? Lol.



38. Post 41324832 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.00h):

Quote from: mymenace on July 01, 2018, 09:35:47 PM
... (whether he is right or wrong is irrelevant)...

Yeah your right
Everything he says is correct

Except there is a severe lack of security on the sites he is posting (misdirection?)

So meh



hmm, maybe he is correct and your reading comprehension skills aren't up to par to understand, let alone debate him.

Don't really care about what sites he links. Assume no site is secure; you best protect ya neck and you'll be just fine  Wink



39. Post 44186379 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.05h):

Quote from: sirsplashalot on August 16, 2018, 01:36:21 PM
I see you've reached for the 'name calling precedent' in your argument.

A heavily played card in this debate.

Quote from: sirsplashalot on August 16, 2018, 01:49:08 PM
Who? You and your butt buddies?

Can you at least put some effort in? It's not even entertaining anymore.



https://imgur.com/a/y50glpY

I drew lines, they look like they are going up. I'm a professional trader now according to this board Wink Grin

Not sure why everyone freaks out when it drops from $7k -> $6k. Unless you bought BTC in the last year and that is all you know, this is really, really boring movement.



40. Post 44927436 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: jbreher on August 30, 2018, 06:29:33 AM
What about the Mercedes V class vans?

Hmm. Wasn't aware of it.

Initial impression: looks relatively incapable of off-highway use. Tag line: The spacious sedan with the star. But more investigation may be warranted.

If you need better off-road capabilities in luxury, you can step it up to this Grin



Top Gear Review - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrUVMdkb4_k

https://www.mercedes-benz.com/en/mercedes-benz/innovation/the-automotive-declaration-of-independence/



41. Post 47265343 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.10h):

Even if cryptocaps are backed by the appropriate amount of physical hats, it's abundantly obvious they have no schelling point and thus we're setting ourselves up for hatastrophe  Grin



42. Post 48645461 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.20h):

Quote from: Paashaas on December 13, 2018, 04:53:22 AM
If you did not continuously admit to bcash shilling, ...

I have never admitted to 'Bcash shilling'. You need -- once again -- to check your definitions.

I have admitted to advocating for Bitcoin Cash. I will admit to advocate for Bitcoin SV.

But the universally recognized definition for 'shilling' is predicated upon renumeration for advocacy of some thing that one would not advocate for if the payment was not made.

I have never shilled for any crypto.

Your insistence in misapplying such charged language only marks you as disingenuous. And is evidence of the actual hostility in this conversation.

Rubbish.  You constantly talk your book.  And you carefully provide misleading information when you do so.  Most of the time, what you say may not be technically wrong, but invariably amounts to a misrepresentation in the broader context.  And some of the time it is outright fabrication.

This discussion is a case in point.  You are relying on a historic definition of the term shill.  We both know that is not how the word is used in 2018 in the crypto community.  But you think yourself marvelously clever for having made the distinction.   It would be most accurate to say you are a fraud and petty conman.



Well said. This is the reason i moved him on my ignore list.


Lulz @ "We use a term incorrectly, thus you using it correctly is incorrect."

edit- grammar



43. Post 50178475 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.36h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on March 15, 2019, 09:38:22 PM

It's prolly much more extreme than that. rich people hide their wealth. i'd guess Putin's richest in dollar terms with 2 or 3x Bezos' little pile.
on the other side, most westerners are in 'debt' up the wazoo, poorer than a third-world subsistence farmer, and probably not counted here because oh they have 'jobs'.

To follow up on that, this only talks about the richest people that report their wealth. I have friends working with people who essentially own various industries (i.e. oil) who are worth so much more than Bezos (in the order of 2-3x, maybe more) that it is staggering to think about, but you will never see it printed anywhere. Makes you think...

(about what, IDK, but it makes you think haha)



44. Post 50213196 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: realr0ach on March 18, 2019, 09:09:26 AM
Just saw this book.  Not sure if the specifics of this guy's analysis is accurate or not, but seems like one of the few people writing books about the energy EROI phenomenon (thermodynamic collapse of oil extraction/transportation/refinement process) that will probably blow up 1st world nations:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Life-After-Growth-global-economy-ebook/dp/B00F3D8M2C

Some people overdo the doom scenario so I don't know if this guy does or not.  Like I said the other day, I think the US has 100 years of coal to power house electricity (plus nuclear and such on top of that), so it's not like the lights should be turning off; but there's no real substitute for powering cars and planes, and most countries are designed around tons of pointless, unsustainable commuting.  It also means Jewish moneychanger globalization is effectively dead in the water and power structures (and everything else) will be far more localized.
Why do you keep ignoring nuclear power plants? Charge batteries with those fuckers and you've got a substitute for powering cars. And nuclear fusion will without a doubt be a thing within 100 years, as well as much more efficient solar panels.

If you look at an actual map, there are already A SHIT TON of nuclear plants in the US.  Building tons more of the things would probably be a mega-disaster waiting to happen.  Probably already is a mega-disaster waiting to happen. In the event of some type of natural catastrophe where those things can't be maintained and all melt down and leak shit everywhere, I wouldn't be surprised if it's game over for a lot of life on earth (or at least the northern hemisphere) as is.  

Like the Yellowstone volcano for instance.  Okay, it creates some nuclear winter for a few years and makes 3/4ths of the US uninhabitable but it's not that huge of a deal...except if the dozens and dozens of nuclear plants in all those states are abandoned and all go Fukushima.  It looks like they've actually planned this out in advance if you look at their locations, but still, I wouldn't be surprised to see dozens of the ones west of the Appalachian mountains abandoned:


Interesting watch on nuclear power if you're afraid of it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciStnd9Y2ak



45. Post 51501941 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

I feel like a lot of you have a love-hate relationship with roach. I would love to see the stats on roach's posts compared to the amount of posts about roach. It's probably a 1:5, maybe even 1:10 ratio. He posts what, maybe a few times a day? Followed by 30 posts of people complaining about him in one way or another.

"roach , you didn't even answer the question..."
"roach is wrong in his fundamentals..."
"roach should be banned..."
"just ignore roach, he'll go away..."


He's made his points clear, we all know what he is, and what he thinks. So... stfu. You know what I can't stand? Olives. You know what I don't talk about (barring this example)? Olives. If someone else posts about them, I just scroll on past and ignore it. Guess what I never have to worry about on here? That's right, having to think about those gross, little, round things.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTurSi0LhJs

When you're on WO, and roach says something ridiculous, stfu.
When roach says "Something, something, jew, something, metals, something", stfu.
If you stfu and ignore him, you'll never have to worry about roach.

I honestly don't care about his posts, if anything it makes me think about why I disagree with him, further cementing my own beliefs. 



46. Post 51502455 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: nutildah on June 17, 2019, 05:22:20 PM
Yet here you are, furthering that which you are claiming to be against...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Right, he feeds off attention, even if its the wrong kind. He loves it. We get that.

I never said I was against it or him; I'm calling out the irony/hypocrisy of everyone complaining about him, all while perpetuating his existence. If anything, find it humorous and entertaining, just like your misinterpretation of my post.

You are like the people who claim to hate Trump, and then go on to complain about him for 2 hours. If you really disliked someone that much, you wouldn't let them effect you so. By the end of the diatribe, I'm not sure if they do hate him or would rather suck his dick.


edit: spelling



47. Post 51511368 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: nutildah on June 18, 2019, 06:18:57 AM
I never said I was against it or him; I'm calling out the irony/hypocrisy of everyone complaining about him, all while perpetuating his existence. If anything, find it humorous and entertaining, just like your misinterpretation of my post.

if anything it makes me think about why I disagree with him, further cementing my own beliefs.  

Sorry for misinterpreting your disagreement with him with being against him. How could I ever make such an atrocious error?  Roll Eyes

You made the error due to not understanding the distinct difference between disagreeing with someone and calling for the censorship of said person. Let me know when you do, and we can continue this conversation.



48. Post 51514290 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: nutildah on June 18, 2019, 04:09:13 PM
Nobody is censoring anybody. That's a basic misunderstanding you have. Flags don't censor people, neither do tags for that matter.

Haha, I'm sorry you keep losing the argument and have to continually change the focus of this conversation. It's like arguing with my girlfriend when she knows she is wrong, eye rolls included.

Who gives a shit about flags and tags (why even bring them up?)? People are literally asking for roach to be banned and/or his posts deleted because they disagree with him and find him annoying. If that's not censoring, tell me your definition of it so we're on the same page.

I'm not sure if you're trolling, or (sadly) just can't see it.



49. Post 51518755 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: nutildah on June 19, 2019, 02:27:47 AM
What an assholish thing to say.

Look, you came in here telling people to "stfu" when it came to roach. Which is ironic because now you can't shut up about him. You don't understand how the forum rules work, just humbly accept that. Nobody can censor roach except for infofront. He's clearly not going to be banned from the forum, so it really doesn't matter what any of us think.

Once again you change the subject  Roll Eyes

Not ironic; I don't care about him or what he says (you should try it); if anything, I use my brain and reaffirm my arguments against him. Don't be such a pansy. You mocked me, patronized me, all because I called out the ridiculousness of people complaining about someone they can completely ignore. You can ignore me, just like I'm putting you on ignore. Yes, I am an asshole, and so are you (probably most of us here, whether we admit it or not), and the fact that you are legendary shows just how far this thread has fallen over the last 7 or so years I've been a part of it.

Now I remember why I stopped coming here; if you're not part of the echo chamber, you're told to gtfo and your opinions are invalid (to get off of roach, jbreher has been subject to this multiple times)... it's pathetic.



50. Post 53544512 (copy this link) (by thisisntbic) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Quote from: heslo on January 07, 2020, 12:14:18 PM
I did see I had been removed from the list but then saw the rules of the 25 earned merit so I didn't speak up. I'm not upset (unless I guessed the right price then I'll be a little salty haha) I guess I'll just have to earn more merits for the next time Smiley

i added another 3 merits so you are now at 275. so that may put you there, but im unsure what you started with (250?)

Thanks bud! And honestly, I don't know how many I needed haha

Also, looks like a bit of movement again, start of the next leg up perhaps?

Hey, welcome to WO.

Almost out of merits, so only one will have to do for now.

Thanks mate; I've been here since 2013 however, just posting sporadically. Plus I lost access to the account for a few years

I snagged your spot in the game. If for some reason that range actually hits, I have no problem splitting it with you.