From the RAND corporation virtual currency report:
"The report suggests that the U.S. Department of Defense should disrupt decentralized digital currencies to prevent “unprecedented global access to information and communication services that, at its core, is agnostic to the national security interests of the United States.”
Therefore, the RAND report suggests pre-emptive strikes and notes that “perhaps the best strategy for the United States and its allies to thwart a VC deployment would be to target those properties of a VC that would most increase its acceptance, most notably transaction anonymity, security, and availability.”
Link:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40lwsq/the_rand_corporation_report_national_security/
"The report suggests that the U.S. Department of Defense should disrupt decentralized digital currencies to prevent “unprecedented global access to information and communication services that, at its core, is agnostic to the national security interests of the United States.”
Therefore, the RAND report suggests pre-emptive strikes and notes that “perhaps the best strategy for the United States and its allies to thwart a VC deployment would be to target those properties of a VC that would most increase its acceptance, most notably transaction anonymity, security, and availability.”
Link:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40lwsq/the_rand_corporation_report_national_security/
Hearn@sigint.google.mil is on the job. That's why Galvin is busy juggling multiple attempts to embrace/extend/extinguish Bitcoin.