It’s still a hard fork which would be opposed by the vast majority of economic weight and users. Go ahead and make your Bitcoin Plus Plus or whatever you want to call it. No one cares.
That’s why Bitcoin relies on consensus. USAF taught us that miners don’t mean shit in Bitcoin.
That’s why Bitcoin relies on consensus. USAF taught us that miners don’t mean shit in Bitcoin.
i would rather rely on math that includes the signature information that proves the coins are mine on chain.
consensus can be a fickle beast, and what power wants and what the current consensus wants may differ in the future. there is a lot of money thats sitting in segwit. i do not want to underestimate the greed and power focused on that.
if/when this attack happens core will remain core with its segwit coins intact and the fork will be the fork, whatever name it chooses. my current legacy coins will remain safe on both. i dont care what the odds are of the fork becoming dominant are as its non zero, and i do not want my btc to be at non zero risk.
as always the choice is the users. this information exists, its up to the user to evaluate it for its risk to their wealth.