Lawsuit is being organized versus Bitcoin.com for misleading novice Bitcoin users 
https://walletinvestor.com/magazine/lawsuit-is-being-organized-versus-bitcoin-com-for-misleading-novice-bitcoin-users/

https://walletinvestor.com/magazine/lawsuit-is-being-organized-versus-bitcoin-com-for-misleading-novice-bitcoin-users/
Even though the idea seems appealing, I don't think that there are very many viable lawsuits that could be filed, unless you could get bcash classified as a security with the SEC, then perhaps some of those SEC related obligations could apply.
Otherwise, what would be the grounds of such lawsuit against bitcoin.com.. portraying itself as coke when it is really pepsi? I might get more excited once I see some legal document that is filed, and see what is being alleged. or otherwise, if someone knows about a decently solid set of allegations that might have some teeth for either damages or injunctive relief, I would be interested to hear those... otherwise such lawsuit, if it were filed, would likely go no where, right?
How many people have actually been fooled? Out of those, how many of them lost money? If there were any people dumb enough to have been fooled into bcash, and lost money on it, they're probably not even going to hear about this lawsuit.
Even if the lawyers manage to sign up people who were stupid enough to buy bcash, and realize losses, it's not over yet. Roger's [highly paid] attorneys would stand a very good chance of being able to convince some ignorant judge that Bitcoin Judas is entitled to use the Bitcoin name for his fork.
TLDR: The lawsuit is going nowhere.
Part of my earlier point was that people being fooled is not enough for a valid cause of action..... even for basic common law fraud type allegations - there is a principle of buyer beware in common law... (aka caveat emptor). Further bitcoin is not trademarked nor copyrighted nor patented, so using the name and saying that you are the real bitcoin is likely not enough, either... There would have to be a showing of intentional and malicious knowing deception - and that might not even be enough without using securities law - and Bcash would have to be deemed a security (which does not create a private cause of action, anyhow, as far as I know (meaning that the SEC is the only agency empowered to bring such a claim)).