 |
January 30, 2014, 04:14:39 AM |
|
Just got home, not gonna bother catching up with the last 30 pages of probable nonsense,
But I just watched the first segment of the first panel today, and sorry for the serious but I'd like if some of you could offer an opinion on the following.
Cyrus R. Vance, the very first person to speak, chooses to start with a case of money laundering, of course. Money laundering is the catch phrase and it's designed to put a negative image on bitcoin. They will repeat it again and again when asked about bitcoin.
The interesting thing is that they were laundering fiat dollars acquired from the theft of credit card information, using western express. This crime can't even happen with bitcoin. There is no credit card information to steal in the first place.
I think the reason they are going to try to vilify bitcoin and try to regulate the shit out of it is so that they can maintain their monopoly on the money laundering business.
What do you think?
|