Average blocksize up over 900KB again. Ripe for a spam attack.
16K shorts vs. 26MM in $ longs on BFX, close to normal range. Could be a squeeze in either direction but not enough to really do much damage. I just can't see a moonshot until after SegWit because we're hard up against the blocksize limit.
Look for a possible double top at $430. There's a lot of momentum and resistance, so it could go either way.
16K shorts vs. 26MM in $ longs on BFX, close to normal range. Could be a squeeze in either direction but not enough to really do much damage. I just can't see a moonshot until after SegWit because we're hard up against the blocksize limit.
Look for a possible double top at $430. There's a lot of momentum and resistance, so it could go either way.
What's your source for this spread of the above bolded FUCD?
I see average blocksize currently around 80%
https://blockchain.info/charts/avg-block-size
Also, what's your information that some of this supposed fullness, to the extent it exists, is not spamming attacks... attempts at self-service claims regarding supposed fullness and spreading of FUCD.