[edited out].
Who's we? I can assure you it's not me, I didn't sign on for this, at least not in this crufty soft-fork-via-opcode-sneak-mode form.
You are coming across as a nitwit libertarian (nothing against normal libertarians) who expects that they have to consent to everything otherwise it does not count. Fuck that stupid shit. We are born into systems that have a lot of rules, and the status quo has some power. There is no problem to disagree with the status quo and to attempt to change it, but trying to act like it does not exist comes off as pure fantasy.
Yeah, I saw your stupid ass attempts to fight the status quo likely soft fork situation in bitcoin and attempting to argue that a hardfork is preferable... additional, one-sided nonsense, fantasy and propaganda attempts.
The "we" that Adam refers to is likely just a recognition that seg wit is pretty much a done deal without any meaningful resistance.
The critical question is whether the miners will bend the knee. [and it will indeed be that, given the apparent likelihood that their side of the hk agreement was turned to confetti before it was even signed (the warning signs were so clear with that scuffle over adam back's title on the document... lawyers were consulted, that's for sure.)]
It will be a (the) crucial moment and decision in the history of Bitcoin.
Nope, not so crucial.. Seg Wit is pretty much a done deal, and the overwhelming majority largely agrees to it, in spite of some loud mouth and stubborn trolls in various bitcoin forums... eg. reddit r/btc and your nonsense fantasy propaganda attempts.