^just thought you'd be interested 
~
~
https://gobitcoin.io/tools/cost-51-attack/ $7,076,517,081
shitcoins: https://thenextweb.com/hardfork/2018/05/30/heres-how-much-it-costs-to-launch-a-51-attack-on-pow-cryptocurrencies/ sixpence ha'penny

~
~
https://gobitcoin.io/tools/cost-51-attack/ $7,076,517,081
shitcoins: https://thenextweb.com/hardfork/2018/05/30/heres-how-much-it-costs-to-launch-a-51-attack-on-pow-cryptocurrencies/ sixpence ha'penny
Well NiceHash attacks could well (should, even?) increase. It might not be too pretty, either - especially as it's POW coins that will take the brunt of it.
OK, I was wondering how shitcoins might be pruned as, in a Darwinian way it seems sort of inevitable when there are obviously way too many with no real use case, or any likely long-term value. But the minimal money to wreck some fairly big name coins, rattles me a tad. It will not exactly be good news if it is widely perceived that POW itself is not safe.
I know BTC is a way bigger deal to attack and almost impossible, but...
EDIT: typos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncPyMUfNyVM