But Bitcoin is a protocol and therefore it is more sensible to compare it to the history of other protocols rather than computer games?
To an extent I agree I do not think this is a Higlander scenario
There can be more than one
To an extent I agree I do not think this is a Higlander scenario
There can be more than one
Bitcoin is different from protocols because it does have a very specific unit price.
Imagine if e-mail would have been created in a way that later adopters have to fill the pockets of early adopters, so they can also send an e-mail. People wouldn't accept this and would create an alternative where everyone has a fair chance with using this protocol.
So, in my idea, bitcoin is not neutral enough to be called an protocol. Gaming suits better to it, especially with the amount of gambling that's happening at the markets.
The price of Bitcoin is reflective of its commodity value this is but the first app that runs on the Bitcoin protocol.