Poll
Question: Closing BTC Price June 28:
$0 - 5 (2.6%)
<$7,000 - 4 (2.1%)
$7,000-$7,499 - 0 (0%)
$7,500-$7,999 - 0 (0%)
$8,000-$8,499 - 1 (0.5%)
$8,500-$8,999 - 3 (1.6%)
$9,000-$9,499 - 4 (2.1%)
$9,500-$9,999 - 27 (14.2%)
$10,000-$10,499 - 26 (13.7%)
$10,500-10,999 - 15 (7.9%)
$11,000-$11,499 - 14 (7.4%)
$11,500-$12,000 - 17 (8.9%)
>$12,000 - 59 (31.1%)
>$20,000 - 15 (7.9%)
Total Voters: 190

Pages: « 1 ... 14698 14699 14700 14701 14702 14703 14704 14705 14706 14707 14708 14709 14710 14711 14712 14713 14714 14715 14716 14717 14718 14719 14720 14721 14722 14723 14724 14725 14726 14727 14728 14729 14730 14731 14732 14733 14734 14735 14736 14737 14738 14739 14740 14741 14742 14743 14744 14745 14746 14747 [14748] 14749 14750 14751 14752 14753 14754 14755 14756 14757 14758 14759 14760 14761 14762 14763 14764 14765 14766 14767 14768 14769 14770 14771 14772 14773 14774 14775 14776 14777 14778 14779 14780 14781 14782 14783 14784 14785 14786 14787 14788 14789 14790 14791 14792 14793 14794 14795 14796 14797 14798 ... 24401 »
  Reply  |  Watch  |  Notify  |  Mark unread  |  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21254331 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (68 posts by 16 users deleted.)
hdbuck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000



View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
February 12, 2016, 12:08:12 PM

Looks like the classic nodes are stalling, will be difficult to achieve a majority of classic nodes.

Hopefully the discussion will lead to an upgrade of core to bigger blocks as well, and preferably before the segwit introduction and more importantly soon...

Will the classic and core be able to co-exist?

Yes, if they both allow 2 MB blocks, why not, they currently do for 1 MB blocks.
As long as classic and core can handle 2 MB blocks whenever miners start mining 2 MB blocks, it should be fine.

Of course it also depends on the version all nodes are running, if most nodes stay on a 1MB version, then there will be a problem, once miners start mining bigger blocks. It is essential for the network to upgrade to the new bigger block versions (classic and core), otherwise there will be a fork.

However a fork will never happen, since I do not expect miners to start mining bigger blocks before a significant part of the network has switched to the new versions. Unfortunately, bigger blocks will only happen if core introduces bigger blocks as well.

So let's wait and see.
My classic node (vote for bigger blocks) is still running....


Well well, seems you figure it all out.

"Increase blocksize limit -> Potential Exponential" Huh
"The blocksize limit should be big enough to enable mass adoption / potential exponential growth." Huh


Braindamaged?