It is the original. It is simply Bitcoin with the maxblocksize set large enough to accommodate the current demand.
Regarding Bitcoin Cash:
I hope the whole damn thing ends up completely consolidated in a single, gigantic Chinese data center.
With 128 MB blocks.
Where the mega miner can make dev changes directly to the code and adopt his/her own changes without user concern.
Perhaps even change it to closed source.
Behind the Great Firewall.
Where the Chinese Govt. can block it at any time they wish.
Sounds perfectly like Satoshi's vision, yeah?
do you know the command pruning ?
-prune=<n> Reduce storage requirements by enabling pruning (deleting) of old blocks. This allows the pruneblockchain RPC to be called to delete specific blocks, and enables automatic pruning of old blocks if a target size in MiB is provided. This mode is incompatible with -txindex and -rescan. Warning: Reverting this setting requires re-downloading the entire blockchain. (default: 0 = disable pruning blocks, 1 = allow manual pruning via RPC, >550 = automatically prune block files to stay under the specified target size in MiB)
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B013JPKUU2/ref=s9_acsd_zwish_hd_bw_b1Muqux_c_x_w?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=merchandised-search-11&pf_rd_r=5S25BFB90F47CP2XV7Y6&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=8fc50eca-db79-5cb9-b4bf-3deedcf4fb2d&pf_rd_i=1254762011
4tbs for 114$. You can use sata ports (most mb have at least 2, but more common is 4+) and build a small raid array. This is the raspi debate. What do you want? with 1mb, fees will get exorbitant or it's the offchain problematic.
Whoever, if anyone, thinks this new clone coin has better fundamentals than the original, could you explain why?
I can in one number : 7tps.
I wanted a 10mb block size, then 100 and 1000 but I make a concession and will see how it goes with time.
Then it has the history, making all the cold hodler have the amount. Mining gears are the same. And there is no useless and dangerous complications resulting from offchain txs.
I can understand the arguments of those who don't want to change the 1mb, and don't want segwit. Keeping the code as is. However as soon as the intentions behind is to push for segwit (to earn the fees) or to push another chain, I think it's dishonest toward those who started it all.
There is no founded argument that increasing 7tps increasing the value. Economics doesn't support it. There is no grounded arguments. There are only people that have no understanding of economics that are screaming like roger "It obvious you dummies" .
Sometimes when the experts and knowledgeable people disagree with what seems like common sense, its because the problem is more complex than you think and the solution not so obvious.

it's clear. how can you not see? the argument is "grounded". there is a strong difference between experts and smart scammers.