Still not ready to do it, eh?
I'll try one more time.
You said: "none of the other exchanges has volunteered to give even a rough idea of their financial position, especially how many BTC they owe and how many BTC they own."
Was that factually correct?
I'll try one more time.
You said: "none of the other exchanges has volunteered to give even a rough idea of their financial position, especially how many BTC they owe and how many BTC they own."
Was that factually correct?
Was it not?
You know it wasn't. The cognitive dissonance on display here is astounding.
I immediately threw up two links - which you yourself could and should have known about that clearly demonstrated at least two "exchanges volunteering to give a rough idea of their financial position."
So. No. It wasn't factually correct.
It was presented as so.
Somewhere therein lies the problem. I'll leave the complexities of that for you to resolve.
