I will no longer consider you a delusional hypocrite.
I think that's rather harsh and ad hominem.
The last few pages have been some of the most interesting and enlightening I've ever seen on this thread and I commend Jorge for being (sincerely) provocative...we need more "Po" and less linear, uniformed thinking.
His posts are all rehashes of old complaints that have been debunked ad-nauseum. There are some genuine criticisms of Bitcoin to be made (though I have heard most of those already) and undoubtedly a few new ones yet to see the light of day. This "academic" is just posting like a noob. It borders on the trollish but I'll give the benefit of the doubt and put it down to arrogance.
Some are, as you call it, already debunked rehashes, like the 'Ponzi' accusation, others are not, like "have we reached a market saturation point (for now)".
Plus, you ignore one thing: it's good to have a genuine "bear" who doesn't resort to idiotic FUD posts and trolling. Say what you want, but jorge *argues* for this (bearish) position, even if you don't agree with his arguments in the end.