It doesn't matter what % of blocks are full you stupid fucks. All that matters is what the average transaction fee is. Since there is no minimum transaction fee, the blocks are basically designed to be full at all times eventually even if you set it to 100MB blocks. Segwit + hard fork in 2017 = 3.2MB blocks. Then schnorr multisig on top of that should lower transaction sizes and increase TPS further.
Hahahahahaha...
That's a great way of expressing the blocksize limit situation.
I'm gonna have to incorporate some variation of those kinds of talking points into my responses with the seemingly multiple dip wads who are participating in these various forums and striving to suggest that block fullness is some kind of ongoing bitcoin "problem," when in fact block fullness seems to be more of a bitcoin feature rather than a bug.
Maybe bitcoin naysayers have figured out some fool proof strategies to keep complaining no matter what - to constantly complain... hahahahaha
In the past few months, I have made about 30 blockchain transactions varying from $1 to $34k, and in more than 90% of those I included fees for each of between $.02 and $.08. Most of those fee transactions were completely confirmed in less than an hour.
Out of those about 30 transactions, I made a few of them with fees of $.01 or less, and those lower fee transactions took longer to confirm, but either way, the transactions went through in less than 10 hours (even with no fees)... I keep wondering about where is this supposed blockfullness "problem" that is bringing down bitcoin beyond the mere ongoing publicity of such supposed "problem"