Out of three as if it makes any difference. These are little people not lines on graphs.
Let me try a different angle.Do you see how the judges decision to force the man in question to pay for the child support of three children that are not biologically his own with a court order could set a precedent for some women to seek out men out of which they'd essentially extort child support by simply playing nice for a period of time?
I believe this falls under caveat emptor.
(i'm not a feminist. don't worry, i wouldn't even dox you mate. just do the right thing.)
We never like to think that marriage and family as contractual yet we probably all know someone paying child support and/or alimony. Marriage is a contract and it comes with certain legal rights and obligations. So I would say that the term Caveat Emptor applies to either party - male or female.