I wouldn't be surprised to see some shocking news about some core devs mysteriously disappearing.
this has VERY often been the price to sticking to one's principles...
this has VERY often been the price to sticking to one's principles...
Even if some core members don't want a blocksize larger than 1mb, the core development plan has a Segwit rollout in a couple of months, with an effective 1.7mb (or more - depending the use) capacity.
Right now we are at 0.74mb avg blocksize, so at ~1.7mb we are looking at something like 120% upgrade (or more for certain uses) - despite the fact that current fees are still ridiculously low.
And some are like "ohh something needs to get done"....
Protip: There are empty blocks mined. Some blocks are solved within minutes of the previous one. It is virtually impossible to get 100% full average. Just the way math works.
For 100% I'd agree. For 95-97% I wouldn't. 0.74 is by no means the max it can do - for *whatever reason*. If miners choose to mine empty blocks, that's not a protocol issue.
Quote
Also, look at the chart.
>And some are like "ohh something needs to get done"....
Still find it funny?
>And some are like "ohh something needs to get done"....
Still find it funny?
With a penny in fees? Why shouldn't I?