I fucking need some moon now that I am again mortgaged! Weeeeeeee!
"Again"? What is the back story?
I think you were busy IRL when I decided to somehow share it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg49054618#msg49054618
Ok.... Now that I read that again, I recall seeing it.
It seems like a bit of an over-leveraging, but not necessarily a bad one. Each of us needs to make those kinds of decisions, and not necessarily kick ourselves if we teeter on one side or another.
I recall that in about late 2014/early 2015, I was teetering on whether I should divert some of my 401k investment into bitcoin. At the time, I was more than 50% in the red in bitcoin, and I figured that such a diversion of merely a portion of my 401k could more than double my BTC holdings. In the end, I decided NOT to do it because I had already gotten to a level of investment in bitcoin that was beyond my initial projection of what I was going to do. So I could not really justify taking a larger stake, which would rise to the level of a kind of excessive gambling, in my thinking. I continued to dollar cost average and to attempt to invest fairly high amounts of my spare cash flow into bitcoin, and I considered that what I was doing was more than enough "overleveraging" because it also allowed me to feel comfortable with my soon thereafter decision to sell on the way up (my current practice of selling on the way up and buying on the way down with ongoing dollar cost averaging into bitcoin of any extra income that I get). So, I never really feel bad to shave off a bit of sales of bitcoin, here and there, because I already feel a bit "overleveraged," but NOT overleveraged so much as to have taken out of my 401k. Anyhow, my point is that there can be a variety of ways to still achieve a kind of overleveraging approach while NOT breaking the bank, so to speak.